Qualitative Data Management and Analysis within a Data Repository

Abstract

Data repositories can support secure data management for multi-institutional and geographically dispersed research teams. Primarily designed to provide secure access, storage, and sharing of quantitative data, limited focus has been given to the unique considerations of data repositories for qualitative research. We share our experiences of using a data repository in a large qualitative nursing research study. Over a 27-month period, data collected by this 15-member team from 83 participants included photos, audio recordings and transcripts of interviews, and field notes. The data repository supported the secure collection, storage, and management of over 1,800 files with data. However, challenges were introduced during analysis that required negotiations about the structure and processes of the data repository. We discuss strengths and limitations of data repositories, and introduce practical strategies for developing a data management plan for qualitative research, which is supported through a data repository.

Keywords

data management data repository data sharing qualitative research data security

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Antonio

M. G.

Petrovskaya

Lau

(2019). Is research on patient portals attuned to health equity: A scoping review, Journal of American Medical Informatics Association, 26(8-9), ocz054. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocz054

Brown

Bruce

Kernohan

(2015). Directions for research data management in UK universities. Retrieved from https://www.fosteropenscience.eu/sites/default/files/pdf/1240.pdf

Chauvette

Schick-Makraroff

Molzahn

A.E.

(2019). Open data in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1-6. doi:10.1177/1609406918823863

Connelly

L. M.

(2016). Trustworthiness in qualitative research. Medsurg Nursing, 25(6), 435.

Digital Curation Centre. (2013). Checklist for a data management plan. v.4.0. Retrieved from http://www.dcc.ac.uk/resources/data-management-plans

DuBois

J. M.

Strait

Walsh

(2017). Is it time to share qualitative research data? Qualitative Psychology, 5(3), 380-393. doi:10.1037/qup0000076

Government of Canada. (2018a). The TCPS 2 tutorial - Course on research ethics. Ottawa, Ontario. Retrieved from http://www.pre.ethics.gc.ca/eng/education/tutorial-didacticiel/.

Government of Canada. (2018b). TCPS–Chapter 5: Privacy and confidentiality. Ottawa, Ontario. Retrieved from http://www.pre.ethics.gc.ca/eng/policy-politique/initiatives/tcps2-eptc2/chapter5-chapitre5/#toc05-1c.

Guba

E. G.

Lincoln

Y. S.

(2005). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In Denzin

N. K.

Lincoln

Y. S.

(Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 191-215). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

10.

Guishard

M. A.

(2017). Now’s not the time! Qualitative data repositories on tricky ground: Comment on DuBois et al. (2017). Qualitative Psychology, 5(3), 402-408. doi:10.1037/qup0000085

11.

Information and Privacy Commissioner for British Columbia. (2004). Privacy and the USA Patriot Act: Implications for British Columbia public sector outsourcing. British Columbia, Canada: Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner, Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publication Data. Retrieved from https://www.oipc.bc.ca/special-reports/1271

12.

Institute of Medicine. (2015). Sharing clinical trial data: Maximizing benefits, minimizing risk. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

13.

Jones

Alexander

S. M.

Bennett

Bishop

Budden

Cox

. . .Winslow

(2018). Qualitatve data sharing and re-use for socio-environmental systems research: A synthesis of opportunities, challenges, resources and approaches. SESYNC White Paper. doi:10.13016/M2WH2DG59 Retrieved from https://www.sesync.org/system/tdf/resources/qualitative_data_sharing_and_re-use_white_paper.pdf

14.

Lapenta

(2011). Some theoretical and methodological views on photo-elicitation. In Margolis

Pauwels

(Eds.), The SAGE handbook of visual research methods (pp. 201-213). London, United Kingdom: SAGE Publications.

15.

McCurdy

S. A.

Ross

M. W.

(2017). Qualitative data are not just quantitative data with text but data with context: On the dangers of sharing some qualitative data: Comment on DuBois et al (2017). Qualitative Psychology, 5(3), 409-411. doi:10.1037/qup0000088

16.

Michener

W. K.

(2015). Ten simple rules for creating a good data management plan. PLOS Computational Biology, 11(10), e1004525. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004525

17.

Meystre

S. M.

Friedlin

F. J.

South

B. R.

Shen

Samore

M. H.

(2010). Automatic de-identification of textual documents in the electronic health record: A review of recent research. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 10(1), 70.

18.

National Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. (2019). Dimensions: Equity, diversity and inclusion Canada. Ottawa, Ontario. Retrieved from http://www.nserc-crsng.gc.ca/NSERC-CRSNG/EDI-EDI/Dimensions_Dimensions_eng.asp

19.

Perazzo

Rodriguez

Currie

Salata

Webel

A. R.

(2019). Creation of data repositories to advance nursing science. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 41(1), 78-95. doi:10.1177/0193945917749481

20.

PLOS ONE. (2019). Data availability. Retrieved from: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability

21.

QDR (Qualitative Data Repository). (2019). Managing data. Retrieved from https://qdr.syr.edu/guidance/managing

22.

QDR (Qualitative Data Repository) and UK Data Source. (2016). Managing and sharing data and achieving research transparency. Retrieved from https://qdr.syr.edu/guidance/teaching

23.

Rolfe

(2006). Validity, trustworthiness and rigour: Quality and the idea of qualitative research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 53(3), 304-310. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03727.x

24.

Silverman

(2013). Doing qualitative research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

25.

Stuart

Baynes

Hrynaszkiewicz

Allin

Penny

Lucraft

Astell

(2018). Practical challenges for researchers in data sharing. Springer Nature, 59750(11), v1. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5971387

26.

Tessier

(2012). From field notes, to transcripts, to tape recordings: Evolution or combination? International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 11(4), 446-460. doi:10.1177/160940691201100410

27.

U.S. Patriot Act. (2001). Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism (USA PATRIOT ACT) Act of 2001, HR3162. (Congress.gov, 2001).

28.

University of Alberta. (2019). The health research data repository. Retrieved from https://www.ualberta.ca/nursing/research/supports-and-services/hrdr

29.

University of California Curation Center. (2019). DMP tool: Build your data management plan. Retrieved from https://dmptool.org/plans/new

30.

University of Victoria. (2011). Symbols of living in-between: Re-stor(y)ing life within life-threatening illness. Retrieved from https://www.uvic.ca/hsd/illnessnarratives/

31.

White

D. E.

Oelke

N. D.

Friesen

(2012). Management of a large qualitative data set: Establishing trustworthiness of the data. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 11(3), 244-258. doi:10.1177/160940691201100305

32.

Wilkinson

M. D.

Dumontier

Aalbersberg

I. J.

Appleton

Axton

Baak

. . .Mons

(2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3, 160018. doi:10.1038/sdata.2016.18

33.

Williams

Bagwell

Nahm Zozus

(2017). Data management plans: The missing perspective. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 71, 130-142. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2017.05.004