Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

As a first step of pursuing the vision of “Big Data science in nursing,” we described the characteristics of nursing research data reported in 194 published nursing studies. We also explored how completely the Version 1 metadata specification of biomedical and healthCAre Data Discovery Index Ecosystem (bioCADDIE) represents these metadata. The metadata items of the nursing studies were all related to one or more of the bioCADDIE metadata entities. However, values of many metadata items of the nursing studies were not sufficiently represented through the bioCADDIE metadata. This was partly due to the differences in the scope of the content that the bioCADDIE metadata are designed to represent. The 194 nursing studies reported a total of 1,181 unique data items, the majority of which take non-numeric values. This indicates the importance of data standardization to enable the integrative analyses of these data to support Big Data science in nursing.

Keywords

data interoperability metadata data standardization Big Data data reusability

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Berman

H. M.

Westbrook

Feng

Gilliland

Bhat

T. N.

Weissig

. . . Bourne

P. E.

(2000). The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Research, 28, 235-242. doi:10.1093/nar/28.1.235

Brennan

P. F.

Bakken

(2015). Nursing needs Big Data and Big Data needs nursing. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 47, 477-484. doi:10.1111/jnu.12159

Clinical Data Acquisition Standards Harmonization. (2016). Retrieved from http://www.cdisc.org/standards/foundational/cdash

Collins

F. S.

Varmus

(2015). A new initiative on precision medicine. The New England Journal of Medicine, 372, 793-795. doi:10.1056/NEJMp1500523

Common Data Element Resource Portal. (2012). Retrieved from https://www.nlm.nih.gov/cde/

Doan

Lin

K.-W.

Conway

Ohno-Machado

Hsieh

Feupe

S. F.

. . . Kim

H.-E.

(2014). PhenDisco: Phenotype discovery system for the database of genotypes and phenotypes. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 21, 31-36. doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001882

Edgar

Domrachev

Lash

A. E.

(2002). Gene expression omnibus: NCBI gene expression and hybridization array data repository. Nucleic Acids Research, 30, 207-210. doi:10.1093/nar/30.1.207

Hall

Huerta

M. F.

McAuliffe

M. J.

Farber

G. K.

(2012). Sharing heterogeneous data: The national database for autism research. Neuroinformatics, 10, 331-339. doi:10.1007/s12021-012-9151-4

Hripcsak

Duke

J. D.

Shah

N. H.

Reich

C. G.

Huser

Schuemie

M. J.

. . . Ryan

P. B.

(2015). Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics (OHDSI): Opportunities for observational researchers. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 216, 574-578.

10.

Institute of Medicine. (2013). Barriers to data sharing. In Olson

downey

A. S.

(Eds.) Sharing clinical research data: Workshop summary (pp. 19-26). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

11.

Kim

Marmor

Singh

Ohno-Machado

(2016). Exploring clinical research data network metdata for phenotype dataset discovery. In Workshop on data science, learning and applications to biomedical and health sciences (pp. 7-11). New York: The New York Academy of Sciences.

12.

Kim

Richardson

Friedman

Quach

Baptista

R.-G.

Sun

. . . Farcas

(2015). Designing iSee, the intelligent Search expansion tool. Abstract presented at the AMIA November, 2015 Annual Symposium, San Francisco, CA.

13.

Korst

L. M.

Signer

J. M. K.

Aydin

C. E.

Fink

(2008). Identifying organizational capacities and incentives for clinical data-sharing: The case of a regional perinatal information system. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 15, 195-197. doi:10.1197/jamia.M2475

14.

Kushida

C. A.

Nichols

D. A.

Jadrnicek

Miller

Walsh

J. K.

Griffin

(2012). Strategies for de-identification and anonymization of electronic health record data for use in multicenter research studies. Medical Care, 50(Suppl. 1), S82-S101. doi:10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182585355

15.

Longo

D. L.

Drazen

J. M.

(2016). Data sharing. The New England Journal of Medicine, 374, 276-277. doi:10.1056/NEJMe1516564

16.

Mailman

M. D.

Feolo

Jin

Kimura

Tryka

Bagoutdinov

. . . Sherry

S. T.

(2007). The NCBI dbGaP database of genotypes and phenotypes. Nature Genetics, 39, 1181-1186. doi:10.1038/ng1007-1181

17.

Margolis

Derr

Dunn

Huerta

Larkin

Sheehan

. . . Green

E. D.

(2015). The National Institutes of Health’s Big Data to Knowledge (BD2K) initiative: Capitalizing on biomedical Big Data. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 21, 957-958. doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002974

18.

McGraw

(2013). Building public trust in uses of Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act de-identified data. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 20, 29-34. doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2012-000936

19.

National Institutes of Health. (2013). Data sharing repositories. Retrieved from https://www.nlm.nih.gov/NIHbmic/nih_data_sharing_repositories.html

20.

National Institutes of Health. (2015). Commons. Retrieved from https://datascience.nih.gov/commons

21.

Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics. (2014). OMOP Common Data Model Specifications: Version 5.0. Retrieved from http://www.ohdsi.org/data-standardization/the-common-data-model/

22.

Ohno-Machado

Alter

Fore

Martone

Sansone

S.-A.

(2015). bioCADDIE white paper: Vision and implementation. Retrieved from https://biocaddie.org/sites/default/files/shared-documents/Meetings/White_Paper/white_paper_v_1_2_nih_approved.pdf

23.

Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network. (2015). PCORnet Common Data Model (CDM) Specification, Version 3.0. Retrieved from http://www.pcornet.org/pcornet-common-data-model/

24.

Perrino

Howe

Sperling

Beardslee

Sandler

Shern

. . . Brown

C. H.

(2013). Advancing science through collaborative data sharing and synthesis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 433-444. doi:10.1177/1745691613491579

25.

Sansone

S.-A.

Rocca-Serra

Gonzalez-Beltran

Vardigan

, & bioCADDIE Members (2015). Working group 3: Metadata specifications. Retrieved from https://zenodo.org/record/28019#.V-66fldLOnQ

26.

Standards for Privacy of Individually Identifiable Health Information; Final Rule, 67 Fed Reg. 53181-53273 (2002).

27.

Westra

B. L.

Clancy

T. R.

Sensmeier

Warren

J. J.

Weaver

Delaney

C. W.

(2015). Nursing knowledge: Big data science-Implications for nurse leaders. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 39, 304-310. doi:10.1097/NAQ.0000000000000130

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.50 MB

0.27 MB

0.14 MB

Explorative Analyses of Nursing Research Data

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material