Current nursing knowledge has been generated by studies whose designs range from exploratory to experimental. Searching the literature for a study illustrating a particular design can be a perplexing process. This article explains strategies that are useful in identifying research studies according to the designs used in their methods. The suggested search strategies assist in identifying the most relevant search results and can save time. Outcomes of such a search can be instructional about the implementation of a design in its classic form or some variation. They can provide practical illustrations of the advantages and limitations of a design when applied in a particular area of interest.
Brink, P. J., & Wood, M. J. (1998). Advanced design in nursing research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2.
Fawcett, J., Watson, J., Neuman, B., Walker, P. H.,& Fitzpatrick, J. J. (2001). Onnursing theories and evidence. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 33(2), 115-119.
3.
Funk, M. E., Reid, C. A.,& McGoogan, L. S. (1983). Indexing consistency in MEDINE. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 71(2), 176-183.
4.
Gehlbach, S. H. (2002). Interpreting the medical literature(4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
5.
Haynes, R. B., Mulrow, C. D., Huth, E. J., Althan, D. G.,& Gardner M. J. (1996). More informative abstracts revisited. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 33(1), 1-9.
6.
Johnson, E. D., Sievert, M. C.,& McKinin, E. J. (1995). Retrieving research studies: Acomparison of bibliographic and full-text versions of the New England Journal of Medicine. Proceedings, Nineteenth Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care, 1, 846-850.
7.
Morrisey, L. J.,& DeBourgh, G. A. (2001). Finding evidence: Refining literature searching skills for the advanced practice nurse. AACN Clinical Issues, 12, 560-577.
