Maternal mortality, largely stemming from complications during pregnancy and childbirth, impacts poor expecting women with limited healthcare access in rural Pakistan. Conditional Cash Transfers (CCTs), commonly implemented in developing nations, are designed to improve the well-being of vulnerable populations by focusing on health and education. A CCT initiative named Chief Minister’s Special Initiative for Mother and Child Health (CM-SIMCH) was launched in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP), one of the less-developed provinces of Pakistan, to empower expecting women to access quality healthcare. This study investigates the factors influencing CM-SIMCH program participation and assesses its impact on the health of expecting women by analyzing health-seeking hospital visits in KP, Pakistan. The study utilizes the Propensity Score Matching (PSM) technique to analyze cross-sectional data obtained from 303 expecting women residing in the Nowshera district of KP. The PSM allows for a balanced comparison of participants who received the CM-SIMCH transfers with those who did not, assessing its impact on maternal healthcare access and outcomes. Empirical results show that factors such as education and family system positively influence the participation of expecting women in the CM-SIMCH program, whereas travel costs exert a negative effect. The intervention leads to a notable increase in hospital visits among these women, contributing to improved health outcomes in KP. This underscores the program’s potential effectiveness in addressing maternal healthcare challenges and enhancing healthcare access for vulnerable women in less-developed areas. Therefore, empirical evidence supports the CM-SIMCH program’s potential to promote maternal health and improve healthcare access in KP. The study recommends government intervention in health sector as a strategic imperative to empower women and enhance infant health.
AbdulaiA.HuffmanW. (2014). The adoption and impact of soil and water conservation technology: An endogenous switching regression application. Land Economics, 90(1), 26–43. https://doi.org/10.3368/le.90.1.26
2.
AghaS. (2011). Impact of a maternal health voucher scheme on institutional delivery among low-income women in Pakistan. Reproductive Health, 8(10), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-8-10
3.
AizawaT. (2022). Re-visiting the conditional cash transfer in India through the partial identification approach. Journal of Development Studies, 58(4), 768–786. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2021.2003336
4.
AnglinK. L.WongV. C.WingC.Miller-BainsK.McConeghyK. (2023). The validity of causal claims with repeated measures designs: A within-study comparison evaluation of differences-in-differences and the comparative interrupted time series. Evaluation Review, 47(5), 895–931. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X231167672
5.
AttanasioO.BattistinE.FitzsimonsE.Vera-HernandezM. (2005). How effective are conditional cash transfers? Evidence from Colombia. London, United Kingdom: The Institute for Fiscal Studies, Briefing Note No. 54.
6.
BardouM.Meunier-BeillardN.Godard-MarceauA.DeruelleP.VirtosC.Eckman-LacroixA.DebrasE.SchmitzT. (2023). Women and health professionals’ perspectives on a conditional cash transfer programme to improve pregnancy follow-up: A qualitative analysis of the NAITRE randomised controlled study. BMJ Open, 13(3), Article e067066. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067066
7.
BarnowB. S.PandeyS. K.LuoQ. E. (2024). How mixed-methods research can improve the policy relevance of impact evaluations. Evaluation Review, 48(3), 495–514. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X241227480
8.
BhuttaZ. A.HafeezA.RizviA.AliN.KhanA.AhmadF.BhuttaS.HazirT.ZaidiA.JafareyS. N. (2013). Reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health in Pakistan: Challenges and opportunities. Lancet (London, England), 381(9884), 2207–2218. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61999-0
9.
BishnoiN.BishnoiV. K. (2022). Maternity benefit programs: An investment in human resource. Population Review, 61(1), 58–67. https://doi.org/10.1353/prv.2022.0003
CahyadiN.HannaR.OlkenB. A.PrimaR. A.SatriawanE.SyamsulhakimE. (2020). Cumulative impacts of conditional cash transfer programs: Experimental evidence from Indonesia. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 12(4), 88–110. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20190245
12.
CarvalhoN.RokickiS. (2019). The impact of India’s Janani Suraksha Yojana conditional cash transfer programme: A replication study. Journal of Development Studies, 55(5), 989–1006. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2018.1506578
DehejiaR. H.WahbaS. (2002). Propensity score-matching methods for nonexperimental causal studies. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(1), 151–161. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465302317331982
15.
De WalqueD.KandpalE. (2022). Reviewing the evidence on health financing for effective coverage: Do financial incentives work?BMJ Global Health, 7(9), Article e009932. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009932
16.
DHIS. (2017). District health information system (DHIS) annual report. Directorate General Health Services, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Peshawar. Retrieved from. https://www.dhiskp.gov.pk
17.
DiNardoJ.TobiasJ. (2001). Nonparametric density and regression estimation, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(4), 11–28. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.15.4.11
18.
Ekirapa-KirachoE.WaiswaP.RahmanM. H.MakumbiF.KiwanukaN.OkuiO.RutebemberwaE.BuaJ.MutebiA.NalwaddaG.SerwaddaD.PariyoG. W.PetersD. H. (2011). Increasing access to institutional deliveries using demand and supply side incentives: Early results from a quasi-experimental study. BMC International Health and Human Rights, 11(Suppl 1), S11–S14. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-698X-11-S1-S11
19.
ElmusharafK.ByrneE.O’DonovanD. (2015). Strategies to increase demand for maternal health services in resource-limited settings: Challenges to be addressed. BMC Public Health, 15(1), 870–910. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2222-3
20.
ElnaiemA.Mohamed-AhmedO.ZumlaA.MecaskeyJ.CharronN.AbakarM. F.RajiT.BahalimA.ManikamL.RiskO.OkerekeE.SquiresN.NkengasongJ.RüeggS. R.Abdel HamidM. M.OsmanA. Y.KapataN.AldersR.HeymannD. L.DarO. (2023). Global and regional governance of One Health and implications for global health security. Lancet (London, England), 401(10377), 688–704. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01597-5
21.
FarjanaF.IslamM. K.KhanamR.MamunT. M. (2023). Impact of conditional cash transfer on health outcome of expectant mothers in Bangladesh. International Journal of Social Economics. 50(11), 1618–1635. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-08-2022-0512
FerdousJ.UllahA. A. (2023). Social safety nets and poverty reduction in developing countries. Taylor & Francis.
24.
FernaldL. C. H.GertlerP. J.NeufeldL. M. (2008). Role of cash in conditional cash transfer programmes for child health, growth, and development: An analysis of Mexico’s oportunidades. Lancet, 371(9615), 828–837. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60382-7
25.
GertlerP. (2004). Do conditional cash transfers improve child health? Evidence from PROGRESA's control randomized experiment. The American Economic Review, 94(2), 336–341. https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828041302109
26.
GlassmanA.DuranD.FleisherL.SingerD.SturkeR.AngelesG.CharlesJ.EmreyB.GleasonJ.MwebsaW.SaldanaK.YarrowK.KoblinskyM.KoblinskyM. (2013). Impact of conditional cash transfers on maternal and newborn health. Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition, 31(4 Suppl 2), S48–S66.
27.
GuptaS. D. (2022). Health management: An introduction. Healthcare system management: Methods and techniques (pp. 1–17). Springer Nature.
28.
HandelD. V.HanushekE. A. (2024). Contexts of convenience: Generalizing from published evaluations of school finance policies. Evaluation Review, 48(3), 461–494. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X241228335
29.
HuberM.LechnerM.SteinmayrA. (2015). Radius matching on the propensity score with bias adjustment: Tuning parameters and finite sample behaviour. Empirical Economics, 49(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-014-0847-1
30.
HujerR.CaliendoM.ThomsenS. L. (2004). New evidence on the effects of job creation schemes in Germany – a matching approach with threefold heterogeneity. Research in Economics, 58(4), 257–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rie.2004.07.001
31.
HussainA. (2015). Cash transfers and child wellbeing in Pakistan: A critical assessment of poverty reduction programs, graduate school of development studies. Institute of Social Studies.
32.
JacobsW.DowneyL. E. (2022). Impact of conditional cash transfer programmes on antenatal care service uptake in low and middle-income countries: A systematic review. BMJ Open, 12(11), Article e064673. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064673
33.
JaipaulC. K.RosenthalG. E. (2003). Are older patients more satisfied with hospital care than younger patients?Journal of General Internal Medicine, 18(1), 23–30. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20114.x
JenaP. R.ChichaibeluB. B.StellmacherT.GroteU. (2012). The impact of coffee certification on small‐scale producers’ livelihoods: A case study from the jimma zone, Ethiopia. Agricultural economics, 43(4), 429–440. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2012.00594.x
36.
KekreA.MahajanK. (2023). Maternity support and child health: Unintended gendered effects. Journal of Comparative Economics. 51(3), 880–898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2023.03.002
37.
KiplagatS.CoudrayM. S.RaviK.JayakrishnaP.KruppK.ArunA.MadhivananP. (2020). Evaluating a conditional cash transfer scheme in a maternal health care utilization program among rural pregnant women in Mysore district, India. Women’s Health Reports. 1(1), 159–166. https://doi.org/10.1089/whr.2019.0021
38.
KronebuschN.DamonA. (2019). The impact of conditional cash transfers on nutrition outcomes: Experimental evidence from Mexico. Economics and Human Biology, 33(1), 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ehb.2019.01.008
39.
KrukM. E.GageA. D.ArsenaultC.JordanK.LeslieH. H.Roder-DeWanS.AdeyiO.BarkerP.DaelmansB.DoubovaS. V.EnglishM.García-ElorrioE.GuanaisF.GurejeO.HirschhornL. R.JiangL.KelleyE.LemangoE. T.LiljestrandJ.PateM. (2018). High-quality health systems in the sustainable development goals era: Time for a revolution. Lancet Global Health, 6(11), 1196–1252. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30386-3
40.
LimS. S.DandonaL.HoisingtonJ. A.JamesS. L.HoganM. C.GakidouE. (2010). India’s Janani Suraksha Yojana, a conditional cash transfer programme to increase births in health facilities: An impact evaluation. Lancet (London, England), 375(9730), 2009–2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60744-1
41.
LingT. (2024). Transferability of lessons from program evaluations: Iron laws, hiding hands and the evidence ecosystem. Evaluation Review, 48(3), 410–426. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X241228332
42.
LiuC.ZhangL.ShiY.ZhouH.MedinaA.RozelleS. (2016). Maternal health services in China’s western rural areas: Uptake and correlates. China Agricultural Economic Review, 8(2), 250–276. https://doi.org/10.1108/caer-12-2014-0148
43.
LongB. T. (2023). Increasing the impact of program evaluation: The importance of challenging assumptions and incorporating new perspectives. Evaluation Review, 47(5), 932–943. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X231163674
44.
LucasA. D. P.de Oliveira FerreiraM.LucasT. D. P.SalariP. (2022). The intergenerational relationship between conditional cash transfers and newborn health. BMC Public Health, 22(1), 201. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-12565-7
45.
MadhiS. A.RiveraL. M.Sáez-LlorensX.MenéndezC.Carrim-GaneyN.CottonM. F.KatzmanD.LuttigM. M.CandelarioR.BakerS.RoychoudhuryM. (2018). Factors influencing access of pregnant women and their infants to their local healthcare system: A prospective, multi-centre, observational study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 18(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1655-3
46.
MahmoodN. (2002). Women’s role in domestic decision-making in Pakistan: Implications for reproductive behaviour. Pakistan Development Review, 41(2), 121–148. https://doi.org/10.30541/v41i2pp.121-148
47.
McCauleyH.LoweK.FurtadoN.MangiaterraV.van den BroekN. (2022). Essential components of postnatal care–a systematic literature review and development of signal functions to guide monitoring and evaluation. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 22(1), 448. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04752-6
48.
McDermottR. (2023). On the scientific study of small samples: Challenges confronting quantitative and qualitative methodologies. The Leadership Quarterly, 34(3), 101675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2023.101675
49.
MorrisS. S.OlintoP.FloresR.NilsonE. A.FigueiroA. C. (2004). Conditional Cash transfers are associated with a small reduction in the rate of weight gain of preschool children in northeast Brazil. The Journal of nutrition, 134(9), 2336–2341. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/134.9.2336
50.
MulugetaA. K.GiruB. W.BerhanuB.DemelewT. M. (2020). Knowledge about birth preparedness and complication readiness and associated factors among primigravida women in Addis Ababa governmental health facilities, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. 2015. Reproductive Health, 17(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-020-0861-z
51.
MumtazZ.SalwayS.BhattiA.ShannerL.ZamanS.LaingL.EllisonG. T. H. (2014). Improving maternal health in Pakistan: Toward a deeper understanding of the social determinants of poor women’s access to maternal health services. American Journal of Public Health, 104(Suppl 1), S17–S24. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301377
52.
NabievaJ.SouaresA. (2019). Factors influencing decision to seek health care: A qualitative study among labour-migrants’ wives in northern Tajikistan. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 19(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-2166-6
53.
NayabD. E.FarooqS. (2014). Effectiveness of cash transfer programmes for household welfare in Pakistan: The case of the Benazir income support programme. Pakistan Development Review, 53(2), 145–174.
54.
NIPS. (2019). National institute of population studies Pakistan demographic and health survey. Islamabad, Pakistan, and Calverton. NIPS and ICF International.
55.
NurkhalimR. F.SusilowatiI.JayantiK. D. (2022). Program Keluarga harapan: A conditional cash transfer to increase prenatal visits and birth weight. Journal of Public Health in Africa, 13(3), 1271. https://doi.org/10.4081/jphia.2022.1271
56.
Owusu-AddoE.CrossR. (2014). The impact of conditional cash transfers on child health in low-and middle-income countries: A systematic review. International Journal of Public Health, 59(4), 609–618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-014-0570-x
57.
ParadaC. (2023). Cash transfers and intra-household decision-making in Uruguay. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 44(3), 757–775. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-022-09856-x
58.
PDHS. (2019). National institute of population studies & demographic and health surveys. Pakistan Demographic and Health Survey.
59.
Powell-JacksonT.MorrisonJ.TiwariS.NeupaneB. D.CostelloA. M. (2009). The experiences of districts in implementing a national incentive programme to promote safe delivery in Nepal. BMC Health Services Research, 9(1), 97. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-9-97
60.
RasellaD.AquinoR.SantosC. A.Paes-SousaR.BarretoM. L. (2013). Effect of a conditional cash transfer programme on childhood mortality: A nationwide analysis of Brazilian municipalities. Lancet (London, England), 382(9886), 57–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60715-1
61.
RawlingsL. B.RubioG. M. (2005). Evaluating the impact of conditional cash transfer programs. The World Bank Research Observer, 20(1), 29–55. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lki001
62.
RichtermanA.MillienC.BairE. F.JeromeG.SuffrinJ. C. D.BehrmanJ. R.ThirumurthyH. (2023). The effects of cash transfers on adult and child mortality in low-and middle-income countries. Nature, 618(7965), 575–582. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06116-2
63.
RongY.SunJ. (2011). Analysis on the impact factors of hospital delivery in rural ethnic minorities areas. Medicine in Society, 24(9), 36–39.
64.
RosenbaumP.RubinD. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.2307/2335942
65.
RuddR. E.AndersonJ. E.OppenheimerS.NathC. (2023). Health literacy: An update of medical and public health literature. Review of Adult Learning and Literacy, 7(1), 175–204.
66.
SaharoyR.PotdukheA.WanjariM.TaksandeA. B. (2023). Postpartum depression and maternal care: Exploring the complex effects on mothers and infants. Cureus, 15(7), Article e41381. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.41381
67.
ShahzadM. F.AbdulaiA. (2020). Adaptation to extreme weather conditions and farm performance in rural Pakistan. Agricultural Systems, 180(1), 102772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2019.102772
68.
SimangunsongH.SihotangD. (2023). The impact of economic conditions on social assistance programs and poverty alleviation. Law and Economics, 17(2), 73–91. https://doi.org/10.35335/laweco.v17i2.2
69.
SmithJ.ToddP. (2005). Does matching overcome Lalonde’s critique of non-experimental estimators?Journal of Econometrics, 125(1–2), 305–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2004.04.011
70.
SuhH.KalaiS.TrivediN.UnderwoodC.HendricksonZ. M. (2023). Effects of women’s economic empowerment interventions on antenatal care outcomes: A systematic review. BMJ Open, 13(3), Article e061693. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061693
71.
TavananezhadN.BolbanabadA. M.GhelichkhaniF.Effati-DaryaniF.MirghafourvandM. (2022). The relationship between health literacy and empowerment in pregnant women: A cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 22(1), 351–359. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04686-z
72.
ThorntonR. L. (2008). The demand for, and impact of, learning HIV status. The American Economic Review, 98(5), 1829–1863. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.98.5.1829
73.
UngsonG. R.HudgensD.Gonzalez-PerezM. A.WongY. Y.WongS. A.Monje-CuetoF.BordaA.SoorapanthS. (2022). The contribution of the private sector to poverty alleviation programs: Exploring business engagement in conditional cash transfers. Management Research: The Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management, 21(1), 48–75. https://doi.org/10.1108/mrjiam-08-2021-1222
ZanconatoG.MsolombaR.GuarentiL.FranchiM. (2006, February). Antenatal care in developing countries: The need for a tailored model. Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, 11(1), 15–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.siny.2005.10.002
78.
ZhouH.WuY.LiuC.SunC.ShiY.ZhangL.MedinaA.RozelleS. (2020). Conditional cash transfers, uptake of maternal and child health services, and health outcomes in western rural China. BMC Public Health, 20(1), 870–917. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-08996-9
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
