Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025-10
Challenges to Olympic Inclusion: A Critical Analysis of the International Wushu Federation’s Strategies in Aligning With International Olympic Committee Program Reforms
Despite several attempts from the International Wushu Federation (IWUF) during the past 20 years, “wushu” (the collective noun for the Chinese martial arts) has not been included in the Olympic program. To understand why the IWUF has not been successful in achieving its Olympic ambition, this study applies a theoretical framework developed by Strittmatter and colleagues to critically analyze why, how and to what extent the IWUF has responded to the International Olympic Committee (IOC) Olympic program reforms. Through qualitative analysis of IOC and IWUF's policy documents, this study examines the legitimating acts present in these policies. Findings indicate that the IOC, when reforming the Olympic program, prioritizes the potential benefits to the Games and host cities brought by introducing new sports. The IWUF's legitimating strategies comprise “substantive” strategies, such as a focus on technical evolution and strengthening international communication, and “symbolic” strategies, including more youth engagement, promotion of traditional wushu, and collaboration with the traditional wushu community. This paper discusses why the IWUF's policy initiatives have not been successful so far and explores the implications within the broader IOC policy context.
AltheideD. L.SchneiderC. J. (2012). Qualitative Media Analysis, vol. 38. Sage.
2.
AnastasiadisS.SpenceL. J. (2020). An Olympic-sized challenge: Effect of organizational pathology on maintaining and repairing organizational legitimacy in sports governing bodies. British Journal of Management, 31(1), 24–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12345
3.
AshforthB. E.GibbsB. W. (1990). The double-edge of organizational legitimation. Organization Science, 1(2), 177–194. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1.2.177
4.
BatuevM.RobinsonL. (2017). How skateboarding made it to the Olympics: An institutional perspective. International Journal of Sport Management and Marketing, 17(4/5/6), 381. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijsmm.2017.087446
5.
BatuevM.RobinsonL. (2019). Organizational evolution and the Olympic Games: The case of sport climbing. Sport in Society, 22(10), 1674–1690. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2018.1440998
6.
BatuevM.RobinsonL. (2022). Organizational evolution and the Olympic Games: The case of sport climbing. In DumontG.ThorpeH. (Eds.), The professionalization of action sports (pp. 36–52). Routledge.
7.
BexellM. (2017). Global governance, legitimacy and (de) legitimation. In Global governance, legitimacy and legitimation (pp. 1–11). Routledge.
8.
BoothD. (2003). Expression sessions: Surfing, style, and prestige. In RinehartR.SydnorS. (Eds.), To the extreme: Alternative sports, inside and out (pp. 315–333). State University of New York Press.
9.
BrownellS. (2012). Wushu and the Olympic games: ‘Combination of East and West’ or clash of body cultures? In LoV. (Ed.), Perfect bodies: Sports medicine and immortality (pp. 59–69). The British Museum.
10.
CaiB. (2004). Inspiration and course of competitive Wushu towards Olympic Games [in Chinese]. China Sport Science, 24(1), 73–77. https://doi.org/10.16469/j.css.2004.01.022
11.
CarraroF. (2002). Review of the Olympic Programme and the Recommendations on the Programme of the Games of the XXIX Olympiad, Beijing 2008. Olympic Programme Commission Executive Board Report. IOC.
Chinese Wushu Research Institute. (1997). History of Chinese Wushu [in Chinese]. People’s Sports Press.
15.
CiembroniewiczE. (2019). Kungfu/wushù in the promotion of China’s culture and image. Review of Nationalities, (9), 61–73. https://doi.org/10.2478/pn-2019-0005.
16.
DamkjaerS. (2004). Post-Olympism and the aestheticization of sport. In BaleJ. (Ed.), Post-Olympism? Questioning sport in the twenty-first century (pp. 13–32). Berg Publishers.
17.
DeephouseD. L.BundyJ.TostL. P.SuchmanM. C. (2017). Organizational legitimacy: Six key questions. In GreenwoodR.OliverC.LawrenceT. B.MeyerR. E. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (2nd ed., Vol. 4, pp. 27–54). Sage.
18.
DeephouseD. L.SuchmanM. (2017). Legitimacy in organizational institutionalism. In GreenwoodR.MeyerR. E.LawrenceT. B.OliverC. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 49–77). Sage.
19.
DyresonM (2012). World Harmony or an athletic ‘Clash of Civilizations’? The Beijing Olympic spectacle, BMX bicycles and the American contours of globalisation. The International Journal of the History of Sport, 29(9), 1231–1242. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523367.2012.692249
20.
GiannoulakisC.PursgloveL. (2017). Evolution of the action sports setting. In KleinS. (Ed.), Defining sport: Conceptions and borderlines (pp. 128–146). Lexington Books.
21.
HanQ.TheeboomM.ZhuD. (2021). Chinese Martial arts and the Olympics: Analysing the policy of the international wushu federation. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 56(5), 603–624. https://doi.org/10.1177/1012690220957177
22.
HanQ.TheeboomM.ZhuD.DeromI. (2023). Promoting the Chinese martial arts internationally: Is it ‘Kung Fu’or ‘Wushu’?International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 58(3), 570–588. https://doi.org/10.1177/10126902221117973
23.
HarrisA.JonesM. (2018). Why context matters: A comparative perspective on education reform and policy implementation. Educational Research for Policy and Practice (17), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-018-9231-9
24.
HeY. (2009). Discussion on the internationalization of wushu [in Chinese]. Sports Culture Guide (11), 149–152 + 156.
HoneaJ. C. (2013). Beyond the alternative vs. mainstream dichotomy: Olympic BMX and the future of action sports. Journal of Popular Culture (Boston), 46(6), 1253–1275. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpcu.12087
27.
HoulihanB. (1994). Homogenization, Americanization, and creolization of sport: Varieties of globalization. Sociology of Sport Journal, 11(4), 356–375. https://doi.org/10.1123/ssj.11.4.356
MeyerJ. W.ScottW. R. (1983). Organizational environments: Ritual and Rationality. Sage.
65.
MurrayS.PigmanG. A. (2014). Mapping the relationship between international sport and diplomacy. Sport in Society, 17(9), 1098–1118. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2013.856616
66.
The Olympic Museum. (2022). Riding the Olympic Wave. The Olympic Museum.
67.
OPC. (2005). Report to the 117th IOC Session. IOC.
PapamiltiadesM. C. (2007). IOC: Factors that fostered the development of the most publicized crisis in its history—the Salt Lake Scandal. Journal of Olympic History, 15(3), 54–69.
71.
Pérez-GutiérrezM.BrownD.Álvarez-del-PalacioE.Gutiérrez-GarcíaC. (2015). The (Re) emergence of a religio-spiritual self-cultivation focus in Asian martial arts monographs published in Spain (1906–2009). The International Journal of the History of Sport, 32(2), 200–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523367.2014.943735
72.
RamchandaniG.WilsonD.MillarR.AshworthB. (2023). New sports and no spectators: Japan’s performance at the Tokyo 2020 Olympic Games. Managing Sport and Leisure, 28(3), 197–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/23750472.2022.2119158
73.
RenH. (2008). Embracing wushu: Globalization and cultural diversification of the Olympic movement. In PriceM.DayanD. (Eds.), Owning the Olympics. Narratives of the New China (pp. 307–319). The University of Michigan Press and Library.
74.
RenfreeG.CuesonD.WoodC. (2024). Skateboard, BMX freestyle, and sport climbing communities’ responses to their sports’ inclusion in the Olympic games. Managing Sport and Leisure, 29(1), 171–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/23750472.2021.2004211
RichardP. (2020). Olympic values: Sponsorship, values and integrity in sport creating a paradigm shift. In ChatziefstathiouD.GarcíaB.SéguinB. (Eds.), Routledge handbook of the Olympic and paralympic games (pp. 75–83). Routledge.
RyanA. (2008). Globalisation and the ‘internal alchemy’ in Chinese martial arts: The transmission of Taijiquan to Britain. East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal, 2(4), 525–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12280-009-9073-x
StrittmatterA.-M. (2016). Defining a problem to fit the solution: A neo-institutional explanation for legitimising the bid for the 2016 Lillehammer Winter Youth Olympic games. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 8(3), 421–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2016.1138990
82.
StrittmatterA.-M.StenlingC.FahlénJ.SkilleE. (2018). Sport policy analysis revisited: The sport policy process as an interlinked chain of legitimating acts. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 10(4), 621–635. https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2018.1522657
TheeboomM.De KnopP. (1997). An analysis of the development of wushu. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 32(3), 267–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/1012690297032003004
86.
TheeboomM.ZhuD.VertonghenJ. (2017). Wushu belongs to the world’. But the gold goes to China…: The international development of the Chinese martial arts. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 52(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1012690215581605
87.
ThorpeH.WheatonB. (2011). The Olympic movement, action sports, and the search for generation Y. In SugdenJ.TomlinsonA. (Eds.), Watching the olympics: Politics, power and representation (pp. 182–200). Routledge.
88.
ThorpeH.WheatonB. (2012). The Olympic movement, action sports, and the search for Generation Y: Holly Thorpe and Belinda Wheaton. In SugdenJ.TomlinsonA. (Eds.), Watching the Olympics: Politics, power and representation (pp. 194–212). Routledge.
89.
ThorpeH.WheatonB. (2019). The Olympic Games, agenda 2020 and action sports: The promise, politics and performance of organisational change. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 11(3), 465–483. https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2019.1569548
Van DijkT. A. (1998). Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Sage.
93.
VanmeerbeekR.ZintzT. (2018). Jacques Rogge—The quest for new Olympic values. In BayleE.ClastresP. (Eds.), Global sport leaders: A biographical analysis of international sport management (pp. 273–300). Springer International Publishing AG.
94.
VanWynsbergheR.DeromI.Pentifallo GaddC. (2021). Legacy and sustainability in the Olympic movement’s new norm era: When reforms are not enough. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 13(3), 443–460. https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2021.1898442
95.
WangG. (2003). “Friendship first”: China’s sports diplomacy during the cold war. Journal of American-East Asian Relations, 12(3-4), 133–153. https://doi.org/10.1163/187656103793645225
96.
WangP.WangG. (2014). Reflections on the failure of wushu’s entry into olympics [in Chinese]. Journal of Shanghai University of Sport, 38(2), 59–62. https://doi.org/10.16099/j.cnki.jsus.2014.02.014
WheatonB.ThorpeH. (2018). Action sports, the Olympic Games, and the opportunities and challenges for gender equity: The cases of surfing and skateboarding. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 42(5), 315–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193723518781230
99.
WheatonB.ThorpeH. (2021). Action Sports and the Olympic Games: Past, Present, Future. Routledge.
100.
XuX. (2006). Modernizing China in the Olympic spotlight: China’s national identity and the 2008 Beijing Olympiad. The Sociological Review, 54(2_suppl), 90–107. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2006.00655.x
101.
XuG. (2008). Olympic Dreams: China and Sports, 1895–2008. Harvard University Press.
102.
YuD.LiuJ. (2014). Criticism and reconstruction: Reflection on wushu’s international communication [in Chinese]. Journal of Shanghai University of Sport, 38(4), 80–84. https://doi.org/10.16099/j.cnki.jsus.2014.04.016
103.
ZhangZ. (2017). When will Wushu enter the Olympics? Interview with the Executive Vice President of IWUF, Wu Ting-Guihttp://www.sohu.com/a/195987395_114977
104.
ZhangY.ZhaoS.LiuH. (2010). Factors for Wushu cannot be an Olympic event and countermeasures for Wushu development [in Chinese]. Journal of Chengdu Sport University, 36(7), 24–28. https://doi.org/10.15942/j.jcsu.2010.07.007
105.
ZhengS. (2011). Wushu’s transformation from the local boxing ring to the world stage. Journal of Asian Martial Arts, 20(4), 53–79.
