The egregious, global problem of athlete abuse, particularly the physical and mental manipulation and exploitation of young athletes, continues unabated. Within the United States, high profile media cases such as the USA Gymnastics scandal led to the passing of specific legislation which restructured and empowered the U.S. Centre for SafeSport to end athlete abuse. Despite these developments, significant challenges remain, with many stakeholders questioning SafeSport's ability to keep athletes safe. We theorize recent developments through a polycentric governance lens, demonstrating how ongoing events can be explained by poorly conceived structural arrangements and inadequate processes that have led to ineffective co-ordination across the regime. Findings present the challenges with the analysis examining causes and the implications for the future of SafeSport.
ArmourN. (2023, May 22). U.S. Center for SafeSport was created to protect athletes from abuse. But is it working?USA Today.
3.
BaldwinE.ThielA.McGinnisM.KellnerE. (2024). Empirical research on polycentric governance: Critical gaps and a framework for studying long-term change. Policy Studies Journal, 52(2), 319–348. 10.1111/psj.12518
4.
BhaskarR. (1975). A realist theory of science. Leeds Books.
5.
BlackJ. (2008). Constructing and contesting legitimacy and accountability in polycentric regulatory regimes. Regulation and Governance, 2, 137–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2008.00034.x
CarlisleK.GrubyR. L. (2019). Polycentric systems of governance: A theoretical model for the commons. Policy Studies Journal, 47(4), 927–952. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12212
DonnellyP.KerrG.KiddB. (2022). Contesting the autonomy of sport to realize the right to safe sport: A Canadian case study. The International Sports Law Journal, 22(2), 165–170. 10.1007/s40318-022-00225-2
FahlénJ.StenlingC. (2019). (Re)conceptualizing institutional change in sport management contexts: The unintended consequences of sport organizations’ everyday organizational life. European Sport Management Quarterly, 19(2), 265–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2018.1516795
18.
GioiaD.CorleyK. G.HamiltonA. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151
19.
Government Accountability Office (GAO). (2021). Amateur athletes: The U.S. center for SafeSport’s response and resolution process for reporting abuse (GAO-21-128R). Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-21-128r.pdf
20.
Government Accountability Office (GAO). (2022). Amateur athlete safety: Certification related to the independence of the U.S. center for SafeSport for fiscal year 2021. Retrieved from https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-22-105572.pdf
GubaE. G.LincolnY. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.) Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105–117). Sage Publications.
23.
GurgisJ. J.KerrG. A. (2021). Sport administrators’ perspectives on advancing safe sport. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 3, 630071. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2021.630071
24.
GurgisJ. J.KerrG.DarnellS. (2022). Safe sport is not for everyone’: Equity-deserving athletes’ perspectives of, experiences and recommendations for safe sport. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 832560. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.832560
25.
HarrisS.DowlingM.HoulihanB. (2021). An analysis of governance failure and power dynamics in international sport: The Russian doping scandal. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 13(3), 359–378. https://doi.org/1080/19406940.2021.1898443
26.
HarrisS.DowlingM.WashingtonM. (2023). Political protest and Rule 50: Exploring the polycentric governance of international and Olympic sport. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 15(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2023.2224345
27.
HarrisS.JedlickaS. (2020). The governance of sport in the USA. In PittsB. J.ZhangJ. J. (Eds.), Sport business in the United States (pp. 24–49). Routledge.
28.
JohnsonN.HannaK.NovakJ.GiardinoA. P. (2020). US center for safesport: Preventing abuse in sports. Women in Sport and Physical Activity Journal, 28(1), 66–71. 10.1123/wspaj.2019-0049
29.
JordanA.HuitemaD.SchoenefeldJ.van AsseltH.ForsterJ.(Eds.). (2018). Governing climate change polycentrically. In JordanA.HuitemaD.van AsseltH.ForsterJ. (Eds.), Governing climate change: Polycentricity in action (pp. 3–26). Cambridge University Press.
30.
KerrG.BattagliaA.StirlingA. (2019). Maltreatment in youth sport: A systemic issue. Kinesiology Review, 8(3), 237–243. https://doi.org/10.1123/kr.2019-0016
31.
KerrG.StirlingA. (2019). Where is safeguarding in sport psychology research and practice?Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 31(4), 367–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200.2018.1559255
KollerD. L. (2018). Twenty-first-century Olympic and amateur sports act. Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law, 20(4), 1027–1072.
34.
LangM.(Ed.). (2021). Routledge handbook of athlete welfare. Routledge.
35.
LangM.HartillM.(Eds.). (2014). Safeguarding, child protection and abuse in sport: International perspectives in research, policy and practice. Routledge.
36.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1986). But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1986(30), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.1427
37.
MagnaniG.GioiaD. (2023). Using the Gioia Methodology in international business and entrepreneurship research. International Business Review, 32(2), 102097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2022.102097
NiteC.NaurightJ. (2020). Examining institutional work that perpetuates abuse in sport organizations. Sport Management Review, 23(1), 117–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2019.06.002
44.
OstromV. (1972). Polycentricity: Working paper. Indiana University.
45.
OstromE. (1990). Governing the commons. The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press.
OstromV.OstromE. (1965). A behavioural approach to the study to intergovernmental relations. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 359(1), 137–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/000271626535900115
48.
OstromV.TieboutC. M.WarrenR. (1961). The organization of government in metropolitan areas: A theoretical inquiry. American Political Science Review, 55(4), 831–842. https://doi.org/10.2307/1952530
49.
Parlow ConeC. (2023, October 9). SafeSport is supposed to protect athletes. Its shortcomings leave them at risk of sexual abuse. Yahoo! News.
StephanM.MarshallG.McGinnisM. (2019). An introduction to polycentricity and governance. In ThielA.BloomquistW.GarrickD. (Eds.), Governing complexity (pp. 21–44). Cambridge University Press.
58.
SuchmanM. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. https://doi.org/10.2307/258788
59.
ThielA.GarrickD. E.BlomquistW. A.(Eds.). (2019). Governing complexity: Analyzing and applying polycentricity. Cambridge University Press.
U.S. Center for SafeSport. (2019). Safesport annual report. [Online report]. Retrieved from uscenterforsafesport.org
62.
U.S. Center for SafeSport. (2020). We are all champions: 2020 Annual Report [Online report]. Retrieved from uscenterforsafesport.org
63.
U.S. Center for SafeSport. (2022). Sparking culture change for a safer tomorrow: 2022 annual report [Online report]. Retrieved from uscenterforsafesport.org
VerkuilP. R. (2005). Privatizing due process. Administrative Law Review, 57(4), 963–994.
68.
YatesE. (2022). Report of the independent investigation to the U.S. soccer federation concerning allegations of abusive behavior and sexual misconduct in women's professional soccer [Online report]. Retrieved from https://assets.bwbx.io/documents/users/iqjWHBFdfxIU/rkHnb7fgThLU/v0
