This article focuses on the changing nature of English football and the shifting relationship between a club and its supporters in the latest era of football commercialization, taking Liverpool Football Club (FC) and its surrounding community in Anfield, Liverpool, England, as an example. The changing nature of English football since the 1990s has forced Liverpool FC to treat its social environment from a commercial perspective. Recently, this trend has been aggravated by Liverpool FC’s land-speculation policy, which is embedded in an urban regeneration policy to take over land in adjacent areas to expand the Anfield Stadium for specifically commercial purposes, escalating tension with local people. This land-use conflict between the local community of Anfield and Liverpool FC has raised the ultimate question of the extent to which the local supporters will remain loyal to the club they support. Drawing on ethnographic research in Anfield, Liverpool, this article looks at the intersection between the urban regeneration policy in Liverpool and the changing nature of English football, which has placed Liverpool FC in a situation of competing with the local fans for urban space, stretching local supporters’ loyalty to the club they support. The result shows that it is the club that has introduced the shift in the meaning of loyalty, tailored to the recent situation in English football. The commercialization of Liverpool FC and its land-speculation policy have produced shock-subjectivities influencing local people’s perception of and practices toward Liverpool FC, suggesting the knife-edge dilemma of being a local fan.
AndersonB. (2006). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London, England: Verso.
2.
BarthF. (1998). Introduction. In BarthF. (Ed.), Ethnic groups and boundaries: The social organization of culture difference (pp. 9-38). Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
3.
BernardH. R. (2006). Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approach (4th ed.). Oxford, UK: AltaMira Press.
4.
BollandP. (2008). The construction of images of people and place: Labelling Liverpool and stereotyping Scousers. Cities, 25, 355-369.
5.
BrewerJ. D. (2000). Ethnography. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
6.
ChannonH. (1976). Portrait of Liverpool. London, England: Robert Hall.
7.
CoaffeJ. (2008). Sport, culture and the modern state: Emerging themes in stimulating urban regeneration in the UK. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 14, 377-397.
8.
ConnD. (2011, August16). The Premier League has priced out fans, young and old. The Guardian. Available from https://www.theguardian.com
9.
ConnD. (2013a, May6). Anfield: The victims, the anger, and Liverpool’s shameful truth. The Guardian. Available from http://www.theguardian.com
10.
ConnD. (2013b, March4). Liverpool report debt increase of £22m and 10 month loss of £40.5m. The Guardian. Available from http://www.theguardian.com
11.
CouchC.FowlesS.KarechaJ. (2009). Reurbanization and housing markets in the central and inner areas of Liverpool. Planning Practice and Research, 24, 321-341.
12.
CouchC.KarechaJ. (2006). Controlling urban sprawl: Some experiences from Liverpool. Cities, 23, 353-363.
CrolleyL.LongC. (2001). Sitting pretty? Women and football in Liverpool. In WilliamsJ.HopkinsS.LongC. (Eds.), Passing rhythm: Liverpool FC in the transformation of English football (pp. 195-214). Oxford, UK: Berg.
15.
DavisJ.ThornleyA. (2010). Urban regeneration for the London 2012 Olympics: Issues of land acquisition and legacy. City, Culture and Society, 1, 89-98.
16.
Deloitte. (2017). Annual review of football finance. Author. Available from https://www2.deloitte.com
DukeV. (2002). Local tradition versus globalisation: Resistance to the McDonaldisation and Disneyisation of professional football in England. Football Studies, 5(1), 5-23.
19.
FarredG. (2002). Long distance love: Growing up a Liverpool football club fan. Journal of Sport & Social Issues, 26, 6-24.
20.
FosterR. (2016, October3). Why are so many football fans protesting against club owners? We asked them. The Guardian. Available from https://www.theguardian.com
21.
FriedmanJ. R. (2007). Shock and subjectivity in the age of globalization: Marginalization, exclusion, and the problem of resistance. Anthropological Theory, 7, 421-448.
22.
GattonC. (2000). The peculiar economics of English professional football. Soccer & Society, 1(1), 11-28.
23.
GiulianottiR. (2002). Supporters, followers, fans and flaneurs: A taxonomy of spectator identities in football. Journal of Sport & Social Issues, 26, 25-46.
24.
GiulianottiR. (2011). Sport mega events, urban football carnivals, and securitised commodification: The case of the English Premier League. Urban Studies, 48, 3293-3310.
HarissonH. (1898). The place-names of the Liverpool District; or the history and the meaning of the local and river names of South-West Lancashire and of Wirral. London, England: Ellion Stock.
27.
HarveyD. (1989). From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: The transformation in urban governance in late capitalism. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 71(1), 3-17.
28.
HarveyD. (2012). Rebel cities: From the right to the city to the urban revolution. London, England: Verso.
29.
HopkinsS. (2001). Passing rhythm: The modern origins and development of the Liverpool way. In WilliamsJ.HopkinsS.LongC. (Eds.), Passing rhythm: Liverpool FC in the transformation of English football (pp. 77-98). Oxford, UK: Berg.
30.
HoyM. (1994). Joyful mayhem: Bakhtin, football songs and the carnivalesque. Text and Performance Quarterly, 14, 289-304.
31.
JohnstoneS.SouthernA.TaylorR. (2000). The midweek match: Premiership football and the urban economy. Local Economy, 15, 198-213.
32.
JonesP.EvansJ. (2008). Urban regeneration in the UK. London, England: SAGE.
33.
KennedyD. (2004). Locality and professional football club development: The demographics of football club support in the late Victorian Liverpool. Soccer & Society, 5, 371-391.
34.
KingA. (1997). New directors, customers, and fans: The transformation of English football in 1990s. Sociology of Sport Journal, 14, 224-240.
35.
Liverpool City Council. (1993). Statistic of Liverpool 1971, 1981, 1991. Liverpool, UK: Central Policy Unit.
36.
Liverpool City Council. (2014). Anfield ward profile. Available from http://liverpool.gov.uk
37.
Liverpool City Council & Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council. (2010). North Liverpool: Strategic regeneration framework 2010. Sefton and Liverpool working together (Final report). Available from http://www.liverpoolvision.co.uk
38.
Liverpool City Council, Your Housing Group, & Liverpool FC. (2013). The Anfield project: A consultation document. Available from http://www.anfieldproject.co.uk/
39.
LowS. M. (1996). The anthropology of cities: Imagining and theorizing the city. Annual Review of Anthropology, 25, 383-409.
40.
MacCartheyJ. (2011). Liverpool FC-You’ll never walk alone. Warwickshire, UK: Coda Book.
41.
MalcolmD. (2000). Football business and football communities in the twenty-first century. Soccer & Society, 1(3), 1-2.
42.
McKenzieA. (2007, February6). Football take over trend. BBC. Available from http://news.bbc.co.uk
43.
NashR. (2000a). Globalised football fandom: Scandinavian Liverpool FC supporters. Football Studies, 3(2), 5-23.
44.
NashR. (2000b). The sociology of English football in the 1990s: Fandom, business, and future research. Football Studies, 3(1), 49-62.
45.
NashR. (2001). English football fan groups in the 1990s: Class, representation and fan power. Soccer & Society, 2(1), 39-58.
46.
PearceJ. (2013, June7). Reds’ new move in £150m Anfield Stadium plan. Liverpool Echo. Available from http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk
47.
PearsonG. (2013). An ethnography of English football fans: Cans, cops and carnival. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
48.
Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act. (2004). The United Kingdom of Great Britain and North Ireland. Available from https://www.legislation.gov.uk
49.
PlattsC.SmithA. (2010). “Money, money, money?” The development of financial inequalities in English professional football. Soccer & Society, 11, 643-658.
50.
RookwoodJ.MillwardP. (2011). “We all dream of a team of Carraghers”: Comparing “local” and Texan Liverpool fans’ talk. Sport in Society, 14, 37-52.
51.
SilkM. L. (2004). A tale of two cities: The social production of sterile sporting space. Journal of Sport & Social Issues, 28, 349-378.
52.
SilkM. L. (2007). Come downtown & play. Leisure Studies, 26, 253-277.
53.
SimpsonB. (2006). “You don’t do fieldwork, fieldwork does you: Between subjectivation and objectivation in anthropology. In HobsD.WrightR. (Eds.), A handbook of fieldwork (pp. 125-138). London, England: SAGE.
54.
SlaterM. (2013, December14). Standing at football: Will terraces return to Britain’s top stadiums?BBC. Available from http://www.bbc.com
55.
SmithA. (2005). Reimaging the city: The value of sport initiatives. Annals of Tourism Research, 31, 217-236.
56.
SouthernA. (2014). Something is stirring in Anfield: Elite Premier League football and localism. Local Economy, 29, 195-212.
57.
SzymanskiS.SmithR. (1997). The English football industry: Profit, performance, and industrial structure. International Review of Applied Economics, 11, 135-153.
58.
TaylorI. (1971). “Football mad”: A speculative sociology of football hooliganism. In DunningE. (Ed.), The sociology of sport: A selection of readings (pp. 357-377). London, England: Frank Cass.
59.
ThornleyA. (2002). Urban regeneration and sport stadia. European Planning Studies, 10, 813-818.
60.
TurnerM. (2013). Modern “live” football: Moving from the panopticon gaze to the performative, virtual and carnivalesque. Sport in Society, 16, 85-93.
61.
WilliamJ. (2001). Kopites, “scallies”, and Liverpool fan cultures: Tales of triumph and disaster. In WilliamsJ.HopkinsS.LongC. (Eds.), Passing rhythm: Liverpool FC in the transformation of English football (pp. 99-128). Oxford, UK: Berg.
62.
WilliamJ. (2012). Walking alone together the Liverpool way: Fan culture and “clueless” Yanks. Soccer & Society, 13, 426-442.
