This research explored how National Football League (NFL) players used Twitter to discuss the verdict in the George Zimmerman murder trial in the immediate aftermath of its announcement. A textual analysis, using constant comparative procedures of 465 tweets from 125 NFL players, was conducted. Results revealed that players discussed the case in the following ways: (a) anticipation, (b) disbelief, (c) critiques of the American Justice System, (d) social commentary, (e) condolences and support, (f) responding to fans, and (g) freedom of speech arguments. The results suggest that Twitter is a viable mechanism for African American and other minority athletes to engage in activism and initiate important conversations about social justice issues. Although empowering, this also may create conflict for team personnel and fans who may be uncomfortable with athletes using Twitter to question structures that favor Whiteness.
AgyemangK. J. (2012). Black male athlete activism and the link to Michael Jordan: A transformation leadership and social cognitive theory analysis. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 47, 433-445.
2.
AgyemangK. J.SingerJ. N.DeLormeJ. (2010). An exploratory study of Black male college athletes’ perceptions on race and athlete activism. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 45, 419-435.
BrockA. (2012). From the blackhand side: Twitter as cultural conversation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56, 529-549.
7.
BrowningB.SandersonJ. (2012). The positives and negatives of Twitter: Exploring how student-athletes use twitter and respond to critical tweets. International Journal of Sport Communication, 5, 503-521.
8.
CarrL. G. (1997). Colorblind racism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
CunninghamG. B.ReganM. R.Jr. (2012). Political activism, racial identity, and the commercial endorsement of athletes. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 47, 657-669.
11.
DeLucaK. M.LawsonS.SunY. (2012). Occupy Wall Street on the public screens of social media: The many framings of the birth of a protest movement. Communication, Culture, & Critique, 5, 483-509.
12.
EbandaDeB’bériB.HogarthP. (2009). White America’s constructions of Black bodies: The case of Ron Artest as a model of covert racial ideology in the NBA’s discourse. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 2, 89-106.
13.
EdwardsH. (1969). The revolt of the Black athlete. New York, NY: Free Press.
14.
GlaserB.StraussA. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
HermansH. J. M. (2004). Introduction: The dialogical self in a global and digital age. Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research, 4, 297-320.
17.
HermansH. J. M.KempenH. J. G.Van LoonR. J. P. (1992). The dialogical self: Beyond individualism and rationalism. American Psychologist, 47, 23-33.
LeonardD. (2004). The next M.J. or the next O.J.? Kobe Bryant, race, and the absurdity of colorblind rhetoric. Journal of Sport & Social Issues, 28, 284-313.
21.
LeonardD. (2006). The real color of money: Controlling black bodies in the NBA. Journal of Sport & Social Issues, 30, 158-179.
22.
LimM. (2012). Clicks, cabs, and coffee houses: Social media and oppositional movements in Egypt, 2004-2011. Journal of Communication, 62, 231-248.
23.
LipsitzG. (1995). The possessive investment in whiteness: Racialized social democracy and the “White” problem in American studies. American Quarterly, 47, 369-387.
McDonaldM. G.TogliaJ. (2010). Dressed for success? The NBA’s dress code, the workings of whiteness, and corporate culture. Sport in Society, 13, 970-983.
26.
MelnickM. J.JacksonS. J. (2002). Globalization American style and reference idol selection. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 37, 429-448.
PelakC. F. (2005). Athletes as agents of change: An examination of shifting race relations within women’s netball in post-apartheid South Africa. Sociology of Sport Journal, 21, 59-77.
SandersonJ. (2010). Weighing in on the coaching decision: Discussing sports and race online. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29, 301-320.
31.
SandersonJ. (2013). Stepping into the (social media) game: Building athlete identity via Twitter. In LuppiciniR. (Ed.), Handbook of research on technoself: Identity in a technological society (pp. 419-438). New York, NY: Idea Group Global.
32.
SpringwoodC. F. (2006). Basektball, Zapatistas, and other racial subjects. Journal of Sport & Social Issues, 30, 364-373.
33.
StraussA. L.CorbinJ. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34.
SuterE. A.BergenK. M.DaasK. L.DurhamW. T. (2006). Lesbian couples’ management of public–private dialectical contradictions. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23, 349-365.
