U.S. society continues to accept myths regarding the supposed weakness of women’s bodies. Women’s displays of physical power are often prevented or undermined, typically in ways centering on the concept of femininity. Increasing numbers of female athletes have not led to a true physical feminist liberation, one which would increase women’s confidence, power, respect, wealth, enjoyment of physicality, and escape from rape and the fear of rape. Despite these possible benefits, most feminists have not encouraged the development of physical power in women. Although caution regarding physical power is warranted, the benefits of a physical, libratory feminism outweigh the risks.
Angier, N.
(1999). Woman: An intimate geography. New York: Anchor.
2.
Bartky, S. L.
(1998). Foucault, femininity, and the modernization of patriarchal power. In R. Weitz (Ed.), The politics of women’s bodies: Sexuality, appearance, and behavior (pp. 25-45). New York: Oxford.
3.
Bordo, S.
(1993). Unbearable weight: Feminism, Western culture, and the body. Berkeley: University of California Press.
4.
Butler, J.
(1990). Performative acts and gender constitution: An essay in phenomenology and feminist theory. In S. Case (Ed.), Performing feminisms: Feminist critical theory and theater (pp. 270-282). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
5.
Butler, J.
(1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of “sex.”New York: Routledge.
6.
Carillo, M. (Writer)
, & Deford, F. (Writer). (1999). Dare to compete: The struggle of women’s sports [Motion picture]. United States: Home Box Office.
7.
Castelnuovo, S.
, & Guthrie, S. (1998). Feminism and the female body: Liberating the Amazon within. London: Lynne Rienner.
8.
Clarke, D. A.
(1993). A woman with a sword. In E. Buchwald, E. P. Fletcher, & M. Roth (Eds.), Transforming a rape culture (pp. 393-404). Minneapolis, MN: Milkeweed.
9.
Costa, D. M.
, & Guthrie, S. (1994). Feminist perspectives: Intersections with women and sport. In D. Costa&S. Guthrie (Eds.), Women and sport: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 235-252). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
10.
Delgado, L.
(1999). Arroz con pollo vs. Slim-Fast. In A. Kesselman, L. D. McNair, & N. Schniedewind (Eds.), Women: Images and realities (pp. 128-129). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
11.
Dowling, C.
(2000). The frailty myth: Women approaching physical equality. New York: Random House.
12.
Dworkin, S.
(2001). “Holding back”: Negotiating a glass ceiling on women’smuscular strength. Sociological Perspectives, 44, 333-350.
13.
Easton, A.
, Summers, J., Tribble, J., Wallace, P. B., & Lock, R. S. (1997). College women’s perceptions regarding resistance to sexual assault. Journal of American College Health, 46, 127-139.
14.
Edut, T.
(1998). The chosen people. In O. Edut (Ed.), Body outlaws: Young women write about body image and identity (pp. 88-95). Seattle, WA: Seal.
15.
Eitzen, D. S.
, & Zinn, M. B. (1989). The de-athleticization of women: The naming and gender marking of collegiate sport teams. Sociology of Sport Journal, 6, 362-370.
16.
Enloe, C.
(1993, July/August). The right to fight: Feminist catch-22. Ms., 4, 84-87.
17.
Feinman, I. R.
(2000). Citizenship rites: Feminist soldiers and feminist antimilitarists. New York: New York University Press.
18.
Freedson, P.
(1994). Muscle strength and endurance. In D. Costa & S. Guthrie (Eds.), Women and sport: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 177-184). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
19.
Frey, J.
,& Eitzen, S. (1991). Sport and society. Annual Review of Sociology, 17, 503-522.
20.
Gatens, M.
(1996). Imaginary bodies: Ethics, power, and corporeality. London: Routledge.
21.
Goldstein, J.
(2001). War and gender: How gender shapes the war system and vice versa. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
22.
Grosz, E.
(1994). Volatile bodies: Toward a corporeal feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
23.
Guthrie, S.
, & Castelnuovo, S. (1994). The significance of body image in psychosocial development and in embodying feminist perspectives. In D. Costa & S. Guthrie (Eds.), Women and sport: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 307-322). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
24.
Gutmann, S.
(2000). The kindler, gentler military: Can America’s gender-neutral fighting force still win wars?New York: Lisa Drew.
25.
Hall, S.
(1999, August 22). Bully in the mirror. The New York Times, sect. 6. p. 31.
26.
Hargreaves, J.
(1994). Sporting females: Critical issues in the history and sociology of women’s sports. New York: Routledge.
27.
Heyden, M.
, Anger, B. F., Jackson, T. T., & Ellner, T. D. (1999) Fighting back works: The case for advocating and teaching self-defense against rape. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 70(5), 31-36.
28.
Jaggar, A.
(1983). Feminist politics and human nature. New York: Rowman& Littlefield.
29.
Kusama, K.(Writer)
, Green, S.(Producer), Griffin, M.(Producer),&Renzi, M. (Producer). (2000). Girlfight [Motion picture]. United States: Tri-Star.
30.
Lambert, J. G.
(2001). Height and weight tables. Retrieved January 15, 2003, from http://www.thirdage.com/health/adam/ency/article/001938.htm
31.
Lawler, J.
(2002). PUNCH! Why women participate in violent sports. Terre Haute, IN: Wish.
32.
Lorde, A.
(1997). The master’s tools will never dismantle the master’s house. In L. Richardson, V. Taylor,&N. Whittier (Eds.), Feminist frontiers IV (pp. 26-27). New York: McGraw-Hill.
33.
MacKinnon, C. A.
(1987). Feminism unmodified: Discourses on life and law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34.
MacKinnon, C. A.
(1989). Sexuality, pornography, and method: “Pleasure under patriarchy.”Ethics, 99(2), 314-346.
35.
McCaughey, M.
(1997). Real knockouts: The physical feminism of women’s self-defense. New York: New York University.
36.
Merleau-Ponty, M.
(1962). Phenomenology of perception (C. Smith, Trans.). London: Routledge & Keegan. (Original work published 1945)
37.
Nelson, M. B.
(1994). The stronger women get, the more men love football: Sexism and the American culture of sports. New York: Harcourt Brace.
38.
Noxon, M. (Executive Producer)
, Whedon, J. (Executive Producer), Greenwalt, D. (Executive Producer), Kuzui, F. R. (Executive Producer), Kuzui, K. (Executive Producer), Berman, G. (Executive Producer), et al. (1997). Buffy the vampire slayer[Television series]. Los Angeles: Twentieth Century Fox.
39.
Oglesby, C.
, Greenberg, D. L., Hall, R. L., Hill, K. L., Johnston, F., & Easterby, S. (Eds.). (1998). Gender differences and performance. In Encyclopedia of women and sport in America (pp. 109-114). Phoenix, AZ: Oryx.
40.
Poran, M.
(2002). Denying diversity: Perceptions of beauty and social comparison processes among Latina, Black, and White women. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 22, 65-82.
41.
Prince-Bythewood, G. (Writer)
, Kitt, S. (Producer), & Lee, S. (Producer). (2000). Love and basketball [Motion picture]. United States: New Line Cinema.
42.
Riley, R.
, & Cantu, N. (1997). Title IX: Twenty-five years of progress. Retrieved October 29, 2002, from www.ed.gov/pubs/TitleIX/
43.
Roberts, D.
(1997). Killing the Black body: Race, reproduction, and the meaning of liberty. New York: Vintage.
44.
Rodney, W.
(1969). The groundings with my brothers. London: Bogle-L’Ouverture.
45.
Root, M.
(1990). Disordered eating in women of color. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 22, 525-536.
46.
Theberge, N.
(1987). Sport and women’s empowerment. Women Studies International Forum, 10, 387-393.
47.
Theberge, N.
(2000). Higher goals: Women’s ice hockey and the politics of gender. Albany: State University of New York Press.
48.
Truth, S.
(1992). Ain’t I a woman? In M. Schneir (Ed.), Feminism: The essential historical writings (pp. 93-95). New York: Vintage.
49.
van Zyl, M.
(1990). Rape mythology. Critical Arts: Women Represented Edition, 5(2). Retrieved November 10, 2002, from www.und.ac.za/und/ccms/publications/criticalarts/v5n2a2.htm%23normal
50.
Wendell, S.
(1996). The rejected body: Feminist philosophical reflections on disability. New York: Routledge.
51.
Wolf, N.
(1991). The beauty myth: How images of beauty are used against women. New York: Doubleday.
52.
Young, I.
(1990). Throwing like a girl and other essays in feminist philosophy and social theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
