The purpose of this study was to identify factors that served as barriers to principal engagement in the professional development process, and identify what resources or supports were needed to increase engagement. The 249 survey participants were drawn from 112 different school systems. From that group 20 principals were purposefully sampled for interviews. The theoretical framework for this study drew from social cognitive, self-efficacy, and collective efficacy theories which served to frame school and district leaders’ roles in professional development.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and actions: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
2.
BanduraA. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman.
3.
BlaseJ.BlaseJ. (2000). Effective instructional leadership: Teachers’ perspectives on how principals promote teaching and learning in schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 38, 130-141.
4.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
5.
DesimoneL. M. (2011). A primer on effective professional development. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(6), 68-71.
6.
FullanM. (2010). All systems go: The change imperative for whole system reform. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
7.
GoddardR.GoddardY.KimE. S.MillerR. (2015). A theoretical and empirical analysis of the roles of instructional leadership, teacher collaboration, and collective efficacy beliefs in support of student learning. American Journal of Education, 121, 501-530.
8.
GoddardR. D.HoyW. K.Woolfolk HoyA. (2000). Collective teacher efficacy: Its meaning, measure, and impact on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 37, 479-507.
9.
GuskeyT. R. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
10.
HallingerP.HosseingholizadehR.HashemiN.KouhsariM. (2018). Do beliefs make a difference? Exploring how principal self-efficacy and instructional leadership impact teacher efficacy and commitment in Iran. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46, 800-819.
11.
HoyW. K.TarterC. J.Woolfolk HoyA. (2006). Academic optimism of schools: A force for student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 43, 425-446.
12.
KennedyM. M. (2016). How does professional development improve teaching?Review of Educational Research, 86, 945-980.
13.
KnappM. S. (2003). Professional development as a policy pathway. Review of Research in Education, 27, 109-157.
14.
KraftM. A.GilmourA. F. (2016). Can principals promote teacher development as evaluators? A case study of principals’ views and experiences. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52, 711-753.
15.
LeithwoodK. (2007). Teacher working conditions that matter: A synthesis of evidence. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Elementary Teacher Federation of Ontario.
16.
LevinB. (2008). How to change 5,000 schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
17.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
McGuiganL.HoyW. K. (2006). Principal leadership: Creating a culture of academic optimism to improve achievement for all students. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 5, 203-229.
19.
MendelsP. (2012). The effective principal. Journal of Staff Development, 33(1), 54-58.
20.
PajaresF. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66, 543-578.
21.
RavitchS. M.CarlN. M. (2015). Qualitative research: Bridging the conceptual, theoretical, and methodological. Sage Publications.
22.
ReevesD. B. (2008). Reframing teacher leadership to improve your school. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
23.
ReevesD. B. (2010). Transforming professional development into student results. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
24.
RobinsonV. M. J.LloydC. A.RoweK. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44, 635-674.
25.
SaldañaJ. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
SparksD.HirshS. (1997). A new vision for staff development. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
27.
SteinK. C.MacalusoM.StanulisR. N. (2016). The interplay between principal leadership and teacher leader efficacy. Journal of School Leadership, 26, 1002-1032.
28.
Tschannen-MoranM.GareisC. R. (2015). Faculty trust in the principal: An essential ingredient in high-performing schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 53, 66-92.
29.
WeiR. C.Darling-HammondL.AndreeA.RichardsonN.OrphanosS. (2009). Professional learning in the learning profession: A status report on teacher development in the United States and abroad. Dallas, TX: National Staff Development Council.
