Disproportionality in school discipline is a serious and ongoing problem. Some schools are experimenting with alternative models to address persistent inequities. This article features one high school’s adoption of a restorative practices discipline program with a focus on teachers’ perceptions of their experiences and the efficacy of the program. Findings indicate that restorative practices can be a powerful means to strengthen relationships and reduce the number of students receiving exclusionary consequences.
AldrupK.KlusmannU.LüdtkeO.GöllnerR.TrautweinU. (2018). Student misbehavior and teacher well-being: Testing the mediating role of the teacher-student relationship. Learning and Instruction, 58, 126-136.
2.
American Psychological Association Zero Tolerance Task Force. (2008). Are zero tolerance policies effective in the schools? An evidentiary review and recommendations. American Psychologist, 63, 852-862.
3.
CornellD. G.MayerM. J. (2010). Why do school order and safety matter?Educational Researcher, 39, 7-15. doi:10.3102/0013189X09357616
4.
CrewsG. A.CountsM. R. (1997). The evolution of school disturbance in America: Colonia times to modern day. Westport, CT: Praeger.
5.
CurwinR. L.MendlerA. N. (1989). We repeat, let the buyer beware: A response to Canter. Educational Leadership, 46(6), 83.
6.
DeMatthewsD. E.CareyR. L.OlivarezA.SaeediK. M. (2017). Guilty as charged? Principals’ perspectives on disciplinary practices and the racial discipline gap. Educational Administration Quarterly, 53, 519-555.
7.
DinkesR.CataldiE. F.Lin-KellyW. (2007). Indicators of school crime and safety: 2007 (NCES 2008-021/NCJ 219553). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
8.
GoldenD. C. (1993). Discipline of students with disabilities: A decision-making model for principals. NASSP Bulletin, 77(550), 11-20.
9.
GregoryA.ClawsonK.DavisA.GerewitzJ. (2014). The promise of restorative practices to transform teacher-student relationships and achieve equity in school discipline. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 25, 1-29. doi:10.1080/10474412.2014.929950
International Institute for Restorative Practices. (n.d.). SaferSanerSchools™: Whole-school change through restorative practices. Retrieved from http://www.iirp.edu/pdf/WSC-Overview.pdf
12.
IrbyD. J. (2018). Mo’ data, mo’ problems: Making sense of racial discipline disparities in a large diversifying suburban high school. Educational Administration Quarterly, 54, 693-722. doi:10.1177/0013161X18769051
13.
KaneJ.LloydG.McCluskeyG.RiddellS.SteadJ.WeedonE. (2007). Restorative practices in three Scottish councils: Final report of the evaluation of the first two years of the pilot projects 2004-2006. Edinburgh, Scotland: Scottish Executive.
14.
LosenD. J.SkibaR. J. (2010). Suspended education: Urban middle schools in crisis. Montgomery, AL: Southern Poverty Law Center.
15.
LustickH. (2017). “Restorative justice” or restoring order? Restorative school discipline practices in urban public schools. Urban Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0042085917741725
16.
MaagJ. W. (2012). School-wide discipline and the intransigency of exclusion. Children and Youth Services Review, 34, 2094-2100.
17.
MacNaughtonR. H.JohnsF. A. (1991). Developing a successful schoolwide discipline program. NAASP Bulletin, 75(536), 47-57.
18.
MacreadyT. (2009). Learning social responsibility in schools: A restorative practice. Educational Psychology in Practice, 25, 211-220. doi:10.1080/02667360903151767
19.
MansfieldK. C.FowlerE.RainboltS. (2018). The potential of restorative practices to ameliorate discipline gaps: The story of one high school’s leadership team. Educational Administration Quarterly, 54(2), 303-323.
20.
MansfieldK. C.RainboltS.FowlerE. (2018). Implementing restorative justice as a step toward racial equity in school discipline. Teachers College Record, 120(14), 1-24.
21.
McCluskeyG.LloydG.KaneJ.RiddellS.SteadJ.WeedonE. (2008). Can restorative practices in schools make a difference?Educational Review, 60, 405-417. doi:10.1080/00131910802393456
22.
MirskyL. (2011). Restorative practices: Giving everyone a voice to create safer saner school communities. Prevention Researcher, 18, 3-6.
23.
MonganP.WalkerR. (2012). “The road to hell is paved with good intentions”: A historical, theoretical, and legal analysis of zero-tolerance weapons policies in American schools. Preventing School Failure, 56, 232-240.
24.
MorrisonB.BloodP.ThorsborneM. (2005). Practicing restorative justice in school communities: Addressing the challenge of culture change. Public Organization Review, 5, 335-357.
25.
MorrisonB. E.VaanderingD. (2012). Restorative justice: Pedagogy, praxis, and discipline. Journal of School Violence, 11, 138-155. doi:10.1080/15388220.2011.653322
26.
NoltemeyerA. L.McloughlinC. S. (2010). Changes in exclusionary discipline rates and disciplinary disproportionality over time. International Journal of Special Education, 25(1), 59-70.
27.
PolkaW. S. (2007). Managing people, things, and ideas in the “effective change zone”: A “high-touch” approach to educational leadership at the dawn of the twenty-first century. Educational Planning, 16(1), 12-17.
28.
Regulation 401.1. (2008). [Tenakomakah] County Public Schools Code of Conduct. (Reference masked to protect anonymity. Copies in research team’s possession and available on request.)
29.
RyanJ. B.KatsiyannisA.PetersonR.ChmelarR. (2007). IDEA 2004 and disciplining students with disabilities. NASSP Bulletin, 91, 130-140.
30.
SalazarP. S. (2016). In this issue . . .NASSP Bulletin, 100, 95-96.
31.
SkibaR. J.RauschM. K. (2006). Zero tolerance, suspension, and expulsion: Questions of equity and effectiveness. In EvertsonC. M.WeinsteinC. S. (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues (pp. 1063-1089). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
32.
SugaiG.HornerR. H. (2009). Defining and describing schoolwide positive behavior support. In SailorW.DunlopG.SugaiG.HornerR. (Eds.), Issues in clinical child psychology: Handbook of positive behavior support (pp. 307-326). New York, NY: Springer.
33.
TerrellH. W. (1976). School discipline: A cooperative approach. NASSP Bulletin, 60(397), 9-14.
WilliamsJ.PazeyB.FallA. M.YatesJ. R.RobertsG. J. (2015). Avoiding the threat: An exploratory study into a theoretical understanding of the de facto segregation of students with disabilities. NASSP Bulletin, 99, 233-253.
36.
[X] Department of Education. (2015). (Reference masked to protect anonymity. Copies in research team’s possession and available upon request.)
37.
ZimmermanJ. (2006). Why some teachers resist change and what principals can do about it. NASSP Bulletin, 90, 238-249. doi:10.1177/0192636506291521
