This research proposes Lesson Study as a professional development structure that allows principals and teachers in secondary schools to meet the demands of English and disciplinary literacy standards. It is a collaborative study between a university and eight schools. The essential questions is, “How can Lesson Study broaden content knowledge and affect instructional leadership?” Data are analyzed using qualitative methods. Findings suggest the possibilities of Lesson Study in creating principal teacher partnerships to address challenges of practice in today’s schools.
AldrichR. S. (2005). Cognitive coaching (SM) practice in online environments (PhD thesis; Pepperdine University). Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/128164/
2.
BjorkC. (2000, March). The role of principal and responsibility for improving quality of teaching in Japanese schools. Paper presented at American Association of Educational Researchers, New Orleans, LA.
3.
CostaA. L.GarmstonR. J. (2002). Cognitive coaching: A foundation for renaissance school (2nd ed.). Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordan.
4.
Darling-HammondL.McLaughlinM. (2011). Policies that support professional development in an era of reform. Kappan, 92(6), 81-92.
5.
Darling-HammondL.WeiR. C.AndreeA.RichardsonN.OrphanosS. (2009). Professional learning in the learning profession: A status report on teacher development in the United States and abroad. Palo Alto, CA: School Redesign Network at Stanford University.
6.
DoigB.GrovesS. (2011). Japanese lesson study: Teacher professional development through communities of inquiry. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 13(1), 77-93.
7.
EdwardsJ. L. (2004).The process of becoming and helping others to become: A grounded theory study. In SteinI. F.CamponeF.PageL. J. (Eds.), Proceedings of the second ICF coaching research symposium (pp. 69-78). Washington, DC: International Coach Federation.
8.
FineC. J.KossackS. W. (2002). The effect of using rubric-embedded cognitive coaching strategies to initiate learning conversations. Journal of Reading Education, 27(2), 31-37.
9.
HallingerR.MurphyJ. (2012). Running on empty? Finding the time and capacity to lead learning. NASSP Bulletin, 97(1), 5-21.
10.
JuarezD. (2006). A practical practice: Shaping and owning teacher research. In FriedrichL.TateishiC.MalarkeyT.SimonsE. R.WilliamsM. (Eds.), Working toward equity (pp. 145-158). Berkeley, CA: National Writing Project.
11.
KnightJ. (2011). Unmistakable impact: A partnership approach for dramatically improving instruction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
12.
Lesson Study Communities Project in Secondary Mathematics. (n.d.). EDC researchers explore innovative teacher program [Website]. Newton, MA: Education Development Center, Center for Mathematics Education. Retrieved from http://main.edc.org/NewsRoom/features/lessonstudy.asp
13.
LewisC. (2000, April). Lesson study: The core of Japanese professional development. Invited address to the Special Interest Group on Research in Mathematics Education. New Orleans, LA.
14.
LincolnY.S.GubaE.G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
15.
MeyerD. R.WilkersonL. T. (2011). Lesson study: The impact on teachers’ knowledge for teaching mathematics. In Lesson study research and practice in mathematics education (pp. 15-26). New York, NY: Springer.
16.
National Policy Board for Educational Administration. (2015). Professional standards for educational leaders 2015. Reston, VA: Author.
17.
The Network for Public Education. (2016). Teachers talk back: Educators on the impact of teacher evaluations. Retrieved from http://networkforpubliceducation.org/
18.
NgangT. K.SamL. C. (2015). Principal support in lesson study. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 205, 134-139.
19.
PerryP.LewisC. (2009). What is successful adaptation of lesson study in the US?Journal of Educational Change, 10, 365-391.
20.
PhillipsV.HughesR. L. (2012, December5). Teacher collaboration: The essential common-core ingredient. Education Week, 32(13), 32-33, 35.
21.
RossmanG. B.WilsonB. L. (1985). Numbers and words: Combining quantitative and qualitative methods in a single large-scale evaluation study. Evaluation Review, 9, 627-643.
