Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Exclusionary School Discipline: Implications for Administrators Leading Discipline Reform Efforts

Abstract

School discipline and school safety are primary areas of concern for school administrators. This article summarizes the research literature regarding suspension in response to nonviolent and subjective offenses for racial/ethnic minorities. Steps that administrators can follow in applying a root cause analysis with a focus on school practices are provided. The following three areas of professional development and teacher support are offered to facilitate changes in school practices: (1) implicit bias, (2) empathy training, and (3) classroom consultation/teacher supports.

Keywords

racial discipline disparities suspension root cause

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Psychological Association Zero Tolerance Task Force. (2008). Are zero tolerance policies effective in the schools? An evidentiary review and recommendations. American Psychologist, 63, 852-862.

Borum

Cornell

D. G.

Modzeleski

Jimerson

S. R.

(2010). What can be done about school shootings? A review of the evidence. Educational Researcher, 39, 27-37. doi:10.3102/0013189X09357620

Children’s Defense Fund. (1975). School suspensions: Are they helping children? Cambridge, MA: Washington Research Project.

Christenson

S. L.

Sinclair

M. F.

Lehr

Hurley

(2000). Promoting successful school completion. In K. M.

Minke

Bear

G. C.

(Eds.), Preventing school problems—promoting school success: Strategies and programs that work (pp. 211-257). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.

Dweck

(2008). Mindset: the new psychology of success. New York, NY: Ballantine Books.

Dworin

S. B.

(2015). Disciplinary intervention curriculum. Chicago, IL: UMOJA.

Fenning

Johnson

M. B.

(in press). Making a systemic difference: Working with the changing system. In: Gullo

G. L.

Capatosto

Staats

(Eds.), Implicit bias in schools: A practitioner’s guide. New York: Routledge.

Fenning

Johnson

M. B.

(2016). Developing prevention-oriented discipline codes of conduct. Loyola University Chicago Children’s Legal Rights Journal (in cooperation with the National Association of Counsel for Children), 36, 107-136.

Fenning

Pulaski

Gomez

Morello

Maciel

Maroney

. . . Maltese

(2012). Call to action: A critical need for designing alternatives to suspension and expulsion [Special issue]. Journal of School Violence, 11, 105-117. doi:10.1080/15388220.2011.646643

10.

Fenning

Rose

(2007). Overrepresentation of African American students in exclusionary discipline: The role of school policy. Urban Education, 42, 536-559.

11.

Gregory

Allen

J. P.

Mikami

A. Y

Hafen

C. A.

Pianta

R. C.

(2015). The promise of teacher professional development in reducing racial disparity in classroom exclusionary discipline. In D. J.

Losen

(Ed.), Closing the school discipline gap: Equitable remedies for excessive exclusion (pp. 166-179). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

12.

Harry

Klinger

(2007). Discarding the deficit model. Educational Leadership, 64(5), 16-21.

13.

Losen

D. J.

(2011). Discipline policies, successful schools, and racial justice. Boulder: National Education Policy Center, University of Colorado.

14.

Losen

D. J.

(2015). Closing the school discipline gap: Equitable remedies for excessive inclusion. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

15.

May

Ard.

Todd

A. W.

Horner

R. H.

Glasgow

Sugai

Sparague

J. R.

(2006). Schoolwide Information System. Eugene: Educational and Community Supports, University of Oregon.

16.

Mayer

G. 1.

(1995). Preventing antisocial behavior in the schools. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 467-478.

17.

McIntosh

Girvan

E. J.

Horner

R. B.

Smolkowski

(2014). Education not incarceration: A conceptual model for reducing racial and ethnic disproportionality in school discipline. Journal of Applied Research on Children: Informing Policy for Children at Risk, 5(2), 1-22. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.library.tmc.edu/childrenatrisk/vol5/iss2/4

18.

Mendez

L. M. R.

Knoff

H. M.

Ferron

J. M.

(2002). School demographic variables and out-of-school suspension rates: A quantitative and qualitative analysis of a large, ethnically diverse school district. Psychology in the Schools, 39, 259-277. doi:10.1002/pits.10020

19.

National Association of School Psychologists. (2015). NASP Practice Implementation Model. Bethesda, MD: Author.

20.

Nichols

J. D.

Ludwin

W. G.

Iadicola

(1999). A darker shade of gray: A year end analysis of discipline and suspension data. Equity & Excellence in Education, 32, 43-55. doi:10.1080/1066568990320105

21.

O’Brennan

L. M.

Bradshaw

C. P

Furlong

M. J.

(2014). Influence of classroom and school climate on teacher perceptions of student problem behavior. School Mental Health, 6, 125-136. doi:10.1007/s12310-014-9118-8

22.

Okonofua

J. A.

Eberhardt

J. L.

(2015). Two strikes: Race and the discipline of young students. Psychological Science, 26, 617-624. doi:10.1177.0956797615570365

23.

Okonofua

J. A.

Paunesku

Walton

G. M.

(2016). Brief intervention to encourage empathic discipline cuts suspension rates in half among adolescents. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U S A, 113, 5221-5226. doi:10.1073/pnas.1523698113

24.

Osher

Fisher

Amos

Katz

Dwyer

Duffey

Colombi

G. D.

(2015). Addressing the root causes of disparities in school discipline: An educator’s action planning guide. Washington, DC: National Center on Safe Supportive Learning Environments (Support and Collaboration with U.S. Department of Education).

25.

Phi Delta Kappan. (2016). Why school? The 48th annual PDK poll of the public’s attitudes toward the public schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 98(1), 1-32.

26.

School Superintendents Association and Children’s Defense Fund. (2014). School discipline in the eyes of school superintendents. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from https://www.aasa.org/uploadedFiles/Childrens_Programs/_files/SurveyReport-School-Discipline-in-the-Eyes-of-Superintendents.pdf.

27.

Sharkey

Fenning

(2012). Rationale for designing school contexts in support of proactive discipline. Journal of School Violence, 11, 95-104.

28.

Skiba

R. J.

Horner

R. H.

Choong-Geun

Rausch

M. K.

May

S. L.

Tobin

(2011). Race is not neutral: A national investigation of African American and Latino disproportionality in school discipline. School Psychology Review, 40, 85-107.

29.

Skiba

R. J.

Michael

R. S.

Nardo

A.C.

Peterson

(2002). The color of discipline: Sources of racial and gender disproportionality in school punishment. Urban Review, 34, 317-342.

30.

Skiba

R. J.

Peterson

R. L.

Williams

(1997). Office referrals and suspension: Disciplinary intervention in middle schools. Education & Treatment of Children, 20, 295-316.

31.

Skiba

R. J.

Trachok

Chung

C. G.

Baker

Hughes

(2012, April). Parsing discipline disproportionality: Contributions of behavior, student, and school characteristics to suspension and expulsion. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

32.

Staats

(2015-2016). Understanding implicit bias: What educators should know. American Educator, Winter, 29-33, 43.

33.

Staats

Capatosto

Wright

R. A.

Jackson

V. W.

(2016). State of the science: Implicit bias review. Columbus: Kirwin Institute for the Study of Race and Ethnicity, Ohio State University.

34.

Verdugo

R.R.

(2002). Race-ethnicity, social class, and zero-tolerance policies The Cultural and Structural Wars. Education and Urban Society, 35, 50-75. Doi: 10.1177/001312402237214

35.

Williams

Pazey

Shelby

Yates

(2013). The enemy among us. NASSP Bulletin, 97, 139-165.

36.

S. C.

Pink

W. T.

Crain

R. L.

Moles

(1982). Student suspension: A critical reappraisal. Urban Review, 14, 245-303.