Despite the successful implementation of the Response to Intervention (RtI) framework in many elementary schools, there is little evidence of successful implementation in high school settings. Several themes emerged from the interviews of nine secondary principals, including a lack of knowledge and training for successful implementation, the ability to identify specific interventions in each tier but recognized the lack of a tiered intervention process, and the identification of barriers one would expect if implementing RtI at the secondary level.
AngelleP. S. (2017). Beliefs and behaviors of two high school principals in developing a sense of school community for students. NASSP Bulletin, 101, 5-22.
2.
BarnesA. C.HarlacherJ. E. (2008). Clearing the confusion: Response to Intervention as a set of principles. Education & Treatment of Children, 31417-431.
3.
BeecherC. (2011). Response to intervention: A socio-cultural perspective of the problems and the possibilities. Journal of Education, 191(3), 1-8.
4.
BogdanR.BiklenS. (1982). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and practice. New York, NY: Allyn & Bacon.
5.
BuffumA.MattosM.WeberC. (2010). The why behind RTI. Educational Leadership, 68(2), 10-16.
6.
CanterA.KlotzM. B.CowanK. (2008). Response to Intervention: The future for secondary schools. Principal Leadership, 8(6), 12-15.
7.
CreswellJ. W. (2005). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
8.
DulaneyS. K. (2013). A middle school’s response-to-intervention journey: Building systematic processes of facilitation, collaboration, and implementation. NASSP Bulletin, 97, 53-77.
9.
FinnJ. E.KohlerP. D. (2010). Transition Outcomes Project: Perceptions of School Personnel Explored through a Multiple Case Study. Journal of Ethnographic & Qualitative Research, 4(2).
10.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.ComptonD. L. (2010). Rethinking response to intervention at middle and high school. School Psychology Review, 39, 22-28.
11.
HooverJ. J.LoveE. (2011). Supporting school-based response to intervention: A practitioner’s model. Teaching Exceptional Children, 43(3), 40-48.
12.
KingS. A.LemonsC. J.HillD. R. (2012). Response to intervention in secondary schools: Considerations for administrators. NASSP Bulletin, 96, 5-22.
13.
NeumannW. L. (2003). Social research methods (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
14.
ParkC.LeeH. (2010). What makes a case study really qualitative? Show me your evidence, please!English Teaching, 65(4), 79-101.
15.
PeckC.FurmanG. (1992). Qualitative research in special education: An evaluation review. In Gaylord-RossR. (Ed.), Issues and research in special education (pp. 1-42). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
16.
SaldañaJ. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17.
SleetD. A.BaldwinG. (2010). Lost in translation: Translating injury research into effective interventions. Journal of the Australasian College of Road Safety, 21(2), 9-12.
18.
SteckerP. M.FuchsD.FuchsL. S. (2008). Progress monitoring as essential practice within response to intervention. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 27(4), 10-17.
19.
TaylorM. J.HallamP. R.CharltonC. T.WallD. G. (2014). Formative Assessment of Collaborative Teams (FACT): Development of a grade-level instructional team checklist. NASSP Bulletin, 98, 26-52.
