This study seeks to identify principals’ leadership typologies and explore whether and to what extent these profiles were linked with teacher resilience and well-being. Employing a data set of 1,831 teachers in 120 elementary and lower secondary schools in Türkiye, we developed and tested a multilevel latent profile mediation model where leadership typologies were treated as independent variables, teacher resilience as mediator, and teacher well-being as outcome variables. The results revealed three distinct leadership profiles at the individual level (limiting, transitioning, and integrating) and two profiles at the school level (transitioned and integrated). We found that integrating teachers and integrated school profiles were associated with a higher level of teacher resilience and well-being. Additionally, our study revealed that both tiers of integrated leadership profiles exhibited an indirect association with teacher well-being, mediated by teacher resilience, particularly when compared to other profile groups. This study extends the global school leadership literature by suggesting that different leadership styles are related and that the link between school leadership and teacher outcomes is strengthened when multiple leadership types are integrated. We provide implications for policy and practice.
AhnJ.BowersA. J. (2024). Do teacher beliefs mediate leadership and teacher behaviors? Testing teacher self-efficacy’s mediation role between leadership for learning and teacher outcomes. Journal of Educational Administration, 62(2), 197–222. https://doi.org/10.1108/jea-12-2022-0227/full/html
2.
AhnJ.BowersA. J.WeltonA. D. (2024). Leadership for learning as an organization-wide practice: Evidence on its multilevel structure and implications for educational leadership practice and research. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 27(6), 1300–1351. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2021.1972162
3.
ArarK.ÖrücüD. (2024). Post-migration ecology in educational leadership and policy for social justice: Welcoming refugee students in two distinct national contexts. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 52(6), 1410–1433. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432221136404
4.
ArnoldK. A. (2017). Transformational leadership and employee psychological well-being: A review and directions for future research. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 381–393. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000062
5.
ArnoldK. A.ConnellyC. E.WalshM. M.Martin GinisK. A. (2015). Leadership styles, emotion regulation, and burnout. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 20(4), 481–490. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039045
6.
ArnoldK. A.TurnerN.BarlingJ.KellowayE. K.McKeeM. C. (2007). Transformational leadership and psychological well-being: The mediating role of meaningful work. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12(3), 193–203. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.12.3.193
7.
AsparouhovT.MuthénB. O. (2014). Auxiliary variables in mixture modeling: Three-step approaches using Mplus. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21(3), 329–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.915181
8.
BagdžiūnienėD.KazlauskienėA.NasvytienėD.SakadolskisE. (2022). Linking supportive school leadership and teacher resilience: The mediating role of job resources. Frontiers in Education, 7, 999086. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.999086
9.
BarbieriB.SulisI.PorcuM.TolandM. D. (2019). Italian teachers’ well-being within the high school context: Evidence from a large scale survey. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1926. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01926
10.
BassB. M. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational Dynamics, 18(3), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(90)90061-S
11.
BassB. M. (1999). Two decades of research and development in transformational leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8(1), 9–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/135943299398410
12.
BassB. M.AvolioB. J. (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Sage.
13.
BellibaşM. Ş.GümüşS.LiuY. (2021b). Does school leadership matter for teachers’ classroom practice? The influence of instructional leadership and distributed leadership on instructional quality. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 32(3), 387–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2020.1858119
14.
BellibaşM. Ş.KılınçA. Ç.PolatcanM. (2021a). The moderation role of transformational leadership in the effect of instructional leadership on teacher professional learning and instructional practice: An integrated leadership perspective. Educational Administration Quarterly, 57(5), 776–814. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X211035079
15.
BellibaşM. Ş.PolatcanM.AkyürekM. İ. (2024). Principal leadership typologies and their relationship with teacher self-efficacy and commitment: A latent profile mediation analysis. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 52(6), 1497–1518. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432221139932
16.
BerkovichI. (2016). School leaders and transformational leadership theory: Time to part ways?Journal of Educational Administration, 54(5), 609–622. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-11-2015-0100
17.
BerkovichI.BoglerR. (2021). Conceptualizing the mediating paths linking effective school leadership to teachers’ organizational commitment. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(3), 410–429. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220907321
18.
Biswas-DienerR.DeanB. (2007). Positive psychology coaching: Putting the science of happiness to work for your clients. John Wiley & Sons.
19.
BolckA.CroonM.HagenaarsJ. (2004). Estimating latent structure models with categorical variables: One-step versus three-step estimators. Political Analysis, 12, 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mph001
20.
BowersA. J. (2020). Examining a congruency-typology model of leadership for learning using two-level latent class analysis with TALIS 2018. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 219, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/c963073b-en
21.
BowersA. J.BlitzM.ModesteM.SalisburyJ.HalversonR. (2017). Is there a typology of teacher and leader responders to CALL, and do they cluster in different types of schools? A two-level latent class analysis of CALL survey data. Teachers College Record, 119(4), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811711900408
22.
BushT. (2013). Instructional leadership and leadership for learning: Global and South African perspectives. Education as Change, 17(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/16823206.2014.865986
23.
BushT. (2022). Challenges facing school principals: Problems and solutions. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 50(4), 533–535. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432221096238
ByrneB. M. (2016). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Routledge.
26.
CarlessS. A.WearingA. J.MannL. (2000). A short measure of transformational leadership. Journal of Business and Psychology, 14(3), 389–405. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022991115523
27.
ChenJ.Chi-Kin LeeJ. (2022). Teacher resilience matters: A buffering and boosting effect between job driving factors and their well-being and job performance. Teachers and Teaching, 28(7), 890–907. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2022.2116574
28.
ChristopherD.GuQ. (2009). Teacher emotions: Well being and effectiveness. In SchutzP. A.ZembylasM. (Eds.), Advances in teacher emotion research: The impact on teachers’ lives (pp. 15–31). Springer.
29.
CollieR. J.ShapkaJ. D.PerryN. E.MartinA. J. (2015). Teacher well-being: Exploring its components and a practice-oriented scale. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 33(8), 744–756. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282915587990
30.
ConnorK. M.DavidsonJ. R. T. (2003). Development of a new resilience scale: The Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale (CDRISC). Depress and Anxiety, 18, 76–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.10113
31.
DayC.GuQ.SammonsP. (2016). The impact of leadership on student outcomes. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(2), 221–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X15616863
32.
DayC.HarrisA.HadfieldM.TolleyH.BeresfordJ. (2000). Leading schools in times of change. Open University Press.
DjourovaN. P.Rodríguez MolinaI.Tordera SantamatildeN.AbateG. (2020). Self-efficacy and resilience: Mediating mechanisms in the relationship between the transformational leadership dimensions and well-being. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 27(3), 256–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/15480518198490
36.
DoanS.SteinerE. D.PandeyR.WooA. (2023). Teacher well-being and intentions to leave: Findings from the 2023 State of the American Teacher Survey. RAND Corporation.
37.
DyerN. G.HangesP. J.HallR. J. (2005). Applying multilevel confirmatory factor analysis techniques to the study of leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 16(1), 149–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.09.009
38.
ErdoğanO.SezginF. (2020). Ethical dilemmas that school administrators and teachers experience: Reasons and coping strategies. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 10(2), 593–634. https://doi.org/10.14527/pegegog.2020.020
Fernandez-BerrocalP.Gutierrez-CoboM. J.Rodriguez-CorralesJ.CabelloR. (2017). Teachers’ affective well-being and teaching experience: The protective role of perceived emotional intelligence. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02227
41.
FinneyS. J.DiStefanoC. (2013). Non-normal and categorical data in structural equation modeling. In HancockG. R.MuellerR. O. (Eds.), A second course in structural equation modeling (pp. 439–492). Information Age Publishing.
FornellC.LarckerD. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
44.
GeijselF.SleegersP.LeithwoodK.JantziD. (2003). Transformational leadership effects on teachers’ commitment and effort toward school reform. Journal of Educational Administration, 41(3), 228–256. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230310474403
45.
GeijselF. P.SleegersP. J.StoelR. D.KrügerM. L. (2009). The effect of teacher psychological and school organizational and leadership factors on teachers’ professional learning in Dutch schools. The Elementary School Journal, 109(4), 406–427. https://doi.org/10.1086/593940
HairJ. R.BlackJ. F.WiC.BabinB. J.AndersonR. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.
49.
HallJ.JohnsonS.WysockiA.KepnerK. (2002). Transformational leadership: The transformation of managers and associates. University of Florida IFAS Extension, 20, 1–3.
50.
HallingerP. (2018). Bringing context out of the shadows of leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143216670652
51.
HallingerP.HeckR. H. (1996). Reassessing the principal’s role in school effectiveness: A review of empirical research, 1980–1995. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32(1), 5–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X96032001002
52.
HambletonR. K.PatsulaL. (1998). Adapting tests for use in multiple languages and cultures. Social Indicators Research, 45, 153–171. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006941729637
53.
HarrisA. (2008). Distributed leadership: According to the evidence. Journal of Educational Administration, 46(2), 172–188. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230810863253
HascherT.WaberJ. (2021). Teacher well-being: A systematic review of the research literature from the year 2000-2019. Educational Research Review, 34, 100411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100411
HeckR. H.HallingerP. (2009). Assessing the contribution of distributed leadership to school improvement and growth in math achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 46(3), 659–689. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209340042
58.
HeckR. H.HallingerP. (2014). Modeling the longitudinal effects of school leadership on teaching and learning. Journal of Educational Administration, 52(5), 653–681. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-08-2013-0097
59.
HeckR. H.MarcoulidesG. A. (1996). The assessment of principal performance: A multilevel evaluation approach. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 10(1), 11–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00139466
60.
HenryK. L.MuthénB. (2010). Multilevel latent class analysis: An application of adolescent smoking typologies with individual and contextual predictors. Structural Equation Modeling, 17(2), 193–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511003659342
HoqueK. E.RayaZ. T. (2023). Relationship between principals’ leadership styles and teachers’ behavior. Behavioral Sciences, 13(2), 111. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13020111
63.
HsuH.-Y.KwokO.LinJ.-H.AcostaS. (2015). Detecting misspecified multilevel structural equation models with common fit indices: A Monte Carlo study. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50(4), 436–464. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2014.977429
64.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cut off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
65.
KellerM. M.ChangM.-L.BeckerE. S.GoetzT.FrenzelA. C. (2014). Teachers’ emotional experiences and exhaustion as predictors of emotional labor in the classroom: An experience sampling study. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1442. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01442
66.
KellowayE. K.TurnerN.BarlingJ.LoughlinC. (2012). Transformational leadership and employee psychological well-being: The mediating role of employee trust in leadership. Work & Stress, 26(1), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2012.660774
67.
KılınçA. Ç.ErE.BeycioğluK. (2021). Mapping the terrain of training and appointment of educational leaders in the turkish context: An historical perspec tive. In SamierE.ElKalehE.HammadW. (Eds.), Internationalisation of educational administration and leadership curriculum (pp. 139–157). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83909-864-220211009
68.
LeeE. S.ForthoferR. N. (2006). Analyzing complex survey data (2nd ed.). Sage.
LeithwoodK.HarrisA.HopkinsD. (2008). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. School Leadership and Management, 28(1), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632430701800060
71.
LeithwoodK.JantziD. (1990). Transformational leadership: How principals can help reform school cultures. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 1(4), 249–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/0924345900010402
72.
LeithwoodK.JantziD. (2000). The effects of transformational leadership on organizational conditions and student engagement with school. Journal of Educational Administration, 38(2), 112–129. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230010320064
73.
LeithwoodK.JantziD. (2005). A review of transformational school leadership research 1996–2005. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4(3), 177–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700760500244769
74.
LeithwoodK.Seashore-LouisK.AndersonS.WahlstromK. (2004). How leadership influences student learning: A review of research for the learning from leadership project. Wallace Foundation.
75.
LeithwoodK. A. (1993, October). Contributions of transformational leadership to school restructuring. Paper presented at the Convention of the University Council for Educational Administration, Houston, TX.
76.
LeithwoodK. A.JantziD. (2006). Transformational school leadership for large-scale reform: Effects on students, teachers, and their classroom practices. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(2), 201–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243450600565829
77.
LeithwoodK. D.JantziD.SteinbachR. (1999). Changing leadership for changing times. Open University Press.
78.
LimonİDilekçiÜDemirerS. (2021). The mediating role of initiative climate on the relationship between distributed leadership and organizational resilience in schools. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 8(1), 128–144. https://doi.org/10.33200/ijcer.829411
79.
LindellM. K.WhitneyD. J. (2001). Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 114–121. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.114
80.
LiuJ.SiuO. L.ShiK. (2010). Transformational leadership and employee well-being: The mediating role of trust in the leader and self-efficacy. Applied Psychology, 59(3), 454–479. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2009.00407.x
81.
LiuL.LiuP.YangH.YaoH.ThienL. M. (2024). The relationship between distributed leadership and teacher well-being: The mediating roles of organisational trust. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 52(4), 837–853. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432221113683
82.
LiuP.ChenX. F.ChengY. X.XiaoS. S. (2023). Understanding the relationship between teacher leadership and teacher well-being: The mediating roles of trust in leaders and teacher efficacy. Journal of Educational Administration, 61(6), 646–661. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-09-2022-0152
83.
LiuS.HallingerP. (2018). Principal instructional leadership, teacher self-efficacy, and teacher professional learning in China: Testing a mediated-effects model. Educational Administration Quarterly, 54(4), 501–528. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X18769048
84.
LiuY. (2021). Distributed leadership practices and student science performance through the four-path model: Examining failure in underprivileged schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 59(4), 472–492. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-07-2020-0159
85.
LiuY.ZhaoL.SuY. S. (2022). The impact of teacher competence in online teaching on perceived online learning outcomes during the COVID-19 outbreak: A moderated-mediation model of teacher resilience and age. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(10), 6282. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19106282
86.
LumbyJ. (2013). Distributed leadership: The uses and abuses of power. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 41(5), 581–597. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143213489288
87.
LyubykhZ.GulserenD.TurnerN.BarlingJ.SeifertM. (2022). Shared transformational leadership and safety behaviours of employees, leaders, and teams: A multilevel investigation. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 95(2), 431–458. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12381
88.
MaddiS. R.KhoshabaD. M. (2005). Resilience at work: How to succeed no matter what life throws at you. AMACOM Books.
89.
MalloyJ.LeithwoodK. (2017). Effects of distributed leadership on school academic press and student achievement. In LeithwoodK.SunJ.PollockK. (Eds.), How school leaders contribute to student success (pp. 69–91). Springer.
90.
MarksH. M.PrintyS. M. (2003). Principal leadership and school performance: An integration of transformational and instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(3), 370–397. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X03253412
91.
MastenA. S.ReedM. G. J. (2002). Resilience in development. In SnyderC. R.LopezS. J. (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 74–88). Oxford University Press.
92.
MayrowetzD. (2008). Making sense of distributed leadership: Exploring the multiple usages of the concept in the field. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(3), 424–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X07309480
93.
McLarnonM. J. W.O’NeillT. A. (2018). Extensions of auxiliary variable approaches for the investigation of mediation, moderation, and conditional effects in mixture models. Organizational Research Methods, 21(4), 955–982. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428118770731
94.
Ministry of Education [MoNE]. (2020). Kapsayıcı eğitim bağlamında okul yöneticilerinin mesleki gelişimi programı: Öğretimsel liderlik [A professional development program for school administrators in the context of inclusive education: Instructional leadership]. Ministry of Education General Directorate of Teacher Training and Development Publications.
ModesteM. E.KelleyC. J. (2020). Examining distributed leadership practices by school grade configuration. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 19(2), 209–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2018.1514057
99.
MoolenaarN. M.DalyA. J.SleegersP. J. (2010). Occupying the principal position: Examining relationships between transformational leadership, social network position, and schools’ innovative climate. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(5), 623–670. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X1037868
100.
MullenC. A.ShieldsL. B.TienkenC. H. (2021). Developing teacher resilience and resilient school cultures. Journal of Scholarship and Practice, 18(1), 8–24.
101.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998–2017). Mplus user’s guide: Statistical analysis with latent variables, user’s guide. Muthén & Muthén.
102.
NylundK.AsparouhovT.MuthénB. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(4), 535–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701575396
103.
ÖzerN.BeycioğluK. (2013). The development, validity and reliability study of distributed leadership scale. Elementary Education Online, 12(1), 77–86.
104.
PietschM.TulowitzkiP. (2017). Disentangling school leadership and its ties to instructional practices–an empirical comparison of various leadership styles. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 28(4), 629–649. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2017.1363787
105.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.LeeJ. Y.PodsakoffN. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
106.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
107.
PrintyS.LiuY. (2021). Distributed leadership globally: The interactive nature of principal and teacher leadership in 32 countries. Educational Administration Quarterly, 57(2), 290–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X20926548
108.
RobinsonV. M.LloydC. A.RoweK. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635–674. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X08321509
109.
RossS. W.RomerN.HornerR. H. (2012). Teacher well-being and the implementation of school-wide positive behavior interventions and supports. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 14(2), 118–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300711413820
110.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaemonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 141–166. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141
111.
SezginF.KılınçAÇÖzdemirS.ÖzdemirN.ErdoğanO. (2024). Exploring the moderation role of teacher cultural value profiles on the association between transformational leadership and teacher job satisfaction: Evidence from Turkish education context. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143224123737
112.
ShroutP. E.FleissJ. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 420–428. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420
113.
SoncinM.BowersA. J.AgasistiT. (2024). A global perspective on school leadership: Evidence from a latent class analysis on OECD TALIS data. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 53(6), 1577–1602. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432241231902
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (7th ed.). Pearson.
119.
TriguerosR.PadillaA.Aguilar-ParraJ. M.MercaderI.López-LiriaR.RocamoraP. (2020). The influence of transformational teacher leadership on academic motivation and resilience, burnout and academic performance. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(20), 7687. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17207687
120.
TrudelE. L.SokalL.BabbJ. (2022). Transformational leadership approaches and their influence on teacher resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Organizational Psychology, 22(1), 60–72. https://doi.org/10.33423/jop.v22i1.5019
UrickA. (2016). The influence of typologies of school leaders on teacher retention: A multilevel latent class analysis. Journal of Educational Administration, 54(4), 434–468. https://doi.org/10.1108/jea-08-2014-0090/full/html
123.
UrickA.BowersA. J. (2014). What are the different types of principals across the United States? A latent class analysis of principal perception of leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 50(1), 96–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X13489019
124.
Van KnippenbergD.SitkinS. B. (2013). A critical assessment of charismatic—transformational leadership research: Back to the drawing board?Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 1–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2013.759433
125.
VeleticJ.OlsenR. V. (2024). Exploring school leadership profiles across the world: A cluster analysis approach to TALIS 2018. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 27(5), 1090–1116. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2021.1953612
126.
WangY.AhnJ. (2025). The more the merrier? A network analysis of construct content validity in school leadership literature. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 53(1), 214–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432231155730
127.
YuanK. H.BentlerP. M. (2000). Three likelihood-based methods for mean and covariance structure analysis with non-normal missing data. Sociological Methodology, 30(1), 165–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/0081-1750.00078
128.
YuklG. (2011). Contingency theories of effective leadership. In BrymanA.GrintK.CollinsonD. L. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of leadership (pp. 286–298). Sage.
129.
ZhangY. (2024). The mediation role of teacher recognition between transformational leadership and teacher professionalism: A multilevel mediation analysis. Educational Administration Quarterly, 60(4), 383–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X241263845
130.
ZhangY.LiuS.AramburoC. A.JiangJ. (2023). Leading by serving: How can servant leadership influence teacher emotional well-being?Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 53(3), 602–624. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432231182250
131.
ZhengX.ZhuW.ZhaoH.ZhangC. (2015). Employee well-being in organizations: Theoretical model, scale development, and cross-cultural validation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(5), 621–644. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1990
132.
ZydziunaiteV.KontrimieneS.PonomarenkoT.KaminskieneL. (2020). Challenges in teacher leadership: Workload, time allocation, and self-esteem. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 9(4), 948–962. https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2020.4.948
