Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The roles of the school principal continue to evolve due to shifting demands as well as ever-changing organizational needs. As new leadership skill sets emerge, we might expect school systems to respond by actively seeking different credentials, experiences, and dispositions of their principal candidates. This study of 279 principal job advertisements from 7 states showed little reconceptualization of building-level leaders’ roles and responsibilities. The number of job advertisements that merely noted traditional, management-oriented responsibilities dwarfed those position announcements that mentioned more future-oriented job roles. Potential implications of the ubiquitous similarity of principal job advertisements include failure to adequately match candidates with organizational needs and an inability to sufficiently adapt to changing societal contexts.

Keywords

leadership hiring principals career

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bolman

L. G.

Deal

T. E.

(2013). Reframing organization: Artistry, choice, and leadership (5th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Catano

Stronge

J. H.

(2007). What do we expect of school principals? Congruence between principal evaluation and performance standards. International Journal of Leadership in Education: Theory and Practice, 10, 379-399.

Christensen

C. M.

Horn

M. B.

Johnson

C. W.

(2011). Disrupting class: How disruptive innovation will change the way the world learns. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Consortium for School Networking. (2004). Essential skills of the K-12 CTO. Learning and Leading With Technology, 32(4), 40-45.

Creighton

(2003). The principal as technology leader. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Davis

M. R.

(2009). The challenges of managing e-ed: It takes more than computers to make e-learning work. Education Week Digital Directions. Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org/dd/articles/2009/10/21/01e-learning.h03.html

Day

Sammons

Hopkins

Leithwood

Kington

(2008). Research into the impact of school leadership on pupil outcomes: Policy and research contexts. School Leadership and Management, 28(1), 5-25.

DeArmond

Denice

Campbell

(2014). Missing out on strong school leaders? A survey of principal hiring and support in Washington State. Seattle, WA: Center on Reinventing Public Education.

DiPaola

Tschannen-Moran

(2003). The principalship at a crossroads: A study of the conditions and concerns of principals. NASSP Bulletin, 87(634), 43-65.

10.

EducationPlus. (2015). Regional education applicant placement. St. Louis, MO: Author. Retrieved from www.usreap.net

11.

Gajda

Militello

(2008). Recruiting and retraining school principals: What we can learn from practicing administrators. AASA Journal of Scholarship and Practice, 5(1), 14-20.

12.

Goertz

Duffy

(2003). Mapping the landscape of high-stakes testing and accountability programs. Theory into Practice, 42(1), 4-11.

13.

Great Schools. (2013). What makes a great principal? Retrieved from http://www.greatschools.org/gk/articles/what-makes-a-great-principal-an-audio-slide-show/

14.

Gumus

(2013). The effects of teacher- and school-level factors on teachers’ participation in professional development activities: The role of principal leadership. Journal of International Education Research, 9, 371-380.

15.

Guskey

T. R.

(2008). Practical solutions for serious problems in standards-based grading. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

16.

Guthrie

J. W.

Schuermann

P. J.

(2010). Successful school leadership: Planning, politics, performance, and power. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

17.

Hallinger

(2011), Leadership for learning: Lessons from 40 years of empirical research. Journal of Educational Administration, 49, 125-142.

18.

Hargreaves

Moore

Fink

Brayman

White

(2003). Succeeding leaders? A study of principal rotation and succession. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Ontario Principals’ Council.

19.

Harper

(2012). The collection and analysis of job advertisements: A review of research methodology. Library and Information Research, 36(112), 29-54.

20.

Hess

F. M.

Kelly

A. P.

(2005, May). The accidental principal: What doesn’t get taught in schools? Education Next, 35, 34-40. Retrieved from http://www.educationnext.org/20053/pdf/34.pdf

21.

Hine

(2013). Are American schools facing a shortage of qualified administrators? Catholic Education: A Journal of Inquiry and Practice, 7, 266-277.

22.

Hoyle

Wallace

(2005). Educational leadership: Ambiguity, professionals and managerialism. Thousand Oak, CA: Sage.

23.

Hunter

R. C.

(2006). Superintendent leadership for technology integration in public education. In S. Tettegah Hunter

R. C.

(Eds.), Technology and education: Issues in administration, policy, and application in K12 schools (pp. 287-300). Boston, MA: Elsevier.

24.

Johansen

(2012). Leaders make the future: Ten new leadership skills for an uncertain world. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.

25.

Keddie

(2015). Student voice and teacher accountability: Possibilities and problematics. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 23, 225-244.

26.

Kurland

Peretz

Hertz-Lazarowitz

(2010). Leadership style and organizational learning: The mediate effect of school vision. Journal of Educational Administration, 48(1), 7-30. doi:10.1108/09578231011015395

27.

Leithwood

Aitken

Jantzi

(2006). Making schools smarter: Leading with evidence. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

28.

Leithwood

Harris

Hopkins

(2008). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. School Leadership and Management, 28(1), 27-42.

29.

Leithwood

Louis

K. S.

Wahlstrom

Anderson

Mascall

Gordon

(2009). How successful leadership influences student learning: The second installment of a longer story. In Hargreaves

Lieberman

Fullan

Hokins

(Eds.), Second international handbook of educational change (pp. 611-629). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.

30.

Leithwood

K. A.

Louis

Anderson

Wahlstrom

(2004). How leadership influences student learning. New York, NY: Wallace Foundation.

31.

Leithwood

K. A.

Riehl

(2003). What we know about successful school leadership. Philadelphia, PA: Laboratory for Student Success.

32.

Leonard

L. J.

Leonard

P. E.

(2006). Leadership for technology integration: Computing the reality. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 52, 212-224.

33.

Lincoln

Y. S.

Guba

E. G.

(1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

34.

Manley

R. J.

Hawkins

R. J.

(2013). Making the common core standards work: Using professional development to build world-class schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

35.

Marks

H. M.

Printy

S. M.

(2003). Principal leadership and school performance: An integration of transformational and instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39, 370-397.

36.

Martin

W. J.

Willower

D. J.

(1981). The managerial behavior of high school principals. Educational Administration Quarterly, 17, 69-90.

37.

Marzano

R. J.

Waters

McNulty

(2005). School leadership that works: From research to results. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

38.

McLeod

Bathon

Richardson

J. W.

(2011). Studies of technology usage are not enough: A response to the articles in this special issue. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 6, 288-297.

39.

McLeod

Richardson

J. W.

(2011). The dearth of technology leadership coverage. Journal of School Leadership, 21, 216-240.

40.

McLester

(2011, May). Turnaround principals: New training models have emerged for preparing school leaders to transform low-achieving schools. Retrieved from http://www.districtadministration.com/article/turnaround-principals

41.

Morris

V. C.

Crowson

R. L.

Hurwitz

Jr. Porter-Gehrie

(1982). The urban principal: Middle manager in the educational bureaucracy. Phi Delta Kappan, 63, 689-692.

42.

Murphy

Torre

(2014). Vision: Essential scaffolding. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. Retrieved from http://ema.sagepub.com/content/early/2014/11/03/1741143214523017.full

43.

National Association of Elementary School Principals, & National Association of Secondary School Principals (1998). Is there a shortage of qualified candidates for openings in the principalship? An exploratory study. Arlington, VA: Authors.

44.

Patton

M. Q.

(1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

45.

Pijanowski

J. C.

Hewitt

P. M.

Brady

K. P.

(2009). Superintendents’ perceptions of the principal shortage. NASSP Bulletin, 93(2), 85-95.

46.

Prensky

(2005). Listen to the natives. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 63(4), 8-13.

47.

Prensky

(2008). Turning on the lights. Educational Leadership, 65(6), 40-45.

48.

Ribble

(2015). Digital citizenship in schools: Nine elements all students should know. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education.

49.

Richardson

J. W.

Flora

Bathon

(2013). Fostering a technology vision for school leaders. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 8, 144-161.

50.

Richardson

J. W.

Hollis

(2015). An analysis of the educational leadership faculty job market. UCEA Review, 56(3), 10-14.

51.

Richardson

J. W.

LaFrance

Beck

(2015). Challenges of virtual school leadership. American Journal of Distance Education, 29, 18-29.

52.

Richardson

J. W.

McLeod

(2011). Technology leadership in Native American schools. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 26(7), 1-14.

53.

Rieckhoff

B. S.

Larsen

(2012). The impact of a professional development network on leadership development and school improvement goals. School-University Partnerships, 5(1), 57-73.

54.

Riehl

C. J.

(2000). The principal’s role in creating inclusive schools for diverse students: A review of normative, empirical, and critical literature on the practice of educational administration. Review of Educational Research, 70(1), 55-81.

55.

Roza

Celio

M. B.

Harvey

Wishon

(2003). A matter of definition: Is there truly a shortage of school principals? Washington, DC: Wallace Foundation.

56.

Sauers

N. J.

Richardson

J. W.

McLeod

(2014). Technology-savvy school superintendents: Success and challenges. Journal of School Leadership, 24, 1177-1201.

57.

School Leaders Network. (2014). Churn: The high cost of principal turnover. Retrieved from http://connectleadsucceed.org/sites/default/files/principal_turnover_cost.pdf

58.

Scriffiny

P. L.

(2008). Seven reasons for standards-based grading. Educational Leadership, 66(2), 70-74.

59.

Spillane

J. P.

Kenney

A. W.

(2012). School administration in a changing education sector: The US experience. Journal of Educational Administration, 50, 541-561. doi:10.1108/09578231211249817

60.

Spillane

J. P.

Louis

K. S.

(2002). School improvement processes and practices: Professional learning for building instructional capacity. Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 101(1), 83-104.

61.

Strauss

A. L.

Corbin

J. M.

(1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

62.

Trimble

(2001). The teacher applicant pool: What top administrators seek. Principal Leadership, 1(7), 44-47.

63.

Tschannen-Moran

Gareis

C. R.

(2015). Faculty trust in principals: An essential ingredient in high-performing schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 53(1), 66-92.

64.

Urick

(2016). Examining U.S. principal perceptions of multiple leadership styles used to practice shared instructional leadership. Journal of Educational Administration, 54, 152-172.

65.

U.S. Department of Education. (2009). Applications now available for $3.5 billion in Title 1 School Improvement Grant to turn around nation’s lowest achieving public schools. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/news/pressreleases/2009/12/12032009a.html

66.

The Wallace Foundation. (2016). Improving university principal preparation programs: Five themes from the field. New York, NY: Author.

67.

Whitaker

(2001). Where are the principal candidates? Perceptions of superintendents. NASSP Bulletin, 85(625), 82-92.

68.

Witt

Orvis

(2010). A guide to becoming a school of the future. Retrieved from http://www.nais.org/files/PDFs/NAISCOASchools.pdf

69.

Ylimaki

R. M.

(2006). Toward a new conceptualization of vision in the work of educational leaders: Case of visionary archetype. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42, 620-651.

Are Changing School Needs Reflected in Principal Job Ads?

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References