This research study analyzes preferred leadership dispositions for teachers, parents, and school leaders. Respondents selected their most preferred dispositions from a list of 20 (Interstate School Leaders Licensure Consortium) leadership standards. Similarities and differences were discerned among the constituent groups. School leaders, teachers, and parents were strongly correlated in their aggregate ranked preferences yet data evidenced unique differences expressed by each group. As a result of the findings, there are inferences suggested for school leaders to consider in their leadership role.
CarterS. (2014). No excuses: Lessons from 21 high achieving high poverty schools for children not to learn. Washington, DC: Heritage Press.
3.
ConnellyG. (Ed.). (2008). Leadership matters: What the research says about the impact of principal leadership (National Association of Elementary School Principals Report). Reston, VA: National Association of Elementary School Principals.
CunninghamS.KreiderH. (2012). Influence of a parent leadership program on participants’ actions. School Community Journal, 22(1), 111-124.
6.
CunninghamW.CordeiroP. (2009). Educational leadership: A bridge to improved practice (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
7.
DanielsonC. (2006). Teacher leadership that strengthens professional practice. Alexandria, VA: ASCD Press.
8.
Darling-HammondL. (1999). Reforming teacher preparation and licensing, debating the evidence. Teachers College Record, 102, 28-56.
9.
DenzinN.LincolnY. (2012). Discipline and practice of qualitative research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.
EakerR.DuFourR. (2005). Creating professional learning communities. Alexandria, VA: ASCD Press.
11.
EdgersonD.KritsonisW. (2006). The role of the teacher-principal relationship in the improvement of student improvement in public schools of the United States. Lamar University Electronic Journal of Student Reserves. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED491985.pdf
12.
Enderline-LampeS. (2002). Empowerment: Teacher perceptions, aspirations and efficacy. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 29, 139-146.
13.
EvansR. (2007). Leadership in research-real world issues. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
14.
FullanM. (2002). The change leader. Educational Leadership, 59(8), 16-21.
15.
FullanM. (2006). Turnaround leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
16.
GreenR.CooperT. (2013). An identification of the most preferred dispositions of effective school leaders. National Forum of Applied Educational Research Journal, 26, 55-76.
17.
HallingerP.HeckR. (2002). Leadership for the 21st century: From instructional leadership to leadership for learning. Hong Kong SAR: Hong Kong Institute for Education Press.
18.
HamedogluM.KantorJ.GülayE. (2012). The effects of locus of control on leadership preferences. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 4, 319-324.
19.
HessM.KellyA. (2007). Learning to lead: What gets taught in principal preparation programs. Teachers College Record, 109, 244-274.
JansenH. (2010). The logic of qualitative survey research and the position in the field of social research. Journal of Qualitative Research, 11(2), article 11.
24.
LeithwoodK. (2003). What we know about successful school leaders (AERA Report). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: National College for School Leadership Press.
25.
LindhalR. (2010). Educational planning: Implications of the 2008 ISLLC revised standards. Planning and Changing Journal, 31, 61-88.
26.
LipmanP. (2004). High stakes education: Inequality, globalization and school reform. New York, NY: Routledge Press.
MarzanoR.McNultyB. (2005). School leadership that works: From research to results. Alexandria, VA: ASCD Press.
29.
MeltonT.MalloryB.GreenR. (2010). Identifying and assessing dispositions of school leader candidates. CAPEA Educational Leadership and Administration Journal, 22, 46-60.
30.
MeltonT.TysingerD.MalloryB.GreenJ. (2011). A validation study of the “School Leadership Dispositions Inventory”. AASA, Journal of Scholarship and Practice, 8(2), 38-50.
MurphyJ. (2003). Reculturing the profession of educational leadership: New blueprints. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38, 176-191.
33.
OrrM.KingC. (2010). Districts developing leaders: Lesson on consumer action and program approved for urban school districts. Washington, DC: Wallace Foundation.
SandersN. M. (Eds.). (2008). Performance expectations and indicators for educational leaders: An ISLLC-Based guide to implementing leader standards and a companion guide to the educational leadership policy standards. Retrieved from http://www.ccsso.org/Documents/2008/Peformance_Indicators_2008.pdf
37.
SchulteL. E.KowalP. (2005). The validation of the Administrator Disposition Index. Educational Leadership & Administration, 17, 75-87.
38.
SergiovanniT. (2012). Rethinking educational leadership, a collection of articles on leading schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
39.
SpillaneJ.ReiserB.ReimerT. (2002, Fall). Policy implementation and cognition: Reframing and refocusing implementation research. Review of Educational Research, 72, 387-431.
