Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This research study analyzes preferred leadership dispositions for teachers, parents, and school leaders. Respondents selected their most preferred dispositions from a list of 20 (Interstate School Leaders Licensure Consortium) leadership standards. Similarities and differences were discerned among the constituent groups. School leaders, teachers, and parents were strongly correlated in their aggregate ranked preferences yet data evidenced unique differences expressed by each group. As a result of the findings, there are inferences suggested for school leaders to consider in their leadership role.

Keywords

educational leadership administrative dispositions characteristics of leadership

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Carole

Young

(2013, June). Standards for Educational Leadership: An analysis (CCSSO Report). Retrieved from http://www.ccsso.org/documents/analysis%20of%20leadership%20standards-Final-070913-RGB.pdf

Carter

(2014). No excuses: Lessons from 21 high achieving high poverty schools for children not to learn. Washington, DC: Heritage Press.

Connelly

(Ed.). (2008). Leadership matters: What the research says about the impact of principal leadership (National Association of Elementary School Principals Report). Reston, VA: National Association of Elementary School Principals.

Council of Chief State School Officers. (2013). Our responsibility, our promise (Report). Retrieved from http://www.ccsso.org/Documents/2012/Our%20Responsibility%20Our%20Promise_2012.pdf

Cunningham

Kreider

(2012). Influence of a parent leadership program on participants’ actions. School Community Journal, 22(1), 111-124.

Cunningham

Cordeiro

(2009). Educational leadership: A bridge to improved practice (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Danielson

(2006). Teacher leadership that strengthens professional practice. Alexandria, VA: ASCD Press.

Darling-Hammond

(1999). Reforming teacher preparation and licensing, debating the evidence. Teachers College Record, 102, 28-56.

Denzin

Lincoln

(2012). Discipline and practice of qualitative research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

10.

Eaker

DuFour

(2005). Creating professional learning communities. Alexandria, VA: ASCD Press.

11.

Edgerson

Kritsonis

(2006). The role of the teacher-principal relationship in the improvement of student improvement in public schools of the United States. Lamar University Electronic Journal of Student Reserves. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED491985.pdf

12.

Enderline-Lampe

(2002). Empowerment: Teacher perceptions, aspirations and efficacy. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 29, 139-146.

13.

Evans

(2007). Leadership in research-real world issues. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

14.

Fullan

(2002). The change leader. Educational Leadership, 59(8), 16-21.

15.

Fullan

(2006). Turnaround leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

16.

Green

Cooper

(2013). An identification of the most preferred dispositions of effective school leaders. National Forum of Applied Educational Research Journal, 26, 55-76.

17.

Hallinger

Heck

(2002). Leadership for the 21st century: From instructional leadership to leadership for learning. Hong Kong SAR: Hong Kong Institute for Education Press.

18.

Hamedoglu

Kantor

Gülay

(2012). The effects of locus of control on leadership preferences. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 4, 319-324.

19.

Hess

Kelly

(2007). Learning to lead: What gets taught in principal preparation programs. Teachers College Record, 109, 244-274.

20.

Honig

(2010, April). Central Office transformation for district-wide teaching and learning improvement. Retrieved from http://depts.washington.edu/ctpmail/PDFs/S2-CentralAdmin-04-2010.pdf

21.

Interstate School Leaders Licensure Consortium. (2008). Standards. Retrieved from http://coe.fgcu.edu/faculty/valesky/isllcstandards.htm

22.

Interstate School Leader Licensure Consortium. (2014). Re-drafted ISLLC Standards (Report). Retrieved from http://www.ccsso.org/Resources/Programs/Developing_and_Supporting_School-Ready_Leaders.html

23.

Jansen

(2010). The logic of qualitative survey research and the position in the field of social research. Journal of Qualitative Research, 11(2), article 11.

24.

Leithwood

(2003). What we know about successful school leaders (AERA Report). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: National College for School Leadership Press.

25.

Lindhal

(2010). Educational planning: Implications of the 2008 ISLLC revised standards. Planning and Changing Journal, 31, 61-88.

26.

Lipman

(2004). High stakes education: Inequality, globalization and school reform. New York, NY: Routledge Press.

27.

Martin

(2008). The relationship between the leadership style of principal and school culture (Doctoral dissertation). Statesboro, GA. Retrieved fromhttp://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1269&context=etd

28.

Marzano

McNulty

(2005). School leadership that works: From research to results. Alexandria, VA: ASCD Press.

29.

Melton

Mallory

Green

(2010). Identifying and assessing dispositions of school leader candidates. CAPEA Educational Leadership and Administration Journal, 22, 46-60.

30.

Melton

Tysinger

Mallory

Green

(2011). A validation study of the “School Leadership Dispositions Inventory”. AASA, Journal of Scholarship and Practice, 8(2), 38-50.

31.

Morrison

(2009). A case study on dispositions that support the identity of successful school leaders (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://libres.uncg.edu/ir/uncg/f/Morrison_uncg_0154D_10115.pdf

32.

Murphy

(2003). Reculturing the profession of educational leadership: New blueprints. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38, 176-191.

33.

Orr

King

(2010). Districts developing leaders: Lesson on consumer action and program approved for urban school districts. Washington, DC: Wallace Foundation.

34.

Perkins-Gough

(2008). School climate: Urban parents’ view [Special Report]. Positive Classroom Journal, 66(1), 89-91.

35.

Ritchhart

(2002). Of dispositions, attitudes and habits: Exploring how emotions shape our thinking. Retrieved from https://www.pakeys.org/private/net/docs/24/Emotions.Dispositions.Webinar.2.pdf

36.

Sanders

N. M.

(Eds.). (2008). Performance expectations and indicators for educational leaders: An ISLLC-Based guide to implementing leader standards and a companion guide to the educational leadership policy standards. Retrieved from http://www.ccsso.org/Documents/2008/Peformance_Indicators_2008.pdf

37.

Schulte

L. E.

Kowal

(2005). The validation of the Administrator Disposition Index. Educational Leadership & Administration, 17, 75-87.

38.

Sergiovanni

(2012). Rethinking educational leadership, a collection of articles on leading schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

39.

Spillane

Reiser

Reimer

(2002, Fall). Policy implementation and cognition: Reframing and refocusing implementation research. Review of Educational Research, 72, 387-431.

40.

Superville

(2014). What are the 2014 ISLLC all about? The 2014 First Draft of ISLLC Standards sent out for public review. Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2014/07/09/36leaders.h33.html?qs=ISLLC+standards+Superville

41.

Wallace Foundation. (2013). Successful schools and district leadership: How leadership influences student learning. Retrieved from http://www.wallacefoundation.org/pages/successful-school-and-district-leadership-how-leadership-influences-student-learning.aspx

42.

Wasicsko

(2002). Assessing educator dispositions: a perceptual psychological Approach. Retrieved from http://www.education.eku.edu-Dean-DispositionsManual.pdf

43.

Wilson

(2012, August 8). Principal preparation programs for urban school leaders (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://www.sandi.net/cms/lib/CA01001235/Centricity/Domain/121/R_R/DistResearch/ResultReports/1026_Wilson_S_SanDiegoStateU_2012.pdf

A Comparison of Preferred Urban Administrative Dispositions Between Constituency Groups

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References