In response to legislative mandates that schools use evidence-based instructional practices, the National Secondary Transition Technical Assistance Center has identified evidence-based practices and predictors in the area of secondary transition for high school students with disabilities. This article provides an overview of practices and predictors, as well as providing examples of how school administrators can use the practices and predictors to help guide staff development and school policy.
AgranM.BlanchardC.WehmeyerM. L. (2000). Promoting transition goals and self-determination through student self-directed learning: The Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 35, 351-364.
2.
BaerR. M.FlexerR. W.BeckS.AmstutzN.HoffmanL.BrothersJ.. . . ZechmanC. (2003). A collaborative followup study on transition service utilization and post-school outcomes. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 26, 7-25.
3.
BatesP. E.CuvoT.MinerC. A.KorabekC. A. (2001). A simulated and community-based instruction involving persons with mild and moderate mental retardation. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 22, 95-115.
4.
BenzM. R.YovanoffP.DorenB. (1997). School-to-work components that predict postschool success for students with and without disabilities. Exceptional Children, 63, 151-165.
BlackorbyJ.HancockG. R.SiegelS. (1993). Human capital and structural explanations of post-school success for youth with disabilities: A latent variable exploration of the National Longitudinal Transition Study. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
7.
BlalockG.Kochhar-BryantC.TestD. W.KohlerP.WhiteW.LehmannJ.. . . PattonJ. (2003). The need for comprehensive personnel preparation in transition and career development: DCDT position statement. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 26, 207-226.
8.
BrownL.NisbetJ.FordA.SweetM.ShiragaB.YorkJ.LoomisR. (1983). The critical need for nonschool instruction in educational programs for severely handicapped students. Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 8, 71-77.
9.
BullisM.DavisC.BullB.JohnsonB. (1995). Transition achievement among young adults with deafness: What variables relate to success?Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 39, 130-150.
10.
Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2014a). Employment status of the civilian population by sex, age, and disability status, not seasonally adjusted. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t06.htm
BurnsM. K.YsseldykeJ. E. (2009). Reported prevalence of evidence-based instructional practices in special education. Journal of Special Education, 43, 3-11.
CarterE. W.AustinD.TrainorA. A. (2012). Predictors of post-school employment outcomes for young adults with severe disabilities. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 23, 50-63.
15.
ChiangH. M.CheungY. K.HicksonL.XiangR.TsaiL. Y. (2012). Predictive factors of participation in postsecondary education for high school leavers with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42, 685-696.
16.
CookB. G.CookS. G. (2013). Unraveling evidence-based practices in special education. Journal of Special Education, 47, 71-82. doi.10.1177/0022466911420877
17.
CookB. G.OdomS. L. (2013). Evidence-based practices and implementation science in special education. Exceptional Children, 79, 135-144.
18.
CookB. G.TankersleyM.LandrumT. J. (2009). Determining evidence-based practices in special education. Exceptional Children, 75, 365-383.
19.
CooperJ. O.HeronT. E.HewardW. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
20.
DennyP. J.TestD. W. (1995). Using the one-more-than technique to teach money counting to individuals with moderate mental retardation: A systematic replication. Education and Treatment of Children, 18, 422-432.
21.
DorenB.BenzM. R. (1998). Employment inequality revisited: Predictors of better employment outcomes for young women with disabilities in transition. Journal of Special Education, 31, 425-442.
22.
DorenB.GauJ. M.LindstromL. E. (2012). The relationship between parent expectations and post-school outcomes of adolescents with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 79, 7-23.
23.
DuganJ. J.CobbR. B.AlwellM. (2007). The effects of technology-based interventions on academic outcomes for youth with disabilities. Fort Collins: School of Education, Colorado State University.
24.
Faggella-LubyM.WardwellM. (2011). RTI in a middle school: Findings and practical implications of a Tier 2 reading comprehension study. Learning Disability Quarterly, 34, 35-49.
25.
FieldS.MartinJ.MillerR.WardM.WehmeyerM. (1998). A practical guide to teaching self-determination. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
26.
FourqureanJ. M.MeisgeierC.SwankP. R.WilliamsR. E. (1991). Correlates of postsecondary employment outcomes for young adults with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 400-405.
27.
GerstenR.FuchsL. S.ComptonD.CoyneM.GreenwoodC.InnocentiM. S. (2005). Quality indicators for group experimental and quasi-experimental research in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 149-164.
28.
GreenwoodC. R.AbbottM. (2001). The research to practice gap in special education. Teacher Education and Special Education, 24, 276-289.
29.
HaleE.RollinsK. (2006). Leading the way to increased student learning. Principal Leadership, 6, 6-10.
30.
HalpernA. S.YovanoffP.DorenB.BenzM. R. (1995) Predicting participation in postsecondary education for school leavers with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 62, 151-164.
31.
HarnB.ParisiD.StoolmillerM. (2013). Balancing fidelity with flexibility and fit: What do we really know about fidelity of implementation in schools?Exceptional Children, 79, 181-193.
32.
HealL. W.RuschF. R. (1994). Prediction of residential independence of special education high school students. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 15, 223-243.
33.
HealL. W.RuschF. R. (1995). Predicting employment for students who leave special education high school programs. Exceptional Children, 61, 472-487.
34.
HollenbeckA. F. (2007). From IDEA to implementation: A discussion of foundational and future responsiveness-to-intervention research. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22, 137-146.
35.
HornerR. H.CarrE. G.HalleJ.McGeeG.OdomS.WoleryM. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165-179.
36.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C.A. §1401 et seq. (2004).
37.
Kleinhammer-TramillP. J.GeigerW. L.MorningstarM. (2003). Policy contexts for transition personnel preparation: An analysis of transition-related credentials, standards, and course requirements in state certification and licensure policies. Career Development for Exceptional Children, 26, 131-143.
38.
KohlerP. D. (1996). A taxonomy for transition programming: Linking research and practice. Champaign: Transition Research Institute, University of Illinois.
39.
KowalskiT. (2009). Need to address evidence-based practice in educational administration. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45, 351-374.
40.
KretlowA. G.BlatzS. L. (2011). The ABC’s of evidence-based practice for teachers. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 43(5), 8-19.
41.
MartinJ. E.Van DyckeJ. L.ChristensenW. R.GreeneB. A.GardnerJ. E.LovettD. L. (2006). Increasing student participation in their transition IEP meetings: Establishing the self-directed IEP as an evidenced-based practice. Exceptional Children, 72, 299-316.
42.
McLeskeyJ.TylerN. C.FlippinS. S. (2004). The supply and demand for special education teachers: A review of research regarding the chronic shortage of special education teachers. Journal of Special Education, 38, 5-21.
43.
MorsinkC. V. (1988). Preparing teachers as collaborators in special education. Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 61, 317-319.
44.
National Association of Secondary School Principals. (2004). Breaking Ranks II: Strategies for leading high school reform. Reston, VA: Author.
45.
National Governors Association. (2012). Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards.
46.
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (Report of the National Reading Panel). Retrieved from http://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/pubs/nrp/documents/report.pdf
NewmanL.WagnerM.CametoR.KnokeyA. M. (2009). The post-high school outcomes of youth with disabilities up to 4 years after high school: A report of findings from the national longitudinal transition study-2 (NLTS2). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. Retrieved from www.nlts2.org/reports/2009_04/nlts2_report_2009_04_complete.pdf
50.
NewmanL.WagnerM.KnokeyA. M.MarderC.NagleK.ShaverD.. . . SchwartingM. (2011). The post-high school outcomes of young adults with disabilities up to 8 years after high school. A report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. Retrieved from http://www.nlts2.org/reports/2011_09_02/index.html
51.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, U.S.C.A §115, et seq. (2002).
52.
OkoloC. M.BahrC. M.RiethH. J. (1993). A retrospective view of computer-based instruction. Journal of Special Education Technology, 12, 1-27.
53.
RepettoJ. B.WebbK. W.GarvanC. W.WashingtonT. (2002). Connecting student outcomes with transition practices in Florida. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 25, 123-139.
54.
ScheelerM. C.BrunoK.GrubbE.SeaveyT. L. (2009). Generalizing teaching techniques from university to K-12 classrooms: Teaching preservice teachers to use what they learn. Journal of Behavioral Education, 18, 189-210.
55.
ShandraC. L.HoganD. P. (2008). School-to-work program participation and the post-high school employment of young adults with disabilities. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 29, 117-130.
56.
SinclairM. F.ChristensonS. L.ThurlowM. L. (2005). Promoting school completion of urban secondary youth with emotional or behavioral disabilities. Exceptional Children, 71, 465-482.
57.
SlavinR. E. (2008). Perspectives on evidence-based research in education. Educational Researcher, 37, 5-14.
58.
TestD. W.FowlerC. H.RichterS. M.WhiteJ.MazzottiV.WalkerA. R.. . . KorteringL. (2009). Evidence-based practices in secondary transition. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32, 115-128.
59.
TestD. W.MasonC.HughesC.KonradM.NealeM.WoodW. (2004). Student involvement in individualized education program meetings. Exceptional Children, 70, 391-412.
60.
TestD. W.MazzottiV. L.MustianA. L.FowlerC. H.KorteringL. J.KohlerP. H. (2009). Evidence-based secondary transition predictors for improving postschool outcomes for students with disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32, 160-181.
Van ReusenA. K.BosC.SchumakerJ. B. (1994). Self-advocacy strategy for education and transition planning. Lawrence, KS: Edge Enterprises.
63.
WehmeyerM.LawrenceM. (1995). Whose future is it anyway? Promoting student involvement in transition planning. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 18, 69-83.
64.
WehmeyerM. L.SchwartzM. (1997). Self-determination and positive adult outcomes: A follow-up study of youth with mental retardation or learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 63, 245-255.
WhiteJ.WeinerJ. S. (2004). Influence of least restrictive environment and community based training on integrated employment outcomes for transitioning students with severe disabilities. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 21, 149-156.
67.
WinokurM. A.CobbR. B.DuganJ. J. (2007). Effects of academic peer assistance interventions on academic outcomes for youth with disabilities: A systematic review. Fort Collins: School of Education, Colorado State University.
68.
WolgemuthJ. R.CobbR. B.AlwellM. (2008). The effects of mnemonic interventions on academic outcomes for youth with disabilities: A systematic review. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 23, 1-10.
69.
WolgemuthJ. R.CobbR. B.DuganJ. J. (2007). The effects of self-management interventions on academic outcomes for youth with disabilities. Fort Collins: School of Education, Colorado State University.
70.
WolgemuthJ. R.TrujilloE.CobbR. B.AlwellM. (2008). The effects of visual display interventions on academic outcomes for youth with disabilities: A systematic review (Systematic review project). Fort Collins: Colorado State University.