The purpose of this qualitative study was to describe, analyze, and interpret the experiences of school principals who use multiple social media tools with stakeholders as part of their comprehensive communications practices. Additionally, it examined why school principals have chosen to communicate with their stakeholders through social media. Four themes emerged from the 12 qualitative interviews with the school principals and from the Internet data regarding their social media use. The four emergent themes included the following: (1) Social media tools allow for greater interactions between school principals and their stakeholders. (2) Social media tools provide stronger connections to local stakeholders, to fellow educators, and to the world. (3) Social media use can have a significant impact on a school principal’s personal and professional growth. (4) Social media use is an expectation; it is no longer optional.
Al-AlakB. A. M. (2006). The impact of marketing actions on relationship quality in the higher education sector in Jordan. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 16(2), 1-23.
2.
AskoolS.NakataK. (2010). A conceptual model for acceptance of social CRM systems based on a scoping study. AI & Society, 26, 205-220. doi:10.1007/s00146-010-0311-5
3.
BunnellT. (2005). Strategic marketing planning in international schools. International Journal of Educational Management, 19, 59-66.
4.
CarrN. (2001). Building a better web site. American School Board Journal Supplement, 188(9), 24-27.
5.
CarrN. (2010). Expand your reach. American School Board Journal, 197(9), 50.
6.
CarrN. (2011a). Acting on the activists. American School Board Journal, 198(7), 38-39.
7.
CarrN. (2011b). Facing Facebook. American School Board Journal, 198(2), 38-39, 41.
8.
CarrN. (2011c). Internal communications. American School Board Journal, 198(9), 44-45.
9.
CarrN. (2012). Technology for effective communication. In HancockR.McLeodS. (Eds.), What school administrators need to know about technology leadership (pp. 1-30). Washington, DC: International Society for Technology in Education.
10.
EngebritsonR. (2011, January). Principals and blogs: In what ways does blogging support the practices of school principals? (Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (Publication No. AAT 3343264)
11.
GreenbergP. (2010). The impact of CRM 2.0 on customer insight. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 25, 410-419. doi:10.1108/08858621011066008
12.
HandleyA.ChapmanC. (2011). Content rules: How to create killer blogs, podcasts, videos, ebooks, webinars (and more) that engage customers and ignite your business. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
13.
HelfertG.RitterT.WalterA. (2002). Redefining market orientation from a relationship perspective: Theoretical consideration and empirical results. European Journal of Marketing, 36, 1119-1139.
14.
HelgesenØ. (2008). Marketing for higher education: A relationship marketing approach. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 18, 50-78. doi:10.1080/08841240802100188
15.
Hemsley-BrownJ.OplatkaI. (2010). Market orientation in universities: A comparative study of two national higher education systems. International Journal of Educational Management, 24, 204-220.
16.
HewK. F. (2009). Use of audio podcast in K-12 and higher education: A review of research topics and methodologies. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57, 333-357.
17.
HughesB. (2010). Twittering in the hands of school leaders. The School Administrator, 67(4), 8.
18.
KusterI.Aviles-ValenzuelaM. (2010). Market orientation in university: A case study. International Journal of Educational Management, 24, 597-614.
19.
MaxwellJ. A. (2005). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20.
OplatkaI.Hemsley-BrownJ. (2004). The research on school marketing: Current issues and future directions. Journal of Educational Administration, 42, 375-400.
21.
OplatkaI.Hemsley-BrownJ. (2007). The incorporation of market orientation in the school culture: An essential aspect of school marketing. International Journal of Educational Management, 21, 292-305.
22.
PavičićJ.AlfirevićN.MihanovićZ. (2009). Market orientation in managing relationships with multiple constituencies of Croatian higher education. Higher Education, 57, 191-207. doi:10.1007/s10734-008-9141-5
23.
PedronC.SaccolA. (2009). What lies behind the concept of CRM? Discussing the essence of CRM through a phenomenological approach. Brazilian Administration Review, 6, 34-49.
24.
SchwartzJ. (2005). If you want to lead, blog. Harvard Business Review, 83(11), 30.
25.
ScottD. (2010). The new rules of marketing & PR: How to use social media, blogs, news releases, online video, and viral marketing to reach buyers directly. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
26.
StockM. (2009). The school administrator’s guide to blogging: A new way to connect with the community. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Education.
27.
TeichA. (2008). Using company blogs to win over decision makers. Publishing Research Quarterly, 24, 261-266.
28.
WeilD. (2006). The corporate blogging book: Absolutely everything you need to know to get it right. New York, NY: Penguin Group.
29.
YinR. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Applied Social Research Method Series, Vol. 5. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30.
YinR. K. (2011). Qualitative research from start to finish. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
