Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

In the United States, students with disabilities are disproportionately exposed to exclusionary discipline. Using Intergroup Threat Theory, literature was analyzed to identify expressed perceptions from school administrators that indicated perceived threat. Analysis revealed perceived threats to administrator beliefs, values, job performance, and available resources for themselves and their school communities. Intervention to alleviate this perception of threat should seek to expand administrators’ knowledge of diversity, specifically for students with disabilities, and provide increased opportunities for personal contact between administrators and students with disabilities.

Keywords

disabilities discipline administrator prejudice threat

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allport

G. W.

(1979). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Perseus.

American Academy of Pediatrics. (2003, November). Policy statement: Out-of-school suspension and expulsion. Pediatrics, 112, 1206-1209. Retrieved from http://aappolicy.aappublications.org/cgi/reprint/pediatrics

American Psychological Association Zero Tolerance Task Force. (2008). Are zero tolerance policies effective in the schools? An evidentiary review and recommendations. American Psychologist, 63, 852-862.

*Barnett

Monda-Amaya

L. E.

(1998). Principals’ knowledge of and attitudes towards inclusion. Remedial and Special Education, 19, 181-192. doi:10.1177/074193259801900306

Borum

Cornell

D. G.

Modzeleski

Jimerson

S. R.

(2010). What can be done about school shootings? A review of the evidence. Educational Researcher, 39, 27-37. doi:10.3102/0013189X09357620

Brint

Contreras

M. F.

Matthews

M. T.

(2001). Socialization messages in primary schools: An organizational analysis. Sociology of Education, 74, 157-180. doi:10.2307/2673273

Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954). Retrieved from http://www.nationalcenter.org/brown.html

*Butera

Klein

McMullen

Wilson

(1998). A statewide study of FAPE and school discipline policies. Journal of Special Education, 32, 108-114. doi:10.1177/002246699803200205

*Carter

E. W.

Hughes

(2006). Including high school students with severe disabilities in general education classrooms: Perspectives of general and special educators, paraprofessionals, and administrators. Research & Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 31, 174-188.

10.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2011). People with disabilities: Living healthy. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/Features/Disabilities/

11.

Clifton

J. P.

(2011). The role of intergroup threat in attitudes towards same-sex marriage and its beneficiaries (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://humboldt-dspace.calstate.edu/handle/2148/710

12.

Columbus Public Schools. (1983). A report to the Federal District Court on the status of desegregation. Columbus, OH: Author.

13.

*Cook

B. G.

Semmel

M. I.

Gerber

M. M.

(1999). Attitudes of principals and special education teachers towards the inclusion of students with mild disabilities: Critical differences of opinion. Remedial and Special Education, 20, 199-207. doi:10.1177/074193259902000403

14.

Cooley

(1995). Suspension/expulsion of regular and special education students in Kansas: A report to the Kansas State Board of Education. Topeka: Kansas State Board of Education

15.

*Crockett

J. B.

Myers

S. T.

Griffin

Hollandsworth

(2007). The unintended side effects of inclusion for students with learning disabilities: The perspectives of school administrators. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 14, 155-166.

16.

Cushner

(2004). Conditions in the organizational environment that support positive intergroup relations. In Stephan

W. G.

Vogt

W. P.

(Eds.), Education programs for improving intergroup relations: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 211-226). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

17.

Cusson

M. M.

(2010). Empirically based components related to students with disabilities in tier I research institution’s educational administration preparation programs (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Texas, Austin.

18.

Deno

(1970). Special education as developmental capital. Exceptional Children, 37, 229-237.

19.

Doe v. Maher, 793 F.2d 1470, 1496 (9th Cir. 1986).

20.

Dovidio

J. F.

Gaertner

S. L.

Stewart

T. L.

Esses

V. M.

ten Vergert

Hodson

(2004). From intervention to outcome: Processes in the reduction of bias. In Stephan

W.G.

Vogt

W. P.

(Eds.), Education programs for improving intergroup relations: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 243-255). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

21.

*Downing

J. E.

Eichinger

Williams

L. J.

(1997). Inclusive Education for students with severe disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 18, 133-142. doi:10.1177/074193259701800302

22.

Dunn

(1968). Special education for the mildly retarded: Is much of it justifiable? Exceptional Children, 35(1), 5-22.

23.

*Dyal

A. B.

Flynt

S. W.

(1996). Schools and inclusion: Principals’ perceptions. Clearing House, 70(1), 32. Retrieved from EBSCOhost

24.

Eagly

A. H.

Diekman

A. B.

(2005). What is the problem? Prejudice as an attitude in context. In Dovidio

J. F.

Glick

Rudman

L. A.

(Eds.), On the nature of prejudice: Fifty years after Allport (pp. 19-35). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

25.

Education of All Handicapped Children Act of 1975, Pub. L. No. 94-142 (1975).

26.

Fabelo

Thompson

M. D.

Plotkin

Carmichael

Marchbanks

M. P.

Booth

E. A.

(2011). Breaking school rules: A statewide study of how discipline relates to student’s success and juvenile justice involvement. Retrieved from http://justicecenter.csg.org/resources/juveniles

27.

Fischer

Schimmel

Kelly

(1999). Teachers and the law. New York, NY: Longman.

28.

Fullen

(1993). Changing forces: Probing the depths of educational reform. New York, NY: Falmer.

29.

Graneheim

U. H.

Lundman

(2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures, and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24, 105-112. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001

30.

*Grider

(1995). Full inclusion: A practitioner’s perspective. Focus on Autistic Behavior, 10(4), 1-11.

31.

Gringart

Helmes

Speelman

(2008). Harnessing cognitive dissonance to promote positive attitudes toward older workers in Australia. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38, 751-778. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00325.x

32.

*Horrocks

J. L.

White

Roberts

(2008). Principals’ attitudes regarding inclusion of children with autism in Pennsylvania public schools. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38, 1462-1473. doi:10.1007/s10803-007-0522-x

33.

*Idol

(2006). Toward inclusion of special education students in general education. Remedial and Special Education, 27, 77-94. doi:10.1177/07419325060270020601

34.

Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act 2004, Pub. L. No. 108-446, Part B Regulations, 34 C.F.R. §300.101 (2004a).

35.

Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act 2004, Pub. L. No. 108-446, Part B Regulations, 34 C.F.R. §300.530-536 (2004b).

36.

Jackman

M. R.

(2005). Rejection or inclusion of outgroups? In Dovidio

J. F.

Glick

Rudman

L. A.

(Eds.), On the nature of prejudice: Fifty years after Allport (pp. 89-105). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

37.

Johnson

Oliff

Williams

(2011). An update on state budget cuts: At least 46 states have already imposed cuts that hurt vulnerable residents and cause job loss. Retrieved from http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=1214

38.

*Junkala

Mooney

F. J.

(1986). Special education students in regular classes: What happened to the pyramid? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19, 218-221. doi:10.1177/002221948601900408

39.

Kakalik

J. S.

(1981). The cost of special education: A rand note. Retrieved from http://www.rand.org/pubs/notes/N1792.html

40.

*Kemp

S. E.

(2006). Dropout policies and trends for students with and without disabilities. Adolescence, 41, 235-250.

41.

Krezmien

M. P.

Leone

P. E.

Achilles

G. M.

(2006). Suspension, race, and disability: Analysis of statewide practices and reporting. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 14, 217-226. doi:10.1177/10634266060140040501

42.

Krippendorff

(2004). Reliability in content analysis: Some common misconceptions and recommendations. Human Communications Research, 30, 411-433. doi:10.1093/hcr/30.3.411

43.

Langford

L. L.

(2010). The development and testing of an evaluation model for special education (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Texas, Austin.

44.

Larkin

(1979). School desegregation and student suspension: A look at one school system. Education and Urban Society, 11, 485-95. doi:10.1177/001312457901100406

45.

Lasky

Karge

B. D.

(2006). Meeting the needs of students with disabilities: Experience and confidence of principals. NASSP Bulletin, 90(1), 19-36. doi:10.1177/0192636505283950

46.

Leone

P. E.

Mayer

M. J.

Malmgren

Meisel

S. M.

(2000). School violence and disruption: Rhetoric, reality, and reasonable balance. Focus on Exceptional Children, 33(1), 1-20.

47.

Levensen

(2011). Something has got to change: Rethinking special education (Working paper). Retrieved from the http://www.aei.org/papers/education/something-has-got-to-change-rethinking-special-education/

48.

Losen

D. J.

(2011). Discipline policies, successful schools, and racial justice. Boulder: National Education Policy Center, University of Colorado.

49.

Losen

D. J.

Gillespie

(2012). Opportunities suspended: The disparate impact of disciplinary exclusion from school. Retrieved from http://civilrightsproject.ucla.edu/resources/projects/center-for-civil-rights-remedies/school-to-prison-folder/federal-reports/upcoming-ccrr-research

50.

Losen

D. L.

Skiba

(2010). Suspended education: Urban middle schools in crisis. Montgomery, AL: Southern Poverty Law Center.

51.

Martin

Terman

(1996). The legislative and litigation history of special education. Future of Children, 6, 25-39. doi:10.2307/1602492

52.

*McCarthy

M. R.

Soodak

L. C.

(2007). The politics of discipline: Balancing school safety and rights of students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 73, 465-474.

53.

Mellard

Seybert

(1996). Voices about school suspension, expulsion, and safety. Lawrence, KS: Center for Research on Learning.

54.

Nelson

J. R.

Roberts

M. L

Rutherford

R. B.

Mathur

S. R.

Aaroe

A. A.

(1999). A statewide survey of special education administrators and school psychologists regarding functional behavioral assessment. Education and Treatment of Children, 22, 267-279.

55.

New York Civil Liberties Union. (2011). Education interrupted: The growing use of suspension in New York City schools. Retrieved from http://www.nyclu.org/issues/due-process-and-justice/publications

56.

Noltemeyer

A. L.

Mcloughlin

C. S.

(2010). Changes in exclusionary discipline rates and disciplinary disproportionality over time. International Journal of Special Education, 25, 59-70.

57.

*Palley

(2004). Balancing student mental health needs and discipline: A case study of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Act. Social Service Review, 78, 243-266. doi:10.1086/382768

58.

Pazey

B. L.

Cole

H. A.

(in press). The role of special education training in the development of socially just leaders: Building an equity consciousness in educational leadership programs. Educational Administration Quarterly.

59.

Pazey

B. L.

Yates

J. R.

(2012). Conceptual and historical foundations of special education administration. In Crocket

J. B.

Billingsley

B. S.

Boscardin

M. R.

(Eds.). Leadership and administration for special education (pp. 17-37). New York, NY: Routledge.

60.

*Praisner

C. L.

(2003). Attitudes of elementary school principals toward the inclusion of students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 69, 135-145.

61.

Raffaele Mendez

L. M.

(2003). Predictors of suspension and negative school outcomes: A longitudinal investigation. In Wald

Losen

D. J.

(Eds.), Deconstructing the school to prison pipeline (New Directions for Youth Development, Vol. 99, pp. 17-34). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

62.

Rausch

M. K.

Skiba

(2006, fall). Discipline, disability, and race: Disproportionality in Indiana schools. Center for Evaluation and Educational Policy: Education Policy Brief, 4(10).

63.

Reynolds

M. C.

(1962). Framework for considering some issues in special education. Exceptional Children, 28, 367-370.

64.

Riek

B. M.

Mania

E. W.

Gaertner

S. L.

(2006). Intergroup threat and outgroup attitudes: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2006, 10, 336-353. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1004_4

65.

*Rose

T. L.

(1988). Current disciplinary practices with handicapped students: suspensions and expulsions. Exceptional Children, 55, 230-239.

66.

Ryan

J. B.

Katsiyannis

Peterson

Chmelar

(2007). IDEA 2004 and disciplining students with disabilities. NASSP Bulletin, 91, 130-140.

67.

Salisbury

C. L.

(2006). Principals’ perspectives on inclusive elementary schools. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 31, 70-82. doi:10.2511/rpsd.31.1.70

68.

Simpson

R. L.

LaCava

P. G.

Sampson-Graner

(2004). The No Child Left Behind Act: Challenges and implications for educators. Intervention in School and Clinic, 40, 67-75. doi:10.1177/10534512040400020101

69.

Skiba

R. J.

(2000). Zero tolerance, zero evidence: An analysis of school disciplinary practice (Policy Research Report No. SRS2). Retrieved from www.indiana.edu/~safeschl/ztze.pdf

70.

Skiba

R. J.

Peterson

R. L.

(1999). The dark side of zero tolerance: Can punishment lead to safe schools? Phi Delta Kappan, 80, 372-376.

71.

Skiba

R. J.

Rausch

M. K.

(2006). Zero tolerance, suspension, and expulsion: Questions of equity and effectiveness. In Evertson

C. M.

Weinstein

C. S.

(Eds.), Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues (pp. 1063-1089). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

72.

Slavin

R. E.

(2008). Perspectives on evidence-based research in education: What works? Issues in synthesizing educational programs. Educational Researcher, 37(1), 5-14. doi:10.3102/ 0013189X08314117

73.

Smith

B. N.

Hains

B. J.

(2012). Examining administrators’ disciplinary philosophies: A conceptual model. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48, 548-576. doi:10.1177/ 0013161X12441363

74.

Stephan

W. G.

Renfro

C. L.

Davis

M. D.

(2008). The role of threat in intergroup relations. In Wagner

Tropp

L. R.

Finchilescu

Tredoux

(Eds.), Improving intergroup relations: Building on the legacy of Thomas F. Pettigrew (pp. 55-72). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

75.

Stephan

W. G.

Ybarra

Morrison

K. R.

(2009). Intergroup threat theory. In Nelson

T. D.

(Ed.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (pp. 43-59). New York, NY: Psychology Press.

76.

Thornton

C. H.

Trent

W. T.

(1988). School desegregation and suspension in east Baton Rouge parish: A preliminary report. Journal of Negro Education, 57, 482-501. doi:10.2307/2295691

77.

Tobin

Sugai

(1996). Patterns in middle school discipline records. Journal of Emotional & Behavioral Disorders, 4(2), 82-94. doi:10.1177/106342669600400203

78.

U.S. Department of Education. (2009). Public school principal, BIE school principal, and private school principal data files 2007-08. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2009/2009323/tables/sass0708_2009323_p12n_02.asp

79.

U.S. Department of Education. (2011). Digest of education statistics, 2010 (NCES 2011-015, Chapter 2). Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2011/2011015.pdf

80.

U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services. (2002). A new era: Revitalizing special education for children and their families. Washington, DC: Author.

81.

U.S. Department of Labor. (2011a). Occupational outlook handbook: 2010-2011 edition. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/oco/ocos007.htm

82.

U.S. Department of Labor. (2011b). Women in the labor force: A databook. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/cps/wlf-databook2011.htm

83.

Wald

Losen

(2003). Defining and redirecting a school to prison pipeline. New Directions for Youth Development, 99, 9-15. doi:10.1002/yd.51

84.

Winzer

M. A.

(2009). From integration to inclusion: A history of special education in the 20th century. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.

85.

Yell

M. L.

(2012). The law and special education (3rd ed.). New Jersey, NJ: Pearson.

86.

Zettel

J. J.

Ballard

(1982). The Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975 (P.L. 94-142): Its history, origins, and concepts. In Ballard

Ramirez

Weintraub

(Eds.), Special education in America: Its legal and governmental foundations (pp. 11-22). Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.

87.

Zhang

Katsiyannis

Herbst

(2004). Disciplinary exclusions in special education: A 4-year analysis. Behavioral Disorders, 29, 337-347.

The Enemy Among Us

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References