The increased number of students with learning disabilities in general education secondary school classrooms presents complex challenges for today’s educators. This article describes how the Universal Design for Learning theoretical framework can be used with assistive technology to enhance educational opportunities for secondary students with learning disabilities. Barriers that prevent secondary teachers from effectively selecting, adopting, implementing, and assessing assistive technology devices are discussed and potential solutions are identified. The article concludes with recommendations for enhancing secondary teachers’ professional development opportunities.
Bailey, M.N., Meidenbauer, N., Fein, J., & Mollica, B.M. ( 2005). Comprehensive statewide programs for technology-related assistance. In D. Edyburn, K. Higgins, & R. Boone (Eds.), Handbook of special education technology research and practice (pp. 31-46). Whitefish Bay, WI: Knowledge By Design.
2.
Cross, P. ( 1981). Adults as learners: Increasing participation and facilitation learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass .
3.
Edyburn, D.L. ( 2000). Assistive technology and students with mild disabilities . Focus on Exceptional Children, 32(9), 1-23.
Gersten, R., Fuchs, L.S., Williams, J.P., & Baker, S. ( 2001). Teaching reading comprehension strategies to students with learning disabilities: A review of research. Review of Educational Research, 71, 279-320.
6.
Grigg, W., Lauko, M., & Brockway, D. ( 2006). The nation’s report card: Science 2005 (NCES 2006-466) . U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. Retrieved from http://nationsreportcard.gov/
Hitchcock, C., & Stahl, S. ( 2003). Assistive technology, universal design, universal design for learning: Improved learning opportunities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 18(4), 45-52.
9.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004, Pub. L. No. 108-446, 20, U.S.C. § 1401: Definitions, pp. 1-2 (2004). Retrieved from http://www.wrightslaw.com/idea/law.htm
10.
Jackson, R. ( 2004). Technologies supporting curriculum access for students with disabilities. Wakefield, MA: National Center on Accessing the General Curriculum. Retrieved from http://www.CAST.org/publications
11.
Judge, S.L. ( 2000). Accessing and funding assistive technology for young children with disabilities. Early Childhood Special Education Journal, 28, 125-131.
12.
Kaplan, M. ( 2003). Tailor-made support. Principal Leadership , 4, 60-64.
13.
Lahm, E.A. ( 2005). Improving practice using assistive technology knowledge and skills. In D. Edyburn, K. Higgins, & R. Boone (Eds.), Handbook of special education technology research and practice (pp. 721-746). Whitefish Bay, WI: Knowledge By Design.
14.
Manset-Williamson, G., & Nelson, J.M. ( 2005). Balanced, strategic reading instruction for upper-elementary and middle school students with reading disabilities: A comparative study of two approaches. Learning Disability Quarterly, 28, 59-74.
15.
Marino, M.T., Marino E. C., & Shaw, S. ( 2006). Making informed assistive technology decisions for students with high incidence disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children , 38(6), 18-25.
16.
Mastropieri, M.A., Scruggs, T.E., & Graetz, J.E. ( 2003). Reading comprehension instruction for secondary students: Challenges for struggling students and teachers. Learning Disability Quarterly, 26, 103-116.
17.
Meo, G. ( 2008). Curriculum planning for all learners: Applying Universal Design for Learning (UDL) to a high school reading comprehension program. Preventing School Failure, 52(2), 21-28.
18.
No Child Left Behind Act. (2001). Elementary and secondary education. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/index.html
19.
Parette, H.P., & Stone, J.B. ( 2008). Benefits of assistive technology use groups for early childhood education professionals. Early Childhood Education Journal, 35, 313-319.
20.
Rose, D., Meyer, A., & Hitchcock, C. ( 2005). The universally designed classroom: Accessible curriculum and digital technologies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
21.
Schmidt, R., Rozendal, M.S., & Greenman, G. ( 2002). Reading instruction in the inclusion classroom: Research practices. Remedial and Special Education, 23, 130-140.
22.
Silver-Pacuilla, H. ( 2006). Moving toward solutions: Assistive & learning technology for all students. Washington, DC: National Center for Technology Innovation. Retrieved from http://www.nationaltechcenter.org/
23.
Smith, S.J., & Allsopp, D. ( 2005). Technology and inservice professional development: Integrating an effective medium to bridge research to practice. In D. Edyburn, K. Higgins & R. Boone (Eds.), Handbook of special education technology research and practice (pp. 777-792). Whitefish Bay, WI: Knowledge By Design.
24.
Snyder, T.D. ( 2008). Mini-digest of education statistics, 2007 (NCES 2008-023) . Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Educational Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
25.
White, E.A., Wepner, S.B., & Wetzel, D.C. ( 2003). Accessible education through assistive technology. T .H.E. Journal, 30(7), 24-32.
26.
Zabala, J., Bowser, G., Blunt, M., Hartsell, K., Carl, D., Korsten, J., . . . Reed, P. ( 2000). Quality indicators for assistive technology services in school settings. Journal of Special Education Technology , 15(4), 25-36.
