This mixed-methods study examines young adolescents' perceptions of strategies implemented before a state-mandated “high-stakes” test. Survey results for Grade 8 students (N = 215) are analyzed by sex, academic group, and preparation team. Letters to the principal are reviewed for convergence and additional themes. Although students were most motivated by extrinsic rewards, those whose teachers developed students' self-efficacy and positively used attribution theory were less influenced. Letters revealed parental impact on students' attitudes and performance. Implications are addressed.
Anderson, L.H., & Midgley, C. (1997). Motivation and middle school students. In J. L. Irvin (Ed.), What current research says to the middle level practitioner (pp. 41-48). Columbus, OH: National Middle School Association.
2.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Longman.
4.
Bernhardt, V. (2004). Data analysis for continuous school improvement . Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education .
5.
Brophy, J. (1998). Motivating students to learn. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
6.
Chang, H. (1992). Adolescent life and ethos: Ethnography of a US high school. Washington, DC: The Falmer Press.
7.
Covington, M.V. (1992). Making the grade: A self-worth perspective on motivation and school reform. New York: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Fedore, H. (2006). De-stressing high stakes testing for NCLB. Education Digest, 71(6), 23-28.
9.
Fenstermacher, G.D. (1994). The knower and the known: The nature of knowledge in research on teaching. In L. Darling-Hammond (Ed.), Review of research in education: Vol. 20 (pp. 3-56). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association .
10.
Foster, L. (2004). Great expectations: Reflections on the 50th anniversary of Brown v. Board of Education. Principal Leadership (Middle School Edition), 4(9), 44-48.
11.
Fraenkel, J.R., & Wallen, N.E. (2009). How to design and evaluate research in education (7th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
12.
Hopkins, K.D., Hopkins, B.R., & Glass, G.V. (1996). Basic statistics for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
13.
Kagan, D.M. (1992). Implications of research on teacher beliefs. Educational Psychologist, 27, 65-90.
14.
Krathwohl, D.R. (1998). Methods of educational and social science research: An integrated approach (2nd ed.). Long Grove, IL: Waveland.
15.
McCabe, P. (2003). Enhancing self-efficacy for high stakes reading tests. The Reading Teacher, 57(1), 12-20.
16.
McGraw Hill. (1989). California test of basic skills Level 4, survey battery (4th ed.). Monterey, CA: CTB/ McGraw Hill.
17.
Miles, M., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2002. Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002). Retrieved October 6, 2006, from http://www.ed.gov/legislation/ESEA02/
19.
Otis, A., & Lennon, R. (1996). The Otis-Lennon School Ability Test Seventh Edition . Retrieved October 6, 2006, from http://harcourtassessment.com/haiweb/cultures/en-us/productdetail.htm?pid=OLSAT
20.
Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21.
Popham, W.J. (2004). America's "failing" schools: How parents and teachers can cope with No Child Left Behind. New York: Routledge Falmer.
22.
Slavin, R.E. (2003). Educational psychology: Theory and practice (7th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
23.
Smith, M.L. (1989). Teachers' beliefs about retention. In L. A. Shepard & M. L. Smith (Eds.), Flunking grades: Research and policies on retention (pp. 132-150). Philadelphia: Falmer.
24.
Thomas, R.M. (2005). High stakes testing: Coping with collateral damage . Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum .
25.
Triplett, C.F., & Barksdale, M.A. (2005). Third through sixth graders' perceptions of high-stakes testing. Journal of Literacy Research , 32(2), 237-260.
26.
Triplett, C.F., Barksdale, M.A., & Leftwich, P. (2003). Children's perceptions of high stakes testing . Journal of Research in Education, 13(1), 15-21.
27.
Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion (Springer series in social psychology). New York: Springer-Verlag.
28.
Wheelock, A., Bebell, D., & Haney, W. (2000a, November 2). Student self-portraits as test-takers: Variations, contextual differences, and assumptions by motivation. Teachers College Record (ID Number: 10635). Retrieved January 11, 2007, from http://www.tcrecord.org
29.
Wheelock, A., Bebell, D., & Haney, W. (2000b, November 2). What can student drawings tell us about high stakes testing in Massachusetts?Teachers College Record (ID Number: 10634). Retrieved January 11, 2007, from http://www.tcrecord.org
