How do students react to being told that they have failed a test required for high school graduation? In 2000, 7,989 students were wrongly informed that they had failed the Minnesota Basic Standards Test in mathematics. The authors conducted a survey of 911 of these students to assess the psychosocial impact of this event. More than 80% of students reported that they increased studying, and nearly half reduced their extracurricular activities. Students reported a range of adverse emotional reactions, with more than 80% reporting that they felt depressed, worried, or embarrassed. About half said that they felt stupid and less proud of themselves. About 4% reported that they dropped out of school as a result of being told that they failed the examination. These findings point to the largely unaddressed need to study student reactions to failing high-stakes tests.
Alliance for Childhood. (2001). High stakes testing position statement. Retrieved October 4, 2001, from www.allianceforchildhood.net/news/histake_test_position_statement.htm
2.
American Educational Research Association. (2000). AERA Position Statement Concerning High-Stakes Testing in PreK-12 Education. Retrieved January 19, 2003, from www.aera.net/about/policy/stakes.htm
3.
American Psychological Association. (2001). Appropriate use of high-stakes testing in our nation’s schools. Retrieved January 19, 2003, from www.apa.org/.pubinfo/testing.html
4.
Armacost, R. L. (1989). Perceptions of stressors by high school students. Journal of Adolescent Research, 4, 443-461.
5.
Barksdale-Ladd, M. A., & Thomas, K. F. (2000). What’s at stake in high-stakes testing—Teachers and parents speak out. Journal of Teacher Education, 51, 384-397.
6.
Barrett, L. F., Lane, R., Sechrest, L., & Schwartz, G. (2000). Sex differences in emotional awareness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1027-1035.
7.
Catterall, J. (1989). Standards and school dropouts: A national study of tests required for high school graduation. American Journal of Education, 98, 1-34.
8.
Center on Education Policy. (2005). States try harder, but gaps persist: High school exit exams 2005. Retrieved September 5, 2005, from www.cep-dc.orgde
9.
Anda, D., Baroni, S., Boskin, L., Buchwald, L., Morgan, J., Ow, J., et al. (2000). Stress, stressors and coping among high school students. Children and Youth Services Review, 22, 441-463.
10.
de Wilde, E. J., & Kienhorst, I. C. W. M. (1998). Life events and adolescent suicidal behavior. In T. W. Miller (Ed.), Children of trauma: Stressful life events and their effects on children and adolescents (pp. 161-178). New York: International Universities Press.
11.
Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education Appropriations Act of 1998, Pub. L. No. 105-78 (1998).
12.
Dindia, K., & Allen, M. (1992). Sex differences in self-disclosure: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 106-124.
13.
Griffin, B. W., & Heidorn, M. H. (1996). An examination of the relationship between minimum competency test performance and dropping out of high school. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 18, 243-252.
14.
Heubert, J. P., & Hauser, R. M. (Eds.). (1999). High stakes: Testing for tracking, promotion, and graduation. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
15.
Hughes, S., & Bailey, J. (2001). What students think about high-stakes testing. Educational Leadership, 59, 74-76.
16.
Hurrelmann, K., Engel, U., Holler, B., & Nordlohne, E. (1988). Failure in school, family conflicts, and psychosomatic disorders in adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 11, 237-249.
17.
Jonas, E. D., & Hayes-Wallace, L. (1986, April). Minimum competency testing: An analysis of student outcomes for those not mastering mandated testing standards. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
18.
Kessler, R. C., Wittchen, H. U., Abelson, J. M., & Zhao, S. (2000). Methodological issues in assessing psychiatric disorder with self-reports. In A. A. Stone, J. S. Turkkan, C. A. Bachrach, J. B. Jobe, H. S. Kurtzman, & V. S. Cain (Eds.), The science of self-report: Implications for research and practice (pp. 229-255). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19.
Kurvers et al. v. NCS, Inc., Order Setting Trial Plan, Hennepin County District Court (March 25, 2002).
20.
Langenfeld, K., Thurlow, M., & Scott, D. (1997). High stakes testing for students: Unanswered questions and implications for students with disabilities. (Synthesis Report No. 26). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
21.
Madaus, G. (1991, November). The effects of important tests on students: Implications for a National Examination System. Phi Delta Kappan, 226-231.
22.
Madaus, G., & Clarke, M. (2001). The adverse impact of high-stakes testing on minority students: Evidence from one hundred years of test data. In G. Orfield & M. L. Kornhaber (Eds.), Raising standards or raising barriers? Inequality and high-stakes testing in public education (pp. 85-106). New York: Century Foundation.
23.
McGuire, D. P., Mitic, W., & Neumann, B. (1987). Perceived stress in adolescents: What normal teenagers worry about. Canada’s Mental Health, 35, 2-5.
24.
Minnesota Department of Children, Families, and Learning (2000). Answers to anticipated district questions regarding scoring errors on February and April mathematics Basic Standards Tests. Retrieved January 13, 2003, from http://cfl.state.mn.us/testindex.html
25.
Natriello, G., & Pallas, A. M. (2001). The development and impact of high-stakes testing. In G. Orfield & M. L. Kornhaber (Eds.), Raising standards or raising barriers? Inequality and high-stakes testing in public education (pp. 19-38). New York: Century Foundation.
26.
Nordlohne, E., & Hurrelmann, K. (1990). Health impairment, failure in school, and the use and abuse of drugs. Health hazards in adolescence, 8, 149-166.
27.
Repetti, R. L., McGrath, E. P., & Ishikawa, S. S. (1999). Daily stress and coping in childhood and adolescence. In A. J. Goreczny & M. Hersen (Eds.), Handbook of pediatric and adolescent health psychology (pp 343-360). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
28.
Rhoades, K., & Madaus, G. (2003). Errors in standardized tests: A systematic problem. Boston: National Board of Educational Testing and Public Policy. Retrieved September 3, 2003, from the National Board of Educational Testing and Public Policy Web site: www.bc.edu/nbetpp
29.
Schmidt, P. (1999). At what cost to our students: The effects on traditionally successful students of repeated failure on the MN Basic Standards Tests. Dissertation Abstracts International, 60, 3A. (UMI No. 9923573)
30.
Schuman, H., & Presser, S. (1981). Questions and answers in attitude surveys: Experiments on question form, wording, and context. New York: Academic Press.
31.
Spielberger, C. D., & Vagg, P. R. (1995). Test anxiety: Theory, assessment, and treatment. Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis.
32.
Stone, A. A., Turkkan, J. S., Bachrach, C. A., Jobe, J. B., Kurtzman, H. S., & Cain, V. S. (2000). The science of self-report: Implications for research and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
33.
Visser, P. S., Krosnick, J. A., & Lavrakas, P. (2000). Survey research methods. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social psychology (pp. 223-252). New York: Cambridge University Press.
34.
Weisberg, H., Krosnick, J. A., & Bowen, B. (1996). Introduction to survey research, polling, and data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35.
Wheelock, A., Bebell, D. J., & Haney, W. (2000). What can student drawings tell us about high-stakes testing in Massachusetts?Teachers College Record (ID Number 10634). Retrieved January 25, 2002, from http://www.tcrecord.org
36.
Zeidner, M. (1998). Test anxiety: The state of the art. New York: Plenum.
