This study examined Columbine's impact on case outcomes related to student searches and its implications for civil liberties and school leader discretion. Using data from 236 court cases since the U.S. Supreme Court ruling of New Jersey v. T.L.O. in 1985, critical search dimensions and outcomes (e.g., level of suspicion) were examined using Columbine as a point of comparison. The findings reveal that Columbine has had only a minor influence on court outcomes, which suggests courts are no more tolerant of excessive discretion after a critical episode. Implications for policy and practice are presented.
Adelman, H. (2002). Canadian borders and immigration post 9/11. International Migration Review, 36(1), 15-29.
2.
Agresti, A. (2002). Categorical data analysis. New York: John Wiley.
3.
Baum, L. (1994). What judges want—Judges goals and judicial behavior. Political Research Quarterly, 47(3), 749-768.
4.
Baum, L. (1999). Recruitment and the motivations of Supreme Court justices. In C. W. Clayton & H. Gillman (Eds.), Supreme Court decision-making (pp. 201-214). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5.
Beauchamp, C. (2000, October). After the Columbine massacre: Who is winning the great American gun war. Paper presented at the meeting of the Australian Political Studies Association, Canberra.
6.
Beger, R. R. (2002). Expansion of police power in public schools and the vanishing rights of students. Social Justice, 29(1/2), 119-130.
7.
Board of Education v. Earls, 536 U.S. 822 (2002).
8.
Casella, R. (2003). Zero tolerance policy in schools: Rationale, consequences, and alternatives. Teachers College Record, 105(5), 872-892.
9.
Cloud, J. (1999). The Columbine effect. Time, 154(23), 51-53.
10.
Dupre, A. P. (1996). Should students have constitutional rights? Keeping order in the public schools. George Washington Law Review, 65(1), 57-57.
11.
Dwyer, K., & Osher, D. (2000). Safeguarding our children: An action guide. Washington, DC: U.S. Departments of Education and Justice, American Institutes for Research.
12.
Epstein, L., & Knight, J. (1999). Mapping out the strategic terrain: The informational role of amici curiae. In C. W. Clayton & H. Gillman (Eds.), Supreme Court decision making (pp. 215-235). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13.
Furlong, M. J., Kingery, P. M., & Bates, M. P. (2001). Introduction to the special issue on the appraisal and prediction of school violence. Psychology in the Schools, 38(2), 89-91.
14.
Gluckman, I. B. (1984). Schools searches and the 4th Amendment. West's Education Law Reporter, 13(1), 199-209.
15.
Hall, J. L. (2003). Columbia and Challenger: Organizational failure at NASA. Space Policy, 19(4), 239-247.
16.
Handler, J. F. (1986). The conditions of discretion. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
17.
Heimann, L. (1993). Understanding the Challenger disaster: Organizational structure and the design of reliable systems. American Political Science Review, 87(2), 421-435.
18.
Hemmings, A. (2003). Fighting for respect in urban high schools. Teachers College Record, 105(3), 416-437.
19.
Huck, S. W., & Cormier, W. H. (1996). Reading statistics and research (3rd ed.). New York: HarperCollins.
20.
Johnson, C. A., & Canon, B. C. (1984). Judicial process: Implementation and impact. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
21.
Kakihara, K. (2003). The post-9/11 paradigms shift and its effects on East Asia. Tokyo: Institute for International Policy Studies.
22.
Kerlinger, F. N. (1986). Foundations of behavioral research. Philadelphia: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
23.
McKinney, J. R. (1994, August 11). The Fourth Amendment and the public schools: Reasonable suspicion in the 90s. West's Education Law Reporter, 91, 455-463.
24.
Morris, E. W. (2005). “Tuck in that shirt!” Race, class, gender, and discipline in an urban school. Sociological Perspectives, 48(1), 25-48.
25.
New Jersey v. T.L.O., 469 U.S. 325 (1985).
26.
Noguera, P. A. (2003). Schools, prisons, and social implications of punishment: Rethinking disciplinary practices. Theory into Practice, 42(4), 341-350.
27.
O'Hara, J. U. (1984). Search and seizure analysis in school settings. West's Education Law Reporter, 13(1), 1-7.
28.
O'Toole, M. E. (2000). The school shooter: A threat assessment perspective. Quantico, VA: Federal Bureau of Investigation, Critical Incident Response Group, National Center for the Analysis of Violent Crime.
29.
Owen, S. S. (2005). The relationship between social capital and corporal punishment in schools—A theoretical inquiry. Youth & Society, 37(1), 85-112.
30.
Perrow, C. (1984). Normal accidents: Living with high-risk technology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
31.
Reiss, A. J. (1971). Research on administrative discretion and justice. Journal of Legal Education, 23(1), 69-76.
32.
Romzek, B. S., & Dubnick, M. J. (1987). Accountability in the public sector: Lessons from the Challenger tragedy. Public Administration Review, 47(3), 227-238.
33.
Rossow, L. F. (1984). Administrative discretion and student suspension: A lion in waiting. Journal of Law & Education, 13(3), 417-440.
34.
Rossow, L. F., & Stefkovich, J. A. (1995). Search and seizure in the public schools (2nd ed.). Topeka, KS: National Organization on Legal Problems of Education.
35.
Sanchez, J. M. (1992). Expelling the Fourth Amendment from American schools:Students' rights six years afterT.L.O. Journal of Law & Education, 21(3), 381-413.
36.
Schnaiberg, L. (1999). Home schooling queries spike after shootings. Education Week, 18(39), 3-3.
37.
Schuck, P. H. (2000). The limits of law: Essays on democratic governance. Boulder, CO: Westview.
38.
Shumavon, D. H., & Hibbeln, H. K. (1986). Administrative Discretion: Problems and prospects. In D. H. Shumavon & H. K. Hibbeln (Eds.), Administrative discretion and public policy implementation (pp. 1-11). New York: Praeger.
39.
Sinclair, B. (2003, February). Patriotism, partisanship and institutional protection: The congressional response to 9/11. Paper presented at the conference on “The Presidency, Congress, and the War on Terrorism: Scholarly Perspectives,” University of Florida, Gainesville.
40.
Skiba, R. J., Michael, R. S., & Nardo, A. C. (2002). The color of discipline: Sources of racial and gender disproportionality in school punishment. The Urban Review, 34(4), 317-342.
41.
Skolnick, J. H., & Fyfe, J. J. (1993). Above the law: Police and the excessive use of force. New York: Free Press.
42.
Snyder, T. D., & Hoffman, C. M. (2000). Digest of education statistics, 1999. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education National Center for Education Statistics. (NCES 2000-031)
43.
Stidham, R., & Carp, R. A. (1987). Judges, presidents, and policy choices: Exploring the linkage. Social Sciences Quarterly, 68, 395-404.
44.
Thompson, A. C. (1999). Stopping the usual suspects: Race and the Fourth Amendment. New York University Law Review, 74(4), 956-1013.
45.
Vaughan, D. (1997). The Challenger launch decision: Risky technology, culture, and deviance at NASA. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
46.
Vernonia v. Acton, 515 U.S. 646 (1995).
47.
Watts, I. E., & Erevelles, N. (2004). These deadly times: Reconceptualizing school violence by using critical race theory and disability studies. American Educational Research Journal, 41(2), 271-299.
