This paper examines the prevalence and characteristics of religiously mixed marriages among Polish migrants in England and Wales, focusing on unions between Catholics and partners from other religious backgrounds. Despite strong cultural and religious ties, Polish Catholics marry outside their faith more frequently than those in Poland and at rates comparable to the general UK population. The analysis draws on over 25,000 church marriage records from 2007 to 2020, collected by the largest Polish organization in Britain. Findings show that 11.5% of marriages were religiously mixed: 59.2% involved a Catholic and a baptized non-Catholic, while 40.8% included a Catholic and a non-Christian or nonbeliever. These results suggest a tendency to marry within historically dominant European religions but also reveal a notable level of social openness within the Polish Catholic migrant community.
AdamowiczL. (2009). Wybrane problemy katolickiego prawa małżeńskiego w kontekście emigracji w wielokulturowej Europie [Selected Issues Connected with Catholic Marital Law in the Light of Emigration in Multicultural Europe]. Roczniki Nauk Prawnych, 19(2), 151–163.
2.
BaniakJ. (2021). Małżeństwo i rozwody w świadomości młodzieży polskiej przełomu XX i XXI wieku w świetle badań socjologicznych [Marriage and Divorce in the Awareness of Polish Youth at the Turn of the 20th and 21st Centuries in the Light of Sociological Research]. Studia Koszalińsko-Kołobrzeskie, 28(1), 287–310. https://doi.org/10.18276/skk.2021.28-14
3.
Benedi LahuertaS.IusmenI. (2021). Eu nationals’ vulnerability in the context of Brexit: the case of Polish nationals. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 47(1), 284–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2019.1710479
4.
BiedrońM. (2017). Problemy małżeństw binacjonalnych. Analiza postów na forach internetowych [Problems of Binational Marriages: Analysis of Posts on Internet Forums]. Wychowanie W Rodzinie, 15(1), 93–115. https://doi.org/10.23734/wwr20171.093.115
5.
BondJ. (2012). In the mix: Making interfaith marriages work. The Christian Muslim Forum.
6.
BoonphaoP. (2020). Canonical considerations in pastoral care of persons in marriages between Roman Catholics and Buddhists in Thailand. Saint Paul University. https://doi.org/10.20381/ruor-25668
7.
BorekD. (2014). Przestępstwa przeciwko wierze w Normach De delictis revervatis z 2010 Roku [Crimes against Faith in the De delictis reservatis Norms of 2010]. Prawo Kanoniczne, 57(3), 105–126. https://doi.org/10.21697/pk.2014.57.3.06
8.
BrzozowskaA. (2017). Mixed marriages in a super-diverse society. The case of Polish-British couples in the cities of the West Midlands. Studia Migracyjne - Przegląd Polonijny, 43(4/166), 13–35.
9.
ButratanaK.TruppA. (2021). Gender, class, and paradoxical mobilities of Thai marriage migrants in Austria. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 42(1), 85–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjtg.12343
10.
ClarkD. (2023). Number of marriages in the United Kingdom from 1887 to 2019. Statista.
11.
ColletB. (2020). Les «couples mixtes» en France. De l’intégration des immigrés par le mariage à l’étude de la Mixité conjugale. Fabrica Societatis, 3(1), 134–150. https://doi.org/10.34616/129270
12.
ConnorP. (2008). Increase or decrease? The impact of the international migratory event on immigrant religious participation. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 47(2), 243–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5906.2008.00405.x
13.
CzykwinE. (2015). Małżeństwa prawosławno-katolickie w perspektywie badawczej [Orthodox-Catholic Marriages in a Research Perspective]. In BieńkowskaM.ŻelaznyW. (Eds.), Pogranicza. Księga jubileuszowa Profesora Andrzeja Sadowskiego [Borderlands. Professor Andrzej Sadowski’s Jubilee Book] (pp. 245–263). Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku.
DomańskiH. (2015). Otwartość struktury społecznej. Teoria i wyniki analiz [Openness of Social Structure: Theory and Analytical Results] (pp. 25–50). Nauka.
16.
DomańskiH.MachB.PrzybyszD. (2019). Otwartość polskiej struktury społecznej: 1982–2016. In: [Openness of Polish Social Structure: 1982–2016]. Studia Socjologiczne, 25–63. https://doi.org/10.24425/122489
17.
Duda-MikulinE. A. (2020). Gendered migrations and precarity in the post-brexit-vote UK: The case of Polish women as workers and carers. Migration and Development, 9(1), 92–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/21632324.2018.1502004
Dunin-WąsowiczR. (2022). Polish Immigrant Organisations in the UK after 2004: Between Lack of Unity and Increased Recognition. Studia Migracyjne – Przegląd Polonijny, 2(184), 47–67. https://doi.org/10.4467/25444972SMPP.22.011.15837
20.
Dunin-WąsowiczR.Gartzou-KatsouyanniK. (2023). Geographical dimensions of populist euroscepticism. Political Studies Review, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/14789299231201810
21.
EadeJ.DrinkwaterS.GarapichM. (2006). Class and ethnicity: Polish migrants in London. University of Surrey.
22.
ErátD. (2021). Educational assortative mating and the decline of hypergamy in 27 European countries. Demographic Research, 44(1), 157–188. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2021.44.7
23.
Estévez-AbeM.CaponioT. (2022). Badante or bride? Patterns of female migration in Italy, Japan, Korea, and Spain. International Migration Review, 56(4), 1167–1194. https://doi.org/10.1177/01979183211070296
24.
FanningB.Kloc-NowakW.LesińskaM. (2021). Polish migrant settlement without political integration in the United Kingdom and Ireland: A comparative analysis in the context of Brexit and thin European citizenship. International Migration, 59(1), 263–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.12758
25.
FelS.KozakJ.WodawskiM.IsańskiJ. (2023). Dilemmas Faced by Polish Migrants in the UK Concerning Brexit and Return Migration. Christianity-World-Politics, 27(2), 201–222. https://doi.org/10.21697/CSP.2023.27.1.12
26.
FiałkowskaK. (2019). “By Education I”m Catholic’. The Gender, Religion and Nationality Nexus in the Migration Experience of Polish Men to the UK. Central and Eastern European Migration Review, 9(2), 89–107. https://doi.org/10.17467/ceemr.2019.12
27.
GallagherK.TrzebiatowskaM. (2017). Becoming a ‘real’ Catholic: Polish migrants and lived religiosity in the UK and Ireland. Journal of Contemporary Religion, 32(3), 431–445. https://doi.org/10.1080/13537903.2017.1362883
28.
GatrellP. (2019). The unsettling of Europe: How migration reshaped a continent. Hachette.
29.
GawlewiczA. (2015a). Beyond ‘Us’ and ‘Them’: Migrant encounters with difference and reimagining the national. Fennia - International Journal of Geography, 193(2), 198–211. https://doi.org/10.11143/46322
30.
GawlewiczA. (2015b). ‘We inspire each other, subconsciously’: The circulation of attitudes towards difference between Polish migrants in the UK and their significant others in the sending society. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 41(13), 2215–2234. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2015.1045463
31.
Górak-SosnowskaK.ŁyszczarzM.Abdallah-KrzepkowskaB. (2024). When whiteness is not an asset. Racialisation strategies towards Polish converts to Islam. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 50(8), 2044–2062. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2023.2166909
32.
GórnyA.KępińskaE. (2004). Mixed marriages in migration from the Ukraine to Poland. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 30(2), 353–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183042000200740
33.
Grzymała-KazłowskaA. (2008). Integracja - Próba Rekonstrukcji Pojęcia [Integration: An Attempt to Reconstruct the Concept]. In Grzymała-KazłowskaA.ŁodzińskiS. (Eds.), Problemy integracji imigrantów. Koncepcje, badania, polityki [Problems of Immigrant Integration: Concepts, Research, Policies]. Wydawnictwa UW.
34.
Grzymala-KazlowskaA. (2017). From connecting to social anchoring: Adaptation and ‘settlement’ of Polish migrants in the UK. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 44(2), 252–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2017.1341713
35.
HöllingerF.HallerM.Valle-HöllingerA. (2007). Christian religion, society and the state in the modern world. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 20(2), 133–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610701502248
36.
Hruzd-MatuszczykA. (2021). Małżeństwa mieszane w przestrzeni społecznej – przegląd aktualnych doniesień [Mixed Marriages in the Social Space – a Review of Current Reports]. Edukacja Międzykulturowa, 15(2), 311–325. https://doi.org/10.15804/em.2021.02.17
37.
IsańskiJ.MichalskiM.SzwarcK.Seredyńska-AbouE. (2021). Fertility potential and child benefits questioned: Polish migration in the UK and changes of family policies in Poland. Migration Letters, 18(4), 381–399. https://doi.org/10.33182/ml.v18i4.1165
38.
JantaB. (2013). Polish migrants’ reproductive behaviour in the United Kingdom. Studia Migracyjne, 39(1), 63–96.
39.
JaroszewskaE. (2003). Małżeństwa polsko-niemieckie W RFN. In [Polish-German Marriages in the Federal Republic of Germany]. Aspra-JR.
40.
Jodłowska-HerudzińskaM. (2002). Kwestie doboru małżeńskiego w międzykulturowych małżeństwach mieszanych [Issues of Marriage Selection in Intercultural Mixed Marriages]. Roczniki Socjologii Rodziny, 14(2), 173–189.
41.
KaczmarczykR. (2017). System aksjologiczny muzułmanów – wyzwanie czy element wspólnej kultury Europy? [The Muslim Axiological System: A Challenge or an Element of the Common Culture of Europe?]. Rocznik Europeistyczny, 3(1), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.19195/2450-274X.3.6
KalmijnM. (2009). Country differences in the effects of divorce on well-being: The role of norms, support, and selectivity. European Sociological Review, 26(4), 475–490. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcp035
44.
Kandido-JakšićM. (2008). Social distance and attitudes towards ethnically mixed marriages. Psihologija, 41(2), 149–162. https://doi.org/10.2298/PSI0802149K
45.
KowalskaI. (2013). Małżeństwa i rozwody [Marriages and Divorces]. In StrzeleckiZ. (Ed.), Sytuacja demograficzna Polski. Raport 2012-2013 [Demographic Situation in Poland. Report 2012-2013] (pp. 56–102). Zakład Wydawnictw Statystycznych.
46.
KozakJ. (2015). Małżeństwo i rodzina w świadomości nupturientów w Polsce i Wielkiej Brytanii. Studium socjologiczne na 120-lecie istnienia Polskiej Misji Katolickiej Anglii i Walii [Marriage and Family in the Consciousness of the Nupturient in Poland and the UK. A Sociological Study on the 120th Anniversary of the Polish Catholic Mission of England and Wales]. Wydawnictwo Gaudium.
47.
KozakJ.FelS.WódkaM. (2021). Religijność a tożsamość narodowa polskich migrantów w Wielkiej Brytanii w dobie brexitu [Religiosity and National Identity of Polish Migrants in the UK in the Brexit Era]. Zeszyty Naukowe KUL, 64(3), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.31743/znkul.13174
KrotofilJ.Górak-SosnowskaK.PielaA.Abdallah-KrzepkowskaB. (2022). Being Muslim, Polish, and at home: Converts to Islam in Poland. Journal of Contemporary Religion, 37(3), 475–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/13537903.2022.2101714
50.
LeeS. M.HouF.EdmonstonB.WuZ. (2017). Religious intermarriage in Canada, 1981 to 2011. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 56(3), 667–677. https://doi.org/10.1111/jssr.12362
51.
Lenart-KłośK. (2013). Stwierdzenie nieważności małżeństwa. Próba ujęcia zjawiska na przykładzie diecezji lubelskiej [Declaration of Invalidity of Marriage. An Attempt to Capture the Phenomenon on the Example of the Lublin Diocese]. In ZadrogaA.SawickiK. (Eds.), Człowiek-społeczeństwo-gospodarka. Perspektywa odpowiedzialności społecznej [Man-Society-Economy. The Perspective of Social Responsibility] (pp. 125–142). Wydawnictwo KUL.
52.
LichterD.BrownJ.QianZ.CarmaltJ. (2007). Marital assimilation among hispanics: Evidence of declining cultural and economic incorporation?Social Science Quarterly, 88(3), 745–765. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2007.00481.x
53.
LiuC.KuluH. (2023). Competing family pathways for immigrants and their descendants in Germany. International Migration Review, 59(6), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/01979183231161600
54.
LockeH. J.SabaghG.ThomesM. M. (1956). Interfaith marriages. Social Problems, 4, 329–333. https://doi.org/10.799290
55.
MaterskiW. (2021). Gruzini na ziemiach polskich – historia i teraźniejszość (próba zakreślenia tematyki) [Georgians in Polish Lands: History and Present (an Attempt to Outline the Subject)]. International Affairs, 74(4), 75–100. https://doi.org/10.35757/SM.2021.74.4.07
56.
MehtaS. K. (2020). Christmas in the room: Gender, conflict, and compromise in multi-religious domestic space. Religions, 11(6), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel11060281
57.
MendañaK. C.ApritadoJ. M. M. (2021). Destination competitiveness and marketing strategies among resorts business in Occidental Mindoro. International Journal of Research, 9(3), 103–119. https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrsm.2021.m7721
58.
ModoodT. (2019). Multiculturalism: A civic idea. Palgrave Macmillan.
59.
MoretJ.AndrikopoulosA.DahindenJ. (2021). Contesting categories: Cross – Border marriages from the perspectives of the state, spouses and researchers. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 47(2), 325–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2019.1625124
60.
MorozA. (2020). Kontakty kulturowe w mikroskali – jak żyćrazem, kiedy dzieli nas kultura? O związkach międzykulturowych [Micro-Cultural Contacts – How to Live Together When Culture Divides Us? About Intercultural Relationships]. In Dąbrowska-ProkopowskaE.GoryńP.ZaniewskaM. F. (Eds.), Kultura w Polsce W XXI wieku. Konteksty społeczne, kulturowe i medialne [Culture in Poland in the 21st Century: Social, Cultural and Media Contexts] (pp. 403–411). Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku.
61.
NarkowiczK. (2023). White enough, not white enough: Racism and racialisation among Poles in the UK. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 49(6), 1534–1551. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2022.2154913
62.
NeumanW. L.RobsonK. (2014). Basics of social research. Pearson.
63.
NowickaM. (2008). Do you really talk about emotions online? Polish transmigrants and the culture of sharing emotions on the internet. Social Identities, 14(3), 281–305.
64.
NowickaM. (2018). “I Don’t Mean to Sound Racist but … ” transforming racism in transnational Europe. Ethnic & Racial Studies, 41(5), 824–841. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2017.1302093
65.
PerryS. L. (2013). Religion and whites’ attitudes toward interracial marriage with African Americans, Asians, and Latinos. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 52(2), 425–442. https://doi.org/10.1111/jssr.12020
66.
PodrazaM. (2023). Problematyka wielokrotnego i podwójnego obywatelstwa z perspektywy polskiej i międzynarodowej [The Issue of Multiple and Dual Citizenship from a Polish and International Perspective]. Studia Prawnoustrojowe, 62(1), 395–404. https://doi.org/10.31648/sp.8796
67.
PołujańskaA. (2009). Wzory doboru małżeńskiego w Polsce i przyczyny ich powstawania [Patterns of Marriage Selection in Poland and Their Determinants]. Studia Demograficzne, 2(156), 45–72.
68.
Popławska-SuśA. (2021). Życie na pograniczu. Małżeństwa i związki polsko-niemieckie w latach 1945-2004 – studium z antropologii historii [Life on the Border: Polish-German Marriages and Relationships in the Years 1945-2004 – a Study in the Anthropology of History]. Uniwersytet Warszawski.
69.
PrutskovaE. (2021). Social vs. Individual centrality of religiosity: Research in religious and non-religious settings in Russia. Religions, 12(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12010015
70.
RajewskiB. (2019). Rektor Polskiej Misji Katolickiej w Anglii i Walii wobec uprawnień udzielania dyspens od przeszkód małżeńskich Polakom zamieszkałych w Anglii i Walii [Rector of the Polish Catholic Mission in England and Wales on the Authority to Grant Dispensations from Marriage Impediments to Poles Residing in England and Wales]. PHW Arti.
71.
RamadhanD.QolyubiI. (2021). Religious moderation as a solution of interfaith marriages in multicultural society. Journal of Advance in Social Sciences and Policy, 1(2), 127–135. https://doi.org/10.23960/jassp.v1i2.31
72.
Rodríguez-GarcíaD. (2006). Mixed marriages and transnational families in the intercultural context: A case study of African – Spanish couples in Catalonia. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 32(3), 403–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691830600555186
73.
RyanL. (2015). Friendship-making: Exploring network formations through the narratives of Irish highly qualified migrants in Britain. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 41(10), 1664–1683. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2015.1015409
74.
RyanL. (2018). Differentiated embedding: Polish migrants in London negotiating belonging over time. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 44(2), 233–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2017.1341710
75.
RyanL.SalesR.TilkiM.SiaraB. (2009). Family strategies and transnational migration: Recent Polish migrants in London. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 35(1), 61–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691830802489176
76.
Sowa-BehtaneE. (2020). Dobór małżeński w małżeństwach międzykulturowych [Marital Selection in Intercultural Marriages]. Studia Paedagogica Ignatiana, 23(3), 179–199. https://doi.org/10.12775/SPI.2020.3.008
77.
StaniewiczT. (2011). Negotiating space and contesting boundaries: The case of Polish Roma and Polish migrants. Studia Migracyjne, 37(1), 259–289.
78.
Statistics (2016). Inter-faith marriages. ONS.
79.
SzukalskiP. (2015). Małżeństwa i rozwody w Polsce z perspektywy europejskiej [Marriages and Divorces in Poland from a European Perspective]. In StrzeleckiZ. (Ed.), Sytuacja demograficzna Polski (pp. 86–137). Rządowa Rada Ludnościowa. Raport2014-2015.
80.
SzukalskiP. (2020). Małżeństwa Polek i Polaków z cudzoziemcami. Czy krajowe dane są miarodajne do oceny skali małżeństw binacjonalnych? [Marriages of Poles with Foreigners: Are National Data Reliable for Assessing the Scale of Binational Marriages?]. Demografia I Gerontologia Społeczna, 10(1), 1–6.
81.
SzukalskiP. (2021). Jak covid-19 wpłynął na zawieranie w Polsce małżeństw binacjonalnych przez polskich obywateli? [How Has Covid-19 Affected Binational Marriages by Polish Citizens in Poland?]. Biuletyn Centrum Studiów Migracyjnych UŁ, 4(13), 2–6.
82.
TrzebiatowskaM. (2021). Presuming religious congruence? The nonreligious and Catholicism in Poland. Social Compass, 68(4), 653–670. https://doi.org/10.1177/0037768621994746
83.
van TubergenF. (2006). Religious affiliation and attendance among immigrants in eight Western countries: Individual and contextual effects. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 45(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5906.2006.00002.x
84.
Van TubergenF.SindradóttirJ. Í. (2011). The religiosity of immigrants in Europe: A cross-national study. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 50(2), 272–288. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5906.2011.01567.x
WatersI. B. (2005). The Catholic Church and mixed marriage. In AbeA. W. (Ed.), Mixed marriages: Catholic/non-Catholic marriages in Australia (pp. 101–106). Ringwood.
87.
WhiteA.GoodwinK. (2021). Invisible Poles and their integration into Polish society: Changing identities of UK second-generation migrants in the Brexit era. Social Identities, 27(3), 410–425. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630.2020.1859361
88.
WódkaM.FelS.KozakJ. (2020). Religiosity of Polish Catholics in the UK: Attitude towards faith, affiliation, membership and religious practices. Religions, 11(8), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel11080422
89.
WojniczP. (2018). Kościół katolicki wobec zagadnienia małżeństw mieszanych religijnie w kontekście migracji [The Catholic Church on the Issue of Religiously Mixed Marriages in the Context of Migration]. Civitas et Lex, 17(1), 37–45. https://doi.org/10.31648/cetl.2485
