This study critically examines how neoliberal market logic and Confucian ethics intertwine to shape motherhood roles in China, revealing the negotiation mechanisms of gendered childcaring responsibilities under structural constraints and cultural norms. Integrating Bourdieu’s concept of symbolic violence and Hewlett’s “mommy track,” we propose an intersectional perspective: the former explains how motherhood responsibilities are misrecognized as “feminine nature” through moralization and naturalization, while the latter shows how structural workplace exclusion institutionalizes motherhood as socioeconomic inevitability. Based on semi-structured interviews with 20 full-time mothers and thematic analysis, this article challenges the mainstream narrative of motherhood as a “private choice,” highlighting it as a critical field of cultural hegemony and institutionalized inequality. Findings further demonstrate that under Confucian collectivism, motherhood negotiation not only reproduces gender inequality but also intensifies class competition and intergenerational dynamics. The study calls for policy reform, cultural shifts, and workplace innovations to achieve care socialization and gender justice.
BearJ. B.GlickP. (2017). Breadwinner bonus and caregiver penalty in workplace rewards for men and women. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(7), 780–788. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616683016
5.
BourdieuP. (1986a). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Routledge.
6.
BourdieuP. (1986b). The forms of capital. In RichardsonJ. G. (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood Press.
7.
BourdieuP. (1991). Language and symbolic power. In ThompsonJ. B. (Ed.) (G. Raymond & M. Adamson, Trans). Harvard University Press.
ChodorowN. (1978). The reproduction of mothering: Psychoanalysis and the sociology of gender. University of California Press.
10.
ChungG.LanierP.WongP. (2020). Mediating effects of parental stress on harsh parenting and parent-child relationship during Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic in Singapore. Journal of Family Violence, 37(5), 801–813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-020-00200-1
11.
CollinsC.LandivarL. C.RuppannerL.ScarboroughW. J. (2021). COVID-19 and the gender gap in work hours. Gender, Work & Organization, 28(S1), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12506
12.
CollinsP. H. (2020). Intersectionality as critical social theory. Duke University Press.
13.
ConstantinS. V. (2018). Increasing employment precariousness in post-socialist China: Everyone equal in a world of uncertainty?NORA - Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 26(4), 278–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/08038740.2018.1534139
14.
CookeF. L. (2005). Women’s managerial careers in China in a period of economic reform. Asia Pacific Business Review, 11(2), 149–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360238042000291216
15.
CookeL. P. (2011). Gender-class equality in political economies. Routledge.
16.
CrenshawK. W. (2013). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. In The public nature of private violence (pp. 93–118). Routledge.
17.
CresswellJ. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
DuF.DongX. Y. (2013). Women’s employment and child care choices in urban China during the economic transition. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 62(1), 131–155. https://doi.org/10.1086/671714
20.
EtikanI.MusaS. A.AlkassimR. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
21.
FolbreN. (2001). The invisible heart: Economics and family values. The New Press.
22.
FongV. L. (2004). Only hope: Coming of age under China's one-child policy. Stanford University Press.
23.
FraserN. (1997). Justice interruptus: Critical reflections on the “postsocialist” condition. Routledge.
24.
FraserN. (2016). Fortunes of feminism: From state-managed capitalism to neoliberal crisis. Verso.
25.
FraserN.JaeggiR. (2023). Capitalism: A conversation in critical theory. Polity Press.
26.
GlennE. N. (1994). Social constructions of mothering: A thematic overview. In GlennE. N.ChangG.ForceyL. R. (Eds.), Mothering: Ideology, experience, and agency (pp. 1–29). Routledge.
27.
GlennE. N. (2004). Unequal freedom: How race and gender shaped American citizenship and labor. Harvard University Press.
28.
GuestG.BunceA.JohnsonL. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
29.
HaysS. (1996). The cultural contradictions of motherhood. Yale University Press.
30.
HewlettS. A. (2007). Off-ramps and on-ramps: Keeping talented women on the road to success. Harvard Business Review Press.
31.
HochschildA. R. (1989). The second shift: Working families and the revolution at home. Viking.
32.
HochschildA. R. (1997). The time bind: When work becomes home and home becomes work. Metropolitan Books.
33.
HuangQ.GambleJ. (2015). Social expectations, gender and job satisfaction: Front-line employees in China's retail sector. Human Resource Management Journal, 25(3), 331–347. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12066
34.
IkelsC. (2004). Filial piety: Practice and discourse in contemporary East Asia. Stanford University Press.
LareauA. (2003). Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life. University of California Press.
37.
McRobbieA. (2020). Feminism and the politics of resilience: Essays on gender, media and the end of welfare. Polity Press.
38.
OgawaR.ChanR. K.OishiA. S.WangL. R. (Eds.), (2018). Gender, care and migration in East Asia. Springer.
39.
OngA. (2006). Neoliberalism as exception: Mutations in citizenship and sovereignty. Duke University Press.
40.
PalinkasL. A.HorwitzS. M.GreenC. A.WisdomJ. P.DuanN.HoagwoodK. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
41.
PedullaD. S.ThébaudS. (2015). Can we finish the revolution? Gender, work-family ideals, and institutional constraint. American Sociological Review, 80(1), 116–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122414564008
42.
RidgewayC. L.CorrellS. J. (2004). Unpacking the gender system: A theoretical perspective on gender beliefs and social relations. Gender & Society, 18(4), 510–531. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243204265269
43.
RottenbergC. (2018). The rise of neoliberal feminism. Oxford University Press.
StoneP. (2007b). Opting out?: Why women really quit careers and head home. University of California Press.
46.
The Central Committee of the Communist Party of China & The State Council. (2021, July 20). Decision on improving the birth policy to promote the long-term balanced development of the population. Xinhua News Agency. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/202203/content_3635500.htm
47.
WilliamsJ. C. (2000). Unbending gender: Why family and work conflict and what to do about it. Oxford University Press.
48.
YanY. (2003). Private life under socialism: Love, intimacy, and family change in a Chinese village, 1949–1999. Stanford University Press.
49.
YangR. (2023). Mosaic of beliefs: Comparing gender ideology in China across generation, geography, and gender. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 64(5), 454–480. https://doi.org/10.1177/00207152221147493
50.
YuY.ChanT. F.HuangQ. (2024). Formulating the discourse of pro-work conservatism: A critical discourse analysis of Weibo posts in response to the implementation of the three-child policy. Feminist Media Studies, 24(3), 497–513. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2023.2200589
51.
ZuoJ.BianY. (2001). Gendered resources, division of housework, and perceived fairness—A case in urban China. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63(4), 1122–1133. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.01122.x
