The purpose of this study is to identify the subgroups of child-rearing values and the patterns of the proportions of the subgroups across OECD countries. It also examines the relationships between the proportions of these subgroups and the total fertility rates (TFRs) of the countries concerned. To this end, the study used data from 16 OECD countries collected during the 7th wave of the World Values Survey and employed Latent Class Analysis. The main findings of the study are as follows. First, three distinct classes of child-rearing values were identified: Huckleberry Finn, Miranda Priestly, and Cleo. Second, a variety of patterns were observed in the proportions of the three classes of child-rearing values across 16 OECD countries. Third, the proportions of Cleo were found to be positively associated with TFR, while those of Huckleberry Finn and Miranda Priestly were found to be negatively associated with TFRs. Based on these findings and limitations, directions for future research and implications for practice were suggested.
AassveA.AdseràA.ChangP. Y.MencariniL.ParkH.PengC.PlachS.RaymoJ. M.WangS.YeungW. J. J. (2024). Family ideals in an era of low fertility. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 121(6), Articlee2311847121. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2311847121
2.
AdemaW. (2012). Setting the scene: The mix of family policy objectives and packages across the OECD. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(3), 487–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.10.007
3.
BalboN.BillariF. C.MillsM. (2013). Fertility in Advanced Societies: A Review of Research: La fécondité dans les sociétés avancées: un examen des recherches. European Journal of Population, 29(1), 1–38.
4.
BerlinK. S.ParraG. R.WilliamsN. A. (2014). An introduction to latent variable mixture modeling (part 1): Overview and cross-sectional latent class and latent profile analyses. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 39(2), 174–187. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jst085
5.
CashmoreJ. A.GoodnowJ. (1986). Influences on Australian parents’ values: Ethnicity versus socioeconomic status. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 17(4), 441–454. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002186017004004
6.
Castro TorresA. F. (2020). Analysis of Latin American fertility in terms of probable social classes. European Journal of Population, 37(2), 297–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-020-09569-7
7.
CoardS. I.WallaceS. A.StevensonH. C.Jr.BrotmanL. M. (2004). Towards culturally relevant preventive interventions: The consideration of racial socialization in parent training with African American families. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 13(3), 277–293. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:jcfs.0000022035.07171.f8
8.
CollinsL. M.LanzaS. T. (2010). Latent class and latent transition analysis: With applications in the social, behavioral, and health sciences. John Wiley & Sons.
9.
DragoR.SawyerK.ShrefflerK. M.WarrenD.WoodenM. (2011). Did Australia’s baby bonus increase fertility intentions and births?Population Research and Policy Review, 30(3), 381–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-010-9193-y
10.
DribeM.BreschiM.GagnonA.GauvreauD.HansonH. A.MaloneyT. N.MolitorisJ.PozziL.SmithK. R.VézinaH.VézinaH. (2017). Socioeconomic status and fertility decline: Insights from historical transitions in Europe and North America. Population Studies, 71(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.2016.1253857
11.
DuffyB.MayG.WrightJ.HewlettK. (2023). Parenting priorities: International attitudes towards raising children. https://doi.org/10.18742/pub01-144
12.
FlècheS.LekfuangfuW. N.ClarkA. E. (2021). The long-lasting effects of family and childhood on adult wellbeing: Evidence from British cohort data. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 181(6), 290–311.
13.
FluchtmannJ.van VeenV.AdemaW. (2023). Fertility, employment and family policy: A cross-country panel analysis. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers. No. 299.
14.
GelfandM. J.RaverJ. L.NishiiL.LeslieL. M.LunJ.LimB. C.DuanL.AlmaliachA.AngS.ArnadottirJ.BoehnkeK.BoskiP.CabecinhasR.ChanD.ChhokarJ.D'AmatoA.Subirats FerrerM.FischlmayrI. C.AycanZ. (2011). Differences between tight and loose cultures: A 33-nation study. Science, 332(6033), 1100–1104. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1197754
15.
GuzmánJ.RodríguezJ.MartínezJ.ContrerasJ.GonzálezD. (2006). The demography of Latin America and the Caribbean since 1950. Population-E, 61(5–6), 519–576. https://doi.org/10.3917/pope.605.0519
16.
HagenaarsJ.HalmanL.MoorsG. (2003). Exploring Europe’s basic values map. In The cultural diversity of European unity (pp. 23–58). Brill.
17.
HagenaarsJ. A.McCutcheonA. L. (2002). Applied latent class analysis. Cambridge University Press.
18.
HarwoodR. L.MillerJ. G.IrizarryN. L. (1995). Culture and attachment: Perceptions of the child in context. Guilford Press.
19.
HoffE.LaursenB.TardifT. (2002). Socioeconomic status and parenting. In BornsteinM. H. (Ed.), Handbook of parenting (2, 2nd ed., pp. 231–252). Lawrence Erlbaum.
20.
InglehartR.MorenoA.BasanezM. (1998). Human values and beliefs: A cross-cultural sourcebook. University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.14858
IzzoF.BaioccoR.PistellaJ. (2022). Children’s and adolescents, happiness and family functioning: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(24), 16593. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192416593
23.
JoseP. E.HuntsingerC. S.HuntsingerP. R.LiawF.-R. (2000). Parental values and practices relevant to young children’s social development in Taiwan and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31(6), 677–702. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022100031006002
24.
JungS. Y. (2017). The effects of personal values on life satisfaction: Focusing on the comparison between Korea, China, and Japan. Journal of Korean Home Management Association, 35(1), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.7466/jkhma.2017.35.1.71
25.
KainzK.JensenT.ZimmermanS. (2018). Cultivating a research tool kit for social work doctoral education. Journal of Social Work Education, 54(4), 792–807. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2018.1434446
26.
KohnM. J. (1969). Class and conformity: A study in values. University of Chicago Press.
27.
KotteM.LudwigV. (2012). Intergenerational transmission of fertility intentions and behaviour in Germany: The role of contagion. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 9, 207–226. https://doi.org/10.1553/populationyearbook2011s207
28.
LaroqueG.SalanieB. (2008). Does fertility respond to financial incentives?IZA Discussion Paper.
29.
LinG. X.MikolajczakM.KellerH.AkgunE.ArikanG.AunolaK.RoskamI.BessonE.BlanchardM. A.BoujutE.BriandaM. E.Brytek-MateraA.CésarF.ChenB. B.DorardG.dos Santos EliasL. C.DunsmuirS.EgorovaN.EscobarM. J. (2023). Parenting culture(s): Ideal-parent beliefs across 37 countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 54(1), 4–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220221221123043
30.
MencariniL.VignoliD.ZeydanliT.KimJ. (2018). Life satisfaction favors reproduction: The universal positive effect of life satisfaction on childbearing in contemporary low fertility countries. PLOS ONE, 13(12), Articlee0206202. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206202
OgiharaY. (2017). Temporal changes in individualism and their ramification in Japan: Rising individualism and conflicts with persisting collectivism. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 695.
34.
PaganoM. E.HirschB. J.DeutschN. L.McAdamsD. P. (2003). The transmission of values to school-age and young adult offspring: Race and gender differences in parenting. Journal of Feminist Family Therapy, 14(3–4), 13–36. https://doi.org/10.1300/J086v14n03_02
35.
RijkenA. J.LiefbroerA. C. (2009). Influences of the family of origin on the timing and quantum of fertility in the Netherlands. Population Studies, 63(1), 71–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/00324720802621575
36.
RindfussR. R.ChoeM. K.Brauner-OttoS. R. (2016). The emergence of two distinct fertility regimes in economically advanced countries. Population Research and Policy Review, 35(3), 287–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-016-9387-z
37.
RindfussR. R.GuilkeyD. K.MorganS. P.KravdalØ. (2010). Child-care availability and fertility in Norway. Population and Development Review, 36(4), 725–748. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2010.00355.x
38.
RosenthalM. K.Roer-StrierD. (2001). Cultural differences in mothers’ developmental goals and ethnotheories. International Journal of Psychology, 36(1), 20–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207590042000029
39.
SeoJ. H.LeeS.TsutsumiN. (2002). A cross-cultural analysis on consumer values of Japanese and Korean college students. Journal of Home Economics of Japan, 53(12), 1185–1192.
40.
ShimY. H. (2018). East Asian patterns of individualization and its consequences for neighborhood community reconstruction. Korea Journal, 58(1), 41–69. https://doi.org/10.25024/kj.2018.58.1.41
41.
ThomasJ.RoweF.WilliamsonP.LinE. S. (2022). The effect of leave policies on increasing fertility: A systematic review. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9(1), 262. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01270-w
TrommsdorffG.NauckB. (2005). The value of children in cross-cultural perspective: Case studies from eight societies. Pabst Science.
44.
TudgeJ.HoganD.LeeS.TammeveskiP.MeltsasM.KulakovaN.SnezhkovaI.PutnamS. (1999). Cultural heterogeneity: Parental values and beliefs and their preschoolers’ activities in the United States, South Korea, Russia, and Estonia. In GöncüA. (Ed.), Children’s engagement in the world: Sociocultural perspectives (pp. 62–96). Cambridge University Press.
45.
TulvisteT.MizeraL.De GeerB.TryggvasonM. T. (2007). Child-rearing goals of Estonian, Finnish, and Swedish mothers. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 48(6), 487–497. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2007.00618.x
46.
UN Committee on the Rights of the Child (2019). Concluding observations on the combined fifth and sixth periodic reports of the Republic of Korea. United Nations.
47.
WangS.Tamis-LeMondaC. (2003). Do child-rearing values in Taiwan and the United States reflect cultural values of collectivism and individualism?Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34(6), 629–642. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022103255498
