Spousal Contributions and Women’s Fertility–Employment Dynamics in China: A Multi-State Model Analysis

Abstract

Using data from the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) from 2010 to 2020, this study examines how spousal contributions to household income and domestic labor influence the fertility and employment dynamics of Chinese women. Applying Multi-State Models (MSMs), we analyze transitions between employment and childbearing states to evaluate the applicability of Gender Equity Theory in China. Results show significant heterogeneity in the effects of household labor division on women’s fertility and employment stability. In economically equal households, increased husband’s domestic labor contribution is linked to lower fertility rates among employed women. Conversely, in female-breadwinner households, employed women are more likely to leave the workforce to focus on childbearing. These findings highlight the “work–fertility” conflict in China, challenging Gender Equity Theory predictions. Future research should explore the interplay between public and private spheres and its impact on fertility behavior within the gender equality framework.

Keywords

gender equity theory fertility employment household labor division China

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aassve

Fuochi

Mencarini

Mendola

(2015). What is your couple type? Gender ideology, housework sharing, and babies. Demographic Research, 32, 835–858, Article 30. https://doi.org/10.4054/demres.2015.32.30

Ahn

Mira

(2002). A note on the changing relationship between fertility and female employment rates in developed countries. Journal of Population Economics, 15(4), 667–682. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001480100078

Behrman

Gonalons-Pons

(2020). Women’s employment and fertility in a global perspective (1960-2015). Demographic Research, 43, 707–744, Article 25. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2020.43.25

Bernhardt

E. M.

(1993). Fertility and employment. European Sociological Review, 9(1), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.esr.a036659

Brewster

K. L.

Rindfuss

R. R.

(2000). Fertility and women’s employment in industrialized nations. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 271–296. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.271

Buber-Ennser

(2003). The influence of the distribution of household and childrearing tasks between men and women on childbearing intentions in Austria. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 1, 165–180. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23025399

Cheng

Y. A.

Hsu

(2020). No more babies without help for whom? Education, division of labor, and fertility intentions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 82(4), 1270–1285. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12672

Chesnais

J.-C.

(1996). Fertility, family, and social policy in contemporary Western Europe. Population and Development Review, 22(4), 729–739. https://doi.org/10.2307/2137807

Cheung

A. K.-L.

(2024). Couples’ housework participation, housework satisfaction and fertility intentions among married couples in Hong Kong. Asian Population Studies, 20(3), 289–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441730.2023.2252633

10.

Cooke

L. P.

(2004). The gendered division of labor and family outcomes in Germany. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(5), 1246–1259. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00090.x

11.

Cooke

L. P.

(2009). Gender equity and fertility in Italy and Spain. Journal of Social Policy, 38(1), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279408002584

12.

Craig

Siminski

(2010). If men do more housework, do their wives have more babies? Social Indicators Research, 101(2), 255–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205010-9644-1

13.

De Laat

Sevilla-Sanz

(2011). The fertility and women’s labor force participation puzzle in OECD countries: The role of men’s home production. Feminist Economics, 17(2), 87–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2011.573484

14.

Doepke

Kindermann

(2019). Bargaining over babies: Theory, evidence, and policy implications. American Economic Review, 109(9), 3264–3306. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20160328

15.

Dommermuth

Hohmann-Marriott

Lappegård

(2017). Gender equality in the family and childbearing. Journal of Family Issues, 38(13), 1803–1824. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X15590686

16.

Feyrer

Sacerdote

Stern

A.D.

(2008). Will the stork return to Europe and Japan? Understanding fertility within developed nations. The Journal of Economic Perspectives: A Journal of the American Economic Association, 22(3), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.22.3.3

17.

Goldscheider

Bernhardt

Brandén

(2013). Domestic gender equality and childbearing in Sweden. Demographic Research, 29, 1097–1126, Article 40. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2013.29.40

18.

Goldscheider

Bernhardt

Lappegård

(2015). The gender revolution: A framework for understanding changing family and demographic behavior. Population and Development Review, 41(2), 207–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2015.00045.x

19.

Hong

C.-H.

Gilbert

(2021). Cognitive dissonance and fertility rates: A comparative analysis of attitudes toward the gender division of labor in East Asian and Western industrial societies. Social Policy and Society, 20(1), 44–61. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746420000196

20.

Jackson

C. H.

(2011). Multi-state models for panel data: The msm package for R. Journal of Statistical Software, 38(8), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v038.i08

21.

Kan

(2023). Are gender attitudes and gender division of housework and childcare related to fertility intentions in Kazakhstan? Genus, 79(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41118-023-00200-1

22.

Kan

M.-Y.

Hertog

Kolpashnikova

(2019). Housework share and fertility preference in four East Asian countries in 2006 and 2012. Demographic Research, 41, 1021–1046, Article 35. https://doi.org/10.4054/demres.2019.41.35

23.

Kavas

(2019). The gendered division of housework and fertility intention in Turkey. Genus, 75(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41118-019-0068-8

24.

Kim

E. H.-W.

(2017). Division of domestic labor and lowest-low fertility in South Korea. Demographic Research, 37, 743–768, Article 34. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2017.37.24

25.

Kim

Kang

(2013). Analysis of survey on economic activities of career-break women. Seoul: Korea Women’s Development Institute.

26.

Lappegård

Neyer

Vignoli

(2021). Three dimensions of the relationship between gender role attitudes and fertility intentions. Genus, 77(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41118-021-00126-6

27.

McDonald

(2000). Gender equity, social institutions and the future of fertility. Journal of the Australian Population Association, 17(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03029445

28.

McDonald

(2013). Societal foundations for explaining fertility: Gender equity. Demographic Research, 28, 981–994, Article 34. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2013.28.34

29.

Miettinen

Basten

Rotkirch

(2011). Gender equality and fertility intentions revisited: Evidence from Finland. Demographic Research, 24, 469–496, Article 20. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2011.24.20

30.

Modiri

Sadeghi

(2021). Gendered division of domestic labor and childbearing intentions in Tehran, Iran. Journal of Family & Reproductive Health, 15(4), 220–228. https://doi.org/10.18502/jfrh.v15i4.7887

31.

Moen

(1991). Transitions in mid-life: Women’s work and family roles in the 1970s. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53(1), 135. https://doi.org/10.2307/353139

32.

Nagase

Brinton

M. C.

(2017). The gender division of labor and second births: Labor market institutions and fertility in Japan. Demographic Research, 36, 339–370, Article 11. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2017.36.11

33.

Neyer

Lappegård

Vignoli

(2013). Gender equality and fertility: Which equality matters? Egalité de genre et fécondité: de quelle égalité s’agit-il? European Journal of Population/Revue Européenne de Démographie, 29(3), 245–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-013-9292-7

34.

Nilsson

(2010). Housework and family formation: Exploring the relationship between gender division of housework and having children. The Open Demography Journal, 6(3), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874918601003010001

35.

Oláh

L. S.

(2003). Gendering fertility: Second births in Sweden and Hungary. Population Research and Policy Review, 22(2), 171–200. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40230818

36.

Philipov

(2008). Family-related gender attitudes. In Höhn

Avramov

Kotowska

(Eds.), People, population change and policies (pp. 153–174). Springer.

37.

Pinnelli

Fiori

(2008). The influence of partner involvement in fatherhood and domestic tasks on mothers’ fertility expectations in Italy. Fathering: A Journal of Theory, Research, and Practice About Men As Fathers, 6(2), 169–191. https://doi.org/10.3149/fth.0602.169

38.

Raybould

Sear

(2021). Children of the (gender) revolution: A theoretical and empirical synthesis of how gendered division of labor influences fertility. Population Studies, 75(2), 169–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.2020.1851748

39.

Rindfuss

R. R.

Brewster

K. L.

Kavee

A. L.

(1996). Women, work, and children: Behavioral and attitudinal change in the United States. Population and Development Review, 22(3), 457–482. https://doi.org/10.2307/2137716

40.

Scanzoni

Becker

G. S.

(1982). A treatise on the family. Contemporary Sociology, 11(6), 696. https://doi.org/10.2307/2068539

41.

Schober

P. S.

(2013). Gender equality and outsourcing of domestic work, childbearing, and relationship stability among British couples. Journal of Family Issues, 34(1), 25–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X11433691

42.

Thomas

Rowe

Lin

E. S.

(2023). Declining fertility in Taiwan: The deterring impact of housework imbalance. Asian Population Studies, 19(3), 270–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441730.2022.2035555

43.

Torr

B. M.

Short

S. E.

(2004). Second births and the second shift: A research note on gender equity and fertility. Population and Development Review, 30(1), 109–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2004.00005.x

44.

Waite

L. J.

(1980). Working wives and the family life cycle. American Journal of Sociology, 86(2), 272–294. https://doi.org/10.1086/227239

45.

Xie

(2014). An introduction to the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS). Chinese Sociological Review, 47(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.2753/CSA2162-0555470101.2014.11082908

46.

(2021). Division of domestic labor and fertility behaviors in China: The impact of extended family traditions on gender equity theory. China Population and Development Studies, 5(1), 41–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42379-021-00082-w

47.

Yang

(2017). Gendered division of domestic work and willingness to have more children in China. Demographic Research, 37, 1949–1974, Article 62. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2017.37.62