Using data from 17,636 respondents in 28 nations, this research uses multilevel modeling to compare the reported division of household labor and factors affecting it for currently married and currently cohabiting couples. Cohabiting men report performing more household labor than do married men, and cohabiting women report performing less household labor than do married women. The findings provide support for the time-availability, relative-resources, and gender-ideology perspectives. The effects of time availability and relative resources on the division of household labor are substantially the same for both union types, but gender ideology is more influential on the division of labor reported by cohabiting than by married respondents. Implications and suggestions for future research are discussed.
Arrighi, B.A., & Maume, D.J. (2000). Workplace subordination and men's avoidance of housework. Journal of Family Issues, 21, 464-487.
2.
Batalova, J.A., & Cohen, P.N. (2002). Premarital cohabitation and housework: Couples in cross-national perspective. Journal of Marriage and Family , 64, 743-755.
3.
Baxter, J. (1997). Gender equality and participation in housework: A cross-national perspective. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 28, 220-248.
4.
Baxter, J., & Kane, E.W. (1995). Dependence and independence: A cross-national analysis of gender inequality and gender attitudes. Gender & Society, 9, 193-215.
5.
Berk, S.F. (1985). The gender factory: The apportionment of work in American households. New York: Plenum.
6.
Bittman, M., England, P., Folbre, N., Sayer, L., & Matheson, G. (2003). When does gender trump money? Bargaining and time in household work. American Journal of Sociology, 109, 186-214.
7.
Brines, J. (1993). The exchange value of housework. Rationality and Society, 5, 302-340.
8.
Brines, J. (1994). Economic dependency, gender, and the division of labor at home. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 652-688.
9.
Brines, J., & Joyner, K. (1999). The ties that bind: Principles of cohesion in cohabitation and marriage. American Sociological Review, 64, 333-355.
10.
Brown, S.L., & Booth, A. (1996). Cohabitation versus marriage: A comparison of relationship quality. Journal of Marriage and Family, 58, 668-678.
11.
Calasanti, T.M., & Bailey, C.A. (1991). Gender inequality and the division of household labor in the United States and Sweden: A socialist-feminist approach. Social Problems, 38, 34-53.
12.
Carrington, C. (1999). No place like home: Relationships and family life among lesbians and gay men. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13.
Ciabattari, T. (2004). Cohabitation and housework: The effects of marital intentions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 118-125.
14.
Coltrane, S. (2000). Research on household labor: Modeling and measuring the social embeddedness of routine family work. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 1208-1233.
15.
Cubbins, L.A., & Vannoy, D. (2004). Division of household labor as a source of contention for married and cohabiting couples in metropolitan Moscow. Journal of Family Issues, 25, 182-215.
16.
Cunningham, J.D., & Antill, J.K. (1994). Cohabitation and marriage: Retrospective and predictive comparisons. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships , 11, 77-93.
17.
Davis, S.N., & Greenstein, T.N. (2004). Cross-national variations in the division of household labor. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 1260-1271.
18.
Fan, P.-L., & Mooney Marini, M. (2000). Influences on gender-role attitudes during the transition to adulthood. Social Science Research, 29, 258-283.
19.
Fuwa, M. (2004). Macro-level gender inequality and the division of household labor in 22 countries. American Sociological Review, 69, 751-767.
20.
Geist, C. (2005). The welfare state and the home: Regime differences in the domestic division of labour. European Sociological Review, 21, 23-41.
21.
Greenstein, T.N. (1996). Husbands' participation in domestic labor: Interactive effects of wives' and husbands' gender ideologies. Journal of Marriage and Family, 58, 585-595.
22.
Greenstein, T.N. (2000). Economic dependence, gender, and the division of labor in the home: A replication and extension. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 322-335.
23.
Gupta, S. (1999). The effects of transitions in marital status on men's performance of housework. Journal of Marriage and Family , 61, 700-711.
24.
Hamplova, D. (2002). Marriage and cohabitation: Qualitative differences in partnership arrangements. Sociologicky Casopis, 38, 771-788.
25.
Hoem, B., & Hoem, J.M. (1988). The Swedish family: Aspects of contemporary developments . Journal of Family Issues, 9, 397-424.
26.
Kamo, Y. (1994). Division of household work in the United States and Japan. Journal of Family Issues, 15, 348-378.
27.
Kaufman, G. (2000). Do gender role attitudes matter? Family formation and dissolution among traditional and egalitarian men and women. Journal of Family Issues, 21, 128-144.
28.
Kiernan, K. (2001). Cohabitation in Western Europe: Trends, issues, and implications. In A. Booth & A. C. Crouter (Eds.), Just living together: Implications of cohabitation on families, children, and social policy (pp. 3-31). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29.
Kiernan, K. (2004). Redrawing the boundaries of marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 980-987.
30.
Kurdek, L.A. (2004). Are gay and lesbian cohabiting couples really different from heterosexual married couples?Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 880-900.
31.
Le Bourdais, C., & Lapierre-Adamcyk, É. (2004). Changes in conjugal life in Canada: Is cohabitation progressively replacing marriage? Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 929-942.
32.
Lopez-Claros, A., Porter, M. E., & Schwab, K. (Eds.). (2005). Global competitiveness report 2005-2006: Policies underpinning rising prosperity. Houndsmills, UK: Palgrave-Macmillan.
33.
Lopez-Claros, A., & Zahidi, S. (2005). Women's empowerment: Measuring the global gender gap. Geneva, Switzerland: World Economic Forum.
34.
Miller, B.C., Rollins, B.C., & Thomas, D.L. (1982). On methods of studying marriages and families . Journal of Marriage and Family, 44, 851-873.
35.
Nock, S.L. (1995a). A comparison of marriages and cohabiting relationships . Journal of Family Issues, 16, 53-76.
36.
Nock, S.L. (1995b). Commitment and dependency in marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 57, 503-514.
37.
Raudenbush, S.W., & Bryk, A.S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38.
Rindfuss, R.R., & Vandenheuvel, A. (1990). Cohabitation: A precursor to marriage or an alternative to being single? Population and Development Review, 16, 703-726.
39.
Sanchez, L. (1993). Women's power and the gendered division of domestic labor in the third world. Gender & Society, 7, 434-459.
40.
Sanchez, L. (1994). Material resources, family structure, resources, and husbands' housework participation: A cross-national comparison. Journal of Family Issues, 15, 379-402.
41.
Seltzer, J.A. (2004). Cohabitation in the United States and Britain: Demography, kinship, and the future. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 921-928.
42.
Shelton, B.A., & John, D. (1993). Does marital status make a difference: Housework among married and cohabiting men and women. Journal of Family Issues, 14, 401-420.
43.
Smith, D.E. (1987). The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
44.
Smock, P.J. (2000). Cohabitation in the United States: An appraisal of research themes, findings, and implications. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 1-20.
45.
South, S.J., & Spitze, G.D. (1994). Housework in marital and nonmarital households . American Sociological Review, 59, 327-347.
46.
Stanley, S.M., Whitton, S.W., & Markman, H.J. (2004). Interpersonal commitment and premarital or nonmarital cohabitation. Journal of Family Issues, 25, 496-519.
47.
Thompson, L., & Walker, A.J. (1982). The dyad as the unit of analysis: Conceptual and methodological issues. Journal of Marriage and Family, 44, 889-900.
48.
Thornton, A., Axinn, W.G., & Hill, D.H. (1992). Reciprocal effects of religiosity, cohabitation, and marriage. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 628-661.
Wilhelm, B. (1998). Changes in cohabitation across cohorts: The influence of political activism. Social Forces, 77, 289-313.
51.
Yodanis, C.L. (2005). Divorce culture and marital gender equality: A cross-national study. Gender & Society, 19, 644-659.
52.
Zentralarchiv für Empirische Sozialforschung. ( 2004). The International Social Survey Programme. Retrieved February 20, 2004, from http://www.gesis.org/en/data_service/issp
