Exploring the Facilitators and Barriers to Maintaining Intimate Relationships during Covid-19 through Online Photovoice Methodology

Abstract

The pandemic has challenged couples and family relationships and resulted in conflict. Albeit the challenges, some positive outcomes on people may have been possibly protecting and repairing their relationships. The current study aimed to explore the potential barriers and facilitators for individuals. Online Photovoice method was applied to 118 individuals, who were in a romantic relationship. Data were analyzed using the Online Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis to identify themes. The findings revealed 16 facilitators and 13 barrier themes. Among those themes, spending more time with the loved ones, finding opportunities to develop spirituality and peace, and using technology to sustain a sense of connectedness, were the most frequently reported facilitators. On the other hand, the most expressed barriers were reported as the Covid-19 restrictions, home confinement, separation from family, and having destructive feelings. Implications for future research and mental health providers are discussed.

Keywords

covid-19 couple and family relationships intimate relationships online photovoice online interpretative phenomenological analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abel

Mcqueen

(2020). The COVID-19 pandemic calls for spatial distancing and social closeness: Not for social distancing. International Journal of Public Health, 65(3), 231–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-020-01366-7

Alves

Milek

Bodenmann

Fonseca

Canavarro

M. C.

Pereira

(2019). Romantic attachment, dyadic coping, and parental adjustment across the transition to parenthood. Personal. Relationships, 26(2), 286–309. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12278

American Psychiatric Association . (2020). New Poll: COVID-19 impacting mental well-being: Americans feeling anxious, especially for loved ones; older adults are less anxious. https://www.psychiatry.org/newsroom/news-releases/new-poll-covid-19-impacting-mental-well-being-americans-feeling-anxious-especially-for-loved-ones-older-adults-are-less-anxious

Balzarini

R. N.

Muise

Zoppolat

Di Bartolomeo

Rodrigues

D. L.

Alonso-Ferres

Slatcher

R. B.

(2020). Love in the time of Covid: Perceived partner responsiveness buffers people from lower relationship quality associated with Covid-related stressors. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/e3fh4

Barakat

(2020). Divorce rate increases in Saudi Arabia amid Covid-19. https://www.aa.com.tr/en/middle-east/divorce-rates-increase-in-saudi-arabia-amid-covid-19/1866563

Binding

(2020). Coronavirus: Law firm sees 40% rise in divorce inquiries during UK lockdown. https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus-law-firm-sees-40-rise-in-divorce-inquiries-during-uk-lockdown-11999307

Bonos

(2020 May 22). Our relationships are relationships are actually doing well during the pandemic, study finds. Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/2020/05/22/marriage-relationships-coronavirus-arguments-sex-couples/ (Accessed 2 June 2020).

Boserup

McKenney

Elkbuli

(2020). Alarming trends in US domestic violence during the Covid-19 pandemic. American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 38(12), 2753–2755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ajem.2020.04.077

Bradbury-Jones

Isham

(2020). The pandemic paradox: The consequences of COVID-19 on domestic violence. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 29(13-14), 2047–2049. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15296

10.

Buckner

J. D.

Abarno

C. N.

Lewis

E. M.

Zvolensky

M. J.

Garey

(2021). Increases in distress during stay-at-home mandates during the COVID-19 pandemic: A longitudinal study. Psychiatry Research, 298, 113821–113821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2021.113821

11.

Campbel

A. M.

(2020). An increasing risk of family violence during the Covid-19 pandemic: Strengthening community collaborations to save lives. Forensic Science International: Reports, 2, 100089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsir.2020.100089

12.

Chandan

J.S.

Taylor

Bradbury-Jones

Nirantharakumar

Kane

Bandyopadhyay

(2020). COVID-19: A public health approach to manage domestic violence is needed. The Lancet Public Health, 5(6), E309. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30112-2

13.

Collins

N. L.

Feeney

B. C.

(2000). A safe haven: An attachment theory perspective on support seeking and caregiving in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(6), 1053–1073. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.6.1053

14.

Dewitte

Otten

Walker

(2020). Making love in the time of corona — considering relationships in lockdown. Nature Review Urology, 17(10), 547–553. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-020-0365-1

15.

Donato

Parise

Pagani

A. F.

Lanz

Regalia

Rosnati

Iafrate

(2021). Together Against COVID-19 Concerns: The role of the dyadic coping process for partners’ psychological well-being during the pandemic. Frontiers in psychology, 11, 578395. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.578395

16.

Engel

G. L.

(1980). The clinical application of the biopsychosocial model. American Journal of Psychiatry, 137(5), 535–544. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.137.5.535

17.

Fancourt

Steptoe

(2021). Trajectories of anxiety and depressive symptoms during enforced isolation due to COVID-19 in England: A longitudinal observational study. The Lancet Psychiatry, 8(2), 141–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30482-X

18.

Fisher

Languilaire

J.-C.

Lawthom

Nieuwenhuis

Petts

R. J.

Runswick-Cole

Yerkes

M. A.

(2020). Community, work, and family in times of COVID-19. Community, Work, & Family, 23(3), 247–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2020.1756568

19.

Genc

Baptist

(2020). Muslim couples: The effects of perceived religion-based discrimination on relationship satisfaction. Journal of Muslim Mental Health, 14(2), 87–107. https://doi.org/10.3998/jmmh.10381607.0014.204

20.

Genc

(2021). Black and White couples: Exploring the role of religiosity on perceived racial discrimination and relationship satisfaction. The American Journal of Family Therapy. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926187.2021.1958269

21.

Genc

Turhan

(2021). The mediating role of dyadic coping on the effects of Covid-19 and relationship satisfaction among Turkish couples. American Journal of Family Therapy. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926187.2021.1984338

22.

Günther-Bel

Vilaregut

Carratala

Torras-Garat

Pérez-Testor

(2020). A Mixed-method study of individual, couple, and parental functioning during the State-regulated COVID-19 lockdown in Spain. Family Process, 59(3), 1060–1079. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12585

23.

Jackson

Newall

(2020). Americans adapting to the Coronavirus pause. https://www.ipsos.com/en-us/news-polls/axios-ipsos-coronavirus-index

24.

Killgore

W. D. S.

Cloonan

S. A.

Taylor

E. C.

Miller

M. A.

Dailey

N. S.

(2020). Three months of loneliness during the COVID-19 lockdown. Psychiatry Research, 293, 113392–113392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113392

25.

Kofman

Y. B.

Garfin

D. R.

(2020). Home is not always a haven: The domestic violence crisis amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 12(S1), S199–S201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/tra0000866

26.

Lebow

J. L.

(2020). Family in the age of COVID-19. Family Process, 59(2), 309–312. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12543

27.

Lehman

B. J.

David

D. M.

Gruber

J.A.

(2017). Rethinking the biopsychosocial model of health: Understanding health as a dynamic system. Social Personality Psychology Compass, 11(8), Article e12328. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/spc3.12328

28.

Wang

Xue

Zhao

Zhu

(2020). The impact of COVID-19 epidemic declaration on psychological consequences: A study on active Weibo users. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(6), 2032. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17062032

29.

Luetke

Hensel

Herbenick

Rosenberg

(2020). Romantic relationship conflict due to the COVID-19 pandemic and changes in intimate and sexual behaviors in a nationally representative sample of American adults. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 46(8), 747–762. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2020.1810185

30.

Maiti

Singh

Innamuri

Hasija

A. D.

(2020). Marital distress during COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown: A brief narrative. International Journal of Indian Psychology, 8(2), 426–433. https://doi.org/10.25215/0802.257

31.

Manne

Kashy

D. A.

Zaider

Lee

Kim

I. Y.

Heckman

Virtue

S. M.

(2018). Interpersonal processes and intimacy among men with localized prostate cancer and their partners. Journal of Family Psychology, 32(5), 664–675. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000404

32.

Niedzwiedz

C. L.

Green

M. J.

Benzeval

Campbell

Craig

Demou

Katikireddi

S. V.

(2021). Mental health and health behaviours before and during the initial phase of the COVID-19 lockdown: Longitudinal analyses of the UK household longitudinal study. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 75(3), 224–231. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2020-215060

33.

Overall

N. C.

Chang

V. T.

Pietromonaco

P. R.

Low

R. S. T.

Henderson

A. M. E.

(2021). Partners’ attachment insecurity and stress predict poorer relationship functioning during COVID-19 quarantines. Social Psychological and Personality Science. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550621992973

34.

Peterman

Potts

(2020). Pandemics and violence against women and children. Washington, DC: Centre for Global Development. Center for Global Development Working Paper 528. https//www.cgdev.org/publication/pandemics-and-violence-against-women-and-children

35.

Pietromonaco

P. R.

Overall

N. C.

(2020). Applying relationship science to evaluate how the COVID-19 pandemic may impact couples’ relationships. American Psychologist. Advance online publication. http://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000714

36.

Pietromonaco

P. R.

Overall

N. C.

(2022). Implications of social isolation, separation, and loss during the COVID-19 pandemic for couples’ relationships. Current Opinion in Psychology, 43, 189–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.07.014

37.

Prime

Wade

Browne

D. T.

(2020). Risk and resilience in family well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic. American Psychologist, 75(5), 631–643. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000660

38.

Reis

H. T.

(2012). Perceived partner responsiveness as an organizing theme for the study of relationships and well-being. In Campbell

Loving

T. J.

(Eds.), Interdisciplinary research on close relationships: The case for integration (pp. 27–52). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

39.

Reis

H. T.

Clark

M. S.

(2013). Responsiveness. In Simpson

J. A.

Campbell

(Eds.), Oxford handbook of close relationships (pp. 400–423). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

40.

Rosner

(2020). US divorce rates skyrocket amid Covid-19 pandemic. https://nypost.com/2020/09/01/divorce-rates-skyrocket-in-u-s-amid-covid-19/

41.

Ruan

Reis

H. T.

Clark

M. S.

Hirsch

J. L.

Bink

B. D.

(2019). Can I tell you how I feel? Perceived partner responsiveness encourages emotional expression. Emotion, 20(3), 329–342. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000650

42.

Salazar

Palomo-Osuna

de Sola

Moral-Munoz

J. A.

Dueñas

Failde

(2021). Psychological impact of the lockdown due to the COVID-19 pandemic in university workers: Factors related to stress, anxiety, and depression. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(8), 4367. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18084367

43.

Slatcher

R. B.

Schoebi

(2017). Protective processes underlying the links between marital quality and physical health. Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, 148–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.09.002

44.

Stanley

S. M.

Markman

H. J.

(2020). Helping couples in the shadow of COVID-19. Family Proccess, 59(3), 937–955. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12575

45.

Tanhan

(2020). Utilizing online photovoice (OPV) methodology to address biopsychosocial spiritual economic issues and wellbeing during COVID-19: Adapting OPV to Turkish. Electronic Turkish Studies. Advance Online Publication. http://doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.44451

46.

Tanhan

Yavuz

K. F.

Young

J. S.

Nalbant

Arslan

Yıldırım

Çiçek

(2020). A proposed framework based on literature review of online contextual mental health services to enhance wellbeing and address psychopathology during COVID-19. Electronic Journal of General Medicine, 17(6), Article em245. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejgm/8316

47.

Usher

Bhullar

Durkin

Gyamfi

Jackson

(2020). Family violence and COVID-19: Increased vulnerability and reduced options for support. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 29(4), 549–552. https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.12735

48.

Vigl

Strauss

Talamini

Zentner

(2022). Relationship satisfaction in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-national examination of situational, dispositional, and relationship factors. PLoS One, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264511.

49.

Waddell

Overall

Chang

Hammond

(2020). Gendered division of labour during a nationwide COVID-19 lockdown: Implications for relationship problems and satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 38(6), 1759–1781. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407521996476

50.

Wong

B.Y.-M.

Lam

T.-H.

Lai

A.Y.-K.

Wang

M.P.

S.-Y.

(2021). Perceived benefits and harms of the COVID-19 pandemic on family well-being and their sociodemographic disparities in Hong Kong: A cross-sectional study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(3), 1217. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18031217

51.

Worldometer (2020). Coronavirus cases. https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/

52.

Yang

(2020). How an epidemic outbreak impacts happiness: Factors that worsen (vs. Protect) emotional well-being during the coronavirus pandemic. Psychiatry Research, 289, 113045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113045