The Coronavirus pandemic in the US represented a fundamental challenge to casual dating and to romantic relationship formation. The How Couples Meet and Stay Together (HCMST) data for 2017–2022 show that the rate of singleness among US adults rose from 18.9% in 2017 to 24.3% in 2022 (or higher after adjusting for age), implying that more than 10 million more US adults were single during the pandemic in 2022 compared to 2017. HCMST data show that the difficulty in forming new relationships during the pandemic seems to explain most of the rise in pandemic singleness. Young adults were especially affected by the pandemic dating recession. The arrival of COVID-19 vaccines did not ameliorate the pandemic dating recession; on the contrary, vaccinated adults were more likely to describe barriers to dating in 2022. The rise in singlehood during the pandemic has been under-appreciated because our official data sources focus primarily on marriage and cohabitation, leaving casual and informal romantic relationships understudied. The lack of data on casual romantic relationships in the US has led to a lack of appreciation for the potential vulnerability of casual relationships to external shocks such as a pandemic.
AhmadF. B.CisewskiJ. A.AndersonR. N. (2022). Provisional mortality data- United States, 2021. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 71(17), 597–600. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7117e1
2.
ArmstrongE. A.PaulaE.FogartyA. C. K. (2012). Accounting for women’s orgasm and seuxal enjoyment in college hookups and relationships. American Sociological Review, 77(3), 435–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122412445802
3.
ArnettJ. J. (2004). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the early twenties. Oxford University Press.
4.
BaileyB. L. (1988). From front porch to back seat: Courtship in twentieth-century America. Johns Hopkins University Press.
5.
BergströmM.BréeS. (2023). Not a single meaning: Definition and evolution of singlehood in France and the United States. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 15(3), 465. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12519
6.
BloomeD.AngS. (2020). Marriage and union formation in the United States: Recent trends across racial groups and economic backgrounds. Demography, 57(5), 1753–1786. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-020-00910-7
7.
BogleK. A. (2008). Hooking up: Sex, dating and relationships on campus. New York University Press.
8.
BonandC.Garcia-BlasS.Tarazona-SantabalbinaF.SanchisJ.Bertomeu-GonzalezV.NunezJ.CorderoA. (2020). The effect of age on mortality in patients with COVID-19: A meta-analysis with 611,583 subjects. The Journal of Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine, 21(7), 915–918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2020.05.045
9.
BrizekM. G.FrashR. E.McLeodB. M.PatienceM. O. (2021). Independent restaurant operator perspectives in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 93(3), Article 102766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102766
CallegaroM.DiSograC. (2008). Computing response metrics for online panels. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72(5), 1008–1032. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfn065
12.
CampbellJ. T.Bennet-BrownM.MarcotteA. S.KaufmanE. M.MoscoviciZ.AdamsO. R.SydneyL.GarciaJ. R.GesselmanA. N. (2023). American singles’ attitudes toward future romandic/sexual partners’ COVID-19 vaccination status: Evidence for both vigilance and indifference in a national sample. Sexuality & Culture, 27(5), 1915–1938. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-023-10097-9
13.
CasperL. M.CohenP. N. (2000). How does POSSLQ measure up? Historical estimates of cohabitation. Demography, 37(2), 237–245. https://doi.org/10.2307/2648125
ChangL.KrosnickJ. (2009). National Surveys via RDD Telephone Interviewing versus the Internet: Comparing Sample Representativeness and Response Quality. Public Opinion Quarterly, 73(4), 661–674. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfp075
16.
CherlinA. J.CumberworthE.MorganS. P.WimerC. (2013). The effects of the great recession on family structure and fertility. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 650(1), 214–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716213500643
17.
CohenP. N. (2014). Recession and divorce in the United States, 2008-2011. Population Research and Policy Review, 33(5), 615–628. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-014-9323-z
18.
CoontzS. (1997). The way we really are: Coming to terms with America’s changing families. Basic Books.
19.
DePauloB. (2023). Single and flourishing: Transcending the deficit narratives of single life. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 15(3), 389–411. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12525
20.
EskridgeW. N.Jr. (1996). The case for same sex marriage: From sexual liberty to civilized commitment. Free Press.
FischerC. S. (2009). The 2004 GSS finding of Shrunken social networks: An artifact?American Sociological Review, 74(4), 657–669. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240907400408
23.
FrickerS.GalesicM.TourangeauR.YanT. (2005). An Experimental Comparison of Web and Telephone Surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 69(3), 370–392. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfi027
24.
GatesG. J. (2011). Recommendations for improving measurement of intimate partner relationships. National Center for Family & Marriage Research, Bowling Green State University.
25.
HamiltonL.ArmstrongE. A. (2009). Gendered sexuality in young adulthood: Double binds and flawed options. Gender & Society, 23(5), 589–616. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243209345829
26.
KannanV. D.VeazieP. J. (2023). US trends in social isolation, social engagement, and companionship- Nationally and by age, sex, race/ethnicity, family income, and work hours, 2003-2020. SSM- Population Health, 21, Article 101331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101331
27.
KlinenbergE. (2012). Going solo: The extraordinary rise and surprising appeal of living alone. The Penguin Press.
28.
LehmillerJ. J.GarciaJ. R.GesselmanA. N.MarkK. P. (2021). Less sex but more sexual diversity: Changes in sexual behavior during the COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic. Leisure Sciences, 43(1–2), 295–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2020.1774016
29.
LewisR. M.LeichliterJ. S.ChessonH. W.MarkowitzL. E. (2022). Sexual behavior among US adults: New sex partners and number of lifetime sex partners, NHANES 2013-2016 and NSFG 2011-2015. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 19(2), 530–540. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-021-00568-9
30.
LinD.-Y.GuY.WheelerB.YoungH.HollowayS.SunnyS.-K.MooreZ.ZengD. (2022). Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines over a 9-month period in North Carolina. New England Journal of Medicine, 386(10), 933–941. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2117128
ManningW. D.PayneK. K. (2021). Marriage and divorce decline during the COVID-19 pandemic: A case study of five states. Socius, 7, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1177/23780231211006976
33.
McGuiganK. A.EllicksonP. L.HaysR. D.BellR. M. (1997). Adjusting for attrition in school-based samples: Bias, precision, and cost trade-offs of three methods. Evaluation Review, 21(5), 554–567. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841x9702100502
34.
McLanahanS. (2011). Family instability and complexity after a nonmarital birth: Outcomes for children in fragile families. In CarlsonM. J.EnglandP. (Eds.), Social class and changing families in an unequal America (pp. 108–133). Stanford University Press.
35.
McPhersonM.Smith-LovinL.BrashearsM. E. (2006). Social isolation in America: Changes in core discussion networks over two decades. American Sociological Review, 71(3), 353–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240607100301
36.
MurphyS. L.KochanekK. D.XuJ.AriasE. (2021). Mortality in the United States, 2020. NCHS Data Brief.
OrthT.JoynerK. (2022). Partnering with partisans: The impact of party identity on long-term partner preferences. Presented at the meeting of the Population Association of America.Atlanta, Georgia: Population Association of America.
PutnamR. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.
41.
RindfussR. R. (1991). The young adult years: Diversity, structural change, and fertility. Demography, 28(4), 493–512. https://doi.org/10.2307/2061419
42.
RosenfeldM. J. (2007). The age of independence: Interracial unions, same-sex unions, and the changing American family. Harvard University Press.
43.
RosenfeldM. J. (2014). Couple longevity in the era of same‐sex marriage in the United States. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76(5), 905–918. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12141
44.
RosenfeldM. J.HausenS. (2023). Resilience and stress in romantic relationships in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sociological Science, 10, 472–500. https://doi.org/10.15195/v10.a17
45.
RosenfeldM. J.ThomasR. J. (2012). Searching for a mate: The rise of the internet as a social intermediary. American Sociological Review, 77(4), 523–547. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122412448050
46.
RosenfeldM. J.ThomasR. J.HausenS. (2023). How couples meet and stay together 2017-2020-2022 combined dataset. Stanford University Libraries. version 2.2. https://data.stanford.edu/hcmst2017
47.
ShanahanM. J. (2000). Pathways to adulthood in changing societies: Variability and mechanisms in life course perspective. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 667–692. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.667
48.
ShiltsR. (1987 [2000]). And the band played on: Politics, people and the AIDS epidemic. Stonewall Inn Edition. St. Martin's Press.
49.
ShovestulB.HanJ.GermineL.Dodell-federD. (2020). Risk factors for loneliness: The high relative importance of age versus other factors. PLoS One, 15(2), Article e0229087. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229087
50.
SmiteD.MoeN. B.HildrumJ.HuertaJ. G.MendezD. (2023). Work-From-Home is here to stay: Call for Flexibility in post-pandemic work policies. Journal of Systems and Software, 195(6), Article 111552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2022.111552
51.
StevensonB.WolfersJ. (2007). Marriage and divorce: Changes and their driving forces. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(2), 27–52. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.21.2.27
52.
StrohmC. Q.SeltzerJ. A.CochranS. D.MaysV. M. (2009). Living Apart together’ relationships in the United States. Demographic Research, 21(7), 177–214. https://doi.org/10.4054/demres.2009.21.7
53.
SutharA. B.WangJ.SeffrenV.WiegandR. E.GriffingS.ZellE. (2022). Public Health impact of COVID-19 vaccines in the United States: Observational study. British Medical Journal, 377, Article e069317. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2021-069317
54.
TesslerH. (2023a). Aromanticism, asexuality, and relationship (non-) formation: How A-spec singles challenge romantic norms and reimagine family life. Sexualities. OnlineFirst. https://doi.org/10.1177/13634607231197061
55.
TesslerH. (2023b). The Stability of Singlehood: Limitations of the relationship status paradigm and a new theoretical framework for reimagining Singlehood. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 15(2), 444. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12506
56.
ThomasD. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748
U.S. Surgeon General. (2023). Our epidemic of lonliness and isolation.
60.
WadeL. (2017). American hookup: The new culture of sex on campus. W. W. Norton.
61.
WagnerB. G.ChoiK. H.CohenP. N. (2020). Decline in marriage associated with the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. Socius, 6(15), Article 2378023120980328. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023120980328
62.
WilliamsA. A.MillerG. H.Marquez-VelardeG. (2021). COVID compatibility and risk negotiation in online dating during the COVID-19 pandemic. American Behavioral Scientist, 65(14), 1951–1971. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642211050902
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
