This study examines the underexplored relationship between union type and mental health for married, cohabiting, and living apart together (“LAT”) individuals. Further, we assess whether gender and age moderate (separately and jointly) this relationship. Using data from Wave 1 of the Generations and Gender Survey (N = 34,833), results suggest that cohabitors and LATs have worse mental health than married individuals. The negative effects of cohabiting or living apart on mental health are stronger for women than men. Young and middle-aged female LATs (to an equal magnitude) have worse mental health than married women of the same ages, while there are no such differences among older women. Middle-aged and older male LATs have worse mental health than married men of the same ages (with the larger effect found for middle-aged men), but there are no such differences among younger men. Thus, we highlight previously undocumented gender and life course dynamics of union type and mental health.
AyusoL. (2019). What future awaits couples living apart together (LAT)?The Review, 67(1), 226–244.
2.
BensonJ. J.ColemanM. (2016). Older adults developing a preference for living apart together. Journal of Marriage and Family, 78(3), 797–812. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12292
3.
BessenoffG.Del PrioreR. E. (2007). Women, weight, and age: Social comparison to magazine images across the lifespan. Sex Roles, 56(3), 215–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9164-2
4.
BrownS. L. (2000). The effect of union type on psychological well-being: Depression among cohabitors versus married. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 41(3), 241–255. https://doi.org/10.2307/2676319
BrownS. L.BulandaJ. R.LeeG. R. (2005). The significance of nonmarital cohabitation: Marital status and mental health benefits among middle-aged and older adults. Journal of Gerontology, 60(1), S21–S29. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/60.1.s21
8.
BrownS. L.ManningW. D.PayneK. K. (2015). Relationship quality among cohabiting versus married couples. Journal of Family Issues, 38(12), 1730–1753. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513x15622236
CarterJ.DuncanS.StoilovaM.PhillipsM. (2016). Sex, love and security: Accounts of distance and commitment in living apart together relationships. Sociology, 50(3), 576–593. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038515573689
ConnidisI.BorellK.KarlssonS. G. (2017). Ambivalence and living apart together in later life: A critical research proposal. Journal of Marriage and Family, 79(5), 1404–1418.
13.
CoulterR.HuY. (2017). Living apart together and cohabitation intentions in Great Britain. Journal of Family Issues, 38(12), 1701–1729. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513x15619461
14.
DuncanS.BarlowA.JamesG. (2005). Why don’t they marry? cohabitation, commitment and DIY marriage. Child and Family Law Quarterly, 17(3), 383–398.
DuncanS.PhillipsM. (2011). People who live apart together (LATs): New family form or just a stage?International Review of Sociology, 21(3), 513–532. https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2011.625660
17.
Kamp DushC. M.AmatoP. R. (2005). Consequences of relationship status and quality for subjective well-being. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22(5), 607–627. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407505056438
18.
EaglyA. H.WoodW. (2012). Social role theory. In Van LangeP.KruglanskiA.HigginsE. (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 458–476).Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19.
ElderG.JohnsonM.CrosnoeR. (2003). The emergence and development of life course theory. In MotimerJ.ShanahanM. (Eds.), Handbook of the life course (pp. 369–388). New York, NY: Plenum.
20.
FloodM. (2005). Mapping loneliness in Australia.Canberra: The Australia Institute.
21.
GoveW. R.HughesM.Briggs StyleC. (1983). Does marriage have positive effects on the psychological well-being of the individual?Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24(2), 122–131. https://doi.org/10.2307/2136639
22.
HairJ.BlackW.BabinB.AndersonR.TathamR. (2006). Multivariate data analysis. (6th ed.) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
23.
HansenT.SlagsvoldB. (2017). The east–west divide in late-life depression in Europe: Results from the generations and gender survey. Scandinavian Psychologist, 4, e4. https://doi.org/10.15714/scandpsychol.4.e4
24.
HansenT.SlagsvoldB.VeenstraM. (2017). Educational inequalities in late-life depression across Europe: Results from the generations and gender survey. European Journal of Ageing14(4), 407–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-017-0421-8
25.
HaskeyJ. C.LewisJ. (2006). Living-apart-together in Britain: Context and meaning. International Journal of Law in Context, 2(1), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1744552306001030
26.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
27.
KaplanR. M.KronickR. G. (2006). “Marital status and longevity in the United States population. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 60(9), 760–765. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2005.037606
28.
KarlssonS.BorellK. (2002). Intimacy and autonomy, gender and ageing: Living apart together. Ageing International, 27(4), 11-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12126-002-1012-2.
29.
KarlssonS. G.JohanssonS.GerdnerA.BorellK. (2007). Caring while living apart. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 49(4), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1300/j083v49n04_02
KingV.ScottM. E. (2005). A comparison of cohabiting relationships among older and younger adults. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(2), 271–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-2445.2005.00115.x
32.
KobayashiK. M.FunkL.KhanM. M. (2017). Constructing a sense of commitment in ‘living apart together’ (LAT) relationships: Interpretive agency and individualization. Current Sociology, 65(7), 991–1009. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392116653237
LewinA. C. (2017). Health and relationship quality later in life: A comparison of LAT, first marriages, remarriages and cohabitation. Journal of Family Issues, 38(12), 1754–1774. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513x16647982
35.
LewinA. C. (2018). Intentions to live together among couples living apart: Differences by age and gender. European Journal of Population, 34(5), 721–743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-017-9446-0
36.
LiefbroerA. C.PoortmanA.SeltzerJ. A. (2015). Why do intimate partners live apart? Evidence on LAT relationships across Europe. Demographic Research, 32, 251–286. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2015.32.8
37.
MahayJ.LewinA. C. (2007). Age and the desire to marry. Journal of Family Issues,28(5), 706–723. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513x06297272
38.
MarcussenK. (2005). Explaining differences in mental health between married and cohabiting individuals. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68(3), 239–257. https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250506800304
39.
MeyerI. H. (2003). Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 674-697. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.674.
40.
MusickK.BumpassL. (2012). Reexamining the case for marriage: Union formation and changes in well-being. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2011.00873.x
41.
PasteelsI.Lyssens-DanneboomV.MortelmansD. (2017). A life course perspective on living apart together: Meaning and incidence across Europe. Social Indicators Research, 130(2), 799–817. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-1189-x
42.
Perelli-HarrisB.MynarskaM.BerringtonA.BerghammerC.EvansA.IsupovaO.VignoliD. (2014). Towards a new understanding of cohabitation: Insights from focus group research across Europe and Australia. Demographic Research, 31, 1043–1078. https://doi.org/10.4054/demres.2014.31.34
43.
Perelli-HarrisB.StryrcM. (2018). Mental well-being differences in cohabitation and marriage: The role of childhood selection. Journal of Marriage and Family, 80, 239–255.
44.
PetryN. (2002). A comparison of young, middle-aged, and older adult treatment-seeking pathological gamblers. The Gerontologist, 42(1), 92–99. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/42.1.92
45.
Régnier-LoilierA. (2018). Are the generations and gender surveys well suited for studying same-sex couples?European Journal of Population, 34(4), 567–578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-017-9440-6
46.
SalkR. H.HydeJ. S.AbramsonL. Y. (2017). Gender differences in depression in representative national samples: Meta-analyses of diagnoses and symptoms. Psychological Bulletin, 143(8), 783–822. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000102
47.
SimonR. W. (2002). Revisiting the relationship among gender, marital status, and mental health. American Journal of Sociology, 107(4), 1065–1096. https://doi.org/10.1086/339225
48.
SimonR. W.BarrettA. E. (2010). Nonmarital romantic relationships and mental health inearly adulthood: Does the association differ for women and men?Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 51(2), 168–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146510372343
49.
SobotkaT.ToulemonL. (2008). Overview chapter 4: Changing family and partnershipbehavior: Common trends and persistent diversity across Europe. DemographicResearch, 19, 85–138. https://doi.org/10.4054/demres.2008.19.6
50.
SoonsJ. P. M.KalmijnM. (2009). Is marriage more than cohabitation? Well-being differencesin 30 European countries. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(5), 1141–1157. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00660.x
51.
StanleyS. M.MarkmanH. J. (1992). Assessing commitment in personal relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 54(3), 595–608. https://doi.org/10.2307/353245
52.
StanleyS. M.RhoadesG. K.WhittonS. W. (2010). Commitment: Functions, formation, and the securing of romantic attachment. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 2(4), 243–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2589.2010.00060.x
53.
StavrovaO.FetchenhauerD.SchlösserT. (2011). Cohabitation, gender and happiness: Across-cultural study in thirty countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43(7), 1063–1081. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022111419030
54.
StrohmC. Q.SeltzerJ. A.CochranS. D.MaysV. M. (2009). Living apart together relationships in the United States. Demographic Research, 21, 177–214. https://doi.org/10.4054/demres.2009.21.7
55.
SzalmaI.LippsO. (2014). A study of living apart together in Switzerland. Paper Presented at the European Population Conference, 25–28 June 2014, Budapest, Hungary.
56.
TaiT.BaxterJ.HewittB. (2014). Do co-residence and intentions make a difference? Relationship satisfaction in married, cohabiting, and living apart together couples in four countries. Demographic Research, 31(3), 71–104. https://doi.org/10.4054/demres.2014.31.3
57.
ThomaB. C.EckstrandK. L.MontanoG. T.RezeppaT. L.MarshalM. P. (2021). Gender nonconformity and minority stress among lesbian, gay, and bisexual individuals: A meta-analytic review. Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 3(4), 301–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620968766
United Nations. (2005). Generations & gender programme: Survey instruments. New York and Geneva: UN.
61.
Upton-DavisK. (2012). Living apart together relationships (LAT): Severing intimacy from obligation. Gender Issues, 29(1–4), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-012-9110-2
62.
Van der WielR.MulderC. H.BaileyA. (2018). Pathways to commitment in living-apart- together relationships in the Netherlands: A study on satisfaction, alternatives, investments and social support. Advances in Life Course Research, 36, 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2018.03.001
63.
WaiteL. J.GallagherM. (2000). The case for marriage: Why married people are happier, healthier and better off financially. New York, NY: Doubleday.
64.
WiikK. A.KeizerR.LappegardT. (2012). Relationship quality in marital and cohabiting unions across Europe. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74(3), 389–398. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2012.00967.x
65.
WrightM. R.BrownS. L. (2017). Psychological well-being among older adults: The role of partnership status. Journal of Marriage and Family, 79(3), 833–849. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12375
66.
YabikuS. T.GagerC.T. (2009). Sexual frequency and the stability of marital and cohabiting unions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(4), 983–1000. https:/doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00648.x
