This study explores whether cultural norms and economic performance shape the differences in the patterns of intergenerational exchanges, and analyzes whether structural, normative, or emotional dimensions of intergenerational solidarity predict the derived typology of intergenerational exchange in Taiwan before and after economic stagnation. Data derives from nationally representative samples of adult children with at least one parent alive in 2006 and 2016. Latent class analysis (LCA), measurement invariance with LCA, and multinomial logistic regression analysis are applied to analyze data. The results demonstrate how filial norms and economic stagnation influence the intergenerational exchange patterns. The study identifies five classes of intergenerational exchanges. There was a higher proportion of the high-exchange membership in the period of salary growth, while there was a higher proportion of the memberships of emotion-oriented exchanges during the wage stagnation period. Results reveal that geographic distance exerts a stronger and more consistent association with various exchange patterns.
Attias-DonfutC.OggJ.WolffF. C. (2005). European patterns of intergenerational financial and time transfers. European Journal of Ageing, 2(3), 161-173.
2.
CamposB.KimH. S. (2017). Incorporating the cultural diversity of family and close relationships into the study of health. American Psychologist, 72(6), 543-554.
3.
ClarkC.TanA. C.HoK. (2018). Ending Taiwan’s economic stagnation: the implications of the elections of presidents Tsai and Trump. Contemporary Chinese Political Economy and Strategic Relations: An International Journal, 4(3), 871-899.
4.
FuS. T.LeeC. S.GunnellD.LeeW. C.ChengT. A. (2013). Changing trends in the prevalence of common mental disorders in Taiwan: a 20-year repeated cross-sectional survey. Lancet, 381, 235-241.
5.
GiarrussoR.FengD.BengstonV. L. (2004). The intergenerational-stake phenomenon over 20 years. Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 24(1), 55-76.
6.
GuoM.ArandaM. P.SilversteinM. (2009). The impact of out-migration on the inter-generational support and psychological wellbeing of older adults in rural China. Ageing and Society, 29(7), 1085-1104.
7.
GuoM.ChiI.SilversteinM. (2012). The structure of intergenerational relations in rural China: a latent class analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74(5), 1114-1128.
8.
HaeppT.,HsinP. L. (2016). Is Taiwan’s workforce underpaid? evidence from marginal product of labor estimates at the company level. Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy, 28(2), 299-331.
9.
HoganD. P.EggebeenD. J.CloggC. C. (1993). The structure of intergenerational exchanges in American families. American Journal of Sociology, 98(6), 1428-1458.
10.
HuA. (2017). Providing more but receiving less: daughters inintergenerational exchange in Mainland China. Journal of Marriage and Family, 79(3), 739-757.
11.
HuntelerB.,MulderC. H. (2020). Geographic proximity to parents, intergenerationalsupport exchange, and migration within Germany. European Journal of Population, 36, 895-918.
12.
KalmijmM. (2019). The effects of ageing on intergenerational support exchange: a new look at the hypothesis of flow reversal. European Journal of Population, 35, 263-284.
13.
KankarašM.MoorsG.VermuntJ. K. (2010). Testing for measurement invariance with latent class analysis. In DavidovE.SchmidtP.BillietJ. (Eds.), Cross-cultural analysis: Methods and applications (pp. 361-386). New York: Routledge.
14.
KimK.ZaritS. H.FingermanK. L.HanG. (2015). Intergenerational exchanges of middle-aged adults with their parents and parents-in-law in Korea. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77, 791-805.
15.
LeeH. J.LyuJ.LeeC. M.BurrJ. A. (2014). Intergenerational financial exchange and the psychological well-being of older adults in the Republic of Korea. Aging & Mental Health, 18(1), 30-39.
16.
LeeY. J.ParishW. L.WillisR. T. (1994). Sons, daughters, and intergenerational support in Taiwan. American Journal of Sociology, 99(4), 1010-1041.
17.
LeiL. (2013). Sons, daughters, and intergenerational support in China. Chinese Sociological Review, 45(3), 26-52.
18.
LinJ. P. (2012). Intergenerational relations and a typology of intergenerational interaction between adult children and parents: the trends in Taiwanese families. In YiC. C.ChangY. H. (Eds.), Taiwan social change survey series III: Vol. 1. Social change in Taiwan, 1985-2005: Family and marriage (pp. 75-124). Taipei, Taiwan: Institute of Sociology, Academia Sinica.
19.
LinC. C.ChangJ. J.LuS. S. (2017). Wage stagnation? fact disclosure and cross-country comparison. Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy, 29(1), 1-39.
20.
LinJ. P.,HuangC. H. (2017). Between adult children and aging parents: intergenerational relationship and well-being in midlife. Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy, 29(3), 1-34.
21.
LinJ. P.,YiC. C. (2013). A comparative analysis of intergenerational relations in East Asia. International Sociology, 28(3), 297-315.
22.
LiuJ.GuoM.MaoW.ChiI. (2018). Geographic distance and intergenerational relationships in Chinese migrant families. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 27(4), 328-345.
23.
LoganJ. R.,BianF. (2003). Parents’ needs, family structure, and regular intergenerational financial exchange in Chinese cities. Sociological Forum, 18(1), 85-101.
24.
LorcaM. B. F.,PonceM. S. H. (2015). Normative, structural, and individual factors that predispose adult children to provide social support to their elderly parents. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 46(4), 517-540.
25.
McCutcheonA. L. (1987). Latent Class Analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
26.
MorelliS. A.LeeI. A.ArnnM. E.ZakiJ. (2015). Emotional and instrumental support provision interact to predict well-being. Emotion, 15(4), 484-493.
27.
MoorN.,KomterA. (2012). The impact of family structure and disruptionon intergenerational emotional exchange in Eastern Europe. European Journal of Ageing, 9, 155-167.
28.
ParkK. S.PhuaV.McNallyJ.SunR. (2005). Diversity and structure of intergenerational relationships: elderly parent–adult child relations in Korea. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 20(4), 285-305.
29.
SchwarzB.TrommsdorffG.AlbertI.MayerB. (2005). Adult parent-child relationships: relationship quality, support, and reciprocity. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54(3), 396-417.
30.
SilversteinM.,BengtsonV. L. (1997). Intergenerational solidarity and the structure of adult child‐parent relationships in American families. American Journal of Sociology, 103(2), 429-460.
31.
TaniguchiH.,KaufmanG. (2017). Filial norms, co-residence, and intergenerational exchange in Japan. Social Science Quarterly, 98(5), 1518-1535.
32.
TsaiF. J.MotamedS.RougemontA. (2013). The protective effect of taking care of grandchildren on elders’ mental health? associations between changing patterns of intergenerational exchanges and the reduction of elders’ loneliness and depression between 1993 and 2007 in Taiwan. BMC Public Health, 13(1), 567. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-567.
33.
YehK. H.,BedfordO. (2003). A test of the dual filial piety model. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 6(3), 215-228.
34.
YehK. H.YiC. C.TsaoW. C.WanP. S. (2013). Filial piety in contemporary Chinese societies: a comparative study of Taiwan, Hong Kong, and China. International Sociology, 28(3), 277-296.
35.
YiC. C.,ChangC. F. (2019). Family and gender in Taiwan, In LiuJ.YamashitaJ. (Eds.), Handbook of East Asian Gender Studies (pp.217-235). USA: Routledge: Taylor and Francis.
36.
YiC. C.,LinJ. P. (2009). Types of relations between adult children and elderly parents in Taiwan: mechanisms accounting for various relational types. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 40(2), 305-324.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
