Although an in-depth body of literature has explored the gendered lives of children in India, little is known about adolescents. Utilizing 24-hour time diary data from South India, this study examined how girls’ (n = 554) and boys’ (n = 577) engagement in housework varied by parents’ gender ideology. Findings show that adolescent girls with egalitarian parents do significantly less housework than girls with less egalitarian parents. At first glance, these findings support socialization theory—that what parents think translates into what adolescents do. However, boys do very little housework, regardless of parents’ gender attitudes. These differing findings are consistent with the idea of a stalled gender revolution and illustrate that socialization theory is not gender neutral.
ÁlvarezB.Miles-TouyaD. (2012). Exploring the relationship between parents’ and children’s housework time in Spain. Review of Economics of the Household, 10(2), 299-318.
2.
ArpinoB.Esping-AndersenG.PessinL. (2015). How do changes in gender role attitudes towards female employment influence fertility? A macro-level analysis. European Sociological Review, 31(3), 370-382.
3.
BarcellosS. H.CarvalhoL. S.Lleras-MuneyA. (2014). Child gender and parental investments in India: Are boys and girls treated differently? American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 6(1), 157-189.
4.
Ben-AriehA.OfirA. (2002). Opinion, dialogue, review: Time for (more) time-use studies: Studying the daily activities of children. Childhood, 9(2), 225-248.
5.
BianchiS. M.MilkieM. A.SayerL. C.RobinsonJ. P. (2000). Is anyone doing the housework? Trends in the gender division of household labor. Social forces, 79(1), 191-228.
6.
BianchiS. M.SayerL. C.MilkieM. A.RobinsonJ. P. (2012). Housework: Who did, does or will do it, and how much does it matter? Social Forces, 91(1), 55-63.
7.
BlairS. L. (1992). The sex-typing of children's household labour: Parental influence on daughters' and sons' housework. Youth & Society, 24(2), 178-203.
8.
BongaartsJ.GuilmotoC. Z. (2015). How many more missing women? Excess female mortality and prenatal sex selection, 1970–2050. Population and Development Review, 41(2), 241-269.
9.
BonkeJ. (2010). Children's housework—Are girls more active than boys? Electronic International Journal of Time Use Research, 7(1), 1-16.
10.
BorkerG.EeckhoutJ.LukeN.MinzS.SwaminathanS.MunshiK. (2019). Wealth, marriage, and sex selection. New Haven: Yale University.
11.
BreenR. (1996). Regression models: Censored, sample selected, or truncated data (Vol. 111). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
12.
ChenJ. J. (2012). Dads, disease, and death: Determinants of daughter discrimination. Journal of Population Economics, 25(1), 119-149.
13.
ColtraneS. (2000). Research on household labour: Modeling and measuring the social embeddedness of routine family work. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(4), 1208-1233.
14.
Cordero-ComaJ.Esping‐AndersenG. (2018). The intergenerational transmission of gender roles: Children's contribution to housework in Germany. Journal of Marriage and Family.
15.
CraigL.PowellA. (2018). Shares of housework between mothers, fathers and young people: Routine and non-routine housework, doing housework for oneself and others. Social Indicators Research, 136(1), 269-281.
16.
CrouterA. C.HeadM. R.BumpusM. F.McHaleS. M. (2001). Household chores: Under what conditions do mothers lean on daughters? New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development94, 23-42.
17.
CunninghamM. (2001). Parental influences on the gendered division of housework. American Sociological Review, 184-203.
18.
Das GuptaM.ZhenghuaJ.BohuaL.ZhenmingX.ChungW.Hwa-OkB. (2003). Why is son preference so persistent in East and South Asia? A cross-country study of China, India and the Republic of Korea. The Journal of Development Studies, 40(2), 153-187.
19.
DavisS. N.GreensteinT. N. (2009). Gender ideology: Components, predictors, and consequences. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 87-105.
20.
DavisS. N.PearceL. D. (2007). Adolescents' work-family gender ideologies and educational expectations. Sociological Perspectives, 50(2), 249-271.
21.
Dotti SaniG. M. (2016). Undoing gender in housework? Participation in domestic chores by Italian fathers and children of different ages. Sex Roles, 74(9–10), 411-421.
22.
DysonT.MooreM. (1983). On kinship structure, female autonomy, and demographic behavior in India. Population and Development Review, 9, 35-60.
23.
EnglandP. (2010). The gender revolution: Uneven and stalled. Gender & Society, 24(2), 149-166.
24.
EvertssonM. (2006). The reproduction of gender: Housework and attitudes towards gender equality in the home among Swedish boys and girls. The British Journal of Sociology, 57(3), 415-436.
25.
EvertssonM. (2014). Gender ideology and the sharing of housework and child care in Sweden. Journal of Family Issues, 35(7), 927-949.
26.
GagerC. T.SanchezL. A.DemarisA. (2009). Whose time is it? The effect of employment and work/family stress on children’s housework. Journal of Family Issues, 30(11), 1459-1485.
27.
GershunyJ.RobinsonJ. P. (1988). Historical changes in the household division of labor. Demography, 25(4), 537-552.
28.
Giménez -NadalJ. I.MolinaJ. A.OrtegaR. (2017). Like my parents at home? Gender differences in children’s housework in Germany and Spain. Empirical Economics, 52, 1143-1179.
29.
Giménez -NadalJ. I.MolinaJ. A.ZhuY. (2018). Intergenerational mobility of housework time in the United Kingdom. Review of Economics of the Household, 16(4), 911-937.
30.
Giménez-NadalJ. I.MangiavacchiL.PiccoliL. (2016). Mobility across generations of the gender distribution of housework. (No. 402).
31.
GoughM.KillewaldA. (2010). Gender, job loss, and housework: The time availability hypothesis revisited. Ann Arbor: Population Studies Center.
32.
GrusecJ. E.HastingsP. D. (Eds), (2014). Handbook of socialization: Theory and research. New York, NY: Guilford Publications.
33.
GuilmotoC. Z. (2012). Skewed sex ratios at birth and future marriage squeeze in China and India, 2005–2100. Demography, 49(1), 77-100.
34.
HofferthS. L.SandbergJ. F. (2001). How American children spend their time. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63(2), 295-308.
35.
HuY. (2015). Gender and children's housework time in China: Examining behavior modeling in context. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77(5), 1126-1143.
36.
KapadiaK. (1995). Siva and her sisters: Gender, caste, and class in rural South India. Routledge: Westview Press, Inc.
37.
KooremanP. (2007). Time, money, peers, and parents; some data and theories on teenage behavior. Journal of Population Economics, 20(1), 9-33.
38.
LinT. C.AdseràA. (2013). Son preference and children’s housework: the case of India. Population Research and Policy Review, 32(4), 553-584.
39.
LukeN.XuH.ThampiB. V. (2014). Husbands' Participation in Housework and Child Care in India. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76(3), 620-637.
40.
LundbergS. (2005). Sons, daughters, and parental behaviour. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 21(3), 340-356.
41.
OsterE. (2009). Proximate sources of population sex imbalance in India. Demography, 46(2), 325-339.
42.
PessinL.ArpinoB. (2018). Navigating between two cultures: Immigrants’ gender attitudes toward working women. Demographic Research, 38, 967.
43.
PlattL.PolaviejaJ. (2016). Saying and doing gender: Intergenerational transmission of attitudes towards the sexual division of labour. European Sociological Review, 32(6), 820-834.
44.
SchulzF. (2020). Trends in children’s gendered housework performance. Time use evidence from Germany, 1991-2013. Child Indicators Research, 13, 1313-1334.
45.
SchulzF. (2021). Mothers', fathers' and siblings' housework time within family households. Journal of Marriage and Family, 83(3), 803-819.
46.
SolazA.WolffF. C. (2015). Intergenerational correlation of domestic work: Does gender matter? Annals of Economics and Statistics/Annales d'Économie et de Statistique, 117/118, 159-184.
47.
Van der VleutenM.JaspersE.MaasI.Van der LippeT. (2016). Boys’ and girls’ educational choices in secondary education. The role of gender ideology. Educational Studies, 42(2), 181-200.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
