This article studies how the gender division in time spent on housework is associated with relationship dissolution among Danish couples. The use of time diary information on the actual time spent on housework for both partners leads to more precise measures than in previous studies. Two waves of the Danish Time Use Survey provided data on 3,434 couples linked to information from the Danish administrative population registries to observe union dissolution. Late entry hazard models were estimated to analyze how men’s contributions predicted dissolution risk after controlling for couple specific time-constant and time-varying covariates. The results show a U-shaped relationship between division of household labor and union dissolution with lowest risk when men provided 40% of the time on household tasks. Couples with the most unequal division of housework were the least stable. Even in a gender egalitarian society, women still perform more of the housework for relationships to be stable.
AdamsM.ColtraneS. (2005). Boys and men in families: The domestic production of gender, power, and privilege. In KimmelM. S.HearnJ.ConnellR. W. (Eds.), Handbook of studies on men and masculinities (pp. 230–248). Sage.
2.
AltintasE.SullivanO. (2016). Fifty years of change updated: Cross-national gender convergence in housework. Demographic Research, 35(1), 455–469.
3.
AmatoP. R. (2000). The consequences of divorce for adults and children. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(4), 1269–1287.
4.
BaxterJ. (2000). The joys and justice of housework. Sociology, 34(4), 609–631.
5.
BaxterJ.HewittB.HaynesM. (2008). Life course transitions and housework: Marriage, parenthood, and time on housework. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70(2), 259–272.
6.
BeckerG. S. (1985). Human capital, effort, and the sexual division of labor. Journal ofLabor Economics, 3(1, Part 2), S33–S58.
7.
BeckerG. S. (1991). A treatise on the family (enl. ed.). Harvard University Press.
8.
BerkS. F. (1985). The gender factory: The apportionment of work in American households. Plenum Press.
9.
BianchiS. M.MilkieM. A.SayerL. C.RobinsonJ. P. (2000). Is anyone doing the housework? Trends in the gender division of household labor. Social Forces, 79(1), 191–228.
10.
BittmanM.EnglandP.SayerL.FolbreN.MathesonG. (2003). When does gender trump money? Bargaining and time in household work. American Journal of Sociology, 109(1), 186–214.
11.
BonkeJ. (2002). Tid og velfærd [Time and Welfare]. Socialforskningsinstituttet.
12.
BonkeJ.FallesenP. (2010). The impact of incentives and interview methods on response quantity and quality in diary-and booklet-based surveys. Survey Research Methods, 4(2), 91–101.
13.
BreenR.CookeL. P. (2005). The persistence of the gendered division of domestic labour. European Sociological Review, 21(1), 43–57.
14.
ChungM. C.HuntL. J. (2014). Posttraumatic stress symptoms and well-being following relationship dissolution: Past trauma, alexithymia, suppression. Psychiatric Quarterly, 85(2), 155–176.
15.
ColtraneS. (2000). Research on household labor: Modeling and measuring the social embeddedness of routine family work. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(4), 1208–1233.
16.
CookeL. P. (2006). “Doing” gender in context: Household bargaining and risk of divorce in Germany and the United States. American Journal of Sociology, 112(2), 442–472.
17.
CraigL.MullanK. (2010). Parenthood, gender and work–family time in the United States, Australia, Italy, France, and Denmark. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(5), 1344–1361.
18.
DavisS. N.GreensteinT. N. (2009). Gender ideology: Components, predictors, and consequences. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 87–105.
19.
DeMarisA. (2007). The role of relationship inequity in marital disruption. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 24(2), 177–195.
20.
DribeM.StanforsM. (2009). Does parenthood strengthen a traditional household division of labor? Evidence from Sweden. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(1), 33–45.
21.
EdlundJ.ÖunI. (2016). Who should work and who should care? Attitudes towards the desirable division of labour between mothers and fathers in five European countries. Acta Sociologica, 59(2), 151–169.
22.
EIGE. (2017). Measuring gender equality in the European Union 2005–2015—Eige report. EU Publications. http://doi.org/10.2839/251,500
23.
Esping-AndersenG. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton University Press.
24.
Esping-AndersenG.BoertienD.BonkeJ.GraciaP. (2013). Couple specialization in multiple equilibria. European Sociological Review, 29(6), 1280–1294.
25.
Esping-AndersenG.GarfinkelI.HanW.-J.MagnusonK.WagnerS.WaldfogelJ. (2012). Child care and school performance in Denmark and the United States. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(3), 576–589.
26.
Esping-AndersenG.BillariF. C. (2015). Re-theorizing family demographics. Population and Development Review, 41(1), 1–31.
27.
EvertssonM.NermoM. (2007). Changing resources and the division of housework: A longitudinal study of Swedish couples. European Sociological Review, 23(4), 455–470.
28.
FriscoM. L.WilliamsK. (2003). Perceived housework equity, marital happiness, and divorce in dual-earner households. Journal of Family Issues, 24(1), 51–73.
29.
GottmanJ. M. (2014). What predicts divorce? The relationship between marital processes and marital outcomes. Psychology Press.
30.
GottmanJ. M.LevensonR. W. (1992). Marital processes predictive of later dissolution: behavior, physiology, and health. Journal of personality and social psychology, 63(2), 221–233.
31.
GreensteinT. N. (2000). Economic dependence, gender, and the division of labor in the home: A replication and extension. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(2), 322–335.
32.
GreensteinT. N. (2009). National context, family satisfaction, and fairness in the division of household labor. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(4), 1039–1051.
33.
GrilichesZ. (1986). Economic data issues. Handbook of Econometrics, 3, 1465–1514.
34.
HauserR.BurkhauserR. V.CouchK. A.Bayaz-OzturkG.TechC. C. (2016). Wife or Frau, women still do worse: A comparison of men and women in the United States and Germany after union dissolutions in the 1990s and 2000s. Demography, 28(3), 353–360.
35.
Hohmann-MarriottB. E. (2006). Shared beliefs and the union stability of married and cohabiting couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68(4), 1015–1028.
IturrateI. F.Domínguez-FolguerasM. (2018). Domestic divisions of work and couple dissolution in the UK. Irish Journal of Sociology, 27(1), 44–61.
38.
KamoY. (2000). “He said, she said”: Assessing discrepancies in husbands’ and wives’ reports on the division of household labor. Social Science Research, 29(4), 459–476.
39.
KanM. Y. (2008). Measuring housework participation: the gap between “stylised” questionnaire estimates and diary-based estimates. Social Indicators Research, 86(3), 381–400.
KlevenH.LandaisC.SøgaardJ. E. (2019). Children and gender inequality: Evidence from Denmark. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 11(4), 181–209.
42.
Lachance-GrzelaM.BouchardG. (2010). Why do women do the lion’s share of housework? A decade of research. Sex Roles, 63(11–12), 767–780.
43.
LennonM. C.RosenfieldS. (1994). Relative fairness and the division of housework: The importance of options. American Journal of Sociology, 100(2), 506–531.
44.
LeopoldT. (2018). Gender differences in the consequences of divorce: A study of multiple outcomes. Demography, 55(3), 769–797.
45.
LeopoldT.KalmijnM. (2016). Is divorce more painful when couples have children? Evidence from long-term panel data on multiple domains of well-being. Demography, 53(6), 1717–1742.
46.
McManusP. A.DiPreteT. A. (2001). Losers and winners: The financial consequences of separation and divorce for men. American Sociological Review, 66(2), 246–268.
47.
MencariniL.VignoliD. (2017). Employed women and marital union stability: It helps when men help. Journal of Family Issues, 39(5), 1348–1373.
48.
OláhL. S.GählerM. (2014). Gender equality perceptions, division of paid and unpaid work, and partnership dissolution in Sweden. Social Forces, 93(2), 571–594.
49.
OlivettiC.PetrongoloB. (2017). The economic consequences of family policies: Lessons from a century of legislation in high-income countries. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(1), 205–230.
50.
OppenheimerV. K. (1997). Women’s employment and the gain to marriage: The specialization and trading model. Annual Review of Sociology, 23(1), 431–453.
51.
OshioT.NozakiK.KobayashiM. (2013). Division of household labor and marital satisfaction in China, Japan, and Korea. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 34(2), 211–223.
52.
ParsonT. (1953). A revised analytical approach to the theory of social stratification. In BendixR.LipsetS. M. (Eds.), Class, status and power: A reader in social stratification (pp. 92–128). Free Press.
53.
Rabe-HeskethS.SkrondalA. (2011). Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using Stata (3rd ed.). Stata Press.
54.
RosenbeckB. (2018). Liberalization of divorce: No-fault divorce in Denmark and the Nordic countries in the early 20th century. Scandinavian Journal of History, 43(1), 18–39.
55.
RuppannerL.BrandénM.TurunenJ. (2018). Does unequal housework lead to divorce? Evidence from Sweden. Sociology, 52(1), 75–94.
56.
SchwartzC. R.Gonalons-PonsP. (2016). Trends in relative earnings and marital dissolution: Are wives who outearn their husbands still more likely to divorce? The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences:RSF, 2(4), 218–236.
57.
ShawS. M. (1988). Gender differences in the definition and perception of household labor. Family Relations, 37(3), 333–337.
58.
SmockP. J.ManningW. D.GuptaS. (1999). The effect of marriage and divorce on women’s economic well-being. American Sociological Review, 64(6), 794–812.
59.
Statistics Denmark. (2019). LIGEAI2: Gender equality indicator of activity and employment rates by frequency, family type, region and age. https://www.statbank.dk/LIGEAI2
60.
StevensD. P.KigerG.MannonS. E. (2005). Domestic labor and marital satisfaction: How much or how satisfied?Marriage & Family Review, 37(4), 49–67.
61.
SullivanO. (2013). What do we learn about gender by analyzing housework separately from child care? Some considerations from time-use evidence. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 5(2), 72–84.
62.
WaiteL. J.LuoY.LewinA. C. (2009). Marital happiness and marital stability: Consequences for psychological well-being. Social Science Research, 38(1), 201–212.
63.
WilcoxW. B.NockS. L. (2006). What’s love got to do with it? Equality, equity, commitment and women’s marital quality. Social Forces, 84(3), 1321–1345.
