Intersectionality espouses progressive societal dominant discourse norms that describe persons as individuals connected to a variety of social locations (e.g., gender, socioeconomic status [SES], ethnicity, sexual orientation, spirituality, vocation). This may not resonate with the cultural ideals of collectivist and bicultural communities, who are better understood when considered in context of both dominant and local intersectionality discourses. This retrospective interpretive thematic analysis examines the lived experiences of Chinese American Christian couples as they negotiate identity and roles in early parenthood. Findings indicate that the intersection of collectivist group identity markers, cultural values and spirituality guides how partners understand identity and negotiate relationship roles in marriage. Couples’ varied responses to cross-cultural and dominant discourse norms and other social location factors (e.g., vocation and SES) also account for individual differences. Implications for Chinese American Christian couples, and for the application of intersectionality theory to diverse populations, are discussed.
AddisonS. M.CoolhartD. (2015). Expanding the therapy paradigm with queer couples: A relational intersectional lens. Family Process, 54(3), 435–453. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12171
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–657.
5.
CaoN. (2005). The church as a surrogate family for working class immigrant Chinese youth: An ethnography of segmented assimilation. Sociology of Religion, 66(2), 183–200.
6.
ChenC. (2006). From filial piety to religious piety: Evangelical Christianity reconstructing Taiwanese immigrant families in the United States. International Migration Review, 40(3), 573–602. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2006.00032.x
7.
ChenFengJ. L. (2018). Integration of self and family: Asian American Christians in the midst of White evangelicalism and being the model minority. In WilsonE. E.NiceL. (Eds.), Socially just religious and spiritual interventions (pp. 15–25). Springer.
8.
ChenFengJ.KimL.WuY.Knudson-MartinC. (2017). Addressing culture, gender, and power with Asian American couples: Application of socio-emotional relationship therapy. Family Process, 56(3), 558–573.
9.
ChenFengJ.Knudson-MartinC.NelsonT. (2015). Intergenerational tension, connectedness, and separateness in the lived experience of first and second generation Chinese American Christians. Contemporary Family Therapy, 37(2), 153–164.
10.
ChuaP.FujinoD. C. (1999). Negotiating new Asian-American masculinities: Attitudes and gender expectations. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 7(3), 391–413.
11.
ChunK. M.AkutsuP. D. (2003). Acculturation among ethnic minority families. In ChunK. M.OrganistaP. E. BallsMarínG. E. (Eds.), Acculturation: Advances in theory, measurement, and applied research (pp. 95–119). American Psychological Association.
12.
CrenshawK. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory, and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 139, 139–167.
13.
CreswellJ. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
14.
DeutschF.GauntR. (2020). Creating equality at home: How 25 couples around the world share housework and childcare. Cambridge University Press.
15.
FalicovC. J. (1995). Training to think culturally: A multidimensional comparative framework. Family Process, 34(4), 373–388.
16.
FerreeM. M. (2010). Filling the glass: Gender perspectives on families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(3), 420–439.
17.
Few-DemoA. L. (2014). Intersectionality as the “new” critical approach in feminist family studies: Evolving racial/ethnic feminisms and critical race theories. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 6(2), 169–183.
18.
Few-DemoA. L.LloydS. A.AllenK. R. (2014). It’s all about power: Integrating feminist family studies and family communication. Journal of Family Communication, 14, 85–94.
19.
GeorgeJ.StithS. M. (2014). An updated feminist view of intimate partner violence. Family Process, 53(2), 179–193.
20.
GergenK. J. (2009). An invitation to social construction (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
21.
GuoZ. (1995). Chinese Confucian culture and the medical ethical tradition. Journal of Medical Ethics, 21(4), 239–246
22.
HankivskyO.GraceD.HuntingG.FerlatteO.ClarkN.FridkinA.LavioletteT. (2012). Intersectionality-based policy analysis. In HankivskyO. (Ed.), An intersectionality-based policy analysis framework (pp. 33–45). Institute for Intersectionality Research and Policy, Simon Fraser University.
23.
HillC. E.KnoxS.ThompsonB. J.WilliamsE. N.HessS. A.LadanyN. (2005). Consensual qualitative research: An update. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 196.
24.
HsiungY. F. Y.FerransC. E. (2007). Recognizing Chinese Americans’ cultural needs in making end-of-life treatment decisions. Journal of Hospice & Palliative Nursing, 9(3), 132–140.
25.
KhooO. (2007). The Chinese exotic: modern diasporic femininity (Vol. 1). Hong Kong University Press.
26.
KimB. K.LiL. C.NgG. F. (2005). The Asian American values scale- multidimensional: Development, reliability, and validity. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 11(3), 187–201. https://doi.org/10.1037/1099-9809.11.3.187
27.
KimballL. S.Knudson-MartinC. (2002). A cultural trinity: Spirituality, religion, and gender in clinical practice. Journal of Family Psychotherapy, 13(1–2), 145–166.
28.
KrauseI. B. (1995). Personhood, culture and family therapy. Journal of Family Therapy, 17(4), 363–382.
29.
KusujiartiS. (2020). Violating social norms. In DeutschF. M.GauntR. A. (Eds.), Creating equality at home (pp. 93–106). Cambridge University Press.
30.
LeeE. (2002). The Chinese exclusion example: Race, immigration, and American gatekeeping, 1882–1924. Journal of American Ethnic History, 21, 36–62.
31.
LiangC. T.LiL. C.KimB. S. (2004). The Asian American racism-related stress inventory: Development, factor analysis, reliability, and validity. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51(1), 103.
32.
LimP. C. (2017). Cultural transmission to cultural transformation: The case of contemporary Chinese Americans in a faith-based community. In QuekK. M.-T.FangS.-R. S. (Eds.), Transition and change in collectivist family life (pp. 79–88). Springer.
33.
LorberJ. (2005). Breaking the bowls: Degendering and feminist change. Norton.
34.
MorrowS. L. (2005). Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 250–260. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.250
35.
NavarreteV.JenkinsS. R. (2011). Cultural homelessness, multiminority status, ethnic identity development, and self-esteem. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 35(6), 791–804.
36.
OysermanD.CoonH. M.KemmelmeierM. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128(1), 3.
37.
QuekK.Knudson-MartinC. (2008). Reshaping marital power: How dual-career newlywed couples create equality in Singapore. Journal of Social and Interpersonal Relations, 25(3), 513–534.
38.
QuekK.Knudson-MartinC.RueD.AlabisoC. (2010). Relational harmony: A new model of collectivism and gender equality among Asian American couples. Journal of Family Issues (Special Edition on Asian American Families), 31, 358–380.
39.
SeedallR. B.HoltropK.Parra-CardonaJ. R. (2014). Diversity, social justice, and intersectionality trends in C/MFT: A content analysis of three family therapy journals, 2004–2011. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 40(2), 139–151.
40.
ShieldsS. A. (2008). Gender: An intersectionality perspective. Sex Roles, 59(5–6), 301–311.
41.
Ting-ToomeyS. (2015). Identity negotiation theory. In BennettJ. (Ed.), Sage encyclopedia of intercultural competence, (Vol. 1, pp. 418–422). SAGE Publications.
42.
TorgeJ. (2014). Freedom and imperative: Mutual care between older spouses with physical disabilities. Journal of Family Nursing, 20, 204–225.
43.
TuanM. (1998). Forever foreigners or honorary whites? The contemporary Asian ethnic experience. Rutgers University Press.
44.
YangF. (1998). Chinese conversion to evangelical Christianity: The importance of social and cultural contexts. Sociology of Religion, 59(3), 237–257.
