We explored the experiences of South African families across the racial divide regarding the burden of care of elderly parents of their emigrating children. The emergence of information and communication technologies has transformed these families’ abilities to stay connected despite distance and enables family members to maintain relationships of care in spite of physical separation. Total 23 families participated in the interviews of this qualitative study. We followed a family systems theoretical approached and analyzed the data according to the thematic analysis method developed by Braun and Clarke. The results reveal ambiguous relationships with technology, either positive or alienating and lacking intimacy. This article hopes to add to the emergent body of knowledge exploring the experiences of transnational families, as well as to underscore the manifold nature of human relationships in our increasing technological world.
AntmanF. M. (2010). Adult child migration and the health of elderly parents left behind in Mexico. American Economic Review, 100(2), 205–208. doi:10.1257/aer.100.2.205
3.
BacigalupeG.CámaraM. (2012). Transnational families and social technologies: Reassessing immigration psychology. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 38(9), 1425–1438. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2012.698211
4.
BaldassarL. (2007a). Transnational families and the provision of moral and emotional support: The relationship between truth and distance. Identities, 14(4), 385–409. doi:10.1080/10702890701578423
5.
BaldassarL. (2007b). Transnational families and aged care: The mobility of care and the migrancy of ageing. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 33(2), 275–297. doi:10.1080/13691830601154252
6.
BaldassarL. (2008). Missing kin and longing to be together: Emotions and the construction of co-presence in transnational relationships. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 29(3), 247–266. doi:10.1080/07256860802169196
7.
BaldassarL. (2016). De-demonizing distance in mobile family lives: Co-presence, care circulation and polymedia as vibrant matter. Global Networks, 16(2), 145–163. doi:10.1111/glob.12109
8.
BaldockC. V. (2000). Migrants and their parents: Caregiving from a distance. Journal of Family Issues, 21(2), 205–224.
9.
BaldockC. V. (2003). Long-distance migrants and family support: A Dutch case study. Health Sociology Review, 12(1), 45–54. doi:10.5172/hesr.12.1.45
10.
BaxterP.JackS. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544–559. Retrieved from https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol13/iss4/2
11.
BerryJ. W. (1997). Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation. Applied Psychology, 46(1), 5–34. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.1997.tb01087.x
12.
BossP. (1991). Ambiguous loss. In WalshF.McGoldrickM. (Eds.), Living beyond loss: Death in the family (pp. 237–246). New York, NY: Norton.
13.
BossP. (1999). Ambiguous loss: Learning to live with unresolved grief. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14.
BossP. (2016). The context and process of theory development: The story of ambiguous loss. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 8(3), 269–286. doi:10.1111/jftr.12152
15.
BorcsaM.PominiV. (2017). Virtual relationships and systemic practices in the digital era. Contemporary Family Therapy, 39(4), 239–248. doi:10.1007/s10591-017-9446-6
16.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
17.
BrycesonD.VuorelaU. (2002). The transnational family: New European frontiers and global networks. Oxford: Berg.
18.
CarvalhoJ.FranciscoR.RelvasA. P. (2015). Family functioning and information and communication technologies: How do they relate? A literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 99–108. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.037
19.
CharlesN.DaviesC. A. (2008). My family and other animals: Pets as kin. Sociological Research Online, 13(5). doi:10.5153/sro.1798
20.
CrushJ. (2000). Losing our minds: Skills migration and the South African brain drain. Migration Policy Series No. 18. Southern African Migration Project, Cape Town, South Africa: IDASA. Retrieved from http://samponline.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Acrobat18.pdf
21.
DorowS. K. (2006). Transnational adoption: A cultural economy of race, gender, and kinship. New York, NY: New York University Press.
22.
FalicovC. J. (2005). Emotional transnationalism and family identities. Family Process, 44(4), 399–406. doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.2005.00068.x
23.
FalicovC. J. (2007). Working with transnational immigrants: Expanding meanings of family, community, and culture. Family Process, 46(2), 157–171. doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.2007.00201.x
24.
FranciscoV. (2015). “The internet is magic”: Technology, intimacy and transnational families. Critical Sociology, 41(1), 173–190. doi:10.1177/0896920513484602
25.
GlickJ. E. (2010). Connecting complex processes: A decade of research on immigrant families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(3), 498–515.
26.
GoldenbergH.GoldenbergI. (2012). Family therapy: An overview. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
GrinbergL.GrinbergR. (1989). Psychoanalytic perspectives on migration and exile. London: Yale University Press.
29.
HamelJ. Y. (2009). Information and communication technologies and migration. Geneva: United Nations Development Programme.
30.
HarrisS. R. (2008). What is family diversity?Journal of Family Issues, 29(11), 1407–1425.
31.
HertleinK. M. (2012). Digital dwelling: Technology in couple and family relationships. Family Relations, 61(3), 374–387. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2012.00702.x
32.
HertleinK. M.AnchetaK. (2014). Advantages and disadvantages of technology in relationships: Findings from an open-ended survey. The Qualitative Report, 19(11), 1–11. Retrieved from https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol19/iss11/2
33.
HöppliT. (2014). Is the brain drain really reversing? New evidence. Policy Research on International Services and Manufacturing Working Paper 1. Cape Town: PRISM, University of Cape Town.
34.
HorowitzS.KaplanR. D. E. (2001). The Jewish exodus from the new South Africa: Realities and implications. International Migration, 39, 3–32. doi:10.1111/1468-2435.00154.
35.
HorstH. (2006). The blessings and burdens of communication: Cell phones in Jamaican transnational social fields. Global Networks, 6(2), 143–159. doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0374.2006.00138.x
36.
HuangY. C.MathersN. J. (2008). Postnatal depression and the experience of South Asian marriage migrant women in Taiwan: Survey and semi-structured interview study. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 45(6), 924–931. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2007.02.006
37.
KaplanD.HöppliT. (2017). The South African brain drain: An empirical assessment. Development Southern Africa, 34(5), 497–514. doi.org/10.1080/0376835X.2017.1351870
38.
KingR.VullnetariJ. (2006). Orphan pensioners and migrating grandparents: The impact of mass migration on older people in rural Albania. Ageing and Society, 26(5), 783–816. doi:10.1017/s0144686x06005125
39.
KnodelJ.SaengtienchaiC. (2007). Rural parents with urban children: Social and economic implications of migration for the rural elderly in Thailand. Population, Space and Place, 13, 193–210. doi:10.1002/psp.436
40.
LeeR. M. (2003). The transracial adoption paradox: History, research, and counseling implications of cultural socialization. The Counseling Psychologist, 31(6), 711–744.
41.
LouwE.MershamG. (2001). Packing for Perth: The growth of a Southern African diaspora. Asian and Pacific Migration Journal, 10(2), 303–333. doi:10.1177/011719680101000204
42.
MadianouM. (2016). Ambient co-presence: Transnational family practices in polymedia environments. Global Networks, 16(2), 183–201. doi:10.1111/glob.12105
43.
Marchetti-MercerM. C. (2009). South Africans in Flux: Exploring the Mental Health Impact of Migration on Family Life. African Journal of Psychiatry, 12, 129–134.
44.
Marchetti-MercerM. C. (2012a). Is It Just About the Crime? A Psychological Perspective on South African Emigration. South African Journal of Psychology, 42, 243–254.
45.
Marchetti-MercerM. C. (2012b). Those Easily Forgotten: The Impact of Emigration on Those Left Behind. Family Process, 51, 373–383. doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.2012.01407.x.
46.
Marchetti-MercerM. C. (2016). If You Uproot a Tree You Leave a Big Hole Behind’: Systemic Interconnectedness in Emigration and Family Life. Contemporary Family Therapy, 38, 339–352. doi:10.1007/s10591-016-9386-6.
47.
Marchetti-MercerM. C. (2017). “The Screen Has Such Sharp Edges to Hug”: The Relational Consequences of Emigration in Transnational South African Emigrant Families. Transnational Social Work, 7(1), 73–89. doi:10.1080/21931674.2016.1277650.
48.
MiltiadesH. B. (2002). The social and psychological effects of an adult child’s emigration on non-immigrant Asian Indian elderly parents. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 17, 33–55. doi:10.1023/A:1014868118739
49.
MorrisonM.JamesS. (2009). Portuguese immigrant families: The impact of acculturation. Family Process, 48(1), 151–166.
50.
MulderC. H.CookeT. J. (2009). Family ties and residential locations [Special Issue]. Population, Space and Place, 15, 299–304. doi:10.1002/psp.556
51.
MuracoA. (2006). Intentional families: Fictive kin ties between cross-gender, different sexual orientation friends. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68(5), 1313–1325.
52.
NedelcuM. (2012). Migrants’ new transnational habitus: Rethinking migration through a cosmopolitan lens in the digital age. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 38(9), 1339–1356. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2012.698203
53.
PalmaryI. (2018). Psychology, migration studies, and their disconnections: A review of existing research and future possibilities. South African Journal of Psychology, 48(1), 3–14.
54.
PeaR.NassC.MeheulaL.RanceM.KumarA.BamfordH.. . . ZhouM. (2012, January23). Media use, face-to-face communication, media multitasking, and social well-being among 8- to 12-year-old girls. Developmental Psychology, 48, 327–36. doi:10.1037/a0027030
55.
SchillerN. G.BaschL.Blanc-SzantonC. (1992). Towards a definition of transnationalism. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 645(1), ix–xiv. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1992.tb33482.x
56.
SilverA. (2011). Families across borders. International Migration, 52(3), 192–220. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2435.2010.00672.x
57.
SluzkiC. E. (1979). Migration and family conflict. Family Process, 18(4), 379–390.
58.
South African Institute for Race Relations (SAIRR). (2009, 23February). Skills flights retards growth and investment. Retrieved from http://www.sairr.org.za
59.
SwartzL.Marchetti-MercerM. C. (2019). Migration, technology and care: What happens to the body?Disability and Society, 34(3), 407–420. doi:10.1080/09687599.2018.1519409
60.
VosslerA. (2016). Internet infidelity 10 years on: A critical review of the literature. The Family Journal, 24(4), 359–366. doi:10.1177/1066480716663191.
61.
WildingR. (2006). “Virtual” intimacies? Families communicating across transnational contexts. Global Networks, 6(2), 125–142. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0374.2006.00137.x
62.
YahirunJ. J.ArenasE. (2018). Offspring migration and parents’ emotional and psychological well-being in Mexico. Journal of Marriage and Family, 80(4), 975–991. doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12479
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
