This study explored how low-income documented and undocumented Latina immigrant mothers negotiate motherhood and adapt to life in new cultural and structural contexts. Grounded in ecocultural theory, we analyzed data from 21 in-depth interviews with Latina immigrant mothers to surface how their experiences of motherhood in the United States were shaped by their country of origin experiences and their situatedness in the United States. We documented emergent tensions related to their immigration context, often driven by changes in their legal status as they crossed borders, changes in family and community supports, and differing cultural expectations of their gendered roles as caregivers and family members. These tensions forced mothers to renegotiate and adjust their perceptions, identities, and roles as women, mothers, partners, and members of larger, often transnational kin and community networks. Implications of these tensions and identity and role shifts in the context of immigrant family life in the United States are discussed.
ArendellT. (2000). Conceiving and investigating motherhood: The decade’s scholarship. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 1192-1207.
2.
Baca ZinnM.WellsB. (2008). Diversity within Latino families: New lessons for family social science. In CoontzS. (Ed.), American families: A multicultural reader (2nd ed., pp. 222-244). New York, NY: Routledge.
3.
BacigalupeG.LambeS. (2011). Virtualizing intimacy: Information communication technologies and transnational families in therapy. Family Process, 50, 12-26.
4.
BlanchardJ.LurieN. (2004). R-E-S-P-E-C-T: Patient reports of disrespect in the health care setting and its impact on care. Journal of Family Practice, 53, 721-730.
5.
BradleyR. H.CorwynR. F.Whiteside-MansellL. (1996). Life at home: Same time, different places: An examination of the HOME Inventory in different cultures. Infant and Child Development, 5, 251-269.
6.
CampbellK. (2016). The “New Selma” and the old Selma: Arizona, Alabama, and the immigration civil rights movement in the twenty-first century. Journal of American Ethnic History, 35, 76-81.
7.
CardosoJ. B.ScottJ. L.FaulknerM.LaneL. B. (2018). Parenting in the context of deportation risk. Journal of Marriage and Family, 80, 301-316.
8.
ChristopherK. (2012). Extensive mothering: Employed mothers’ constructions of the good mother. Gender & Society, 26, 73-96.
9.
CollinsP. (1994). Shifting the center: Race, class, and feminist theorizing about motherhood. In GlennE. N.ChangG.ForceyL. (Eds.), Mothering: Ideology, experience, and agency (pp. 45-66). New York, NY: Routledge.
10.
CowanC. P.CowanP. A. (1995). Interventions to ease the transition to parenthood: Why they are needed and what they can do. Family Relations, 44, 412-423.
11.
CowanC. P.CowanP. A. (2000). When partners become parents: The big life change for couples. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12.
CutcliffeJ. R. (2005). Adapt or adopt: Developing and transgressing the methodological boundaries of grounded theory. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 51, 421-428.
13.
DeWildeC.BurtonC. W. (2017). Cultural distress: An emerging paradigm. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 28, 334-341. doi:10.1177/1043659616682594
14.
DrebyJ. (2015). Everyday illegal. Oakland: University of California Press.
FuentesE. (2013). Political mothering: Latina and African American mothers in the struggle for educational justice. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 44, 304-319. doi:10.1111/aeq.12027
17.
GareyA. I. (1999). Weaving work and motherhood. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
HarknessS.SuperC. M. (2006). Themes and variations: Parental ethnotheories in Western cultures. In RubinK. H.ChungO. B. (Eds.), Parenting beliefs, behaviors, and parent-child relations (pp. 61-79). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
20.
HaysS. (1996). The cultural contradictions of motherhood. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
21.
HelmsH. M.SuppleA.ProulxC. M. (2011). Mexican-origin couples in the early years of parenthood: Marital well-being in ecological context. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 3, 67-95.
22.
Hondagneu-SoteloP.AvilaE. (1997). “I’m here, but I’m there”: The meanings of Latina transnational motherhood. Gender & Society, 11, 548-71. doi:10.1177/089124397011005003
23.
HustonT. L. (2000). The social ecology of marriage and other intimate unions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 298-319.
24.
KreftingL. (1999). Rigor in qualitative research: The assessment of trustworthiness. In MilinkiA. K. (Ed.), Cases in qualitative research (pp. 173-181). Los Angeles, CA: Pyrczak.
25.
LaRossaR. (2005). Grounded theory methods in qualitative family research. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 837-857.
26.
MaranoM. R.RomanE. (2017). Latino couples and families. In KellyS. (Ed.), Diversity in couple and family therapy (pp. 63-90). Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.
27.
MaxwellJ. A.LoomisD. M. (2003). Mixed methods design: An alternative approach. In TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 241-272). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28.
PessinL. (2018). Changing gender norms and marriage dynamics in the United States. Journal of Marriage and Family, 80, 25-41.
29.
Pew Research Center. (2015). Modern immigration wave brings 59 million to U.S., driving population growth and change through 2065: Views of immigration’s impact on U.S. society mixed. Washington, DC: Author.
30.
PollardS. E.NievarM. A.NathansL. L.RiggsS. A. (2014). A comparison of White and Hispanic women’s stories of adjustment to the birth of a child. Infant Mental Health Journal, 35, 193-209. doi:10.1002/imhj.21437
31.
QuinnN.HollandD. (1987). Culture and cognition. In HollandD.QuinnN. (Eds.), Cultural models in language and thought (pp. 3-42). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
32.
RomeroM. (2008). Go after the women: Mothers against illegal aliens’ campaign against Mexican immigrant women and their children. Indiana Law Journal, 83, 1355-1389.
33.
SmithD. E. (1993). The Standard North American Family: SNAF as an ideological code. Journal of Family Issues, 14, 50-65.
34.
Tamis-LeMondaC. S.WayN.HughesD.YoshikawaH.KalmanR. K.NiwaE. Y. (2008). Parents’ goals for children: The dynamic coexistence of individualism and collectivism in cultures and individuals. Social Development, 17, 183-209.
35.
Verduzco-BakerL. (2015). “I don’t want them to be a statistic”: Mothering practices of low-income mothers. Journal of Family Issues, 38, 1010-1038. doi:10.1177/0192513X15610616
36.
VeselyC. K.GoodmanR. D.EwaidaM.KearneyK. B. (2014). A better life? Immigrant mothers’ experiences building economic security. Journal of Family and Economic Issues. doi 10.1007/s10834-014-9422-3.
37.
VeselyC. K.LetiecqB. L.GoodmanR. D. (2017). Immigrant family resilience in context: Using a Community-based approach to build a new conceptual model. Journal of Family Theory and Review, 9, 93-110. doi: 10.1111/jftr.12177.
38.
WeisnerT. S. (1997). The ecocultural project of human development: Why ethnography and its findings matter. Ethos, 25, 177-190.
39.
WeisnerT. S. (2002). Ecocultural pathways, family values, and parenting. Parenting: Science and Practice, 2, 325-334.
40.
YoshikawaH.ChaudryA.RiveraA. C.TorresK. (2007). Metrobaby Qualitative Study interview protocol for visits 1,3,5,7,9. Unpublished manuscript, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
