Adoption Context,Parental Investment,and Children’s Educational Outcomes

Abstract

Adoptive parents invest more resources into their children than comparable nonadoptive and biological parents, a pattern strongly linked to parental socioeconomic status. But important differences among families related to adoption context (international, private, foster) could affect parental investment and its impact on educational outcomes. Using the National Survey of Children’s Health, our findings indicate that parental investment strategies are contingent on adoption context and partially mitigate the negative direct association between adoption and educational outcomes. Internationally adoptive parents invest significantly more than do other adoptive and nonadoptive families. Without these parental investments, however, internationally adoptive children tend to experience the poorest educational outcomes. Even though parental investments can help mitigate internationally adoptive children’s negative educational outcomes, private domestic adoptive families seem to be more successful at mitigation. Results highlight how social stratification dynamics shape selection into adoption venues while also influencing parents’ efforts to invest and translate investments into educational gains.

Keywords

education parent/child relations race/ethnicity global/international adoption adoption context parental investment stratification

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ainsworth-Darnell

Downey

(1998). Assessing the oppositional culture explanation for racial/ethnic differences in school performance. American Sociological Review, 63, 536-553.

Allison

(2002). Missing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Amato

(2005). The impact of family formation change on the cognitive, social, and emotional well-being of the next generation. Future of Children, 15, 75-96.

Aschaffenburg

Maas

(1997). Cultural and educational careers: The dynamics of social reproduction. American Sociological Review, 62, 573-587.

Beckett

Maughan

Rutter

Castle

Colvert

Groothues

. . . Sonuga-Barke

(2006). Do the effects of early severe deprivation on cognition persist into early adolescence? Findings from the English and Romanian adoptees study. Child Development, 77, 696-711.

Biblarz

Raftery

(1999). Family structure, educational attainment, and socioeconomic success. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 321-365.

Bimmel

Juffer

van Ijzendoorn

Bakermans-Kranenburg

(2003). Problem behavior of internationally adopted adolescents: A review and meta-analysis. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 11, 64-77.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2007). National Survey of Children’s Health. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/slaits/nsch.htm#nsch2007

Cheng

Powell

(2007). Under and beyond constraints: Resource allocation to young children from biracial families. American Journal of Sociology, 112, 1044-1094.

10.

Children’s Bureau. (2013). Regulation of private domestic adoption expenses. Retrieved from https://www.childwelfare.gov/pubPDFs/expenses.pdf

11.

Dalen

Rygvold

(2006). Educational achievement in adopted children from China. Adoption Quarterly, 9, 45-58.

12.

Downey

(1995). Understanding academic achievement among children in stephouseholds: The role of parental resources, sex of stepparent, and sex of child. Social Forces, 73, 875-894.

13.

Evan B. Donaldson Adoption Institute. (2010). International Adoption Facts. Retrieved from http://www.adoptioninstitute.org/old/whowe/newsletter_archives.html#over

14.

Farr

Patterson

(2009). Transracial adoption by lesbian, gay, and heterosexual couples: Who completes transracial adoptions and with what results? Adoption Quarterly, 12, 187-204.

15.

Fisher

(2003). Still “not quite as good as having your own”? Toward a sociology of adoption. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 335-361.

16.

Frank

K. A.

Maroulis

Duong

M. Q.

Kelcey

(2013). What would it take to change an inference? Using Rubin’s causal model to interpret the robustness of causal inferences. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 35, 437-460.

17.

Freese

Powell

(1999). Sociobiology, status, and parental investment in sons and daughters. American Journal of Sociology, 104, 1704-1743.

18.

Hamilton

Cheng

Powell

(2007). Adoptive parents, adaptive parents: Evaluation the importance of biological ties for parental investment. American Sociological Review, 72, 95-116.

19.

Hamilton

Werum

Steelman

Powell

(2011). Changing family, changing education. In Hallinan

(Ed.), Frontiers in sociology of education (pp. 205-223). New York, NY: Springer.

20.

Ishizawa

Kubo

(2014). Factors affecting adoption decisions: Child and parental characteristics. Journal of Family Issues, 35, 627-653.

21.

Jacobson

(2014). Framing adoption: The media and parental decision making. Journal of Family Issues, 35, 654-676.

22.

Kreider

R. M.

(2011). Interracial adoptive families and their children: 2008. In Kreider

R. M.

(Ed.), Adoption Factbook V (pp. 97-113). Alexandria, VA: National Council for Adoption.

23.

Lansford

Ceballo

Abbey

Stewart

(2001). Does family structure matter? A comparison of adoptive, two-parent biological, single-mother, stepfather, and stepmother households. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 840-851.

24.

Lareau

(2003). Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life. Berkeley: University of California Press.

25.

Meier

Musick

(2014). Variation in associations between family dinners and adolescent well-being. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76, 13-23.

26.

Powell

Bolzendahl

Geist

Steelman

(2012). Counted out: Same-sex relations and Americans’ definitions of family. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.

27.

Preacher

Leonardelli

(2001). Calculation for the Sobel test: An interactive calculation tool for mediation tests. Retrieved from http://quantpsy.org/sobel/sobel.htm

28.

Raleigh

(2012). Are same-sex and single adoptive parents more likely to adopt transracially? A national analysis of race, family structure, and the adoption marketplace. Sociological Perspectives, 55, 449-471.

29.

Rueter

Koerner

(2008). The effect of family communication patterns on adopted adolescent adjustment. Journal of Mariage and Family, 70, 715-727.

30.

Schwartz

Finley

(2006). Father involvement, nurturant fathering, and young adult psychosocial functioning: Differences among adoptive, adoptive stepfather, and nonadoptive stepfamilies. Journal of Family Issues, 27, 712-731.

31.

Thomas

Tessler

(2007). Bicultural socialization among adoptive families. Journal of Family Issues, 28, 1189-1219.

32.

van Ijzendoorn

Juffer

Poelhuis

. (2005). Adoption and cognitive development: A meta-analytic comparison of adopted and nonadopted children’s IQ and school performance. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 301-316.

33.

Vandivere

Malm

Radel

(2009). Adoption USA: A chartbook based on the 2007 National Survey of Adoptive Parents. Retrieved from http://aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/09/NSAP/chartbook/index.cfm

34.

Vandivere

McKlindon

(2010). The well-being of U.S. children adopted from foster care, privately from the United States and internationally. Adoption Quarterly, 13, 157-184.

35.

Werum

Davis

Cheng

(2011). How institutional context alters social reproduction dynamics: Ethnic track placement patterns in the U.S. and Germany. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 29, 371-391.

36.

Zhang

Lee

(2011). Intercountry versus transracial adoption: Analysis of adoptive parents’ motivations and preferences in adoption. Journal of Family Issues, 32, 75-98.