The complex phenomena of interest to family scientists require the use of quantitative and qualitative approaches. Researchers across the social sciences are now turning to mixed methods designs that combine these two approaches. Mixed methods research has great promise for addressing family science topics, but only if researchers understand the design options and procedures that accompany this methodological choice. Discussions of mixed methods in the family science literature are difficult to locate, and little has been written about how family scientists apply this approach in practice. This article presents an overview of mixed methods research, including its definition, terminology, and design types, and examines how it is being successfully used and reported in family research journals. The authors review the application of mixed methods designs in 19 studies and discuss design features and issues that arose during implementation. They conclude with recommendations for family scientists considering using this approach.
Brewer, J., & Hunter, J. (1989). Multimethod research: A synthesis of styles. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2.
Burgess, E.W. (1927). Statistics and case studies as methods of sociological research. Sociology and Social Research, 12, 103-120.
3.
Campbell, C.L., & Demi, A.S. (2000). Adult children of fathers missing in action (MIA): An examination of emotional distress, grief, and family hardiness. Family Relations, 49(3), 267-276.
4.
Carr, D. (2005). The psychological consequences of midlife men's social comparisons with their young adult sons. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(1), 240-250.
5.
Coleman, M. (Ed.). (1995). Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57(4).
6.
Creswell, J.W. (1999). Mixed-method research: Introduction and application . In G. J. Cizek (Ed.), Handbook of educational policy (pp. 455-472). San Diego, CA : Academic Press.
7.
Creswell, J.W. (2005). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
8.
Creswell, J.W., Fetters, M.D., & Ivankova, N.V. (2004). Designing a mixed methods study in primary care. Annals of Family Medicine, 2(1), 7-12.
9.
Creswell, J.W., Fetters, M.D., Plano Clark, V.L., & Morales, A. (in press). Nesting qualitative data in health sciences intervention trials: A mixed methods application. In S. Andrew & L. Halcomb (Eds.), Mixed methods research for nursing and the health sciences. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
10.
Creswell, J.W., Goodchild, L.F., & Turner, P.P. (1996). Integrated qualitative and quantitative research: Epistemology, history, and designs. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 11, pp. 90-136). New York: Agathon.
11.
Creswell, J.W., & Plano Clark, V.L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
Creswell, J.W., Plano Clark, V.L., Gutmann, M.L., & Hanson, W.E. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 209-240). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
Creswell, J.W., Tashakkori, A., Jensen, K.D., & Shapley, K.L. (2003). Teaching mixed methods research: Practices, dilemmas, and challenges. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 619-637). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
Dalla, R.L., & Gamble, W.C. (1997). Exploring factors related to parenting competence among Navajo teenage mothers: Dual techniques of inquiry. Family Relations, 46(2), 113-121.
15.
Gibson-Davis, C.M., Edin, K., & McLanahan, S. (2005). High hopes but even higher expectations: The retreat from marriage among low-income couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(5), 1301-1312.
16.
Gomel, J.N., Tinsley, B.J., Parke, R.D., & Clark, K.M. (1998). The effects of economic hardship on family relationships among African American, Latino, and Euro-American families. Journal of Family Issues, 19(4), 436-467.
17.
Greene, J.C. (2005). Synthesis: A reprise on mixing methods. In T. S. Weisner (Ed.), Discovering successful pathways in children's development: Mixed methods in the study of childhood and family life (pp. 405-419). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18.
Greene, J. C., & Caracelli, V. J. (Eds.). (1997). Advances in mixed-method evaluation: The challenges and benefits of integrating diverse paradigms. In New directions for evaluation (Vol. 74). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
19.
Greene, J.C., Caracelli, V.J., & Graham, W.F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis , 11(3), 255-274.
20.
Greenstein, T.N. (2006). Methods of family research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
21.
Handel, G. (1996). Family worlds and qualitative family research: Emergence and prospects of whole-family methodology. In M. B. Sussman & J. F. Gilgun (Eds.), The methods and methodologies of qualitative family research (pp. 335-348). Binghamton, NY: Haworth.
22.
Hanson, W.E., Creswell, J.W., Plano Clark, V.L., Petska, K.P., & Creswell, J.D. (2005). Mixed methods research designs in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology , 52(2), 224-235.
23.
Hendrickson Christensen, D., & Dahl, C.M. (1997). Rethinking research dichotomies. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 25(3), 269-285.
24.
Javo, C., Alapack, R., Heyerdahl, S., & Ronning, J.A. (2003). Parental values and ethnic identity in indigenous Sami families: A qualitative study. Family Process, 42(1), 151-164.
25.
Javo, C., Ronning, J.A., & Heyerdahl, S. (2004). Child-rearing in an indigenous Sami population in Norway: A cross-cultural comparison of parental attitudes and expectations . Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 45(1), 67-78.
26.
Jick, T.D. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 602-611.
27.
Katz, R., & Lowenstein, A. (1999). Adjustment of older Soviet immigrant parents and their adult children residing in shared households: An intergenerational comparison. Family Relations, 48(1), 43-50.
28.
Knodel, J., & Saengtienchai, C. (2005). Older-aged parents: The final safety net for adult sons and daughters with AIDS in Thailand. Journal of Family Issues, 26(5), 665-698.
29.
Lavee, Y., Ben-David, A., & Azaiza, F. (1997). Israeli and Palestinian families in the peace process: Sources of stress and response patterns. Family Process , 36(3), 247-263.
30.
Mangen, D.J. (1995). Methods and analysis of family data. In R. Blieszner & V. Hilkevitch Bedfor (Eds.), Handbook of aging and the family (pp. 148-177). Westpoint, CT: Greenwood.
31.
Marshall, T., & Solomon, P. (2004). Provider contact with families of adults with severe mental illness: Taking a closer look. Family Process , 43(2), 209-216.
32.
Mason, M.A., Harrison-Jay, S., Svare, G.M., & Wolfinger, N.H. (2002). Stepparents: De facto parents or legal strangers? Journal of Family Issues, 23(4), 507-522.
33.
McGraw, L.A., Zvonkovic, A.M., & Walker, A.J. (2000). Studying postmodern families: A feminist analysis of ethical tensions in work and family research. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(1), 68-77.
34.
Mertens, D.M. (2003). Mixed methods and the politics of human research: The transformative- emancipatory perspective. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 135-164). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35.
Miall, C.E., & March, K. (2005a). Community attitudes toward birth fathers' motives for adoption placement and single parenting. Family Relations , 54(4), 535-546.
36.
Miall, C.E., & March, K. (2005b). Open adoption as a family form. Journal of Family Issues, 26(3), 380-410.
37.
Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38.
Morgan, D.L. (1998). Practical strategies for combining qualitative and quantitative methods: Applications to health research. Qualitative Health Research, 8(3), 362-376.
National Council on Family Relations Annual Conference. (2006). 2006 NSFR call for papers [Brochure]. Retrieved January 15, 2006, from http://www.ncfr.org/pdf/Call_for_Proposals.pdf
41.
O'Brien, M. (2005). Studying individual and family development: Linking theory and research. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(4), 880-890.
42.
O'Cathain, A., Murphy, E., & Nicholl, J. (2007). Integration and publications as indicators of "yield" from mixed methods studies. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 147-163.
43.
Perlesz, A.L., & Lindsay, J. (2003). Methodological triangulation in researching families: Making sense of dissonant data. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 6(1), 25-40.
44.
Plano Clark, V.L. (2005). Cross-disciplinary analysis of the use of mixed methods in physics education research, counseling psychology, and primary care. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Nebraska-Lincoln , 2005). Dissertation Abstracts International , 66, 02A.
45.
Punch, K.F. (1998). Introduction to social research: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. London: Sage.
46.
Rank, M.R. (1988, November). The blending of quantitative and qualitative data in family research. Paper presented at the National Council of Family Relations Pre-Conference Workshop on Theory Construction and Research Methodology, Philadelphia, PA.
47.
Rank, M.R. (1996). The blending of qualitative and quantitative methods in understanding childbearing among welfare recipients. In J. F. Gilgun, K. J. Daly, & G. Handel (Eds.), Qualitative methods in family research (pp. 281-300). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
48.
Richter, K. (1997). Child care choice in urban Thailand: Qualitative and quantitative evidence of the decision-making process. Journal of Family Issues, 18(2), 174-204.
49.
Sale, J.E., Lohfeld, L.H., & Brazil, K. (2002). Revisiting the quantitative-qualitative debate: Implications for mixed-methods research. Quality and Quantity , 36, 43-53.
50.
Sandelowski, M. (1996). Using qualitative methods in intervention studies . Research in Nursing and Health, 19(4), 359-364.
51.
Sandelowski, M. (2003). Tables or tableaux? The challenges of writing and reading mixed methods studies. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 321-350). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
52.
Shulha, L.M., & Wilson, R.J. (2003). Collaborative mixed methods research. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 639-669). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
53.
Smith, J.K., & Heshusius, L. (1986). Closing down the conversation: The end of the quantitative-qualitative debate among educational inquirers. Educational Researcher, 15(1), 4-12.
54.
Strazdins, L., & Broom, D.H. (2004). Acts of love (and work): Gender imbalance in emotional work and women's psychological distress. Journal of Family Issues, 25(3), 356-378.
55.
Struthers, C.B., & Bokemeier, J.L. (2000). Myths and realities of raising children and creating family life in a rural county. Journal of Family Issues, 21(1), 17-46.
56.
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
57.
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
58.
Walker, A. J. (Ed.). (2005). Theoretical and methodological issues in studying families [Special issue] . Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(4).
59.
Weigel-Garrey, C.J., Cook, C.C., & Brotherson, M.J. (1998). Children and privacy: Choice, control, and access in home environments. Journal of Family Issues, 19(1), 43-64.
60.
Weine, S., Knafl, K., Feetham, S., Kulauzovic, Y., Klebic, A., Sclove, S., et al. (2005). A mixed methods study of refugee families engaging in multiple-family groups. Family Relations, 54(4), 558-568.
61.
Yin, R.K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
