This article focuses on one aspect of family networks, namely, the frequency of contact with close kin for adults living in different traditional and new family types. Two mechanisms are hypothesized to account for the differences. The first focuses on structural factors such as the number and type of persons in the primary family network, availability of a second family network, and geographical proximity. The second is selection: Individuals with more postmodern (family) attitudes and relatively strong orientation to friends rather than to family may be selected into certain family types. Data from the Netherlands Kinship Panel Study ( N = 8,155) give little support for the selection hypothesis in explaining the differences in contact frequency found by family type. The structural hypothesis, however, yields significant results, with network size and geographical proximity being of key importance.
Abramson, P.R., & Inglehart, R. (1998). Value change in global perspective. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
2.
Agneessens, F., De Lange, D., & Waege, H. (2003). Over het verband tussen sociale relaties en attitudes, waarden en normen [About the relationship between social relations and attitudes, values and norms]. In Administratie Planning en Statistiek (Ed.), Vlaanderen Gepeild, 2003 (pp. 15-51). Brussels, Belgium: Ministerie van de Vlaamse Gemeenschap .
3.
Attias-Donfut, C. (2003). Family transfers and cultural transmissions between three generations in France. In B. L. Bengston & M. Silverstein (Eds.), Global aging and challenges to the families (pp. 214-250). New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
4.
Bengston, V.L. (2001). Beyond the nuclear family: The increasing importance of multigenerational bonds. Journal of Marriage and Family , 63, 1-16.
5.
Burgess, E. (1916). The function of socialization in social evolution . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6.
Busschots, M., & Lauwers, J. (1994). Familiale en sociaal culturele werken [Family and social cultural work]. Leuven, Belgium: Acco.
7.
Coleman, M., Ganong, L., & Fine, M. (2000). Reinvestigating remarriage: Another decade of progress. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 1288-1367.
8.
de Beer, J., & Deven, F. (2000). Diversity in family formation: The second demographic transition in Belgium and the Netherlands. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
9.
De Jong Gierveld, J., & Liefbroer, A. (1998). Sociale herkomst, opvattingen over relaties en gezin en leefvormkeuzes van jongvolwassenen [Social background, family attitudes and living arrangement choices of young adults: Results of a panel study] . Sociologische gids, 45, 96-115.
10.
Dykstra, P., Kalmijn, M., Knijn, T., Komter, A., Liefbroer, A., & Mulder, C. (2004). Codebook of the Netherlands Kinship Panel Study: A multi-actor, multi-method panel study on solidarity in family relationships . Wave 1 [NKPS working paper] (Vol. 1). The Hague: Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute.
11.
Dykstra, P., & Komter, A. (2006). Structural characteristics of Dutch kin networks . In P. Dykstra, M. Kalmijn, T. Knijn, A. Komter, A. Liefbroer, & C. Mulder (Eds.), Family solidarity in the Netherlands (pp. 21-42). Amsterdam: Dutch University Press.
12.
Fischer, J.L., Sollie, D.L., Sorell, G.T., & Green, S.K. (1989). Marital status and career stage influences on social networks of young adults. Journal of Marriage and Family , 51, 512-534.
13.
Ganong, L., Coleman, M., McDaniel, A.K., & Killian, T. (1998). Attitudes regarding obligations to assist on older parent and stepparent following later life remarriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 60, 595-610.
14.
Gauthier, A. (2002). The role of grandparents. Current Sociology, 50, 295-307.
15.
Henderson, S.H., & Taylor, L.C. (1999). Parent-adolescent relationships in nonstep-, simple step-, and complex stepfamilies. In E. M. Hetherington, S. H. Henderson, & D. Reiss (Eds.), Adolescent siblings in stepfamilies: Family functioning and adolescent adjustment (pp. 79-101). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
16.
Hogan, D.P., Eggebeen, D.J., & Clogg, C.C. (1993). The structure of intergenerational exchanges inAmerican families. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 1428-1458.
17.
Johnson, C.L. (1992). Divorced and reconstituted families: Effects on the older generation. Generations, 16, 17-21.
18.
Kalmijn, M. (2005). Educational inequality and family relationships: Influences on contact and proximity. European Sociological Review, 22, 1-16.
19.
Knijn, T. (2004). Family solidarity and social solidarity: Substitutes or complements. In T. Knijn & A. Komter (Eds.), Solidarity between the sexes and generations (pp. 18-33). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
20.
Knipscheer, C.P.M., De Jong Gierveld, J., Van Tilburg, T.G., & Dykstra, P. (1995). Living arrangements and social networks of older adults. Amsterdam: VU University Press.
21.
Kohli, M., & Künemund, H. (2003). Intergenerational transfers in the family: What motivates giving? In V. L. Bengston & M. Silverstein (Eds.), Global aging and challenges to families (pp. 123-142). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
22.
Lansford, J.E., Ceballo, R., Abbey, A., & Stewart, A.J. (2001). Does family structure matter? A comparison of adoptive, two-parent biological, single-mother, stepfather, and step-mother households. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 840-851.
23.
Lesthaeghe, R. (Ed.). (2002). Meaning and choice: Value orientations and life course decisions. Brussels, Belgium: NIDI-CBGS Monographs.
24.
Lesthaeghe, R., & Meekers, D. (1986). Value changes and the dimensions of familism in theEuropean Community. European Journal of Population, 2, 225-268.
25.
Lesthaeghe, R., & Moors, G. (1994). Living arrangements, socio-economic position, and values among young adults: A pattern description for Belgium, France, the Netherlands and West-Germany, 1990. In H. Van den Brekel & H. Deven (Eds.), Population and family in the Low Countries 1994: Selected current issues (pp. 1-56). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
26.
Lesthaeghe, R., & Neidert, L. (2006). The second demographic transition in the United States: Exception or textbook example? Population and Development Review, 34, 669-698.
27.
Lesthaeghe, R., & Surkyn, J. (2007). When history moves on: The foundations and diffusion of a second demographic transition. In R. Jayakody, A. Thornton, & W. Axinn (Eds.), International family change: Ideational perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
MacDonald, W.L., & DeMaris, A. (2002). Stepfather-stepchild relationship quality: The stepfather's demand for conformity and the biological father's involvement . Journal of Family Issues, 23, 121-137.
30.
Marks, N.F., & McLanahan, S. (1993). Gender, family structure, and social support among parents. Journal of Marriage and Family, 55, 481-493.
31.
Moore, G. (1990). Structural determinants of men's and women's personal networks. American Sociological Review, 55, 726-735.
32.
Moors, G. (1996). Gezinsvorming en processen van waardenselectie en-aanpassing [Union formation and processes of selection and adaptation of values]. Mens en maatschappij, 71, 4-24.
33.
Parsons, T., & Bales, R.F. (1955). Family: Socialization and interaction process . New York: Free Press.
34.
Pinquart, M. (2003). Loneliness in married, widowed, divorced, and never-married older adults. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 20, 31-53.
35.
Popenoe, D. (1993). American family decline, 1960-1990: A review and appraisal. Journal of Marriage and Family, 55, 527-555.
36.
Rossi, A.S., & Rossi, P.H. (1990). Of human bonding. New York : Aldine de Gruyter.
37.
Schwarz, B., Trommsdorff, G., Albert, I., & Mayer, B. (2005). Adult parent-child relationships: Relationship quality, support, and reciprocity. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54, 396-417.
38.
Silverstein, M., & Bengston, V.L. (1997). Intergenerational solidarity and the structure of adult child-parent relationships inAmerican families. American Journal of Sociology, 103, 429-460.
39.
Terhell, E.L., Broese van Groenou, M.I., & Van Tilburg, T. (2004). Network dynamics in the long-term period after divorce. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21, 719-738.
40.
Thornton, A. (1989). Changing attitudes toward family issues in the United States. Journal of Marriage and Family, 51, 873-893.
41.
Thornton, A., & Young-DeMarco, L. (2001). Four decades of trends in attitudes toward family issues in the United States: The 1960s through the 1990s. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 1009-1037.
42.
Wellman, B., & Wortley, S. (1989). Brothers' keepers: Situating kinship relations in broader networks of social support. Sociological Perspectives , 32, 273-306.
43.
White, L. (1994). Growing up with single parents and stepparents: Long-term effects on family solidarity. Journal of Marriage and Family, 56, 935-948.
