Family rituals provide a rich context in which to study the relation between ideology and action. Guided by the gender perspective, this article analyzes the experiences of 21 newly married heterosexual couples who described how they planned their weddings. The interplay among gender ideology, gender display, and gender assessment differed across three types of couples: traditional (n = 6), transitional (n = 10), and egalitarian (n = 5). An examination of gender assessment in transitional couples illustrates how holding competing ideologies contributes to the reproduction of hegemonic gendered work patterns within wedding planning.
Berger, B. (1981). Survival of a counterculture. Berkeley: University of California Press.
2.
Blaisure, K.R., & Allen, K.R. (1995). Feminists and the ideology and practice of marital equality. Journal of Marriage and Family, 57, 5-19.
3.
Blaisure, K.R., & Koivunen, J.M. (2000). Incorporating a discussion of equality in couple education programs. FamilyScience Review , 13, 74-95.
4.
Cheal, D.J. (1989). Women together: Bridal showers and gender membership . In B. J. Risman & P. Schwartz (Eds.), Gender in intimate relationships: A microstructural approach (pp. 87-93). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
5.
Coltrane, S. (1990). Birth timing and the division of labor in dual-earner families: Exploratory findings and suggestions for future research. Journal of Family Issues, 11, 157-181.
6.
Coltrane, S. (1998). Gender and families. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
7.
Condé Nast Publications. (2001). BRIDE'S 2001 state of the union report. New York: Condé Nast.
8.
Corrado, M. (2002). Teaching wedding rules: How bridal workers negotiate control over their customers. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography , 31, 33-67.
9.
Currie, D.H. (1993). “Here comes the bride”: The making of a “modern traditional” wedding in Western culture. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 24, 403-421.
10.
Deaux, K., & Major, B. (1987). Putting gender into context: An interactive model of gender-related behavior. Psychological Review, 94, 369-389.
11.
Di Leonardo, M. (1987). The female world of cards and holidays: Women, families, and the work of kinship. Signs, 12, 440-453.
12.
Ferree, M.M. (1990). Beyond separate spheres: Feminism and family research . Journal of Marriage and Family, 52, 866-884.
13.
Geller, J. (2001). Here comes the bride: Women, weddings, and the marriage mystique. New York: Four Walls Eight Windows.
14.
Goffman, E. (1976). Gender display. Studies in the Anthropology of VisualCommunication, 3, 69-77.
15.
Haas, L. (1999). Families and work. In M. B. Sussman, S. K. Steinmetz, & G. W. Peterson (Eds.), Handbook of marriage and the family (2nd ed., pp. 571-612). New York: Plenum Press.
16.
Hays, S. (1998). The cultural contradictions of motherhood. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
17.
Hertz, R. (1995). Separate but simultaneous interviewing of husbands and wives. Qualitative Inquiry, 4, 429-451.
18.
Hochschild, A. (1989). The second shift. New York : Avon.
19.
Illouz, E. (1997). Consuming the romantic utopia: Love and the cultural contradictions of capitalism. Berkeley: University of California Press.
20.
Ingraham, C. (1999). White weddings: Romancing heterosexuality in popular culture. New York: Routledge.
21.
Kalmijn, M. (2004). Marriage rituals as reinforcers of role transitions: An analysis of weddings in the Netherlands. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 582-594.
22.
Kuckartz, U. (2001). MAXqda qualitative data analysis: Introduction. Berlin, Germany: Author
23.
LaRossa, R. (2005). Grounded theory methods and qualitative family research. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 837-857.
24.
Lowry, T.M., & Otnes, C. (1994). Construction of a meaningful wedding: Differences in the priorities of brides and grooms. In J. ArnoldCosta (Ed.), Gender issues and consumer behavior (pp. 164-183). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25.
Mahoney, J. (1999). Nominal, ordinal, and narrative appraisal in macrocausal analysis. American Journal of Sociology, 104, 1154-1196.
26.
Montemurro, B. (2002). “You go 'cause you have to”: The bridal shower as a ritual of obligation. Symbolic Interaction, 25, 67-92.
27.
Morse, J.M. (2000). The significance of saturation. Qualitative Health Research, 5, 147-149.
28.
Neuman, W.L. (2003). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (5th ed.). Boston : Allyn & Bacon.
29.
Oswald, R.F. (2000). A member of the wedding? Heterosexism and family ritual. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17, 349-368.
30.
Oswald, R.F. (2002). Who am I in relation to them? Gay, lesbian, and queer people leave the city to attend rural family weddings. Journal of Family Issues, 23, 323-348.
31.
Oswald, R.F., & Suter, E.A. (2004). Heterosexist inclusion and exclusion during ritual: A “straight versus gay” comparison. Journal of Family Issues, 25, 881-899.
32.
Otnes, C.C., & Pleck, E.H. (2003). Cinderella dreams: The allure of the lavish wedding . Berkeley: University of California Press.
33.
Perry-Jenkins, M. (1994). The family division of labor: Not all work is created equally. In D. L. Sollie & L. A. Leslie (Eds.), Gender, families, and close relationships: Feminist research journeys (pp. 169-188). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34.
Pleck, E.H. (2000). Celebrating the family: Ethnicity, consumer culture, and family rituals. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
35.
Risman, B.J. (1998). Gender vertigo: American families in transition . New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
36.
Rubin, H.J., & Rubin, I.S. (1995). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37.
Schwartz, P. (1994). Peer marriage: How love between equals really works. New York: Free Press.
38.
Smith, J. (1997). Weddings: A sociology of emotions perspective . Unpublished master's thesis, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
39.
Sniezek, T. (2005). Is it our day or the bride's day? The division of wedding labor and its meaning for couples. QualitativeSociology, 28, 215-234.
40.
Snyder, M., & Ickes, W. (1985). Personality and social behavior. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 883-947). New York: Random House.
41.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
42.
Thompson, L. (1993). Conceptualizing gender in marriage: The case of marital care. Journal of Marriage and Family, 55, 557-569.
