Integrating thought from critical feminist and disability theorists via a strategic social constructionist perspective, the authors analyzed 10 in-depth qualitative interviews to begin to understand the dialogue between (a) how nondisabled sisters understand themselves and their siblings with developmental disabilities and (b) wider systems of power or discourse. The women in this exploratory study described themselves as good sisters by portraying their siblings with disabilities as normal, emphasizing opportunities for moral enhancement, minimizing personal sacrifices, and accepting the gendered nature of family care. This study suggests that nondisabled sisters co-opt ideology that holds women accountable for moral conduct in families to oppose discourse that devalues people with disabilities. This ideology does not, however, help them transcend a gender system that requires mothers and sisters but not fathers and brothers to engage in family care.
Acker, J., Barry, K., & Esseveld, J. (1983). Objectivity and truth: Problems in doing feminist research. Women's Studies International Forum, 6, 423-435.
2.
Andersen, M. L., & Collins, P. H. (Eds.). (1995). Race, class, and gender: An anthology (2nd ed.). San Francisco : Wadsworth.
3.
Auletta, R., & DeRosa, A.P. (1991). Self-concepts of adolescent siblings of children with mental retardation. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 73, 211-214.
4.
Bigby, C. (1997). Parental substitutes? The role of siblings in the lives of older people with intellectual disability. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 29, 3-21.
5.
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method . Berkeley: University of California Press.
6.
Bogdan, R., & Taylor, S.J. (1994). The social meaning of mental retardation: Two life stories. New York: Teachers College Press.
7.
Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds: Possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative methods (2nd ed., pp. 509-536). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
Cicirelli, V.G. (1994). Sibling relationships in cross-cultural perspective . Journal of Marriage and Family, 56, 7-20.
10.
Epstein, C.F. (1999). Similarity and difference: The sociology of gender distinctions. In J. S. Chafetz (Ed.), Handbook of the sociology of gender (pp. 45-64). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
11.
Ericksen, S., & Gerstel, N. (2002). A labor of love or labor itself: Care work among adult brothers and sisters. Journal of Family Issues, 23, 836-856.
12.
Ferree, M.M. (1991). Feminism and family research. In A. Booth (Ed.), Contemporary families: Looking forward, looking back (pp. 103-121). Minneapolis, MN: National Council on Family Relations.
13.
Fleischer, D.Z., & Zames, F. (2001). The disability rights movement: From charity to confrontation. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
14.
Fonow, M.M., & Cook, J.A. (1991). Back to the future: A look at the second wave of feminist epistemology and methodology. In M. Fonow & J. Cook (Eds.), Beyond methodology (pp. 1-15). Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
15.
Foucault, M. (1990). The use of pleasure: The history of sexuality . New York: Vintage.
16.
Freedman, E. (2002). No turning back: The history of feminism and the future of women. New York: Ballantine .
17.
Gavey, N. (1989). Feminist poststructuralism and discourse analysis: Contributions to a feminist psychology. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 13, 459-475.
18.
Gergen, K.J. (1999). An invitation to social construction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19.
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
20.
Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of a spoiled identity . Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
21.
Greenberg, J.A., Seltzer, M.M., Orsmond, G.I., & Krauss, M.W. (1999). Siblings of adults with mental illness or mental retardation: Current involvement and expectation of future caregiving. Psychiatric Services, 50, 1214-1219.
22.
Grissom, M.O., & Borkowski, J.G. (2002). Self-efficacy in adolescents who have siblings with or without disabilities. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 107, 79-90.
23.
Gubrium, J.F., & Holstein, J.A. (1993). Phenomenology, ethnomethodology, and family discourse. In P. G. Boss, W. J. Doherty, R. LaRossa , W. R. Schumm, & S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theories and methods: A contextual approach (pp. 651-672). New York: Plenum.
24.
Gubrium, J.F., & Holstein, J.A. (2000). Analyzing interpretive practice. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 487-508). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25.
Hays, S. (1996). The cultural contradictions of motherhood. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
26.
Heller, T., Hsieh, K., & Rowitz, L. (1997). Maternal and paternal caregiving of persons with mental retardation across the lifespan. Family Relations, 46, 407-415.
27.
Hillyer, B. (1993). Feminism and disability. Norman : University of Oklahoma Press.
28.
Hondagneu-Sotelo, P. (2001). Domestica: Immigrant workers cleaning and caring in the shadows of affluence. Berkeley: University of California Press.
29.
hooks, b. (1984). Feminist theory: From margin to center. Boston: South End.
30.
Hooyman, N.R., & Gonyea, J. (1995). Feminist perspectives on family care: Policies for gender justice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31.
Huberman, A.M., & Miles, M.B. (1994). Data management and analysis methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 428-444). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32.
Krauss, M.W., Seltzer, M.M., Gordon, R., & Friedman, D.H. (1996). Binding ties: The roles of adult siblings of persons with mental retardation. Mental Retardation, 34, 83-93.
33.
La Rossa, R., & Reitzes, D.C. (1993). Symbolic interactionism and family studies. In P. G. Boss, W. J. Doherty, R. LaRossa, W. R. Schumm, & S. Steinmetz (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theories and methods: A contextual approach (pp. 135-162). New York: Plenum .
34.
Lather, P. (1991). Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern. New York: Routledge.
35.
Lloyd, M. (2001). The politics of disability and feminism: Discord or synthesis?Sociology, 35, 715-728.
36.
McGraw, L.A., Zvonkovic, A.M., & Walker, A.J. (2000). Studying postmodern families: A feminist analysis of ethical tensions in work and family research. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 68-77.
37.
Meyer, M. H. (Ed.). (2000). Care work: Gender, labor, and the welfare state. New York : Routledge.
38.
Orsmond, G.I., & Seltzer, M.M. (2000). Brothers and sisters of adults with mental retardation: Gendered nature of the sibling relationship. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 105, 486-507.
39.
Osmond, M.W., & Thorne, B. (1993). Feminist theories: The social construction of gender in families and society. In P. G. Boss , W. J. Doherty, R. LaRossa, W. R. Schumm , & S. Steinmetz (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theories and methods: A contextual approach (pp. 591-622). New York: Plenum.
40.
Pruchno, R.A., Patrick, J.H., & Burant, C.J. (1996). Aging women and their children with chronic disabilities: Perceptions of sibling involvement and effects on well-being. Family Relations, 45, 318-326.
41.
Ribbens, J. (1989). Interviewing - An “unnatural situation”?Women's Studies International Forum, 12, 579-592.
42.
Rubin, H.J., & Rubin, I.S. (1995). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
43.
Seltzer, M.M., Greenberg, J.S., Krauss, M.W., Gordon, R.M., & Judge, K. (1997). Siblings of adults with mental retardation or mental illness: Effects on lifestyle and psychological well-being. Family Relations, 46, 395-405.
44.
Sewell, W.H. (1992). A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation . American Journal of Sociology, 98, 1-29.
45.
Smith, C. (2003). Moral, believing animals. New York: Oxford University Press.
46.
Spillman, L. (2002). Introduction: Culture and cultural sociology. In L. Spillman (Ed.), Cultural sociology (pp. 1-15). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
47.
Stalker, K., & Connors, C. (2004). Children's perceptions of their disabled siblings: “She's different but it's normal for us.” Children and Society , 18, 218-230.
48.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
49.
Stroman, D.F. (2003). The disability rights movement. New York: University Press of America.
50.
Taylor, S.J. (2000). “You're not a retard, you're just wise”: Disability, social identity, and family networks. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 29, 58-92.
51.
Thorne, B. (1992). Feminism and the family: Two decades of thought . In B. Thorne & M. Yalom (Eds.), Rethinking the family: Some feminist questions (pp. 591-622). Boston: Northeastern University Press.
52.
Traustadottir, R. (1991). Mothers who care: Gender, disability, and family life. Journal of Family Issues, 53, 211-228.
53.
Traustadottir, R. (2000). Disability reform and women's caring work. In M. H. Meyer (Ed.), Care work: Gender, labor and the welfare state (pp. 249-269). New York: Routledge.
54.
Tronto, J.C. (1993). Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. New York: Routledge .
55.
Weedon, C. (1997). Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory (2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
56.
Wendell, S. (1996). The rejected body: Feminist philosophical reflections on disability. New York: Routledge .
57.
West, J. (1993). The evolution of disability rights. In L. O. Gostin & H. A. Beyer (Eds.), Implementing the Americans With Disabilities Act: Rights and responsibilities of all Americans (pp. 3-16). Baltimore : Brookes.
58.
White, M., & Epston, D. (1990). Narrative means to therapeutic ends. New York: Norton.
59.
Willoughby, J.C., & Glidden, L.M. (1995). Fathers helping out: Shared child care and marital satisfaction of parents of children with disabilities. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 99, 399-406.
