The purpose of the study is to examine the meaning that the institution of marriage can hold for young, unmarried adults, based on their systems (or collections) of beliefs about marriage. Based on symbolic interactionism, it is argued that marital meaning has implications for how people behave prior to and during marriage that may relate to marital functioning. A qualitative content analysis of scholarly literature reveals that marital meaning is multifaceted and can be conceptualized as including five distinct dimensions. A confirmatory factor analysis identifies beliefs that are scaled to represent their respective dimensions. A cluster analysis categorizes participants into three groups based on participants’ scores along these dimensions. Similarities and distinctions across the three groups are discussed to highlight the complexity of belief systems that young adults can have about the institution of marriage.
Ajzen, I. (1988). Attitudes, personality, and behavior. Chicago: Dorsey.
2.
Altheide, D. L. (1996). Qualitative media analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3.
Amato, P. R., & Booth, A. (1997). A generation at risk: Growing up in an era of family upheaval. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4.
Amato, P. R., & Rogers, S. J. (1999). Do attitudes toward divorce affect marital quality?Journal of Family Issues, 20, 69-86.
5.
Arbuckle, J. (2003). Amos 5.0 update to the Amos user’s guide. Chicago: SmallWaters Corporation.
6.
Axinn, W. G., & Thornton, A. (1992). The relationship between cohabitation and divorce: Selectivity or causal influence?Demography, 29, 357-374.
7.
Baldwin, M. W. (1992). Relational schemas and the processing of social information. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 461-484.
8.
Barich, R. R., & Bielby, D. D. (1996). Rethinking marriage: Change and stability in expectations, 1967-1994. Journal of Family Issues, 17, 139-169.
9.
Baucom, D. H., Epstein, N., Rankin, L. A., & Burnett, C. K. (1996). Assessing relationship standards: The inventory of specific relationship standards. Journal of Family Psychology, 10, 72-88.
10.
Baumeister, R. F. (1991). Meanings of life. New York: Guilford.
11.
Berg, B. L. (2001). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
12.
Blackwell, D. L., & Lichter, D. T. (2000). Mate selection among married and cohabiting couples. Journal of Family Issues, 21, 275-302.
13.
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
14.
Blumstein, P., & Schwartz, P. (1983). American couples: Money, work, and sex. New York: William Morrow.
15.
Bradbury, T. N., & Fincham, F. D. (1993). Assessing dysfunctional cognition in marriage: A reconsideration of the relationship belief inventory. Psychological Assessment, 5, 92-101.
16.
Cate, R. M., & Lloyd, S. A. (1992). Courtship. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
17.
Christensen, S., & Westenholz, A. (1997). The social/behavioral construction of employees as strategic actors on company boards of directors. American Behavioral Scientist, 40, 490-501.
18.
Christopher, F. S. (2001). To dance the dance: A symbolic interactional exploration of pre-marital sexuality. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19.
Cooke, R., & Sheeran, P. (2004). Moderation of cognition-intention and cognition-behaviour relations: A meta-analysis of properties of variables from the theory of planned behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 159-186.
20.
Coontz, S. (2000). Marriage: Then and now. Phi Kappa Phi Journal, 80, 16-20.
21.
Crosby, J. F. (1991). Illusion and disillusion: The self in love and marriage. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
22.
Dostal, C., & Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J. (1997). Relationship-specific cognitions and family-of-origin divorce and abuse. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 27, 101-120.
23.
Ehrensaft, D. (1985). Dual parenting and the duel of intimacy. In G. Handel (Ed.), The psychosocial interior of the family (pp. 323-337). Hawthorne, NY: Aldine.
24.
Eidelson, R. J., & Epstein, N. (1982). Cognition and relationship maladjustment: Development of a measure of dysfunctional relationship beliefs. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 50, 715-720.
25.
Fitzpatrick, J., & Sollie, D. L. (1999). Unrealistic gendered relationship-specific beliefs: Contributions to investments and commitment in dating relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 16, 852-867.
26.
Franuik, R., Cohen, D., & Pomerantz, E. M. (2002). Implicit theories of relationships: Implications for relationship satisfaction and longevity. Personal Relationships, 9, 345-367.
27.
Glenn, N. D. (1991). The recent trend in marital success in the United States. Journal of Marriage and Family, 53, 261-270.
28.
Harris, S. R. (2001). What can interactionism contribute to the study of inequality? The case of marriage and beyond. Symbolic Interaction, 24, 455-480.
29.
Hoyle, R. H., & Smith, G. T. (1994). Formulating clinical research hypotheses as structural equation models: A conceptual overview. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 429-440.
30.
Jones, G. D., & Nelson, E. S. (1996). Expectations of marriage among college students from intact and non-intact homes. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 26, 171-189.
31.
Klinger, E. (1998). The search for meaning in evolutionary perspective and its clinical implications. In P. T. P. Wong & P. S. Fry (Eds.), The human quest for meaning: A handbook of psychological research and clinical applications (pp. 27-50). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
32.
Knee, C. R. (1998). Implicit theories of relationships: Assessment and prediction of romantic relationship initiation, coping, and longevity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 360-370.
33.
Knee, C. R., Patrick, H., Vietor, N. A., & Neighbors, C. (2004). Implicit theories of relationships: Moderators of the link between conflict and commitment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 617-628.
34.
Kurdek, L. A. (1992). Assumptions versus standards: The validity of two relationship cognitions in heterosexual and homosexual couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 6, 164-170.
35.
Laner, M. R., & Russell, J. N. (1994). Course content and change in students: Are marital expectations altered by marriage education. Teaching Sociology, 22, 10-18.
36.
LaRossa, R., & Reitzes, D. C. (1993). Symbolic interactionism and family studies. In P. G. Boss, W. J. Doherty, R. LaRossa, W. R., Schumm, & S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theories and methods: A contextual approach (pp. 135-163). New York: Plenum.
37.
Larson, J. H. (1988). The marriage quiz: College students’ beliefs in selected myths about marriage. Family Relations, 37, 3-11.
38.
Larson, J. H., Benson, M. J., Wilson, S. M., & Medora, N. (1998). Family of origin influences on marital attitudes and readiness for marriage in late adolescents. Journal of Family Issues, 16, 750-768.
39.
Larson, J. H., & Thayne, T. R. (1998). Marital attitudes and personal readiness for marriage of young adult children of alcoholics. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 16, 59-73.
40.
Lundeen, M. G. (1999). Interpersonal experience in infancy as a foundation for capacity in adults for stable relationships. In J. M. Adams & W. H. Jones (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal commitment and relationship stability (pp. 91-108). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
41.
Madden-Derdich, D. A., & Leonard, S. A. (2002). Shared experiences, unique realities: Formerly married mothers’ and fathers’ perceptions of parenting and custody after divorce. Family Relations, 51, 37-45.
42.
Moors, G. (2000). Values and living arrangements: A recursive relationship. In L. J. Waite (Ed.), The ties that bind: Perspectives on marriage and cohabitation (pp. 212-226). Hawthorne, NY: Aldine.
43.
Nock, S. L. (1998). Marriage in men’s lives. New York: Oxford University Press.
44.
Noller, P., Dixon, K., & Limerick, T. (1989). Beliefs about marriage. In J. P. Forgas & J. M. Innes (Eds.), Recent advances in social psychology: An intergenerational perspective (pp. 203-233). Oxford, UK: North-Holland.
45.
Oppenheimer, V. K. (1994). Women’s rising employment and the fate of the family in industrialized societies. Population and Development Review, 20, 293-342.
46.
Oropesa, R. S., & Gorman, B. K. (2000). Ethnicity, immigration, and beliefs about marriage as a “tie that binds.” In L. J. Waite (Ed.), The ties that bind: Perspectives on marriage and cohabitation (pp. 188-211). Hawthorne, NY: Aldine.
47.
Piaget, J. (1969). The psychology of the child. New York: Random House.
48.
Read, S. J., & Miller, L. C. (1994). Dissonance and balance in beliefs systems: The promise of parallel constraint satisfaction processes and connectionist modeling approaches. In R. C. Schank & E. Langer (Eds.), Beliefs, reasoning, and decision making (pp. 209-235). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
49.
Regan, P. C. (1998). What if you can’t get what you want? Willingness to compromise ideal mate selection standards as a function of sex, mate value, and relationship context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1294-1303.
50.
Roger, D., Garcia de la Banda, G., Lee, H. S., & Olason, D. T. (2001). A factor-analytic study of cross-cultural differences in emotional rumination and emotional inhibition. Personality-and-Individual-Differences, 31, 227-238.
51.
Rogers, S. J., & Amato, P. R. (2000). Have changes in gender relations affected marital quality?Social Forces, 79, 731-753.
52.
Rokeach, M. (1968). Beliefs, attitudes, and values. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
53.
Sabatelli, R. M., & Pearce, J. T. (1986). Exploring marital expectations. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 3, 307-321.
54.
Schwartz, T. W. (2000). The land mines of marriage: Intergenerational causes of marital conflict. Gestalt Review, 4, 47-62.
55.
Shulman, S., Rosenheim, E., & Knafo, D. (1999). The interface of adolescent and parent marital expectations. American Journal of Family Therapy, 27, 213-222.
56.
Smock, P. J. (2004). The wax and wane of marriage: Prospects for marriage in the 21st century. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 966-973.
57.
Sommers, K. L., & Baumeister, R. F. (1998). The construction of meaning from life events: Empirical studies of personal narratives. In P. T. P. Wong & P. S. Fry (Eds.), The human quest for meaning: A handbook of psychological research and clinical applications (pp. 143-161). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
58.
Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.
59.
Stryker, S. (1980). Symbolic interactionism: A social structural version. Redwood City, CA: Benjamin-Cummings.
60.
Sullivan, B. F., & Schwebel, A. I. (1995). Relationship beliefs and expectations of satisfaction in marital relationships: Implications for family practitioners. Counseling & Therapy for Couples & Families, 3, 298-305.
61.
Thornton, R., & Nardi, P. M. (1975). The dynamics of role acquisition. American Journal of Sociology, 80, 870-885.
62.
Waite, L. J., & Gallagher, M. (2000). The case for marriage: Why married people are happier, healthier, and better off financially. New York: Doubleday.
63.
Whitehead, B. D., & Popenoe, D. (1999). Changes in teen attitudes toward marriage, cohabitation and children: 1975 - 1995. New Brunswick, NJ: Author.
64.
Whitehead, B. D., & Popenoe, D. (2001). Who wants to marry a soul mate? New survey finding on young adults’ attitudes about love and marriage. New Brunswick, NJ: The National Marriage Project.
65.
Wimberley, D. W. (1989). Religion and role-identity: A structural symbolic interactionist conceptualization of religiosity. Sociological Quarterly, 30, 125-142.
66.
Wolf-Smith, J. H., & LaRossa, R. (1992). After he hits her. Family Relations, 41, 324-329.
67.
Wyatt, P. K. (1999). Conceiving couple commitment: Choice, promise, and fulfillment. In J. M. Adams & W. H. Jones (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal commitment and relationship stability (pp. 53-72). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
