Life history interviews were conducted with 40 low-income noncustodial African American men in three age cohorts. Using four elements of a life course perspective (human agency, linked lives, social context, and multiple rhythms of time), the author explored how the stories that men told of their fathers' life experiences shaped their own paternal identities. Three narrative themes (stability, liminality, and inquiry) gave meaning to men's struggles to become involved fathers and linked them to similar challenges faced by their fathers years earlier. Differences in narrative construction between cohorts suggest how sociohistorical context defines opportunities for men to become involved parents.
Allen, W.,& Conner, M. (1995). An African American perspective on generative fathering. In A. Hawkins & D. Dollahite (Eds.), Generative fathering: Beyond deficit perspectives(pp. 52-70). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2.
Allen, W., & Doherty, W. (1996). The responsibilities of fatherhood as perceived by African American teenage fathers. Families in Society: Journal of Contemporary Human Services, 79, 142-155.
3.
Becker, G. (1997). Disrupted lives: How people create meaning in a chaotic world. Berkeley: University of California Press.
4.
Bengtson, V.,& Allen, K. (1993). The life course perspective applied to families over time. In P. Boss, W. Doherty, R. LaRossa, W. Schumm, & S. Steinmetz (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theories and methods: A contextual approach(pp. 469-499). New York: Plenum.
5.
Bertaux, D. (1981). From life history approach to the transformation of sociological practice. In D. Bertaux (Ed.), Biography and society: The life history approach in the social sciences(pp. 29-45). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
6.
Bowman, P. J., & Sanders, R. (1998). Unmarried African American fathers: A comparative life span analysis. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 29, 39-56.
7.
Bruner, J. (1987). Life as narrative. Social Research, 54, 11-32.
8.
Burton, L., & Snyder, A. (1998). The invisible man revisited: Comments on the life course, history, and men's roles in American families. In A. Booth (Ed.), Men in families: When do they get involved? What difference does it make?(pp. 31-39). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9.
Chen, Z., & Kaplan, H. (2001). Intergenerational transmission of constructive parenting. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 17-31.
10.
Coley, R. L. (2001). (In)visible men: Emerging research on low-income, unmarried, and minority fathers. American Psychologist, 56, 743-753.
11.
Daly, K. (1995). Reshaping fatherhood: Finding the models. InW. Marsiglio (Ed.), Fatherhood: Contemporary theory, research, and social policy(pp. 21-40). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
Daly, K. (1996). Families and time: Keeping pace in a hurried culture.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
Dilworth Anderson, P., Burton, L., & Boulin Johnson, L. (1993). Reframing theories for understanding race, ethnicity and families. In P. Boss, W. Doherty, R. LaRossa, W. Schumm,& S. Steinmetz (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theories and methods: A contextual approach(pp. 627-646). New York: Plenum.
14.
Duster, T. (1995). Postindustrialization and youth unemployment: African Americans as harbingers. In K. McFate, L. Lawson, & W. J. Wilson (Eds.), Poverty, inequality, and the future of social policy(pp. 461-486). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
15.
Edin, K., Nelson, T., & Paranal, R. (2001). Fatherhood and incarceration as potential turning points in the criminal careers of unskilled men. Paper presented at the Institute for Policy Research, Northwestern University.
16.
Eggebeen, D., & Uhlenberg, P. (1985). Changes in the organization of men's lives: 1960-1980. Family Relations, 34, 251-257.
17.
Elder, G. H., Jr. (1999). Children of the Great Depression(25th anniversary ed.).Boulder, CO: Westview.
18.
Elder, G. H., Jr.,& O'Rand, A. (1995). Adult lives in a changing society. InK. Cook, G. Fine,& J. House (Eds.), Sociological perspectives on social psychology(pp. 452-475). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
19.
Elder, G. H., & Pellerin, L. (1998). Linking history and human lives. In J. Giele & G. H. Elder (Eds.), Methods of life course research: Qualitative and quantitative approaches(pp. 264-294). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20.
Elder, G. H., Jr., Robertson, E.,& Conger, R. (1996). Fathers and sons in rural America: Occupational choice and intergenerational ties across the life course. In T. Hareven (Ed.), Aging and generational relations over the life course: A historical and cross-cultural perspective(pp. 294-311). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
21.
Fox, G. L.,& Bruce, C. (2001). Conditional fatherhood: Identity theory and parental investment theory as alternative sources of explanation of fathering. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 394-403.
22.
Freedman, D. A., Thornton, D., Camburn, D., Alwin, D.,& Young-Demarco, L. (1988). Life history calendar: Techniques for collecting retrospective data. Sociological Methodology, 18, 37-68.
23.
Furstenberg, F., & Weiss, C. (2000). Intergenerational transmission of fathering roles in at risk families. Marriage and Family Review, 29, 181-201.
24.
Gerson, K. (1995). An institutional perspective on generative fathering: Creating social supports for parenting equality. In A. Hawkins & D. Dollahite (Eds.), Generative fathering: Beyond deficit perspectives(pp. 36-51). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25.
Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
26.
Giele, J., & Elder, G. H. (1998). Life course research: Development of a field. In J. Giele & G. H. Elder (Eds.), Methods of life course research: Qualitative and quantitative approaches(pp. 5-27). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27.
Griswold, R. (1993). Fatherhood in America: A history. New York: Basic Books.
28.
Gubrium, J., Holstein, J., & Buckholdt, D. (1994). Constructing the life course. Dix Hills, NY: General Hall.
29.
Hagestad, G. (1992). Assigning rights and duties: Age, duration, and gender in social institutions. In W. Heinz (Ed.), Theoretical advances in life course research, Vol. 3: Status passages, institutions, and gatekeeping(pp. 261-279).Weinheim: Deutscher Studien Verlag.
30.
Hagestad, G., & Neugarten, B. (1985). Age and the life course. In E. Shanas & R. Binstock (Eds.), Handbook of aging and the social sciences(2nd ed., pp. 35-61). New York: Springer.
31.
Jarrett, R. (1994). Living poor: Family life among single parent, African American women. Social Problems, 41, 30-49.
32.
Johnson, W. (2000). Work preparation and labor market experiences among urban, poor, nonresident fathers. In S. Danziger& A. Lin (Eds.), Coping with poverty: The social contexts of neighborhood, work and family in the African American community(pp. 224-261). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
33.
Kost, K. (2001). The function of fathers: What poor men say about fatherhood. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Human Services, 82, 499-508.
34.
Lamb, M. (2000). Ahistory of research on father involvement: An overview. Marriage and Family Review, 29, 23-42.
35.
Lamb, M., Pleck, J., Charnov, E.,& Levine, J. (1987). Abiosocial perspective on paternal behavior and involvement. In J. Lancaster, J. Altman, A. Rossi, & L. Sherrod (Eds.), Parenting across the life span: Biosocial perspectives(pp. 11-42). New York: Academic.
36.
LaRossa, R. (1995). Stories and relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 12, 553-558.
37.
LaRossa, R. (1997). The modernization of fatherhood. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
38.
Laub, J., & Sampson, R. (1998). Integrating quantitative and qualitative data. In J. Giele & G. H. Elder, Jr. (Eds.), Methods of life course research: Qualitative & quantitative approaches(pp. 213-230). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39.
Lerman, R., & Sorensen, E. (2000). Father involvement and their nonmarital children: Patterns, determinants, and effects on their earnings. Marriage and Family Review, 29, 181-201.
Lupton, D.,& Barclay, L. (1997). Constructing fatherhood: Discourses and experiences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42.
Magnusson, D., & Bergman, L. (1990). Data quality in longitudinal research. New York: Cambridge University Press.
43.
Marsiglio, W. (1995). Fathers'diverse life course patterns and roles: Theory and social interventions. InW. Marsiglio (Ed.), Fatherhood: Contemporary theory, research, and social policy(pp. 78-101). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
44.
Marsiglio, W., Amato, P., Day, R., & Lamb, M. (2000). Scholarship on fatherhood in the 1990s and beyond. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 1173-1191.
45.
Marsiglio, W.,& Cohen, M. (2000). Conceptualizing father involvement and paternal influence: Sociological and qualitative themes. Marriage and Family Review, 29, 75-95.
46.
Marsiglio, W., Hutchinson, S., & Cohen, M. (2001). Young men's procreative identity: Becoming aware, being aware, and being responsible. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 123-135.
47.
Maruna, S. (2001). Making good: How ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives.Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
48.
McAdams, D. (1985). Power, intimacy, and the life story: Personological inquiries into identity. New York: Guilford.
49.
McAdams, D. (1989). The development of a narrative identity. InD. M. Buss& N. Cantor (Eds.), Personality psychology: Recent trends and emerging directions(pp. 160-174). New York: Springer-Verlag.
50.
McAdams, D. (1993). The stories we live by: Personal myths and the making of the self. New York: William Morrow.
51.
McLoyd, V. (1989). Socialization and development in a changing economy: The effect of paternal job and income loss on children. American Psychologist, 44, 293-302.
52.
Modell, J. (1989). Into one's own: From youth to adulthood in the United States, 1920-1975.Berkeley: University of California Press.
53.
Mott, F. (1990). When is a father really gone? Paternal-child contact in father-absent homes. Demography, 27, 499-517.
54.
Orloff, A.,& Monson, R. (2002). Citizens, workers, or fathers? Men in the history of U.S. social policy. In B. Hobson (Ed.), Making men into fathers: Men, masculinities, and the social politics of fatherhood(pp. 61-91). New York: Cambridge University Press.
55.
Palkovitz, R. (2002). Involved fathering and men's adult development: Provisional balances. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
56.
Pasley, K., Futris, T.,& Skinner, M. (2002). Effects of commitment and psychological centrality on fathering. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 130-138.
57.
Pattillo McCoy, M. (1999). Black picket fences: Privilege and peril among the Black middle class. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
58.
Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods(3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
59.
Pellegrini, R., & Sarbin, T. (2002). Between fathers and sons: Critical incident narratives in the development of men's lives. New York: Haworth.
60.
Plath, D. (1980). Contours of consociation: Lessons from a Japanese narrative. In P. Baltes & O. Brim, Jr. (Eds.), Life span development and behavior(Vol. 3, pp. 287-305). New York: Academic Press.
61.
Pleck, J. (1997). Paternal involvement: Levels, sources, and consequences. In M. Lamb (Ed.), The role of the father in child development(pp. 66-103). New York: Wiley.
62.
Reisman, C. (1993). Narrative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
63.
Riley, M. W. (1987). On the significance of age in sociology. American Sociological Review, 52, 1-14.
64.
Sampson, R.,& Laub, J. (1993). Crime in the making: Pathways and turning points through life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
65.
Sampson, R., Raudenbush, S.,& Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 177, 919-919.
66.
Snarey, J. (1993). How fathers care for the next generation: A four decade study.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
67.
Strauss, A. (1990). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.
68.
Strauss, A.,& Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
69.
Tamis-LeMonda, C., & Cabrera, N. (1999). Perspectives on father involvement: Research and policy(Social Policy Report, Vol. 13, No. 2). Ann Arbor, MI: SRCD.
70.
Turner, V. (1974). Dramas, fields, and metaphors. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
71.
U.S. Department of Labor. (1976-1993). Geographic profile of employment and unemployment. Washington, DC: Bureau of Labor Statistics.
72.
Venkatesh, S. (2000). American project: The rise and fall of a modern ghetto. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
73.
Wacquant, L. (1996). The rise of advanced marginality: Notes on its nature and implications. Acta Sociologica, 39, 121-139.
74.
Wideman, J. (1994). Fatheralong: A meditation on fathers and sons, race and society. New York: Pantheon Books.
75.
Wilson, W. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
76.
Wilson, W. J. (1996). When work disappears: The world of the new urban poor. New York: Knopf.
77.
Young, A., Jr. (2000). On the outside looking in: Low-income Black men's conceptions of work opportunity and the good job. In S. Danziger & A. Lin (Eds.), Coping with poverty: The social context of neighborhood, work, and family in the African American community(pp. 141-171). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
