Using a sample of 101 heterosexual, coresidential couples, the author evaluates four housework theories: gender ideology, relative resources, time availability, and doing gender. Unlike some tests of these theories, the author operationalizes gender ideology as an identity, and the author tests the models on the traditionally feminine chores as well as the traditionally masculine and gender-neutral chores. Using the new operationalization, the author finds that gender ideology is related to the allocation of feminine tasks but generally unrelated to the division of nonfemininechores. Wives’ and husbands’time availability also helps explain the division of feminine and, to a lesser extent, gender-neutral chores. Some socioeconomic resources are related to the allocation of each housework category although absolute and relative resources often have contrasting effects when controlling for both. Regardless of gender ideology, time availability, or resources, however, wives do a significantly greater share of their family’s total and feminine housework, and husbands do a significantly greater share of their family’s masculine chores.
Atkinson, M. P., & Boles, J. (1984). WASP (Wives as senior partners). Journal of Marriage and the Family, 46, 861-870.
2.
Barnett, R. C., & Baruch, G. K. (1987). Determinants of fathers’ participation in family work. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49, 29-40.
3.
Berk, S. F. (1985). The gender factory: The appointment of work in American households. New York: Plenum.
4.
Blood, R. O., & Wolfe, D. M. (1960). Husbands and wives. New York: Free Press.
5.
Brayfield, A. A. (1992). Employment resources and housework in Canada. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 19-30.
6.
Brayfield, A. A. (1995). Juggling jobs and kids: The impact of employment schedules on fathers’ caring for children. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 321-332.
7.
Brines, J. (1993). The exchange value of housework. Rationality and Society, 5, 302-340.
8.
Brines, J. (1994). Economic dependency, gender, and the division of labor at home. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 652-688.
9.
Calasanti, T. M., & Bailey, C. A. (1991). Gender inequality and the division of household labor in the United States and Sweden. Social Problems, 38, 34-53.
10.
Charng, H., Pilliavin, J. A., & Callero, P. L. (1988). Role identity and reasoned action in the prediction of repeated behavior. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51, 303-317.
11.
Coltrane, S. (1989). Household labor and the routine production of gender. Social Problems, 36, 473-490.
12.
Coltrane, S. (2000). Research on household labor: Modeling and measuring the social embeddedness of routine family work. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 1208-1233.
13.
Coltrane, S., & Ishii-Kuntz, M. (1992). Men’s housework: A life course perspective. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 43-57.
14.
Deutsch, F. M., Lussier, J. B., & Servis, L. J. (1993). Husbands at home: Predictors of paternal participation in childcare and housework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1154-1166.
15.
DeVault, M. L. (1991). Feeding the family: The social organization of caring as gendered work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16.
Fenstermaker, S., West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1991). Gender inequality: New conceptual terrain. In R. L. Blumberg (Ed.), Gender, family, and economy: The triple overlap (pp. 289-307). Newbury Park: Sage.
17.
Ferree, M. M. (1990). Beyond separate spheres: Feminism and family research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 866-884.
18.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996.) The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491-512.
19.
Goldscheider, F. K., & Waite, L. J. (1991). New families, no families? The transformation of the American home. Berkeley: University of California Press.
20.
Greenstein, T. N. (1996). Husbands’ participation in domestic labor: Interactive effects of wives’ and husbands’ gender ideologies. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 585-595.
21.
Greenstein, T. N. (2000). Economic dependence, gender, and the division of labor in the home: A replication and extension. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 322-335.
22.
Griffin, C. (1989). I’m not a women’s libber, but...: Feminism, consciousness and identity. In S. Skevington& D. Baker (Eds.), The social identity of women. London: Sage.
23.
Gupta, S. (1999). The effects of transitions in marital status on men’s performance of housework. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 700-711.
24.
Haas, L. (1999). Families and work. In M. Sussman, S. K. Steinmetz, & G. W. Peterson (Eds.), Handbook of marriage and the family (2nd ed., pp. 571-672). New York: Plenum.
25.
Hall, L. D., Walker, A. J., & Acock, A. C. (1995). Gender and family work in one-parent households. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 685-692.
26.
Hardesty, C., & Bokemeier, J. (1989). Finding time and making do: Distribution of household labor in nonmetropolitan marriages. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 227-253.
27.
Hiller, D. V., & Philliber, W. W. (1986). The division of labor in contemporary marriage: Expectations, perceptions, and performance. Social Problems, 33, 191-201.
28.
Hochschild, A. R. (1990). Ideology and emotion management: A perspective and path for future research. In T. D. Kemper (Ed.), Research agendas in the sociology of emotions (pp. 117-142). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
29.
Hochschild, A. R. (with Machung, A.). (1989). The second shift. New York: Viking.
30.
Huber, J., & Spitze, G. (1983). Sex stratification: Children, housework, and jobs. New York: Academic Press.
31.
Jackson, S. A. (1998). Something about the word: African American women and feminism. In K. M. Blee. (Ed.), No middle ground (pp. 38-50). New York: NYU Press.
32.
Kamo, Y. (1991). A non-linear effect of the number of children on the division of household labor. Sociological Perspectives, 34, 205-218.
33.
Kroska, A. (1997). The division of labor in the home: A review and reconceptualization. Social Psychology Quarterly, 60, 304-322.
34.
Kroska, A. (2000). Conceptualizing and measuring gender ideology as an identity. Gender & Society, 14, 368-394.
35.
Manke, B., Seery, B. L., Crouter, A. C., & McHale, S. M. (1994). The three corners of domestic labor: Mothers’, fathers’, and children’s weekday and weekend housework. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 56, 657-668.
36.
Marini, M. M., & Shelton, B. A. (1993). Measuring household work: Recent experience in the United States. Social Science Research, 22, 361-382.
37.
McHale, S. M., & Crouter, A. (1992). You can’t always get what you want: Incongruence between sex-role attitudes and family work roles and its implications for marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 537-547.
38.
Miller, D. C. (1983.) Handbook of research design and social measurement: A text and reference book for the social and behavioral sciences. White Plains, NY: Longman.
39.
Orbuch, T. L., & Eyster, S. L. (1997). Division of household labor among Black couples and White couples. Social Forces, 76, 301-332.
40.
Perkins, H. W., & DeMeis, D. K. (1996). Gender and family effects on the second-shift domestic activity of college-educated young adults. Gender & Society, 10, 78-93.
41.
Pittman, J. F., & Blanchard, D. (1996). The effects of work history and timing of marriage on the division of household labor: A life-course perspective. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 78-90.
42.
Pittman, J. F., Solheim, C. A., & Blanchard, D. (1996). Stress as a driver of the allocation of housework. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 456-468.
43.
Presser, H. B. (1994). Employment schedules among dual-earner spouses and the division of household labor by gender. American Sociological Review, 59, 348-364.
44.
Reed, J. S., & Dubow, E. F. (1997). Cognitive and behavioral predictors of communication in clinic-referred and nonclinical mother-adolescent dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59, 91-102.
45.
Rexroat, C., & Shehan, C. (1987). The family life cycle and spouses’ time in housework. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49, 737-750.
46.
Rogers, W. H. (1993). Regression standard errors in clustered samples. Stata Technical Bulletin, 13, 19-23.
47.
Ross, C. E. (1987). The division of labor at home. Social Forces, 65, 816-833.
48.
Sanchez, L., & Thomson, E. (1997). Becoming mothers and fathers: Parenthood, gender, and the division of labor. Gender & Society, 11, 747-772.
49.
Schuman, H. (1995). Attitudes, beliefs, and behavior. In K. S. Cook, G. A. Fine,& J. S. House (Eds.), Sociological perspectives on social psychology (pp. 68-89). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
50.
Seccombe, K. (1986). The effects of occupational conditions upon the division of household labor: An application of Kohn’s theory. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 839-848.
51.
Sexton, C., & Perlman, D. S. (1989). Couples’ career orientation, gender role orientation, and perceived equity as determinants of marital power. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 933-941.
52.
Shelton, B. A. (1999). Gender and unpaid work. In J. S. Chafetz (Ed.), Handbook of the sociology of gender (pp. 375-390). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
53.
Shelton, B. A., & John, D. (1993). Ethnicity, race, and difference: A comparison of White, Black, and Hispanic men’s household labor time. In J. C. Hood (Ed.), Men, work, and family (pp. 131-150). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
54.
Shelton, B. A., & John, D. (1996). The division of household labor. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 299-322.
55.
Silver, H., & Goldscheider, F. (1994). Flexible work and housework: Work and family constraints on women’s domestic labor. Social Forces, 72, 1103-1119.
56.
South, S. J., & Spitze, G. (1994). Housework in marital and nonmarital households. American Sociological Review, 59, 327-347.
57.
Sparks, P., and Shepherd, R. (1992). Self-identity and the theory of planned behavior: Assessing the role of identification with green consumerism. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55, 388-399.
58.
Stryker, S. (1980). Symbolic Interactionism. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin-Cummings.
59.
Surra, C. A., & Hughes, D. K. (1997). Commitment processes in accounts of the development of premarital relationships. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59, 5-21.
60.
Thompson, L. (1993). Conceptualizing gender in marriage: The case of marital care. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 557-569.
61.
Thompson, L., & Walker, A. J. (1989). Gender in families: Women and men in marriage, work, and parenthood. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 845-871.
62.
Tichenor, V. J. (1999). Status and income as gendered resources. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 638-650.
63.
Tong, R. (1998). Feminist thought: A comprehensive introduction (2nd ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview.
64.
Twiggs, J. E., McQuillan, J., & Ferree, M. M. (1999). Meaning and measurement: Reconceptualizing measures of the division of household labor. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 712-724.
65.
Walker, A. (1999). Gender and family relationships. In M. Sussman, S. K. Steinmetz, & G. W. Peterson (Eds.), Handbookof marriage and the family (2nd ed., pp. 439-474). New York: Plenum.
66.
Warner, R. (1986). Alternative strategies for measuring household division of labor: A comparison. Journal of Family Issues, 7, 179-195.
67.
Wharton, C. S. (1994). Finding time for the “second shift”: The impact of flexible work schedules on women’s double days. Gender & Society, 8, 189-205.
68.
Williams, R. L. (2000). A note on robust variance estimation for cluster-correlated data. Biometrics, 56, 645-646.
