This study examined the role of men’s breadwinner status and their gender ideologies in shifting the breadwinning boundary. Data come from a 3-wave panel survey of 522 married men in 1980, 1983, and 1988. A strong effect of men’s breadwinner status on their ideologies is foundin 1983 but notin 1988, whereas the reversed pattern holds for the impact of ideology on status. The direction of their impact on each other is consistent with the hypothesis that men with a lower breadwinner status are more likely to embrace egalitarian ideology. Similarly, egalitarian believers are more likely to engage in the equal sharing of breadwinning. The lack of a significant effect of ideology on status in 1983 and status on ideology in 1988 is largely attributable to the changing family stages of childrearing. The study suggests that, although a decline in men’s breadwinning status is likely to promote egalitarian ideology, men’s egalitarian ideology cannot effect a structural change in breadwinning without the diminution of structural constraints elsewhere.
Amato, P., & Booth, A. (1995). Changes in gender role attitudes and perceived marital quality. American Sociological Review, 60, 58-66.
2.
Bernard, J. (1994). The good-provider role: Its rise and fall. In A. Skolnick & J. H. Skolnick (Eds.), Familyin transition (pp. 117-135). New York: HarperCollins College Publishers.
3.
Bolak, H. C. (1997). When wives are major providers. Gender and Society, 11, 409-433.
4.
Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: John Wiley.
5.
Booth, A., Johnson, D. R., White, L. K., Amoloza, T. O., & Edwards, J. N. (1988). Marital instability over the life course: Methodology report for fourth wave. Lincoln: University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Department of Sociology.
6.
Booth, A., Amato, P., Johnson, D. R., & Edwards, J. N. (1993). Marital instability over the life course: Methodology report for fourth wave. Lincoln: University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Department of Sociology.
7.
Brennan, R. T., Barnett, R. C., & Gareis, K. C. (2001). When she earns more than he does: A longitudinal study of dual-earner couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 168-182.
8.
Brewster, K. L., & Padavic, I. (2000). Change in gender-ideology, 1977-1996: The contributions of intracohort change and population turnover. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 477-487.
9.
Cassidy, M. L., & Warren, B. O. (1996). Family employment status and gender role attitudes. Gender and Society, 10, 312-329.
10.
Chow, E. N. (1998). Family, economy, and the state. In S. Ferguson (Ed.), Shifting the center: Understanding contemporary families (pp. 93-114). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing.
11.
Collins. P. H. (1989). A comparison of two works on Black families. Signs, 14, 875-884.
12.
Collins, P. H. (1998). Shifting the center: Race, class, and feminist theorizing about motherhood. In S. J. Ferguson (Ed.), Shifting the center: Understanding contemporary families (pp. 291-310). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing.
13.
Coltrane, S. (1996). Family man: Fatherhood, housework, and gender equity. New York: Oxford University Press.
14.
Coltrane, S. (2000). Research on household labor: Modeling and measuring the social embeddedness of routine family work. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 1208-1233.
15.
Connell, R. W. (1987). Gender and power. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
16.
Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. Berkeley: University of California Press.
17.
Fenstermaker, S., West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1991). Gender inequality: New conceptual terrain. In R. L. Blumberg (Ed.), Gender, family, and economy (pp. 289-307). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
18.
Ferree, M. M. (1990). Beyond separate spheres: Feminism and family research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 866-884.
19.
Ferree, M. M. (1991). The gender division of labor in two-career marriages: Dimensions of variability and change. Journal of Family Issues, 12, 158-180.
20.
Gerson, J. M., & Peiss, K. (1985). Boundaries, negotiation, consciousness: Reconceptualizing gender relations. Social Problems, 32, 317-331.
21.
Gerson, K. (1985). Hard choices: How women decide about work, career, and motherhood. Berkeley: University of California Press.
22.
Gerson, K. (1993). No man’s land. New York: Basic Books.
23.
Gerson, K. (1994). Choosing between privilege and sharing: Men’s responses to gender and familychange.In A. Skolnick & J. H. Skolnick(Eds.), Family in transition (pp. 149-156). New York: Harper Collins College Publishers.
24.
Gerson, K. (2002). Moral dilemmas, moral strategies, and the transformation of gender. Gender and Society, 16, 8-28.
25.
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
26.
Gilmartin, C. K., Hershatter, G., Rofel, L., & White, T. (1994). Introduction. In C. Gilmartin, G. Hershatter, L. Rofel, & T. White (Eds.), Engendering China (pp. 1-24). Boston: Harvard University Press.
27.
Goode, W. J. (1994). Why men resist. In A. Skolnick & J. H. Skolnick (Eds.), Family in transition (pp. 137-146). New York: Harper Collins College Publishers.
28.
Greenstein, T. N. (1996). Husband’s participation in domestic labor: Interaction effects of wives’ and husbands’ gender ideologies. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 585-595.
29.
Hall, E. J. (1993). Waitering/waitressing: Engendering the work of table servers. Gender and Society, 7, 329-746.
30.
Hayduk, L. A. (1987). Structural equation modeling with LISREL. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
31.
Hearn, J., & Collinson, D. L. (1994). Theorizing unities and differences between men and between masculinities. In H. Brod & M. Kaufman (Eds.), Theorizing masculinities (pp. 97-118). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32.
Hochschild, A. (1989). The second shift. New York: Avon.
33.
Hood, J. C. (1986). The provider role: Its meaning and measurement. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 349-359.
34.
Hunt, J., & Hunt, L. (1987).Male resistance to role symmetry in dual-earner households. In N. Gerstel & H. E. Gross (Eds.), Families and work, (pp. 192-203). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
35.
Husbands, C. T. (1979). The “threat hypothesis” and racist voting in England and the United States. In R. Miles & A. Phizacklea (Eds.), Racism and political action in Britain (pp. 147-183). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
36.
Izraeli, D. N. (1994). Money matters: Spousal incomes and family/work relations among physician couples in Israel. Sociological Quarterly, 35, 69-84.
37.
Johnson, D. R., & Creech, J. (1983). Ordinal measures in multiple indicators models: A simulation study of categorization error. American Sociological Review, 48, 398-407.
38.
Kimmel, M. S. (1998). What do men want? In A. S. Wharton (Ed.), Working in America (pp. 433-444). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing.
39.
Kroska, A. (2000). Conceptualizing and measuring gender ideology as an identity. Gender and Society, 14, 368-394.
40.
Lehrer, E. L. (1999). Married women’s labor supply behavior in the 1990s: Differences by life cycle stage. Social Science Quarterly, 80, 574-590.
41.
Mason, K. O., & Lu, Y. H. (1988). Attitudes toward women’s familial roles: Changes in the United States, 1977-1985. Gender and Society, 40, 39-57.
42.
McAdoo, J. L., & McAdoo, J. B. (1998). The African American father’s roles within the family. In S. J. Ferguson (Ed.), Shifting the center: Understanding contemporary families (pp. 371-384). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing.
43.
Messner, M. A. (1993). Changingmen’and feminist politics in the United States. Theory and Society, 22, 723-737.
44.
Nock, S. (1998). Marriage in men’s lives. New York: Oxford University Press.
45.
Nock, S., & Kingston, P. W. (1989). The division of leisure and work. Social Science Quarterly, 70, 24-39.
46.
Pierce, J. (1995). Gender trials. Berkeley: University of California Press.
47.
Pleck, J. H. (1989). The work-family role system. In L. Richardson & V. Taylor (Eds.), Feminist frontiers II (pp. 161-169). New York: Random House.
48.
Potuchek, J. L. (1992). Employed wives’ orientation to breadwinning: A gender theory analysis. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 548-558.
49.
Potuchek, J. L. (1997). Who supports the family. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
50.
Pyke, K. (1996). Class-based masculinities. Gender and Society, 10, 527-549.
51.
Ramu, G. H. (1989). Women, work and marriage in urban India: A study of dual and single-earner couples. New Delhi, India: Sage.
52.
Rice, T. W., & Coates, D. L. (1995). Gender role attitudes in the Southern United States. Gender and Society, 9, 744-756.
53.
Ridgeway, C. L. (1997). Interaction and the conservation of gender inequality: Considering employment. American Sociological Review, 62, 218-235.
54.
Risman, B. J. (1998). Gender vertigo. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
55.
Rogers, S. J., & DeBoer, D. D. (2001). Changes in wives’ income: Effects on marital happiness, psychological well-being, and the risk of divorce. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 458-472.
56.
Rubin, L. B. (1994). Families on the fault line. New York: HarperCollins.
57.
Schor, J. B. (1991). The overworked American. New York: Basic Books.
58.
Smith, T. E., & Graham, P. G. (1995). Socioeconomic stratification family research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 930-940.
59.
Schwartz, P. (1994). Peer marriage. New York: Free Press.
60.
Thornton, A., Alwin, D. F., & Camburn, D. (1983). Causes and consequences of sex role attitudes and attitude change. American Sociological Review, 48, 211-227.
61.
Weiss, R. (1987). Men and their wives’ work. In F. Grosby (Ed.), Spouse, parent worker (pp. 109-121). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
62.
West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender and Society, 1, 125-151.
63.
White, L., & Rogers, S. J. (2000). Economic circumstances and family outcomes: A review of the 1990s. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 1035-1051.
64.
Wilkie, J. R. (1993). Changes in U.S. men’s attitudes toward the family provider role, 1972-1989. Gender and Society, 7, 261-279.
65.
Willinger, B. (1993). Resistance and change. In J. C. Hood (Ed.), Men, work, and family (pp. 108-130). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
66.
Zinn, M. B. (1989). Family, race, and poverty. Signs, 14, 856-874.
67.
Zinn, M. B. (1998). Feminist rethinking from racial-ethnic families. In S. J. Ferguson (Ed.), Shifting the center: Understanding contemporary families (pp. 12-20). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing.
68.
Zuo, J. (1997). The effect of men’s breadwinner status on their changing gender beliefs. Sex Roles, 37, 799-816.
69.
Zuo, J., & Tang, S. (2000). Breadwinner status and gender ideologies of men and women regarding family roles. Sociological Perspectives, 43, 29-43.
70.
Zvonkovic, A. M., Greaves, K. M., Schmiege, C. J., & Hall, L. D. (1996). The marital construction of gender through work and family decisions: A qualitative analysis. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 78-90.
