The existing body of literature encompasses the dimensions of institutional quality, as well as their relationships with various sectors, including foreign direct investment, trade, economic growth and the energy sector. However, a significant gap remains between institutional quality and geopolitical risk relationships. To investigate the association between institutional quality and geopolitical risk, we utilize panel vector autoregression and generalized method of moments on panel data for G20 countries from 2002 to 2022. Results from panel vector autoregression-generalized method of moments reveal that higher institutional quality, particularly political stability, plays a crucial mitigating role in reducing long-term geopolitical risk, indicating primarily unidirectional causality from institutions to geopolitical risk. However, geopolitical risk is persistent and self-reinforcing over time, with only limited and short-term effects on institutional indicators such as government effectiveness, political stability and rule of law, supporting weak reverse causality. Granger causality tests confirm limited bidirectionality, with institutional quality driving geopolitical risk reductions rather than vice versa.
AcemogluDaronJohnsonSimonRobinsonJames A (2001) The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An empirical investigation. American Economic Review91(5): 1369–1401.
2.
AntonakakisNikolaosCunadoJuncalFilisGeorgeDe GraciaFernando P (2017) Oil Dependence, Quality of Political Institutions and Economic Growth: A panel VAR approach. Resources Policy53: 147–163.
3.
ArellanoManuelBondStephen (1991) Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies58(2): 277–297.
4.
ArifImtiazRawatAamir SShahbazMuhammad (2020) Az USA gazdaságpolitikai bizonytalanságának hatása a geopolitikai kockázatra. A BRIC-gazdaságok által alátámasztott bizonyítékok. Pénzügyi Szemle65(4): 486–497.
5.
AsifMuhammadMajidAbdul (2018) Institutional Quality, Natural Resources and FDI: Empirical evidence from Pakistan. Eurasian Business Review8(4): 391–407.
6.
Aydın-DüzgitSenemTurhanEbru (2025) Germany and Rule of Law Support in Turkey: A status quo power?German Politics. Epub ahead of print 29 April 2025. DOI: 10.1080/09644008.2025.2497082.
7.
BakerNatalie BKhaterMonaHaddadChristian (2019) Political Stability and the Contribution of Private Investment Commitments in Infrastructure to GDP: An institutional perspective. Public Performance & Management Review42(4): 808–835.
8.
BakvisHermanSkogstadGrace (2002) Canadian Federalism: Performance, Effectiveness, and Legitimacy. Toronto, ON: Oxford University Press Toronto.
9.
BalliFarukBalliHatice OHasanMudassarGregory-AllenRussell (2022) Geopolitical Risk Spillovers and Its Determinants. The Annals of Regional Science68(2): 463–500.
10.
BenáčekVladimírLenihanHelenaAndreosso-O’CallaghanBernadetteMichalíkováEvaKanDavid (2012) Political Risk, Institutions and Foreign Direct Investment: How Do They Relate in Various European Countries? IES Working Paper. Prague: Charles University in Prague.
11.
BienenHenry SGersovitzMark (1985) Economic Stabilization, Conditionality, and Political Stability. International Organization39(4): 729–754.
12.
BülowJannik (2015) Does Institutional Quality Impact Firm Performance? Evidence from Emerging and Transition Economies. Sweden: Lund University Publication.
13.
BusseMatthiasHefekerCarsten (2007) Political Risk, Institutions and Foreign Direct Investment. European Journal of Political Economy23(2): 397–415.
14.
CaldaraDarioIacovielloMatteo (2022) Measuring Geopolitical Risk. American Economic Review112(4): 1194–1225.
15.
CaldaraDarioIacovielloMatteoMarkiewitzAdam (2018) Country-Specific Geopolitical Risk. Washington, D.C.: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Board.
16.
CamposNauro FKinoshitaYuko (2003) Why Does FDI Go Where It Goes? New Evidence from the Transition Economies. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
17.
CarmignaniFabrizio (2003) Political Instability, Uncertainty and Economics. Journal of Economic Surveys17(1): 1–54.
18.
CervoAmado L (2010) Brazil’s Rise on the International Scene: Brazil and the world. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional53: 7–32.
19.
ChangChong-Chuo (2023) The Impact of Quality of Institutions on Firm Performance: A global analysis. International Review of Economics & Finance83: 694–716.
20.
CossinDidier (2024) High Performance Boards: A Practical Guide to Improving and Energizing Your Governance. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
21.
DavidRobert JTolbertPamela SBoghossianJohn (2019) Institutional Theory in Organization Studies. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management. Oxford, UK: Oxford University press.
22.
DessusSébastienLafayJean-DominiqueMorrissonChristian (1998) A Politico-Economic Model for Stabilisation in Africa. Journal of African Economies7(1): 91–119.
23.
EkinsmythCarolHallsworthAlanLeonardSimonTaylorMichael (1995) Stability and Instability: The uncertainty of economic geography. Area27(4): 289–299.
24.
FedderkeJohannes WLuizJohn M (2008) The Political Economy of Institutions, Stability and Investment: A simultaneous equation approach in an emerging economy. The case of South Africa. The Journal of Development Studies44(7): 1056–1079.
25.
GoldsmithArthur A (1987) Does Political Stability Hinder Economic Development? Mancur Olson’s theory and the Third World. Comparative Politics19(4): 471–480.
26.
HaggardStephanKaufmanRobert R (2016) Democratization During the Third Wave. Annual Review of Political Science19(1): 125–144.
27.
HaoZhonghaoPrapanArunee AGavriilidisKonstantinosPetmezasDimitrisVagenas-NanosEvangelos (2022) Does Geopolitical Risk Affect Acquisitions?https://ssrn.com/abstract=3475537.
28.
HaqueTariqPhamThi PYangJing (2023) Geopolitical Risk, Financial Constraints, and Tax Avoidance. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money88: 101858.
29.
Holtz-EakinDouglasNeweyWhitneyRosenHarvey S (1988) Estimating Vector Autoregressions with Panel Data. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society56(6): 1371–1395.
30.
JensenNathan (2008) Political Risk, Democratic Institutions, and Foreign Direct Investment. The Journal of Politics70(4): 1040–1052.
31.
KaufmannDanielKraayAartMastruzziMassimo (2009) Governance Matters VIII. Policy Research Working Paper, 4978, Washington, D.C.: The World Bank Development Research Group, 2–6.
32.
KauppiKatri (2022) Institutional Theory. In Handbook of Theories for Purchasing, Supply Chain and Management Research. Chauchat College, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 320–334.
LuBinLiuWei (2024) Does Comprehensive Geopolitical Risk Deter FDI Outflows: Evidence from China. Defence and Peace Economics35(3): 383–399.
35.
LuZhimingGozgorGirayHuangMinLauMarco Chi Keung (2020) The Impact of Geopolitical Risks on Financial Development: Evidence from emerging markets. Journal of Competitiveness12(1): 93–107.
36.
NguyenDuc TLeThi HDoDuc DNguyenHiep N (2023) Does Geopolitical Risk Hinder Sustainable Development Goals? Evidence from a panel analysis. Journal of Environmental Management347: 119204.
37.
NorthDouglass C (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
38.
PanXiaofeiWangYimingTianMengnaFengShaAiBinqing (2023) Spatio-Temporal Impulse Effect of Foreign Direct Investment on Intra-and Inter-Regional Carbon Emissions. Energy262: 125438.
39.
PosnerRichard A (1997) Equality, Wealth, and Political Stability. The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization13(2): 344–365.
40.
RasshyvalovDmytroPortnovYevhenSigaievaTetianaAlboshchiiOleksandrRozumnyiOleksandr (2024) Navigating Geopolitical Risks: Implications for global supply chain management. Multidisciplinary Reviews7: 2024spe017.
41.
SiyakiyaPerks (2017) The Impact of Institutional Quality on Economic Performance: An empirical study of European union 28 and prospective member countries. World Journal of Applied Economics3(2): 3–24.
42.
SmalesLee A (2021) Geopolitical Risk and Volatility Spillovers in Oil and Stock Markets. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance80: 358–366.
43.
TsheolaJohannesSebolaMokokoMamaboloMalesela (2023) South Africa’s “Triple Crisis of Governance” and Societal Leadership Vacuum. Insights into Regional Development5(4): 23–35.
44.
UddinMd AkhtarAliMd HakimMasihMansur (2017) Political Stability and Growth: An application of dynamic GMM and quantile regression. Economic Modelling64: 610–625.
45.
WangErhongGozgorGirayMahalikMantu KPatelGaganHuGuoheng (2022) Effects of Institutional Quality and Political Risk on the Renewable Energy Consumption in the OECD Countries. Resources Policy79: 103041.
46.
ZhangBoLiuZhiyingWangZhaohuaZhangShuai (2023) The Impact of Geopolitical Risk on Energy Security: Evidence from a GMM panel VAR approach. Resources Policy86: 104222.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
