We live in a technologically advanced era with a marked dependence on digital technologies. Simultaneously, we face increasingly frequent and diverse large-scale emergencies such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Civic engagement refers to the range of activities of people working to impact public life in communities, both offline and online. This study investigates the antecedents of online emergency-oriented civic engagement. We focus on states of emergency and develop a framework to explain the emergence of online emergency-oriented civic engagement compared to offline engagement. Using data from 612 Israelis during the COVID-19 pandemic, we demonstrate major differences between the antecedents of online and offline emergency-oriented civic engagement. Trust in government has a modest impact on online emergency-oriented civic engagement. However, citizens’ perceptions about participation in decision-making, uncertainty and risk cognition add explanatory power through mediating and moderating relationships. Implications and recommendations for future studies are suggested.
AdlerRichard PGogginJudy (2005) What Do We Mean by ‘Civic Engagement’?Journal of Transformative Education3(3): 236–253.
2.
AitamurtoTanja (2015) Motivation Factors in Crowdsourced Journalism: Social impact, social change, and peer learning. International Journal of Communication9: 3523–3543.
ArshadSarmanKhurramSobia (2020) Can Government’s Presence on Social Media Stimulate Citizens’ Online Political Participation? Investigating the influence of transparency, trust, and responsiveness. Government Information Quarterly37(3): 101486.
5.
BaytiyehHoda (2018) Can Disaster Risk Education Reduce the Impacts of Recurring Disasters on Developing Societies?Education and Urban Society50(3): 230–245.
6.
BennettLance WSegerbergAlexandra (2012) The Logic of Connective Action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society15(5): 739–768.
7.
BergerCharles RCalabreseRichard J (1975) Some Explorations in Initial Interaction and Beyond: Toward a developmental theory of interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research1(2): 99–112.
8.
BertotJohn CJaegerPaul THansenDerek L (2012) The Impact of Polices on Government Social Media Usage: Issues, challenges, and recommendations. Government Information Quarterly29(1): 30–40.
9.
BoinArjenHartPaul TKuipersSanekke (2018) The Crisis Approach. In RodríguezHDonnerWTrainorJE (eds) Handbook of Disaster Research. New York, NY: Springer, 23–38.
10.
BoulianneShelly (2009) Does Internet Use Affect Engagement? A meta-analysis of research. Political Communication26(2): 193–211.
11.
BronfmanNicolas CCisternasPamela CLópez-VázquezEsperanzaCifuentesLuis A (2016) Trust and Risk Perception of Natural Hazards: Implications for risk preparedness in Chile. Natural Hazards81(1): 307–327.
12.
BuhrKristinDugasMichel J (2002) The Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale: Psychometric properties of the English version. Behaviour Research and Therapy40(8): 931–945.
CarlsenHjalmar BToubølJonasBrinckerBenedikte (2021) On Solidarity and Volunteering During the COVID-19 Crisis in Denmark: The impact of social networks and social media groups on the distribution of support. European Societies 23(sup1): S122–S140.
15.
ChadwickAndrew (2006) Internet Politics: States, Citizens’, and New Communication Technologies. Boston, MA: Oxford University Press.
16.
ChenEmilyLermanKristinaFerraraEmillio (2020) Tracking Social Media Discourse About the Covid-19 Pandemic: Development of a public coronavirus twitter data set. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance6(2): 1–9.
17.
ChoEunae (2020) Examining Boundaries to Understand the Impact of COVID-19 on Vocational Behaviors. Journal of Vocational Behavior119: 103437.
18.
CobbCamilleMcCarthyTedPerkinsAnnuskaBharadwajAnkithaComisJaredDoBrianStarbirdKate (2014) Designing for the Deluge: Understanding and supporting the distributed, collaborative work of crisis volunteers. In: Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW), Baltimore, MD.
19.
CuratoNicole (2019) Democracy in a Time of Misery: From Spectacular Tragedies to Deliberative Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20.
CutterSusan LBoruffBryan JShirleyW Lynn (2012) Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. In CutterSL (ed.) Hazards Vulnerability and Environmental Justice. London: Routledge, 115–132.
21.
DatyevIgor OFedorovAndrey MShchurAndrey L (2020) Framework for Civic Engagement Analysis Based on Open Social Media Data. In: Artificial Intelligence and Bioinspired Computational Methods: Proceedings of the 9th Computer Science On-line Conference 2020, Zlín, Czech Republic, Vol. 2, Springer International Publishing, 586–597.
22.
DoolittleAmyFaulAnna C (2013) Civic Engagement Scale: A validation study. Sage Open3(3): 1–2.
23.
DruryJohnReicherSteve (2009) Collective Psychological Empowerment as a Model of Social Change: Researching crowds and power. Journal of Social Issues65(4): 707–725.
24.
DugasMichel JPatrickGosselinRobertLadouceur (2001) Intolerance of Uncertainty and Worry: Investigating specificity in a nonclinical sample. Cognitive Therapy and Research25(5): 551–558.
25.
FalcoEnzoKleinhansReinout (2018) Beyond Technology: Identifying local government challenges for using digital platforms for citizen engagement. International Journal of Information Management40: 17–20.
26.
GerstonLarry N (2014) Public Policymaking in a Democratic Society: A Guide to Civic Engagement. New York, NY: Routledge.
27.
Gil de ZúñigaHomero GBarnidgeMatthewSchermanAndres (2017) Social Media Social Capital, Offline Social Capital, and Citizenship: Exploring asymmetrical social capital effects. Political Communication34(1): 44–68.
28.
Gil de ZúñigaHomero GJungNakwonValenzuelaSebastian (2012) Social Media Use for News and Individuals’ Social Capital, Civic Engagement and Political Participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication17(3): 319–336.
29.
GkeredakisManosLifshitz-AssafHilaBarrettMichael (2021) Crisis as Opportunity, Disruption and Exposure: Exploring emergent responses to crisis through digital technology. Information and Organization31(1): 100344.
30.
GrovesPhilip MThompsonRichard F (1970) Habituation: A dual-process theory. Psychological Review77(5): 419–450.
31.
HarrisonSaraJohnsonPeter (2019) Challenges in the Adoption of Crisis Crowdsourcing and Social Media in Canadian Emergency Management. Government Information Quarterly36(3): 501–509.
32.
HayColin (2007) Why we Hate Politics. Vol. 5. Cambridge: Polity.
33.
HayesAndrew FScharkowMichael (2013) The Relative Trustworthiness of Inferential Tests of the Indirect Effect in Statistical Mediation Analysis: Does method really matter?Psychological Science24(10): 1918–1927.
34.
HofmannSaraPappasIllias O (2021) Understanding Civic Engagement on Social Media Based on Users’ Motivation to Contribute. In: Electronic Participation: 13th IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference, ePart 2021, Granada, Spain, 7–9 September 2021, Springer International Publishing, 27–39.
35.
HongHyehyunKimYeuseung (2021) What Makes People Engage in Civic Activism on Social Media?Online Information Review45(3): 562–576.
36.
HoskinsBryony LMascheriniMascherini (2009) Measuring Active Citizenship Through the Development of a Composite Indicator. Social Indicators Research90(3): 459–488.
37.
KimSoonhee (2016) Public Trust in Government in China and South Korea: Implications for building community resilience. Chinese Public Administration Review7(1): 35–76.
38.
LaorTal (2022) Twitter as a Clique: Journalists’ patterns of Twitter use in Israel. Online Information Review46(1): 40–58.
39.
LeeJoohoKimSoonhee (2018) Citizens’ E-Participation on Agenda Setting in Local Governance: Do individual social capital and e-participation management matter?Public Management Review20(6): 873–895.
40.
MartinWade EMartinIngrid MKentBrian (2009) The Role of Risk Perceptions in the Risk Mitigation Process: The case of wildfire in high risk communities. Journal of Environmental Management91(2): 489–498.
41.
MizrahiShlomoBen-EliyahuAdarCohenNissimHertzUriMiller-MorRotemMishorEfratVigoda-GadotEran (2022) Public Management During a Crisis: When are citizens’ willing to contribute to institutional emergency preparedness?Public Management Review26(1): 48–72.
42.
MizrahiShlomoVigoda-GadotEranCohenNissim (2021) How Well Do They Manage a Crisis? The government’s effectiveness during the Covid-19 pandemic. Public Administration Review81(6): 1120–1130.
43.
MizrahiShlomoMinchukYitzhak (2019) Accountability and Performance Management: Citizens’ willingness to monitor public officials. Public Management Review21(3): 334–353.
44.
NannestadPeter (2008) What Have We Learned About Generalized Trust, If Anything?Annual Review of Political Science11: 413–436.
45.
NewmanJanet (2005) The New Public Management, Modernization and Institutional Change: Disruptions, disjunctures and dilemmas. In McLaughlinKathleenFerlieEwanOsborneStephen P (eds) New Public Management: Current Trends and Future Prospects. London: Routledge, 89–104.
46.
NohrstedtDanielParkerCharles Fvon UexkullNinaMårdJohannaAlbrechtFrederikePetrovaKristinaNybergLarsGotemanMalinHilemanJacobMassoriGabrieleDi BaldassarreGiuliano (2022) Disaster Risk Reduction and the Limits of Truisms: Improving the knowledge and practice interface. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction67: 1–8.
47.
OliveiraLidiaTajariolFedericoGonçalvesLiliana B (2021) Digital Services in Crisis, Disaster, and Emergency Situations. Hershey, PA: IGI Global Scientific Publishing.
48.
ParkChul HJohnstonErik W (2017) A Framework for Analyzing Digital Volunteer Contributions in Emergent Crisis Response Efforts. New Media & Society19(8): 1308–1327.
49.
PutnamRobert D (2000) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
50.
RyanRichard MDeciEdward L (2000) Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology25(1): 54–67.
51.
ScanlonJosephHelslootIraGroenendaalJelle (2014) Putting It All Together: Integrating ordinary people into emergency response. International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters32(1): 43–63.
52.
SeoHyun JSonMinjieHongAh J (2021) Trends in Civic Engagement Disaster Safety Education Research: Systematic literature review and keyword network analysis. Sustainability13(5): 1–18.
53.
ValenzuelaSebastianParkNamsuKeeKerk F (2009) Is There Social Capital in a Social Network Site?: Facebook use and college students’ life satisfaction, trust, and participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication14(4): 875–901.
54.
Vigoda-GadotEranMizrahiShlomo (2014) Managing Democracies in Turbulent Times. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.
55.
Vigoda-GadotEranMizrahiShlomoCohenNissimMishorEfrat (2023) Citizens’ Reactions to Global Crises: A longitudinal study during the COVID-19 pandemic in Israel. SN Social Sciences3(2): 24.
56.
VitakJessicaZubePaulSmockAndrewCarrCaleb T.EllisonNicoleLampeCliff (2011) It’s Complicated: Facebook Users’ Political Participation in the 2008 Election. CyberPsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking14(3): 107–114.
57.
WangXiaoHuWan WartMontgomery (2007) When Public Participation in Administration Leads to Trust: An empirical assessment of managers’ perceptions. Public Administration Review67(2): 265–278.
58.
WuJingsi C (2014) Expanding Civic Engagement in China: Super Girl and entertainment-based online community. Information, Communication & Society17(1): 105–120.
59.
ZukinCliffKeeterScottAndolinaMollyJenkinsKristaCarpiniDelli Michael X (2006) A New Engagement? Political Participation, Civic Life, and the Changing American Citizen. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
