This note analyses the relationship between the facial characteristics of non-democratic leaders and the way in which they reached office. After collecting pictures of 274 leaders in office between 1975 and 2010, we use a computer-based survey to assess how these faces are spontaneously perceived by ordinary people for five facial characteristics. We find that selected dictators (that is, those who were either elected, appointed, or foreign imposed) look more trustworthy than monarchs, who were not selected by anyone. Attractiveness and competence are uncorrelated with entry mode. These results suggest that authoritarian selectorates, like voters in democracies, use facial characteristics as cues to choose leaders, but value different qualities in their rulers.
AlleyZoe MKerrDavid CRWilsonJohn PaulRuleNicholas O (2023) Relating Facial Trustworthiness to Antisocial Behavior in Adolescent and Adult Men. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior47(3): 385–402.
BaiYingZhouTiti (2019) “Mao’s Last Revolution”: A dictator’s loyalty–competence tradeoff. Public Choice180(3–4): 469–500.
4.
BanducciSusan AKarpJeffrey AThrasherMichaelRallingsColin (2008) Ballot Photographs as Cues in Low-information Elections. Political Psychology29(6): 903–917.
5.
BerggrenNiclasJordahlHenrikPoutvaaraPanu (2010) The Looks of a Winner: Beauty and electoral success. Journal of Public Economics94(1–2): 8–15.
6.
BesleyTimothyReynal-QuerolMarta (2011) Do Democracies Select More Educated Leaders?American Political Science Review105(3): 552–566.
7.
BjornsdottirR ThoraRuleNicholas O (2017) The Visibility of Social Class from Facial Cues. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology113(4): 530.
8.
BrownleeJason (2007) Hereditary Succession in Modern Autocracies. World Politics59(4): 595–628.
9.
Bueno de MesquitaBruceMorrowJames DSiversonRandolph MSmithAlastair (1999) Policy Failure and Political Survival: The contribution of political institutions. Journal of Conflict Resolution43(2): 147–161.
10.
CogsdillEmily JTodorovAlexander TSpelkeElizabeth SBanajiMahzarin R (2014) Inferring Character from Faces: A developmental study. Psychological Science25(5): 1132–1139.
11.
ColganJeff D (2013) Domestic Revolutionary Leaders and International Conflict. World Politics65(4): 656–690.
12.
EgorovGeorgySoninKonstantin (2011) Dictators and Their Viziers: Endogenizing the loyalty–competence trade-off. Journal of the European Economic Association9(5): 903–930.
13.
EgorovGeorgySoninKonstantin (2020) The Political Economics of Non-democracy. Technical Report. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.
14.
FiskeSusan TCuddyAmy JCGlickPeter (2007) Universal Dimensions of Social Cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences11(2): 77–83.
15.
FrançoisAbelPanelSophieWeillLaurent (2023) Dictators’ Facial Characteristics and Foreign Direct Investment. The Leadership Quarterly34(2): 101644.
16.
GeddesBarbaraWrightJosephFrantzErica (2018) How Dictatorships Work: Power, Personalization, and Collapse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17.
GiacominMirandaMulliganAlexanderRuleNicholas O (2021) Dictators Differ from Democratically Elected Leaders in Facial Warmth. Social Psychological and Personality Science12(7): 1216–1224.
18.
GoemansHenk EGleditschKristian SkredeChiozzaGiacomo (2009) Introducing Archigos: A dataset of political leaders. Journal of Peace Research46(2): 269–283.
19.
GraboAllenvan VugtMark (2018) Voting for a Male Warrior or Female Peacekeeper? Testing the evolutionary contingency hypothesis in the 2016 US presidential elections. Evolutionary Psychology16(2): 1474704918773267.
20.
GründlerKlausPotrafkeNiklasWochnerTimo (2024) The Beauty Premium of Politicians in Office. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization217: 298–311.
21.
HullPeterImaiMasami (2013) Economic Shocks and Civil Conflict: Evidence from foreign interest rate movements. Journal of Development Economics103(1): 77–89.
22.
KimNam Kyu (2016) Revisiting Economic Shocks and Coups. Journal of Conflict Resolution60(1): 3–31.
23.
KimNam Kyu (2018) International Conflict, International Security Environment, and Military Coups. International Interactions44(5): 936–952.
24.
KimNam Kyu (2019) External Territorial Threats and Military Regimes. Political Research Quarterly72(4): 863–877.
25.
KrishnarajanSuthan (2019) Economic Crisis, Natural Resources, and Irregular Leader Removal in Autocracies. International Studies Quarterly63(3): 726–741.
26.
KrumhuberEvaMansteadAntony SRCoskerDarrenMarshallDaveRosinPaul LKappasArvid (2007) Facial Dynamics as Indicators of Trustworthiness and Cooperative Behavior. Emotion7(4): 730.
27.
LaustsenLassePetersenMichael Bang (2016) Winning Faces Vary by Ideology: How nonverbal source cues influence election and communication success in politics. Political Communication33(2): 188–211.
28.
LaustsenLassePetersenMichael Bang (2017) Perceived Conflict and Leader Dominance: Individual and contextual factors behind preferences for dominant leaders. Political Psychology38(6): 1083–1101.
29.
LittleAnthony CBurrissRobert PJonesBenedict CRobertsS Craig (2007) Facial Appearance Affects Voting Decisions. Evolution and Human Behavior28(1): 18–27.
30.
Magni BertonRaulPanelSophie (2017) Strategic Gerontocracy: Why nondemocratic systems produce older leaders. Public Choice171(3): 409–427.
31.
MaozIfat (2012) The Face of the Enemy: The effect of press-reported visual information regarding the facial features of opponent politicians on support for peace. Political Communication29(3): 243–256.
32.
MiguelEdwardSatyanathShankerSergentiErnest (2004) Economic Shocks and Civil Conflict: An instrumental variables approach. Journal of Political Economy112(4): 725–753.
33.
OhDongWonBuckElinor ATodorovAlexander (2019) Revealing Hidden Gender Biases in Competence Impressions of Faces. Psychological Science30(1): 65–79.
34.
OlivolaChristopher YTodorovAlexander (2010) Fooled by First Impressions? Reexamining the diagnostic value of appearance-based inferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology46(2): 315–324.
35.
OosterhofNikolaas NTodorovAlexander (2008) The Functional Basis of Face Evaluation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America105(32): 11087–11092.
36.
PotrafkeNiklasRöschMarcusUrsprungHeinrich (2020) Election Systems, the “Beauty Premium” in Politics, and the Beauty of Dissent. European Journal of Political Economy64: 101900.
37.
RhodesMatthew GAnastasiJeffrey S (2012) The Own-Age Bias in Face Recognition: A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin138(1): 146.
38.
RuleNicholas OAmbadyNaliniAmbadyNaliniAdamsReginald BJrOzonoHirokiNakashimaSatoshiYoshikawaSakikoWatabeMotoki (2010) Polling the Face: Prediction and consensus across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology98(1): 1.
39.
RuleNicholas OKrendlAnne CIvcevicZoranaAmbadyNalini (2013) Accuracy and Consensus in Judgments of Trustworthiness from Faces: Behavioral and neural correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology104(3): 409.
40.
SpisakBrian R (2012) The General Age of Leadership: Older-looking presidential candidates win elections during war. PLoS One7(5): e36945.
41.
SpisakBrian RDekkerPeter HKrügerMaxvan VugtMark (2012) Warriors and Peacekeepers: Testing a biosocial implicit leadership hypothesis of intergroup relations using masculine and feminine faces. PLoS One7(1): e30399.
42.
SpisakBrian RGraboAllen EArveyRichard Dvan VugtMark (2014) The Age of Exploration and Exploitation: Younger-looking leaders endorsed for change and older-looking leaders endorsed for stability. The Leadership Quarterly25(5): 805–816.
43.
StockemerDanielPrainoRodrigo (2017) Physical Attractiveness, Voter Heuristics and Electoral Systems: The role of candidate attractiveness under different institutional designs. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations19(2): 336–352.
44.
SutherlandClare AMLiuXiziZhangLingshanChuYingtungOldmeadowJulian AYoungAndrew W (2018) Facial First Impressions Across Culture: Data-driven modeling of Chinese and British perceivers’ unconstrained facial impressions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin44(4): 521–537.
45.
SutherlandClare AMOldmeadowJulian ASantosIsabel MTowlerJohnBurtD MichaelYoungAndrew W (2013) Social Inferences from Faces: Ambient images generate a three-dimensional model. Cognition127(1): 105–118.
46.
SutherlandClare AMYoungAndrew WRhodesGillian (2017) Facial First Impressions from Another Angle: How social judgements are influenced by changeable and invariant facial properties. British Journal of Psychology108(2): 397–415.
47.
SvolikMilan W (2012) The Politics of Authoritarian Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48.
TodorovAlexanderMandisodzaAnesu NGorenAmirHallCrystal C (2005) Inferences of Competence from Faces Predict Election Outcomes. Science308(5728): 1623–1626.
49.
TodorovAlexanderOlivolaChristopher YDotschRonMende-SiedleckiPeter (2015) Social Attributions from Faces: Determinants, consequences, accuracy, and functional significance. Annual Review of Psychology66(1): 519–545.
50.
TodorovAlexanderSaidChris PEngellAndrew DOosterhofNikolaas N (2008) Understanding Evaluation of Faces on Social Dimensions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences12(12): 455–460.
51.
YoungSteven GHugenbergKurtBernsteinMichael JSaccoDonald F (2012) Perception and Motivation in Face Recognition: A critical review of theories of the cross-race effect. Personality and Social Psychology Review16(2): 116–142.
52.
ZebrowitzLeslie ACollinsMary AnnDuttaRanjana (1998) The Relationship Between Appearance and Personality Across the Life Span. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin24(7): 736–749.
53.
ZebrowitzLeslie AKikuchiMasakoFellousJean-Marc (2010) Facial Resemblance to Emotions: Group differences, impression effects, and race stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology98(2): 175.
54.
ZebrowitzLeslie AWangRuoxueBronstadP MatthewEisenbergDanUndurragaEduardoReyes-GarcíaVictoriaGodoyRicardo (2012) First Impressions from Faces Among US and Culturally Isolated Tsimane’ People in the Bolivian Rainforest. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology43(1): 119–134.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
